Loading…
Non-classical types of loess
The purpose of this contribution is to describe the sequence of physical and chemical processes resulting in the sediment-type named loess, a fine-grained sediment deposit of universal occurrence. Owing to historical causes, loess has been (and still is) implicitly linked to glacial/periglacial envi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sedimentary geology 2007-12, Vol.202 (3), p.352-368 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-397c17e71c962818a6ac307ebaedb4b376d132f15fd06b1dc38c969fa169a18b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-397c17e71c962818a6ac307ebaedb4b376d132f15fd06b1dc38c969fa169a18b3 |
container_end_page | 368 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 352 |
container_title | Sedimentary geology |
container_volume | 202 |
creator | Iriondo, M.H. Kröhling, D.M. |
description | The purpose of this contribution is to describe the sequence of physical and chemical processes resulting in the sediment-type named loess, a fine-grained sediment deposit of universal occurrence. Owing to historical causes, loess has been (and still is) implicitly linked to glacial/periglacial environments among most naturalists. However it is known today that most eolian dust is deflated from tropical deserts. Hence, that sequence of processes is more comprehensive than the former narrow cold scenario. Six examples of different “non-classical” cases (from South America and Europe) that fit well to the loess definition are developed: 1) volcanic loess in Ecuador: pyroclastic eruptions/valley wind/mountain praire/silica structuring; 2) tropical loess in northeastern Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay: deflation of river and fan splays/savanna/iron sesquioxide structuring; 3) gypsum loess in northern Spain: destruction of anhydrite/gypsiferous layers in a dry climate/valley wind/Saharian shrub peridesert/gypsum structuring; 4) trade-wind deposits in Venezuela and Brazil: deflation in tidal flats/trade wind into the continent/savanna/iron hydroxide structuring; 5) anticyclonic gray loess in Argentina: continental anticyclone on plains/anti-clockwise winds and whirls/steppe/carbonate structuring. All these non-classical types conform to the accepted loess definitions and they also share the most important field characteristics of loess such as grain size, friability, vertical or sub-vertical slopes in outcrops, subfusion and others. Other cases can probably be recognized when systematically scrutinized. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.03.012 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20724755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0037073807001352</els_id><sourcerecordid>20724755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-397c17e71c962818a6ac307ebaedb4b376d132f15fd06b1dc38c969fa169a18b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j7FOwzAURT2ARCn8QYdObAnvxYmdLEioAopUwQKz5dgvyFVaF78UqX9PqjAz3eGee6UjxAIhR0B1v82Z_BfFvADQOcgcsLgQMwCpM9CyvhLXzFsYy1rDTCze4j5zvWUOzvbL4XQgXsZu2UdivhGXne2Zbv9yLj6fnz5W62zz_vK6etxktgQ1ZLLRDjVpdI0qaqytsk6CptaSb8tWauVRFh1WnQfVoneyHsmms6gai3Ur5-Ju-j2k-H0kHswusKO-t3uKRzYF6KLUVTWC5QS6FJkTdeaQws6mk0EwZ32zNZO-OesbkGbUH2cP04xGiZ9AybALtHfkQyI3GB_D_we_8rJl2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20724755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-classical types of loess</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Iriondo, M.H. ; Kröhling, D.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Iriondo, M.H. ; Kröhling, D.M.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this contribution is to describe the sequence of physical and chemical processes resulting in the sediment-type named loess, a fine-grained sediment deposit of universal occurrence. Owing to historical causes, loess has been (and still is) implicitly linked to glacial/periglacial environments among most naturalists. However it is known today that most eolian dust is deflated from tropical deserts. Hence, that sequence of processes is more comprehensive than the former narrow cold scenario. Six examples of different “non-classical” cases (from South America and Europe) that fit well to the loess definition are developed: 1) volcanic loess in Ecuador: pyroclastic eruptions/valley wind/mountain praire/silica structuring; 2) tropical loess in northeastern Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay: deflation of river and fan splays/savanna/iron sesquioxide structuring; 3) gypsum loess in northern Spain: destruction of anhydrite/gypsiferous layers in a dry climate/valley wind/Saharian shrub peridesert/gypsum structuring; 4) trade-wind deposits in Venezuela and Brazil: deflation in tidal flats/trade wind into the continent/savanna/iron hydroxide structuring; 5) anticyclonic gray loess in Argentina: continental anticyclone on plains/anti-clockwise winds and whirls/steppe/carbonate structuring. All these non-classical types conform to the accepted loess definitions and they also share the most important field characteristics of loess such as grain size, friability, vertical or sub-vertical slopes in outcrops, subfusion and others. Other cases can probably be recognized when systematically scrutinized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-0738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.03.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Last Glacial Maximum ; Loess ; Quaternary ; South America</subject><ispartof>Sedimentary geology, 2007-12, Vol.202 (3), p.352-368</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-397c17e71c962818a6ac307ebaedb4b376d132f15fd06b1dc38c969fa169a18b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-397c17e71c962818a6ac307ebaedb4b376d132f15fd06b1dc38c969fa169a18b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iriondo, M.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröhling, D.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Non-classical types of loess</title><title>Sedimentary geology</title><description>The purpose of this contribution is to describe the sequence of physical and chemical processes resulting in the sediment-type named loess, a fine-grained sediment deposit of universal occurrence. Owing to historical causes, loess has been (and still is) implicitly linked to glacial/periglacial environments among most naturalists. However it is known today that most eolian dust is deflated from tropical deserts. Hence, that sequence of processes is more comprehensive than the former narrow cold scenario. Six examples of different “non-classical” cases (from South America and Europe) that fit well to the loess definition are developed: 1) volcanic loess in Ecuador: pyroclastic eruptions/valley wind/mountain praire/silica structuring; 2) tropical loess in northeastern Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay: deflation of river and fan splays/savanna/iron sesquioxide structuring; 3) gypsum loess in northern Spain: destruction of anhydrite/gypsiferous layers in a dry climate/valley wind/Saharian shrub peridesert/gypsum structuring; 4) trade-wind deposits in Venezuela and Brazil: deflation in tidal flats/trade wind into the continent/savanna/iron hydroxide structuring; 5) anticyclonic gray loess in Argentina: continental anticyclone on plains/anti-clockwise winds and whirls/steppe/carbonate structuring. All these non-classical types conform to the accepted loess definitions and they also share the most important field characteristics of loess such as grain size, friability, vertical or sub-vertical slopes in outcrops, subfusion and others. Other cases can probably be recognized when systematically scrutinized.</description><subject>Last Glacial Maximum</subject><subject>Loess</subject><subject>Quaternary</subject><subject>South America</subject><issn>0037-0738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j7FOwzAURT2ARCn8QYdObAnvxYmdLEioAopUwQKz5dgvyFVaF78UqX9PqjAz3eGee6UjxAIhR0B1v82Z_BfFvADQOcgcsLgQMwCpM9CyvhLXzFsYy1rDTCze4j5zvWUOzvbL4XQgXsZu2UdivhGXne2Zbv9yLj6fnz5W62zz_vK6etxktgQ1ZLLRDjVpdI0qaqytsk6CptaSb8tWauVRFh1WnQfVoneyHsmms6gai3Ur5-Ju-j2k-H0kHswusKO-t3uKRzYF6KLUVTWC5QS6FJkTdeaQws6mk0EwZ32zNZO-OesbkGbUH2cP04xGiZ9AybALtHfkQyI3GB_D_we_8rJl2w</recordid><startdate>20071201</startdate><enddate>20071201</enddate><creator>Iriondo, M.H.</creator><creator>Kröhling, D.M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071201</creationdate><title>Non-classical types of loess</title><author>Iriondo, M.H. ; Kröhling, D.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-397c17e71c962818a6ac307ebaedb4b376d132f15fd06b1dc38c969fa169a18b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Last Glacial Maximum</topic><topic>Loess</topic><topic>Quaternary</topic><topic>South America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iriondo, M.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröhling, D.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Sedimentary geology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iriondo, M.H.</au><au>Kröhling, D.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-classical types of loess</atitle><jtitle>Sedimentary geology</jtitle><date>2007-12-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>202</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>352</spage><epage>368</epage><pages>352-368</pages><issn>0037-0738</issn><abstract>The purpose of this contribution is to describe the sequence of physical and chemical processes resulting in the sediment-type named loess, a fine-grained sediment deposit of universal occurrence. Owing to historical causes, loess has been (and still is) implicitly linked to glacial/periglacial environments among most naturalists. However it is known today that most eolian dust is deflated from tropical deserts. Hence, that sequence of processes is more comprehensive than the former narrow cold scenario. Six examples of different “non-classical” cases (from South America and Europe) that fit well to the loess definition are developed: 1) volcanic loess in Ecuador: pyroclastic eruptions/valley wind/mountain praire/silica structuring; 2) tropical loess in northeastern Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay: deflation of river and fan splays/savanna/iron sesquioxide structuring; 3) gypsum loess in northern Spain: destruction of anhydrite/gypsiferous layers in a dry climate/valley wind/Saharian shrub peridesert/gypsum structuring; 4) trade-wind deposits in Venezuela and Brazil: deflation in tidal flats/trade wind into the continent/savanna/iron hydroxide structuring; 5) anticyclonic gray loess in Argentina: continental anticyclone on plains/anti-clockwise winds and whirls/steppe/carbonate structuring. All these non-classical types conform to the accepted loess definitions and they also share the most important field characteristics of loess such as grain size, friability, vertical or sub-vertical slopes in outcrops, subfusion and others. Other cases can probably be recognized when systematically scrutinized.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.03.012</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0037-0738 |
ispartof | Sedimentary geology, 2007-12, Vol.202 (3), p.352-368 |
issn | 0037-0738 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20724755 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Last Glacial Maximum Loess Quaternary South America |
title | Non-classical types of loess |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A05%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-classical%20types%20of%20loess&rft.jtitle=Sedimentary%20geology&rft.au=Iriondo,%20M.H.&rft.date=2007-12-01&rft.volume=202&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=368&rft.pages=352-368&rft.issn=0037-0738&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.03.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20724755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-397c17e71c962818a6ac307ebaedb4b376d132f15fd06b1dc38c969fa169a18b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20724755&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |