Complications and survival rates of inlays and onlays vs complete coverage restorations: A systematic review and analysis of studies

• Published in: Journal of oral rehabilitation 2018-11, Vol.45 (11), p.903-920
• Main Authors: Vagropoulou, Georgia I., Klifopoulou, Georgia L., Vlahou, Stefania G., Hirayama, Hiroshi, Michalakis, Konstantinos
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ceramics; complications; Composite Resins; crown; Dental caries; Dental Porcelain; Dental Restoration Failure - statistics & numerical data; Dental Restoration, Permanent; Dental restorative materials; Dental Stress Analysis; Dentistry; Denture, Overlay; Fractures; Humans; inlay; onlay; Statistical analysis; Survival; survival rates; Teeth; tooth
• ISSN: 0305-182X; 1365-2842
• DOI: 10.1111/joor.12695

Summary Objective The aim of this study was to identify if different types of indirect restorations used for single teeth had different biological and technical complications, as well as survival rates. Method An electronic search was performed in various electronic databases to identify articles, published between 1980 and 2017. The search terms were categorised into 4 groups: inlay, onlay, inlay/onlay and crown. Manual searches of published full‐text articles and related reviews were also performed. Results A total number of 2849 papers were retrieved initially. After a detailed assessment for eligibility, 9 studies were selected for inclusion. The heterogeneity of the studies did allow neither a meta‐analysis nor any meaningful comparison between types of restorations or materials. Only some pooling was performed for representative reasons. The mean survival rate of inlays was 90.89%, while for onlays and crowns it was 93.50% and 95.38%, respectively. For the fourth study group, consisting of both inlays and onlays, the survival rate was found to be 99.43%. Statistical analysis demonstrated caries to be the main biological complication for all types of restorations, followed by a root and/or tooth fracture incidence (11.34%) and endodontic incidence. Ceramic fractures represented the most common technical complication, followed by loss of retention and porcelain chipping. Conclusion The 5‐year survival rate for crowns and inlays/onlays is very high, exceeding 90%. An association between the kind of complications and different types of restorations could not be established. Nevertheless, a relatively high failure rate due to caries and ceramic fractures was noted.