Loading…

Succession of Microphytobenthos in a Restored Coastal Wetland

Sediment microphytobenthos, such as diatoms and photosynthetic bacteria, are functionally important components of food webs and are key mediators of nutrient dynamics in marine wetlands. The medium to long-term recovery of benthic microproducers in restored habitats designed to improve degraded coas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Estuaries and coasts 2007-04, Vol.30 (2), p.265-276
Main Authors: Christopher N. Janousek, Currin, Carolyn A., Levin, Lisa A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61e7034acbf9d7a5695ea774175c4791474410ccc8f8beec76dbf7a7e92be4d23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61e7034acbf9d7a5695ea774175c4791474410ccc8f8beec76dbf7a7e92be4d23
container_end_page 276
container_issue 2
container_start_page 265
container_title Estuaries and coasts
container_volume 30
creator Christopher N. Janousek
Currin, Carolyn A.
Levin, Lisa A.
description Sediment microphytobenthos, such as diatoms and photosynthetic bacteria, are functionally important components of food webs and are key mediators of nutrient dynamics in marine wetlands. The medium to long-term recovery of benthic microproducers in restored habitats designed to improve degraded coastal wetland sites is largely unknown. Using taxon-specific photopigments, we describe the composition of microphytobenthic communities in a large restoration site in southern California and differences in the temporal recovery of biomass (chlorophyll a), composition, and taxonomic diversity between vegetated Spartina foliosa salt marsh and unvegetated mudflat. Visually distinct, spatially discreet, microphytobenthic patches appeared after no more than 7 mo within the restoration site and were distinguished by significant differences in biomass, taxonomic diversity, and the relative abundance of cyanobacteria versus diatoms. Sediment chlorophyll a concentrations within the restored site were similar to concentrations in nearby natural habitat 0.2-2.2 yr following marsh creation, suggesting rapid colonization by microproducers. Restored Spartina marsh very rapidly (between 0.2 and 1.2 yr) acquired microphytobenthic communities of similar composition and diversity to those in natural Spartina habitat, but restored mudflats took at least 1.6 to 2.2 yr to resemble natural mudflats. These results suggest relatively rapid recovery of microphytobenthic communities at the level of major taxonomic groups. Sediment features, such as pore water salinity and Spartina density, explained little variation in microphytobenthic taxonomic composition. The data imply that provision of structural heterogeneity in wetland construction (such as pools and vascular plants) might speed development of microproducer communities, but no direct seeding of sediment microfloras may be necessary.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02700169
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20804138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4494084</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4494084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61e7034acbf9d7a5695ea774175c4791474410ccc8f8beec76dbf7a7e92be4d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYvnj0EQQ9CdTY7yewePGixKlQEP_AYNpsNTYnZupsc-u9NaWnBi6cZmGdeZh7GTjlccwC6uZ9ATAA8VXtswJNEjWISfH_bx-KQHYUwB8AkARyw2_fOGBtC5ZrIldFLZbxbzJaty23TzlyIqibS0ZsNrfO2iMZOh1bX0Zdta90Ux-yg1HWwJ5s6ZJ-Th4_x02j6-vg8vpuOjCDejlJuCQRqk5eqIJ2kKrGaCDklBklxJEQOxhhZytxaQ2mRl6TJqji3WMRiyC7XuQvvfrr-mOy7CsbW_Q3WdSGLQQJyIf8FuSIhhIQePP8Dzl3nm_6JjASmEolUD12toV5KCN6W2cJX39ovMw7Zyne2893DF5tEHYyuS68bU4XdhpSCAKnnztbcfOV0O0dUCBLFL6WkhxU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734684779</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Succession of Microphytobenthos in a Restored Coastal Wetland</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Christopher N. Janousek ; Currin, Carolyn A. ; Levin, Lisa A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Christopher N. Janousek ; Currin, Carolyn A. ; Levin, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><description>Sediment microphytobenthos, such as diatoms and photosynthetic bacteria, are functionally important components of food webs and are key mediators of nutrient dynamics in marine wetlands. The medium to long-term recovery of benthic microproducers in restored habitats designed to improve degraded coastal wetland sites is largely unknown. Using taxon-specific photopigments, we describe the composition of microphytobenthic communities in a large restoration site in southern California and differences in the temporal recovery of biomass (chlorophyll a), composition, and taxonomic diversity between vegetated Spartina foliosa salt marsh and unvegetated mudflat. Visually distinct, spatially discreet, microphytobenthic patches appeared after no more than 7 mo within the restoration site and were distinguished by significant differences in biomass, taxonomic diversity, and the relative abundance of cyanobacteria versus diatoms. Sediment chlorophyll a concentrations within the restored site were similar to concentrations in nearby natural habitat 0.2-2.2 yr following marsh creation, suggesting rapid colonization by microproducers. Restored Spartina marsh very rapidly (between 0.2 and 1.2 yr) acquired microphytobenthic communities of similar composition and diversity to those in natural Spartina habitat, but restored mudflats took at least 1.6 to 2.2 yr to resemble natural mudflats. These results suggest relatively rapid recovery of microphytobenthic communities at the level of major taxonomic groups. Sediment features, such as pore water salinity and Spartina density, explained little variation in microphytobenthic taxonomic composition. The data imply that provision of structural heterogeneity in wetland construction (such as pools and vascular plants) might speed development of microproducer communities, but no direct seeding of sediment microfloras may be necessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-2723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2731</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02700169</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Estuarine Research Federation</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Bacillariophyceae ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brackish ; Brackish water ecosystems ; Cyanobacteria ; Diatoms ; Estuaries ; Food webs ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat conservation ; Habitats ; Heterogeneity ; Marine ; Marshes ; Mud flats ; Nutrient dynamics ; Pigments ; Plankton ; Pore water ; Relative abundance ; Salt marshes ; Sediments ; Spartina foliosa ; Synecology ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Estuaries and coasts, 2007-04, Vol.30 (2), p.265-276</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Estuarine Research Federation</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Estuarine Research Federation 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61e7034acbf9d7a5695ea774175c4791474410ccc8f8beec76dbf7a7e92be4d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61e7034acbf9d7a5695ea774175c4791474410ccc8f8beec76dbf7a7e92be4d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4494084$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4494084$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18837047$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christopher N. Janousek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currin, Carolyn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><title>Succession of Microphytobenthos in a Restored Coastal Wetland</title><title>Estuaries and coasts</title><description>Sediment microphytobenthos, such as diatoms and photosynthetic bacteria, are functionally important components of food webs and are key mediators of nutrient dynamics in marine wetlands. The medium to long-term recovery of benthic microproducers in restored habitats designed to improve degraded coastal wetland sites is largely unknown. Using taxon-specific photopigments, we describe the composition of microphytobenthic communities in a large restoration site in southern California and differences in the temporal recovery of biomass (chlorophyll a), composition, and taxonomic diversity between vegetated Spartina foliosa salt marsh and unvegetated mudflat. Visually distinct, spatially discreet, microphytobenthic patches appeared after no more than 7 mo within the restoration site and were distinguished by significant differences in biomass, taxonomic diversity, and the relative abundance of cyanobacteria versus diatoms. Sediment chlorophyll a concentrations within the restored site were similar to concentrations in nearby natural habitat 0.2-2.2 yr following marsh creation, suggesting rapid colonization by microproducers. Restored Spartina marsh very rapidly (between 0.2 and 1.2 yr) acquired microphytobenthic communities of similar composition and diversity to those in natural Spartina habitat, but restored mudflats took at least 1.6 to 2.2 yr to resemble natural mudflats. These results suggest relatively rapid recovery of microphytobenthic communities at the level of major taxonomic groups. Sediment features, such as pore water salinity and Spartina density, explained little variation in microphytobenthic taxonomic composition. The data imply that provision of structural heterogeneity in wetland construction (such as pools and vascular plants) might speed development of microproducer communities, but no direct seeding of sediment microfloras may be necessary.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Bacillariophyceae</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Brackish water ecosystems</subject><subject>Cyanobacteria</subject><subject>Diatoms</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Food webs</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marshes</subject><subject>Mud flats</subject><subject>Nutrient dynamics</subject><subject>Pigments</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Pore water</subject><subject>Relative abundance</subject><subject>Salt marshes</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Spartina foliosa</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>1559-2723</issn><issn>1559-2731</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYvnj0EQQ9CdTY7yewePGixKlQEP_AYNpsNTYnZupsc-u9NaWnBi6cZmGdeZh7GTjlccwC6uZ9ATAA8VXtswJNEjWISfH_bx-KQHYUwB8AkARyw2_fOGBtC5ZrIldFLZbxbzJaty23TzlyIqibS0ZsNrfO2iMZOh1bX0Zdta90Ux-yg1HWwJ5s6ZJ-Th4_x02j6-vg8vpuOjCDejlJuCQRqk5eqIJ2kKrGaCDklBklxJEQOxhhZytxaQ2mRl6TJqji3WMRiyC7XuQvvfrr-mOy7CsbW_Q3WdSGLQQJyIf8FuSIhhIQePP8Dzl3nm_6JjASmEolUD12toV5KCN6W2cJX39ovMw7Zyne2893DF5tEHYyuS68bU4XdhpSCAKnnztbcfOV0O0dUCBLFL6WkhxU</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>Christopher N. Janousek</creator><creator>Currin, Carolyn A.</creator><creator>Levin, Lisa A.</creator><general>Estuarine Research Federation</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>H97</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>Succession of Microphytobenthos in a Restored Coastal Wetland</title><author>Christopher N. Janousek ; Currin, Carolyn A. ; Levin, Lisa A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61e7034acbf9d7a5695ea774175c4791474410ccc8f8beec76dbf7a7e92be4d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Bacillariophyceae</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Brackish water ecosystems</topic><topic>Cyanobacteria</topic><topic>Diatoms</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Food webs</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marshes</topic><topic>Mud flats</topic><topic>Nutrient dynamics</topic><topic>Pigments</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Pore water</topic><topic>Relative abundance</topic><topic>Salt marshes</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Spartina foliosa</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christopher N. Janousek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currin, Carolyn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><jtitle>Estuaries and coasts</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christopher N. Janousek</au><au>Currin, Carolyn A.</au><au>Levin, Lisa A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Succession of Microphytobenthos in a Restored Coastal Wetland</atitle><jtitle>Estuaries and coasts</jtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>276</epage><pages>265-276</pages><issn>1559-2723</issn><eissn>1559-2731</eissn><abstract>Sediment microphytobenthos, such as diatoms and photosynthetic bacteria, are functionally important components of food webs and are key mediators of nutrient dynamics in marine wetlands. The medium to long-term recovery of benthic microproducers in restored habitats designed to improve degraded coastal wetland sites is largely unknown. Using taxon-specific photopigments, we describe the composition of microphytobenthic communities in a large restoration site in southern California and differences in the temporal recovery of biomass (chlorophyll a), composition, and taxonomic diversity between vegetated Spartina foliosa salt marsh and unvegetated mudflat. Visually distinct, spatially discreet, microphytobenthic patches appeared after no more than 7 mo within the restoration site and were distinguished by significant differences in biomass, taxonomic diversity, and the relative abundance of cyanobacteria versus diatoms. Sediment chlorophyll a concentrations within the restored site were similar to concentrations in nearby natural habitat 0.2-2.2 yr following marsh creation, suggesting rapid colonization by microproducers. Restored Spartina marsh very rapidly (between 0.2 and 1.2 yr) acquired microphytobenthic communities of similar composition and diversity to those in natural Spartina habitat, but restored mudflats took at least 1.6 to 2.2 yr to resemble natural mudflats. These results suggest relatively rapid recovery of microphytobenthic communities at the level of major taxonomic groups. Sediment features, such as pore water salinity and Spartina density, explained little variation in microphytobenthic taxonomic composition. The data imply that provision of structural heterogeneity in wetland construction (such as pools and vascular plants) might speed development of microproducer communities, but no direct seeding of sediment microfloras may be necessary.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Estuarine Research Federation</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02700169</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1559-2723
ispartof Estuaries and coasts, 2007-04, Vol.30 (2), p.265-276
issn 1559-2723
1559-2731
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20804138
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Nature
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Bacillariophyceae
Biological and medical sciences
Brackish
Brackish water ecosystems
Cyanobacteria
Diatoms
Estuaries
Food webs
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Habitat conservation
Habitats
Heterogeneity
Marine
Marshes
Mud flats
Nutrient dynamics
Pigments
Plankton
Pore water
Relative abundance
Salt marshes
Sediments
Spartina foliosa
Synecology
Wetlands
title Succession of Microphytobenthos in a Restored Coastal Wetland
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A47%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Succession%20of%20Microphytobenthos%20in%20a%20Restored%20Coastal%20Wetland&rft.jtitle=Estuaries%20and%20coasts&rft.au=Christopher%20N.%20Janousek&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=276&rft.pages=265-276&rft.issn=1559-2723&rft.eissn=1559-2731&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02700169&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4494084%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-61e7034acbf9d7a5695ea774175c4791474410ccc8f8beec76dbf7a7e92be4d23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734684779&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4494084&rfr_iscdi=true