Loading…
Comparison of the Sameoto, Manta, and MARMAP neustonic ichthyoplankton samplers in the Gulf of Alaska
A comparison of three types of neuston-sampling gear, the Sameoto, the Manta, and the Marine Resources Monitoring, Assessment, and Prediction Program (MARMAP) array was conducted to examine and understand the effectiveness of each sampler in collecting larval fishes in the Gulf of Alaska. Comparison...
Saved in:
Published in: | Fisheries research 2008-03, Vol.89 (3), p.222-229 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f1771c40ba38e825ec3bf4dfc23bc69f1fde0a9be1ed901312aeb4c9cf6c4393 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f1771c40ba38e825ec3bf4dfc23bc69f1fde0a9be1ed901312aeb4c9cf6c4393 |
container_end_page | 229 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 222 |
container_title | Fisheries research |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Jump, Christina M. Duffy-Anderson, Janet T. Mier, Kathryn L. |
description | A comparison of three types of neuston-sampling gear, the Sameoto, the Manta, and the Marine Resources Monitoring, Assessment, and Prediction Program (MARMAP) array was conducted to examine and understand the effectiveness of each sampler in collecting larval fishes in the Gulf of Alaska. Comparison criteria included: number of individuals collected, assemblage diversity, and lengths of larvae. The MARMAP array had lower overall abundance compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Species diversity was comparable among the gears, though the MARMAP array had a slightly higher and more evenly distributed range of taxa compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Larval lengths were statistically comparable among gears, though the MARMAP array had relatively fewer large larvae compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Based on these results, choice of gears should be considered depending on whether the primary objective is to obtain estimates of abundance or estimates of diversity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fishres.2007.08.019 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20762390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165783607002184</els_id><sourcerecordid>20762390</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f1771c40ba38e825ec3bf4dfc23bc69f1fde0a9be1ed901312aeb4c9cf6c4393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEGP0zAQhS0EEmXhJyD5AqdNsOM0Tk6oqtgFaStWC5ytiTNW3U3s4EmR9t-vSyuunEYafe-9mcfYeylKKWTz6VA6T_uEVFZC6FK0pZDdC7aSra6KRjfqJVtlbl3oVjWv2Ruig8igbuSK4TZOMyRPMfDo-LJH_gMmjEu85jsIC1xzCAPfbR52m3se8EhLDN5yb_fL_inOI4THvOEE0zxiIu7DX5Pb4-hOhpsR6BHeslcORsJ3l3nFft18-bn9Wtx9v_223dwVVmmxFLWTWktbix5Ui221Rqt6Vw_OVqq3TeekG1BA16PEoRNSyQqwr21nXWNr1akr9vHsO6f4-4i0mMmTxTFfifFIphK6qVQnMrg-gzZFooTOzMlPkJ6MFOZUqjmYS6nmVKoRrcmlZt2HSwCQhdElCNbTP3ElZCu7dZu5z2cO87d_PCZD1mOwOPiEdjFD9P9JeganK5EW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20762390</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Sameoto, Manta, and MARMAP neustonic ichthyoplankton samplers in the Gulf of Alaska</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jump, Christina M. ; Duffy-Anderson, Janet T. ; Mier, Kathryn L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jump, Christina M. ; Duffy-Anderson, Janet T. ; Mier, Kathryn L.</creatorcontrib><description>A comparison of three types of neuston-sampling gear, the Sameoto, the Manta, and the Marine Resources Monitoring, Assessment, and Prediction Program (MARMAP) array was conducted to examine and understand the effectiveness of each sampler in collecting larval fishes in the Gulf of Alaska. Comparison criteria included: number of individuals collected, assemblage diversity, and lengths of larvae. The MARMAP array had lower overall abundance compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Species diversity was comparable among the gears, though the MARMAP array had a slightly higher and more evenly distributed range of taxa compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Larval lengths were statistically comparable among gears, though the MARMAP array had relatively fewer large larvae compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Based on these results, choice of gears should be considered depending on whether the primary objective is to obtain estimates of abundance or estimates of diversity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-7836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2007.08.019</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FISRDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agnatha. Pisces ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.) ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gulf of Alaska ; Ichthyoplankton ; Manta ; Marine ; MARMAP ; Neuston ; Sameoto ; Sampling gear ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>Fisheries research, 2008-03, Vol.89 (3), p.222-229</ispartof><rights>2007</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f1771c40ba38e825ec3bf4dfc23bc69f1fde0a9be1ed901312aeb4c9cf6c4393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f1771c40ba38e825ec3bf4dfc23bc69f1fde0a9be1ed901312aeb4c9cf6c4393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20181958$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jump, Christina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffy-Anderson, Janet T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mier, Kathryn L.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Sameoto, Manta, and MARMAP neustonic ichthyoplankton samplers in the Gulf of Alaska</title><title>Fisheries research</title><description>A comparison of three types of neuston-sampling gear, the Sameoto, the Manta, and the Marine Resources Monitoring, Assessment, and Prediction Program (MARMAP) array was conducted to examine and understand the effectiveness of each sampler in collecting larval fishes in the Gulf of Alaska. Comparison criteria included: number of individuals collected, assemblage diversity, and lengths of larvae. The MARMAP array had lower overall abundance compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Species diversity was comparable among the gears, though the MARMAP array had a slightly higher and more evenly distributed range of taxa compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Larval lengths were statistically comparable among gears, though the MARMAP array had relatively fewer large larvae compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Based on these results, choice of gears should be considered depending on whether the primary objective is to obtain estimates of abundance or estimates of diversity.</description><subject>Agnatha. Pisces</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.)</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gulf of Alaska</subject><subject>Ichthyoplankton</subject><subject>Manta</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>MARMAP</subject><subject>Neuston</subject><subject>Sameoto</subject><subject>Sampling gear</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>0165-7836</issn><issn>1872-6763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEGP0zAQhS0EEmXhJyD5AqdNsOM0Tk6oqtgFaStWC5ytiTNW3U3s4EmR9t-vSyuunEYafe-9mcfYeylKKWTz6VA6T_uEVFZC6FK0pZDdC7aSra6KRjfqJVtlbl3oVjWv2Ruig8igbuSK4TZOMyRPMfDo-LJH_gMmjEu85jsIC1xzCAPfbR52m3se8EhLDN5yb_fL_inOI4THvOEE0zxiIu7DX5Pb4-hOhpsR6BHeslcORsJ3l3nFft18-bn9Wtx9v_223dwVVmmxFLWTWktbix5Ui221Rqt6Vw_OVqq3TeekG1BA16PEoRNSyQqwr21nXWNr1akr9vHsO6f4-4i0mMmTxTFfifFIphK6qVQnMrg-gzZFooTOzMlPkJ6MFOZUqjmYS6nmVKoRrcmlZt2HSwCQhdElCNbTP3ElZCu7dZu5z2cO87d_PCZD1mOwOPiEdjFD9P9JeganK5EW</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Jump, Christina M.</creator><creator>Duffy-Anderson, Janet T.</creator><creator>Mier, Kathryn L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Sameoto, Manta, and MARMAP neustonic ichthyoplankton samplers in the Gulf of Alaska</title><author>Jump, Christina M. ; Duffy-Anderson, Janet T. ; Mier, Kathryn L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f1771c40ba38e825ec3bf4dfc23bc69f1fde0a9be1ed901312aeb4c9cf6c4393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agnatha. Pisces</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.)</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gulf of Alaska</topic><topic>Ichthyoplankton</topic><topic>Manta</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>MARMAP</topic><topic>Neuston</topic><topic>Sameoto</topic><topic>Sampling gear</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jump, Christina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffy-Anderson, Janet T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mier, Kathryn L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Fisheries research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jump, Christina M.</au><au>Duffy-Anderson, Janet T.</au><au>Mier, Kathryn L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Sameoto, Manta, and MARMAP neustonic ichthyoplankton samplers in the Gulf of Alaska</atitle><jtitle>Fisheries research</jtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>222</spage><epage>229</epage><pages>222-229</pages><issn>0165-7836</issn><eissn>1872-6763</eissn><coden>FISRDJ</coden><abstract>A comparison of three types of neuston-sampling gear, the Sameoto, the Manta, and the Marine Resources Monitoring, Assessment, and Prediction Program (MARMAP) array was conducted to examine and understand the effectiveness of each sampler in collecting larval fishes in the Gulf of Alaska. Comparison criteria included: number of individuals collected, assemblage diversity, and lengths of larvae. The MARMAP array had lower overall abundance compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Species diversity was comparable among the gears, though the MARMAP array had a slightly higher and more evenly distributed range of taxa compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Larval lengths were statistically comparable among gears, though the MARMAP array had relatively fewer large larvae compared to the Sameoto and Manta arrays. Based on these results, choice of gears should be considered depending on whether the primary objective is to obtain estimates of abundance or estimates of diversity.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fishres.2007.08.019</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-7836 |
ispartof | Fisheries research, 2008-03, Vol.89 (3), p.222-229 |
issn | 0165-7836 1872-6763 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20762390 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Agnatha. Pisces Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.) Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gulf of Alaska Ichthyoplankton Manta Marine MARMAP Neuston Sameoto Sampling gear Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution |
title | Comparison of the Sameoto, Manta, and MARMAP neustonic ichthyoplankton samplers in the Gulf of Alaska |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T12%3A42%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Sameoto,%20Manta,%20and%20MARMAP%20neustonic%20ichthyoplankton%20samplers%20in%20the%20Gulf%20of%20Alaska&rft.jtitle=Fisheries%20research&rft.au=Jump,%20Christina%20M.&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=222&rft.epage=229&rft.pages=222-229&rft.issn=0165-7836&rft.eissn=1872-6763&rft.coden=FISRDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fishres.2007.08.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20762390%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f1771c40ba38e825ec3bf4dfc23bc69f1fde0a9be1ed901312aeb4c9cf6c4393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20762390&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |