The benefits and risks of asking research participants about suicide: A meta-analysis of the impact of exposure to suicide-related content

One obstacle potentially hindering research on suicide is the assumption that assessing suicide may make individuals more likely to engage in suicidal thoughts or behaviours; a concern expressed by ethics committees, researchers, and clinicians. However, decisions which are overly cautious and restr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical psychology review 2018-08, Vol.64, p.1-12
Main Authors: Blades, Caroline A., Stritzke, Werner G.K., Page, Andrew C., Brown, Julia D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ethical framework
Humans
Institutional review boards
Research Subjects - psychology
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Risk-benefit assessment
Suicide - psychology
Suicide research
Suicide, Attempted - psychology
Vulnerable research participants
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b9c3abd30b069843c783991a147d9a1056997f64000d472a68f1f34b35083863
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b9c3abd30b069843c783991a147d9a1056997f64000d472a68f1f34b35083863
container_end_page 12
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Clinical psychology review
container_volume 64
creator Blades, Caroline A.
Stritzke, Werner G.K.
Page, Andrew C.
Brown, Julia D.
description One obstacle potentially hindering research on suicide is the assumption that assessing suicide may make individuals more likely to engage in suicidal thoughts or behaviours; a concern expressed by ethics committees, researchers, and clinicians. However, decisions which are overly cautious and restrictive when approving research proposals will hinder important research in this area. The present aim was to conduct a meta-analysis to examine whether asking about suicide or exposure to suicide-related content in research studies led to changes in participants' levels of distress, suicidal ideation, or suicide attempts. A systematic search of peer-reviewed and unpublished literature from 2000 to 2017 identified 18 studies. Exposure to suicide-related content led to significant, albeit small, reductions in suicidal ideation (g = −0.13, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.07.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2071570647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0272735818301351</els_id><sourcerecordid>2071570647</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b9c3abd30b069843c783991a147d9a1056997f64000d472a68f1f34b35083863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EokPhAdggL9kk2HHGdmBVVfxJldjM3rqxb6iniR1sB9FX4KnxMC1LVvdH3znSvYeQ15y1nHH57tjaNbUd47plqmWMPyE7rpVolOb8KdmxTnWNEnt9QV7kfGSV0D1_Ti5E7Xotux35fbhFOmLAyZdMITiafL7LNE4U8p0P32nCjJDsLV0hFW_9CuFEjnErNG914fA9vaILFmggwHyf_V95qcZ-WcGW04S_1pi3hLTER1WTcIaCjtoYCobykjybYM746qFeksOnj4frL83Nt89fr69uGisGWZpxsAJGJ9jI5KB7YZUWw8CB98oNwNleDoOaZF-vdb3qQOqJT6IfxZ5poaW4JG_PtmuKPzbMxSw-W5xnCBi3bDqm-F4x2auK8jNqU8w54WTW5BdI94Yzc0rAHE1NwJwSMEyZ-tWqefNgv40Lun-Kx5dX4MMZwHrjT4_JZOsxWHQ-oS3GRf8f-z8tEZdK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2071570647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The benefits and risks of asking research participants about suicide: A meta-analysis of the impact of exposure to suicide-related content</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Blades, Caroline A. ; Stritzke, Werner G.K. ; Page, Andrew C. ; Brown, Julia D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blades, Caroline A. ; Stritzke, Werner G.K. ; Page, Andrew C. ; Brown, Julia D.</creatorcontrib><description>One obstacle potentially hindering research on suicide is the assumption that assessing suicide may make individuals more likely to engage in suicidal thoughts or behaviours; a concern expressed by ethics committees, researchers, and clinicians. However, decisions which are overly cautious and restrictive when approving research proposals will hinder important research in this area. The present aim was to conduct a meta-analysis to examine whether asking about suicide or exposure to suicide-related content in research studies led to changes in participants' levels of distress, suicidal ideation, or suicide attempts. A systematic search of peer-reviewed and unpublished literature from 2000 to 2017 identified 18 studies. Exposure to suicide-related content led to significant, albeit small, reductions in suicidal ideation (g = −0.13, p &lt; .001) and a lower likelihood of engaging in suicidal behaviour (OR = 0.714, p &lt; .05). The reduction in suicidal ideation was moderated by age such that adolescents showed nearly twice as large a reduction in suicidal ideation from pre- to post-exposure as adults did. Thus, evidence to date suggests that asking research participants about suicide does not increase risk, and may be associated with small benefits. Ethics review boards should calibrate their consideration of the risks associated with participation based on the available evidence and relative to the cost of depriving potential participants of any benefits that participation may offer. •First meta-analysis to examine impact of exposure to suicide content on behaviour.•Participation in suicide research offers significant, albeit small, benefits to participants.•Available evidence should inform cost-benefit analysis in ethical decision making.•Ethics committees should calibrate consideration of risks relative to benefits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-7358</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7811</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.07.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30014862</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Ethical framework ; Humans ; Institutional review boards ; Research Subjects - psychology ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Risk-benefit assessment ; Suicide - psychology ; Suicide research ; Suicide, Attempted - psychology ; Vulnerable research participants</subject><ispartof>Clinical psychology review, 2018-08, Vol.64, p.1-12</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b9c3abd30b069843c783991a147d9a1056997f64000d472a68f1f34b35083863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b9c3abd30b069843c783991a147d9a1056997f64000d472a68f1f34b35083863</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3133-2844</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30014862$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blades, Caroline A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stritzke, Werner G.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Andrew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Julia D.</creatorcontrib><title>The benefits and risks of asking research participants about suicide: A meta-analysis of the impact of exposure to suicide-related content</title><title>Clinical psychology review</title><addtitle>Clin Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>One obstacle potentially hindering research on suicide is the assumption that assessing suicide may make individuals more likely to engage in suicidal thoughts or behaviours; a concern expressed by ethics committees, researchers, and clinicians. However, decisions which are overly cautious and restrictive when approving research proposals will hinder important research in this area. The present aim was to conduct a meta-analysis to examine whether asking about suicide or exposure to suicide-related content in research studies led to changes in participants' levels of distress, suicidal ideation, or suicide attempts. A systematic search of peer-reviewed and unpublished literature from 2000 to 2017 identified 18 studies. Exposure to suicide-related content led to significant, albeit small, reductions in suicidal ideation (g = −0.13, p &lt; .001) and a lower likelihood of engaging in suicidal behaviour (OR = 0.714, p &lt; .05). The reduction in suicidal ideation was moderated by age such that adolescents showed nearly twice as large a reduction in suicidal ideation from pre- to post-exposure as adults did. Thus, evidence to date suggests that asking research participants about suicide does not increase risk, and may be associated with small benefits. Ethics review boards should calibrate their consideration of the risks associated with participation based on the available evidence and relative to the cost of depriving potential participants of any benefits that participation may offer. •First meta-analysis to examine impact of exposure to suicide content on behaviour.•Participation in suicide research offers significant, albeit small, benefits to participants.•Available evidence should inform cost-benefit analysis in ethical decision making.•Ethics committees should calibrate consideration of risks relative to benefits.</description><subject>Ethical framework</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Institutional review boards</subject><subject>Research Subjects - psychology</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Risk-benefit assessment</subject><subject>Suicide - psychology</subject><subject>Suicide research</subject><subject>Suicide, Attempted - psychology</subject><subject>Vulnerable research participants</subject><issn>0272-7358</issn><issn>1873-7811</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EokPhAdggL9kk2HHGdmBVVfxJldjM3rqxb6iniR1sB9FX4KnxMC1LVvdH3znSvYeQ15y1nHH57tjaNbUd47plqmWMPyE7rpVolOb8KdmxTnWNEnt9QV7kfGSV0D1_Ti5E7Xotux35fbhFOmLAyZdMITiafL7LNE4U8p0P32nCjJDsLV0hFW_9CuFEjnErNG914fA9vaILFmggwHyf_V95qcZ-WcGW04S_1pi3hLTER1WTcIaCjtoYCobykjybYM746qFeksOnj4frL83Nt89fr69uGisGWZpxsAJGJ9jI5KB7YZUWw8CB98oNwNleDoOaZF-vdb3qQOqJT6IfxZ5poaW4JG_PtmuKPzbMxSw-W5xnCBi3bDqm-F4x2auK8jNqU8w54WTW5BdI94Yzc0rAHE1NwJwSMEyZ-tWqefNgv40Lun-Kx5dX4MMZwHrjT4_JZOsxWHQ-oS3GRf8f-z8tEZdK</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Blades, Caroline A.</creator><creator>Stritzke, Werner G.K.</creator><creator>Page, Andrew C.</creator><creator>Brown, Julia D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3133-2844</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>The benefits and risks of asking research participants about suicide: A meta-analysis of the impact of exposure to suicide-related content</title><author>Blades, Caroline A. ; Stritzke, Werner G.K. ; Page, Andrew C. ; Brown, Julia D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b9c3abd30b069843c783991a147d9a1056997f64000d472a68f1f34b35083863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Ethical framework</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Institutional review boards</topic><topic>Research Subjects - psychology</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Risk-benefit assessment</topic><topic>Suicide - psychology</topic><topic>Suicide research</topic><topic>Suicide, Attempted - psychology</topic><topic>Vulnerable research participants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blades, Caroline A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stritzke, Werner G.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Andrew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Julia D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical psychology review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blades, Caroline A.</au><au>Stritzke, Werner G.K.</au><au>Page, Andrew C.</au><au>Brown, Julia D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The benefits and risks of asking research participants about suicide: A meta-analysis of the impact of exposure to suicide-related content</atitle><jtitle>Clinical psychology review</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Psychol Rev</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>64</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><issn>0272-7358</issn><eissn>1873-7811</eissn><abstract>One obstacle potentially hindering research on suicide is the assumption that assessing suicide may make individuals more likely to engage in suicidal thoughts or behaviours; a concern expressed by ethics committees, researchers, and clinicians. However, decisions which are overly cautious and restrictive when approving research proposals will hinder important research in this area. The present aim was to conduct a meta-analysis to examine whether asking about suicide or exposure to suicide-related content in research studies led to changes in participants' levels of distress, suicidal ideation, or suicide attempts. A systematic search of peer-reviewed and unpublished literature from 2000 to 2017 identified 18 studies. Exposure to suicide-related content led to significant, albeit small, reductions in suicidal ideation (g = −0.13, p &lt; .001) and a lower likelihood of engaging in suicidal behaviour (OR = 0.714, p &lt; .05). The reduction in suicidal ideation was moderated by age such that adolescents showed nearly twice as large a reduction in suicidal ideation from pre- to post-exposure as adults did. Thus, evidence to date suggests that asking research participants about suicide does not increase risk, and may be associated with small benefits. Ethics review boards should calibrate their consideration of the risks associated with participation based on the available evidence and relative to the cost of depriving potential participants of any benefits that participation may offer. •First meta-analysis to examine impact of exposure to suicide content on behaviour.•Participation in suicide research offers significant, albeit small, benefits to participants.•Available evidence should inform cost-benefit analysis in ethical decision making.•Ethics committees should calibrate consideration of risks relative to benefits.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30014862</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cpr.2018.07.001</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3133-2844</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-7358
ispartof Clinical psychology review, 2018-08, Vol.64, p.1-12
issn 0272-7358
1873-7811
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2071570647
source Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects Ethical framework
Humans
Institutional review boards
Research Subjects - psychology
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Risk-benefit assessment
Suicide - psychology
Suicide research
Suicide, Attempted - psychology
Vulnerable research participants
title The benefits and risks of asking research participants about suicide: A meta-analysis of the impact of exposure to suicide-related content
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A34%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20benefits%20and%20risks%20of%20asking%20research%20participants%20about%20suicide:%20A%20meta-analysis%20of%20the%20impact%20of%20exposure%20to%20suicide-related%20content&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20psychology%20review&rft.au=Blades,%20Caroline%20A.&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=64&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.issn=0272-7358&rft.eissn=1873-7811&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.07.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2071570647%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b9c3abd30b069843c783991a147d9a1056997f64000d472a68f1f34b35083863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2071570647&rft_id=info:pmid/30014862&rfr_iscdi=true