Loading…

Comparison of the Sameoto, Manta, and MARMAP neustonic ichthyoplankton samplers in the Gulf of Alaska

A comparison of three types of neuston-sampling gear, the Sameoto, the Manta, and the Marine Resources Monitoring, Assessment, and Prediction Program (MARMAP) array was conducted to examine and understand the effectiveness of each sampler in collecting larval fishes in the Gulf of Alaska. Comparison...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fisheries research 2008-03, Vol.89 (3), p.222-229
Main Authors: Jump, Christina M., Duffy-Anderson, Janet T., Mier, Kathryn L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f1771c40ba38e825ec3bf4dfc23bc69f1fde0a9be1ed901312aeb4c9cf6c4393
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f1771c40ba38e825ec3bf4dfc23bc69f1fde0a9be1ed901312aeb4c9cf6c4393
container_end_page 229
container_issue 3
container_start_page 222
container_title Fisheries research
container_volume 89
creator Jump, Christina M.
Duffy-Anderson, Janet T.
Mier, Kathryn L.
description A comparison of three types of neuston-sampling gear, the Sameoto, the Manta, and the Marine Resources Monitoring, Assessment, and Prediction Program (MARMAP) array was conducted to examine and understand the effectiveness of each sampler in collecting larval fishes in the Gulf of Alaska. Comparison criteria included: number of individuals collected, assemblage diversity, and lengths of larvae. The MARMAP array had lower overall abundance compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Species diversity was comparable among the gears, though the MARMAP array had a slightly higher and more evenly distributed range of taxa compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Larval lengths were statistically comparable among gears, though the MARMAP array had relatively fewer large larvae compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Based on these results, choice of gears should be considered depending on whether the primary objective is to obtain estimates of abundance or estimates of diversity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fishres.2007.08.019
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20762390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165783607002184</els_id><sourcerecordid>20762390</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f1771c40ba38e825ec3bf4dfc23bc69f1fde0a9be1ed901312aeb4c9cf6c4393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEGP0zAQhS0EEmXhJyD5AqdNsOM0Tk6oqtgFaStWC5ytiTNW3U3s4EmR9t-vSyuunEYafe-9mcfYeylKKWTz6VA6T_uEVFZC6FK0pZDdC7aSra6KRjfqJVtlbl3oVjWv2Ruig8igbuSK4TZOMyRPMfDo-LJH_gMmjEu85jsIC1xzCAPfbR52m3se8EhLDN5yb_fL_inOI4THvOEE0zxiIu7DX5Pb4-hOhpsR6BHeslcORsJ3l3nFft18-bn9Wtx9v_223dwVVmmxFLWTWktbix5Ui221Rqt6Vw_OVqq3TeekG1BA16PEoRNSyQqwr21nXWNr1akr9vHsO6f4-4i0mMmTxTFfifFIphK6qVQnMrg-gzZFooTOzMlPkJ6MFOZUqjmYS6nmVKoRrcmlZt2HSwCQhdElCNbTP3ElZCu7dZu5z2cO87d_PCZD1mOwOPiEdjFD9P9JeganK5EW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20762390</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Sameoto, Manta, and MARMAP neustonic ichthyoplankton samplers in the Gulf of Alaska</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jump, Christina M. ; Duffy-Anderson, Janet T. ; Mier, Kathryn L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jump, Christina M. ; Duffy-Anderson, Janet T. ; Mier, Kathryn L.</creatorcontrib><description>A comparison of three types of neuston-sampling gear, the Sameoto, the Manta, and the Marine Resources Monitoring, Assessment, and Prediction Program (MARMAP) array was conducted to examine and understand the effectiveness of each sampler in collecting larval fishes in the Gulf of Alaska. Comparison criteria included: number of individuals collected, assemblage diversity, and lengths of larvae. The MARMAP array had lower overall abundance compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Species diversity was comparable among the gears, though the MARMAP array had a slightly higher and more evenly distributed range of taxa compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Larval lengths were statistically comparable among gears, though the MARMAP array had relatively fewer large larvae compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Based on these results, choice of gears should be considered depending on whether the primary objective is to obtain estimates of abundance or estimates of diversity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-7836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2007.08.019</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FISRDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agnatha. Pisces ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.) ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gulf of Alaska ; Ichthyoplankton ; Manta ; Marine ; MARMAP ; Neuston ; Sameoto ; Sampling gear ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>Fisheries research, 2008-03, Vol.89 (3), p.222-229</ispartof><rights>2007</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f1771c40ba38e825ec3bf4dfc23bc69f1fde0a9be1ed901312aeb4c9cf6c4393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f1771c40ba38e825ec3bf4dfc23bc69f1fde0a9be1ed901312aeb4c9cf6c4393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20181958$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jump, Christina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffy-Anderson, Janet T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mier, Kathryn L.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Sameoto, Manta, and MARMAP neustonic ichthyoplankton samplers in the Gulf of Alaska</title><title>Fisheries research</title><description>A comparison of three types of neuston-sampling gear, the Sameoto, the Manta, and the Marine Resources Monitoring, Assessment, and Prediction Program (MARMAP) array was conducted to examine and understand the effectiveness of each sampler in collecting larval fishes in the Gulf of Alaska. Comparison criteria included: number of individuals collected, assemblage diversity, and lengths of larvae. The MARMAP array had lower overall abundance compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Species diversity was comparable among the gears, though the MARMAP array had a slightly higher and more evenly distributed range of taxa compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Larval lengths were statistically comparable among gears, though the MARMAP array had relatively fewer large larvae compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Based on these results, choice of gears should be considered depending on whether the primary objective is to obtain estimates of abundance or estimates of diversity.</description><subject>Agnatha. Pisces</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.)</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gulf of Alaska</subject><subject>Ichthyoplankton</subject><subject>Manta</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>MARMAP</subject><subject>Neuston</subject><subject>Sameoto</subject><subject>Sampling gear</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>0165-7836</issn><issn>1872-6763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEGP0zAQhS0EEmXhJyD5AqdNsOM0Tk6oqtgFaStWC5ytiTNW3U3s4EmR9t-vSyuunEYafe-9mcfYeylKKWTz6VA6T_uEVFZC6FK0pZDdC7aSra6KRjfqJVtlbl3oVjWv2Ruig8igbuSK4TZOMyRPMfDo-LJH_gMmjEu85jsIC1xzCAPfbR52m3se8EhLDN5yb_fL_inOI4THvOEE0zxiIu7DX5Pb4-hOhpsR6BHeslcORsJ3l3nFft18-bn9Wtx9v_223dwVVmmxFLWTWktbix5Ui221Rqt6Vw_OVqq3TeekG1BA16PEoRNSyQqwr21nXWNr1akr9vHsO6f4-4i0mMmTxTFfifFIphK6qVQnMrg-gzZFooTOzMlPkJ6MFOZUqjmYS6nmVKoRrcmlZt2HSwCQhdElCNbTP3ElZCu7dZu5z2cO87d_PCZD1mOwOPiEdjFD9P9JeganK5EW</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Jump, Christina M.</creator><creator>Duffy-Anderson, Janet T.</creator><creator>Mier, Kathryn L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Sameoto, Manta, and MARMAP neustonic ichthyoplankton samplers in the Gulf of Alaska</title><author>Jump, Christina M. ; Duffy-Anderson, Janet T. ; Mier, Kathryn L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f1771c40ba38e825ec3bf4dfc23bc69f1fde0a9be1ed901312aeb4c9cf6c4393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agnatha. Pisces</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.)</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gulf of Alaska</topic><topic>Ichthyoplankton</topic><topic>Manta</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>MARMAP</topic><topic>Neuston</topic><topic>Sameoto</topic><topic>Sampling gear</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jump, Christina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffy-Anderson, Janet T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mier, Kathryn L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Fisheries research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jump, Christina M.</au><au>Duffy-Anderson, Janet T.</au><au>Mier, Kathryn L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Sameoto, Manta, and MARMAP neustonic ichthyoplankton samplers in the Gulf of Alaska</atitle><jtitle>Fisheries research</jtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>222</spage><epage>229</epage><pages>222-229</pages><issn>0165-7836</issn><eissn>1872-6763</eissn><coden>FISRDJ</coden><abstract>A comparison of three types of neuston-sampling gear, the Sameoto, the Manta, and the Marine Resources Monitoring, Assessment, and Prediction Program (MARMAP) array was conducted to examine and understand the effectiveness of each sampler in collecting larval fishes in the Gulf of Alaska. Comparison criteria included: number of individuals collected, assemblage diversity, and lengths of larvae. The MARMAP array had lower overall abundance compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Species diversity was comparable among the gears, though the MARMAP array had a slightly higher and more evenly distributed range of taxa compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Larval lengths were statistically comparable among gears, though the MARMAP array had relatively fewer large larvae compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Based on these results, choice of gears should be considered depending on whether the primary objective is to obtain estimates of abundance or estimates of diversity.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fishres.2007.08.019</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-7836
ispartof Fisheries research, 2008-03, Vol.89 (3), p.222-229
issn 0165-7836
1872-6763
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20762390
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agnatha. Pisces
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.)
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gulf of Alaska
Ichthyoplankton
Manta
Marine
MARMAP
Neuston
Sameoto
Sampling gear
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
title Comparison of the Sameoto, Manta, and MARMAP neustonic ichthyoplankton samplers in the Gulf of Alaska
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T12%3A42%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Sameoto,%20Manta,%20and%20MARMAP%20neustonic%20ichthyoplankton%20samplers%20in%20the%20Gulf%20of%20Alaska&rft.jtitle=Fisheries%20research&rft.au=Jump,%20Christina%20M.&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=222&rft.epage=229&rft.pages=222-229&rft.issn=0165-7836&rft.eissn=1872-6763&rft.coden=FISRDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fishres.2007.08.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20762390%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f1771c40ba38e825ec3bf4dfc23bc69f1fde0a9be1ed901312aeb4c9cf6c4393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20762390&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true