Loading…
Succession of Microphytobenthos in a Restored Coastal Wetland
Sediment microphytobenthos, such as diatoms and photosynthetic bacteria, are functionally important components of food webs and are key mediators of nutrient dynamics in marine wetlands. The medium to long-term recovery of benthic microproducers in restored habitats designed to improve degraded coas...
Saved in:
Published in: | Estuaries and coasts 2007-04, Vol.30 (2), p.265-276 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61e7034acbf9d7a5695ea774175c4791474410ccc8f8beec76dbf7a7e92be4d23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61e7034acbf9d7a5695ea774175c4791474410ccc8f8beec76dbf7a7e92be4d23 |
container_end_page | 276 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 265 |
container_title | Estuaries and coasts |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Christopher N. Janousek Currin, Carolyn A. Levin, Lisa A. |
description | Sediment microphytobenthos, such as diatoms and photosynthetic bacteria, are functionally important components of food webs and are key mediators of nutrient dynamics in marine wetlands. The medium to long-term recovery of benthic microproducers in restored habitats designed to improve degraded coastal wetland sites is largely unknown. Using taxon-specific photopigments, we describe the composition of microphytobenthic communities in a large restoration site in southern California and differences in the temporal recovery of biomass (chlorophyll a), composition, and taxonomic diversity between vegetated Spartina foliosa salt marsh and unvegetated mudflat. Visually distinct, spatially discreet, microphytobenthic patches appeared after no more than 7 mo within the restoration site and were distinguished by significant differences in biomass, taxonomic diversity, and the relative abundance of cyanobacteria versus diatoms. Sediment chlorophyll a concentrations within the restored site were similar to concentrations in nearby natural habitat 0.2-2.2 yr following marsh creation, suggesting rapid colonization by microproducers. Restored Spartina marsh very rapidly (between 0.2 and 1.2 yr) acquired microphytobenthic communities of similar composition and diversity to those in natural Spartina habitat, but restored mudflats took at least 1.6 to 2.2 yr to resemble natural mudflats. These results suggest relatively rapid recovery of microphytobenthic communities at the level of major taxonomic groups. Sediment features, such as pore water salinity and Spartina density, explained little variation in microphytobenthic taxonomic composition. The data imply that provision of structural heterogeneity in wetland construction (such as pools and vascular plants) might speed development of microproducer communities, but no direct seeding of sediment microfloras may be necessary. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF02700169 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20804138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4494084</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4494084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61e7034acbf9d7a5695ea774175c4791474410ccc8f8beec76dbf7a7e92be4d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYvnj0EQQ9CdTY7yewePGixKlQEP_AYNpsNTYnZupsc-u9NaWnBi6cZmGdeZh7GTjlccwC6uZ9ATAA8VXtswJNEjWISfH_bx-KQHYUwB8AkARyw2_fOGBtC5ZrIldFLZbxbzJaty23TzlyIqibS0ZsNrfO2iMZOh1bX0Zdta90Ux-yg1HWwJ5s6ZJ-Th4_x02j6-vg8vpuOjCDejlJuCQRqk5eqIJ2kKrGaCDklBklxJEQOxhhZytxaQ2mRl6TJqji3WMRiyC7XuQvvfrr-mOy7CsbW_Q3WdSGLQQJyIf8FuSIhhIQePP8Dzl3nm_6JjASmEolUD12toV5KCN6W2cJX39ovMw7Zyne2893DF5tEHYyuS68bU4XdhpSCAKnnztbcfOV0O0dUCBLFL6WkhxU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734684779</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Succession of Microphytobenthos in a Restored Coastal Wetland</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Christopher N. Janousek ; Currin, Carolyn A. ; Levin, Lisa A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Christopher N. Janousek ; Currin, Carolyn A. ; Levin, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><description>Sediment microphytobenthos, such as diatoms and photosynthetic bacteria, are functionally important components of food webs and are key mediators of nutrient dynamics in marine wetlands. The medium to long-term recovery of benthic microproducers in restored habitats designed to improve degraded coastal wetland sites is largely unknown. Using taxon-specific photopigments, we describe the composition of microphytobenthic communities in a large restoration site in southern California and differences in the temporal recovery of biomass (chlorophyll a), composition, and taxonomic diversity between vegetated Spartina foliosa salt marsh and unvegetated mudflat. Visually distinct, spatially discreet, microphytobenthic patches appeared after no more than 7 mo within the restoration site and were distinguished by significant differences in biomass, taxonomic diversity, and the relative abundance of cyanobacteria versus diatoms. Sediment chlorophyll a concentrations within the restored site were similar to concentrations in nearby natural habitat 0.2-2.2 yr following marsh creation, suggesting rapid colonization by microproducers. Restored Spartina marsh very rapidly (between 0.2 and 1.2 yr) acquired microphytobenthic communities of similar composition and diversity to those in natural Spartina habitat, but restored mudflats took at least 1.6 to 2.2 yr to resemble natural mudflats. These results suggest relatively rapid recovery of microphytobenthic communities at the level of major taxonomic groups. Sediment features, such as pore water salinity and Spartina density, explained little variation in microphytobenthic taxonomic composition. The data imply that provision of structural heterogeneity in wetland construction (such as pools and vascular plants) might speed development of microproducer communities, but no direct seeding of sediment microfloras may be necessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-2723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2731</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02700169</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Estuarine Research Federation</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Bacillariophyceae ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brackish ; Brackish water ecosystems ; Cyanobacteria ; Diatoms ; Estuaries ; Food webs ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat conservation ; Habitats ; Heterogeneity ; Marine ; Marshes ; Mud flats ; Nutrient dynamics ; Pigments ; Plankton ; Pore water ; Relative abundance ; Salt marshes ; Sediments ; Spartina foliosa ; Synecology ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Estuaries and coasts, 2007-04, Vol.30 (2), p.265-276</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Estuarine Research Federation</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Estuarine Research Federation 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61e7034acbf9d7a5695ea774175c4791474410ccc8f8beec76dbf7a7e92be4d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61e7034acbf9d7a5695ea774175c4791474410ccc8f8beec76dbf7a7e92be4d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4494084$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4494084$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18837047$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christopher N. Janousek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currin, Carolyn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><title>Succession of Microphytobenthos in a Restored Coastal Wetland</title><title>Estuaries and coasts</title><description>Sediment microphytobenthos, such as diatoms and photosynthetic bacteria, are functionally important components of food webs and are key mediators of nutrient dynamics in marine wetlands. The medium to long-term recovery of benthic microproducers in restored habitats designed to improve degraded coastal wetland sites is largely unknown. Using taxon-specific photopigments, we describe the composition of microphytobenthic communities in a large restoration site in southern California and differences in the temporal recovery of biomass (chlorophyll a), composition, and taxonomic diversity between vegetated Spartina foliosa salt marsh and unvegetated mudflat. Visually distinct, spatially discreet, microphytobenthic patches appeared after no more than 7 mo within the restoration site and were distinguished by significant differences in biomass, taxonomic diversity, and the relative abundance of cyanobacteria versus diatoms. Sediment chlorophyll a concentrations within the restored site were similar to concentrations in nearby natural habitat 0.2-2.2 yr following marsh creation, suggesting rapid colonization by microproducers. Restored Spartina marsh very rapidly (between 0.2 and 1.2 yr) acquired microphytobenthic communities of similar composition and diversity to those in natural Spartina habitat, but restored mudflats took at least 1.6 to 2.2 yr to resemble natural mudflats. These results suggest relatively rapid recovery of microphytobenthic communities at the level of major taxonomic groups. Sediment features, such as pore water salinity and Spartina density, explained little variation in microphytobenthic taxonomic composition. The data imply that provision of structural heterogeneity in wetland construction (such as pools and vascular plants) might speed development of microproducer communities, but no direct seeding of sediment microfloras may be necessary.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Bacillariophyceae</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Brackish water ecosystems</subject><subject>Cyanobacteria</subject><subject>Diatoms</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Food webs</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marshes</subject><subject>Mud flats</subject><subject>Nutrient dynamics</subject><subject>Pigments</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Pore water</subject><subject>Relative abundance</subject><subject>Salt marshes</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Spartina foliosa</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>1559-2723</issn><issn>1559-2731</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYvnj0EQQ9CdTY7yewePGixKlQEP_AYNpsNTYnZupsc-u9NaWnBi6cZmGdeZh7GTjlccwC6uZ9ATAA8VXtswJNEjWISfH_bx-KQHYUwB8AkARyw2_fOGBtC5ZrIldFLZbxbzJaty23TzlyIqibS0ZsNrfO2iMZOh1bX0Zdta90Ux-yg1HWwJ5s6ZJ-Th4_x02j6-vg8vpuOjCDejlJuCQRqk5eqIJ2kKrGaCDklBklxJEQOxhhZytxaQ2mRl6TJqji3WMRiyC7XuQvvfrr-mOy7CsbW_Q3WdSGLQQJyIf8FuSIhhIQePP8Dzl3nm_6JjASmEolUD12toV5KCN6W2cJX39ovMw7Zyne2893DF5tEHYyuS68bU4XdhpSCAKnnztbcfOV0O0dUCBLFL6WkhxU</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>Christopher N. Janousek</creator><creator>Currin, Carolyn A.</creator><creator>Levin, Lisa A.</creator><general>Estuarine Research Federation</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>H97</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>Succession of Microphytobenthos in a Restored Coastal Wetland</title><author>Christopher N. Janousek ; Currin, Carolyn A. ; Levin, Lisa A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61e7034acbf9d7a5695ea774175c4791474410ccc8f8beec76dbf7a7e92be4d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Bacillariophyceae</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Brackish water ecosystems</topic><topic>Cyanobacteria</topic><topic>Diatoms</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Food webs</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marshes</topic><topic>Mud flats</topic><topic>Nutrient dynamics</topic><topic>Pigments</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Pore water</topic><topic>Relative abundance</topic><topic>Salt marshes</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Spartina foliosa</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christopher N. Janousek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currin, Carolyn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><jtitle>Estuaries and coasts</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christopher N. Janousek</au><au>Currin, Carolyn A.</au><au>Levin, Lisa A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Succession of Microphytobenthos in a Restored Coastal Wetland</atitle><jtitle>Estuaries and coasts</jtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>276</epage><pages>265-276</pages><issn>1559-2723</issn><eissn>1559-2731</eissn><abstract>Sediment microphytobenthos, such as diatoms and photosynthetic bacteria, are functionally important components of food webs and are key mediators of nutrient dynamics in marine wetlands. The medium to long-term recovery of benthic microproducers in restored habitats designed to improve degraded coastal wetland sites is largely unknown. Using taxon-specific photopigments, we describe the composition of microphytobenthic communities in a large restoration site in southern California and differences in the temporal recovery of biomass (chlorophyll a), composition, and taxonomic diversity between vegetated Spartina foliosa salt marsh and unvegetated mudflat. Visually distinct, spatially discreet, microphytobenthic patches appeared after no more than 7 mo within the restoration site and were distinguished by significant differences in biomass, taxonomic diversity, and the relative abundance of cyanobacteria versus diatoms. Sediment chlorophyll a concentrations within the restored site were similar to concentrations in nearby natural habitat 0.2-2.2 yr following marsh creation, suggesting rapid colonization by microproducers. Restored Spartina marsh very rapidly (between 0.2 and 1.2 yr) acquired microphytobenthic communities of similar composition and diversity to those in natural Spartina habitat, but restored mudflats took at least 1.6 to 2.2 yr to resemble natural mudflats. These results suggest relatively rapid recovery of microphytobenthic communities at the level of major taxonomic groups. Sediment features, such as pore water salinity and Spartina density, explained little variation in microphytobenthic taxonomic composition. The data imply that provision of structural heterogeneity in wetland construction (such as pools and vascular plants) might speed development of microproducer communities, but no direct seeding of sediment microfloras may be necessary.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Estuarine Research Federation</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02700169</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1559-2723 |
ispartof | Estuaries and coasts, 2007-04, Vol.30 (2), p.265-276 |
issn | 1559-2723 1559-2731 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20804138 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Nature |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Bacillariophyceae Biological and medical sciences Brackish Brackish water ecosystems Cyanobacteria Diatoms Estuaries Food webs Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Habitat conservation Habitats Heterogeneity Marine Marshes Mud flats Nutrient dynamics Pigments Plankton Pore water Relative abundance Salt marshes Sediments Spartina foliosa Synecology Wetlands |
title | Succession of Microphytobenthos in a Restored Coastal Wetland |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A47%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Succession%20of%20Microphytobenthos%20in%20a%20Restored%20Coastal%20Wetland&rft.jtitle=Estuaries%20and%20coasts&rft.au=Christopher%20N.%20Janousek&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=276&rft.pages=265-276&rft.issn=1559-2723&rft.eissn=1559-2731&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02700169&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4494084%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61e7034acbf9d7a5695ea774175c4791474410ccc8f8beec76dbf7a7e92be4d23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734684779&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4494084&rfr_iscdi=true |