Loading…

Non-classical types of loess

The purpose of this contribution is to describe the sequence of physical and chemical processes resulting in the sediment-type named loess, a fine-grained sediment deposit of universal occurrence. Owing to historical causes, loess has been (and still is) implicitly linked to glacial/periglacial envi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sedimentary geology 2007-12, Vol.202 (3), p.352-368
Main Authors: Iriondo, M.H., Kröhling, D.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-397c17e71c962818a6ac307ebaedb4b376d132f15fd06b1dc38c969fa169a18b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-397c17e71c962818a6ac307ebaedb4b376d132f15fd06b1dc38c969fa169a18b3
container_end_page 368
container_issue 3
container_start_page 352
container_title Sedimentary geology
container_volume 202
creator Iriondo, M.H.
Kröhling, D.M.
description The purpose of this contribution is to describe the sequence of physical and chemical processes resulting in the sediment-type named loess, a fine-grained sediment deposit of universal occurrence. Owing to historical causes, loess has been (and still is) implicitly linked to glacial/periglacial environments among most naturalists. However it is known today that most eolian dust is deflated from tropical deserts. Hence, that sequence of processes is more comprehensive than the former narrow cold scenario. Six examples of different “non-classical” cases (from South America and Europe) that fit well to the loess definition are developed: 1) volcanic loess in Ecuador: pyroclastic eruptions/valley wind/mountain praire/silica structuring; 2) tropical loess in northeastern Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay: deflation of river and fan splays/savanna/iron sesquioxide structuring; 3) gypsum loess in northern Spain: destruction of anhydrite/gypsiferous layers in a dry climate/valley wind/Saharian shrub peridesert/gypsum structuring; 4) trade-wind deposits in Venezuela and Brazil: deflation in tidal flats/trade wind into the continent/savanna/iron hydroxide structuring; 5) anticyclonic gray loess in Argentina: continental anticyclone on plains/anti-clockwise winds and whirls/steppe/carbonate structuring. All these non-classical types conform to the accepted loess definitions and they also share the most important field characteristics of loess such as grain size, friability, vertical or sub-vertical slopes in outcrops, subfusion and others. Other cases can probably be recognized when systematically scrutinized.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.03.012
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20724755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0037073807001352</els_id><sourcerecordid>20724755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-397c17e71c962818a6ac307ebaedb4b376d132f15fd06b1dc38c969fa169a18b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j7FOwzAURT2ARCn8QYdObAnvxYmdLEioAopUwQKz5dgvyFVaF78UqX9PqjAz3eGee6UjxAIhR0B1v82Z_BfFvADQOcgcsLgQMwCpM9CyvhLXzFsYy1rDTCze4j5zvWUOzvbL4XQgXsZu2UdivhGXne2Zbv9yLj6fnz5W62zz_vK6etxktgQ1ZLLRDjVpdI0qaqytsk6CptaSb8tWauVRFh1WnQfVoneyHsmms6gai3Ur5-Ju-j2k-H0kHswusKO-t3uKRzYF6KLUVTWC5QS6FJkTdeaQws6mk0EwZ32zNZO-OesbkGbUH2cP04xGiZ9AybALtHfkQyI3GB_D_we_8rJl2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20724755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-classical types of loess</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Iriondo, M.H. ; Kröhling, D.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Iriondo, M.H. ; Kröhling, D.M.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this contribution is to describe the sequence of physical and chemical processes resulting in the sediment-type named loess, a fine-grained sediment deposit of universal occurrence. Owing to historical causes, loess has been (and still is) implicitly linked to glacial/periglacial environments among most naturalists. However it is known today that most eolian dust is deflated from tropical deserts. Hence, that sequence of processes is more comprehensive than the former narrow cold scenario. Six examples of different “non-classical” cases (from South America and Europe) that fit well to the loess definition are developed: 1) volcanic loess in Ecuador: pyroclastic eruptions/valley wind/mountain praire/silica structuring; 2) tropical loess in northeastern Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay: deflation of river and fan splays/savanna/iron sesquioxide structuring; 3) gypsum loess in northern Spain: destruction of anhydrite/gypsiferous layers in a dry climate/valley wind/Saharian shrub peridesert/gypsum structuring; 4) trade-wind deposits in Venezuela and Brazil: deflation in tidal flats/trade wind into the continent/savanna/iron hydroxide structuring; 5) anticyclonic gray loess in Argentina: continental anticyclone on plains/anti-clockwise winds and whirls/steppe/carbonate structuring. All these non-classical types conform to the accepted loess definitions and they also share the most important field characteristics of loess such as grain size, friability, vertical or sub-vertical slopes in outcrops, subfusion and others. Other cases can probably be recognized when systematically scrutinized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-0738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.03.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Last Glacial Maximum ; Loess ; Quaternary ; South America</subject><ispartof>Sedimentary geology, 2007-12, Vol.202 (3), p.352-368</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-397c17e71c962818a6ac307ebaedb4b376d132f15fd06b1dc38c969fa169a18b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-397c17e71c962818a6ac307ebaedb4b376d132f15fd06b1dc38c969fa169a18b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iriondo, M.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröhling, D.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Non-classical types of loess</title><title>Sedimentary geology</title><description>The purpose of this contribution is to describe the sequence of physical and chemical processes resulting in the sediment-type named loess, a fine-grained sediment deposit of universal occurrence. Owing to historical causes, loess has been (and still is) implicitly linked to glacial/periglacial environments among most naturalists. However it is known today that most eolian dust is deflated from tropical deserts. Hence, that sequence of processes is more comprehensive than the former narrow cold scenario. Six examples of different “non-classical” cases (from South America and Europe) that fit well to the loess definition are developed: 1) volcanic loess in Ecuador: pyroclastic eruptions/valley wind/mountain praire/silica structuring; 2) tropical loess in northeastern Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay: deflation of river and fan splays/savanna/iron sesquioxide structuring; 3) gypsum loess in northern Spain: destruction of anhydrite/gypsiferous layers in a dry climate/valley wind/Saharian shrub peridesert/gypsum structuring; 4) trade-wind deposits in Venezuela and Brazil: deflation in tidal flats/trade wind into the continent/savanna/iron hydroxide structuring; 5) anticyclonic gray loess in Argentina: continental anticyclone on plains/anti-clockwise winds and whirls/steppe/carbonate structuring. All these non-classical types conform to the accepted loess definitions and they also share the most important field characteristics of loess such as grain size, friability, vertical or sub-vertical slopes in outcrops, subfusion and others. Other cases can probably be recognized when systematically scrutinized.</description><subject>Last Glacial Maximum</subject><subject>Loess</subject><subject>Quaternary</subject><subject>South America</subject><issn>0037-0738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j7FOwzAURT2ARCn8QYdObAnvxYmdLEioAopUwQKz5dgvyFVaF78UqX9PqjAz3eGee6UjxAIhR0B1v82Z_BfFvADQOcgcsLgQMwCpM9CyvhLXzFsYy1rDTCze4j5zvWUOzvbL4XQgXsZu2UdivhGXne2Zbv9yLj6fnz5W62zz_vK6etxktgQ1ZLLRDjVpdI0qaqytsk6CptaSb8tWauVRFh1WnQfVoneyHsmms6gai3Ur5-Ju-j2k-H0kHswusKO-t3uKRzYF6KLUVTWC5QS6FJkTdeaQws6mk0EwZ32zNZO-OesbkGbUH2cP04xGiZ9AybALtHfkQyI3GB_D_we_8rJl2w</recordid><startdate>20071201</startdate><enddate>20071201</enddate><creator>Iriondo, M.H.</creator><creator>Kröhling, D.M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071201</creationdate><title>Non-classical types of loess</title><author>Iriondo, M.H. ; Kröhling, D.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-397c17e71c962818a6ac307ebaedb4b376d132f15fd06b1dc38c969fa169a18b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Last Glacial Maximum</topic><topic>Loess</topic><topic>Quaternary</topic><topic>South America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iriondo, M.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröhling, D.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Sedimentary geology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iriondo, M.H.</au><au>Kröhling, D.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-classical types of loess</atitle><jtitle>Sedimentary geology</jtitle><date>2007-12-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>202</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>352</spage><epage>368</epage><pages>352-368</pages><issn>0037-0738</issn><abstract>The purpose of this contribution is to describe the sequence of physical and chemical processes resulting in the sediment-type named loess, a fine-grained sediment deposit of universal occurrence. Owing to historical causes, loess has been (and still is) implicitly linked to glacial/periglacial environments among most naturalists. However it is known today that most eolian dust is deflated from tropical deserts. Hence, that sequence of processes is more comprehensive than the former narrow cold scenario. Six examples of different “non-classical” cases (from South America and Europe) that fit well to the loess definition are developed: 1) volcanic loess in Ecuador: pyroclastic eruptions/valley wind/mountain praire/silica structuring; 2) tropical loess in northeastern Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay: deflation of river and fan splays/savanna/iron sesquioxide structuring; 3) gypsum loess in northern Spain: destruction of anhydrite/gypsiferous layers in a dry climate/valley wind/Saharian shrub peridesert/gypsum structuring; 4) trade-wind deposits in Venezuela and Brazil: deflation in tidal flats/trade wind into the continent/savanna/iron hydroxide structuring; 5) anticyclonic gray loess in Argentina: continental anticyclone on plains/anti-clockwise winds and whirls/steppe/carbonate structuring. All these non-classical types conform to the accepted loess definitions and they also share the most important field characteristics of loess such as grain size, friability, vertical or sub-vertical slopes in outcrops, subfusion and others. Other cases can probably be recognized when systematically scrutinized.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.03.012</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0037-0738
ispartof Sedimentary geology, 2007-12, Vol.202 (3), p.352-368
issn 0037-0738
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20724755
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Last Glacial Maximum
Loess
Quaternary
South America
title Non-classical types of loess
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A05%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-classical%20types%20of%20loess&rft.jtitle=Sedimentary%20geology&rft.au=Iriondo,%20M.H.&rft.date=2007-12-01&rft.volume=202&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=368&rft.pages=352-368&rft.issn=0037-0738&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.03.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20724755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-397c17e71c962818a6ac307ebaedb4b376d132f15fd06b1dc38c969fa169a18b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20724755&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true