Loading…

Mitigating exotic impacts: restoring deer mouse populations elevated by an exotic food subsidy

The threat posed by exotic organisms to native systems has led to extensive research on exotic invaders, yet management of invasives has progressed relatively slowly. This is partly due to poor understanding of how exotic species management influences native organisms. To address this shortfall, we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological applications 2008-03, Vol.18 (2), p.321-334
Main Authors: Pearson, D.E, Fletcher, R.J. Jr
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4051-729a6624348750fe18cbebe635a4adc7b01242204a0b4ca36d01e48a14b512be3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4051-729a6624348750fe18cbebe635a4adc7b01242204a0b4ca36d01e48a14b512be3
container_end_page 334
container_issue 2
container_start_page 321
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 18
creator Pearson, D.E
Fletcher, R.J. Jr
description The threat posed by exotic organisms to native systems has led to extensive research on exotic invaders, yet management of invasives has progressed relatively slowly. This is partly due to poor understanding of how exotic species management influences native organisms. To address this shortfall, we experimentally evaluated the efficacy of an invasives management tool for restoring native deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) populations elevated by exotic species. The exotic insects, Urophora spp., were introduced in North America for biological control of the Eurasian invader, spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosd), but instead of controlling C. maculosa, Urophora have become an important food resource that doubles P. maniculatus populations, with substantial indirect effects on other organisms. We hypothesized that herbicide suppression of Urophora's host plant would reduce the Urophora food resource and restore P. maniculatus populations to natural levels. Prior to treatment, mouse populations did not differ between controls and treatments, but following treatment, P. maniculatus were half as abundant where treatment reduced Urophora. Peromyscus maniculatus is insensitive to direct herbicide effects, and herbicide-induced habitat changes could not explain the P. maniculatus response. Treatment-induced reductions of the Urophora food resource offered the most parsimonious explanation for the mouse response. Multistate mark-recapture models indicated that P. maniculatus survival declined where Urophora were removed, and survival rates were more correlated with variation in population size than movement rates. Other demographic and reproductive parameters (sex ratios, reproductive status, pregnancy rates, and juvenile recruitment) were unaffected by treatment. These results suggest the Urophora biocontrol elevated P. maniculatus survival, and the herbicide treatment restored mouse populations by removing the exotic food and reducing survival. This work illustrates the importance of mechanistic understandings of community and population ecology for improving invasive species management.
doi_str_mv 10.1890/07-0766.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20815852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40062133</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40062133</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4051-729a6624348750fe18cbebe635a4adc7b01242204a0b4ca36d01e48a14b512be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtr3TAUhEVpyKtZ5Ack1SrQxU2PXrbcXQhJG0hJoc22QrKPLwr2lSPZbe6_j4xv21W1OYL5ZhiGkFMGl0xX8BHKFZRFccnekENWiWqllOZv8x8UmxV2QI5SeoL8OOf75IBpqbWqqkPy86sf_dqOfrOm-BJGX1PfD7Ye0ycaMY0hzkqDGGkfpoR0CMPUZT5sEsUOf9kRG-q21G7--NsQGpoml3yzfUf2WtslPNndY_J4e_Pj-svq_uHz3fXV_aqWc8eSV7YouBRSlwpaZLp26LAQykrb1KUDxiXnIC04WVtRNMBQasukU4w7FMfkYskdYniecm_T-1Rj19kN5tqGg2ZKK57BDwtYx5BSxNYM0fc2bg0DM49poDTzmIZl9nwXOrkem3_kbr0MyAX47Tvc_j_J3Fx945AraC74nHu22J7mff_aJECRVZH194ve2mDsOvpkHr9zYCJHVCVUhXgFg9GRHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20815852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mitigating exotic impacts: restoring deer mouse populations elevated by an exotic food subsidy</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Pearson, D.E ; Fletcher, R.J. Jr</creator><creatorcontrib>Pearson, D.E ; Fletcher, R.J. Jr</creatorcontrib><description>The threat posed by exotic organisms to native systems has led to extensive research on exotic invaders, yet management of invasives has progressed relatively slowly. This is partly due to poor understanding of how exotic species management influences native organisms. To address this shortfall, we experimentally evaluated the efficacy of an invasives management tool for restoring native deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) populations elevated by exotic species. The exotic insects, Urophora spp., were introduced in North America for biological control of the Eurasian invader, spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosd), but instead of controlling C. maculosa, Urophora have become an important food resource that doubles P. maniculatus populations, with substantial indirect effects on other organisms. We hypothesized that herbicide suppression of Urophora's host plant would reduce the Urophora food resource and restore P. maniculatus populations to natural levels. Prior to treatment, mouse populations did not differ between controls and treatments, but following treatment, P. maniculatus were half as abundant where treatment reduced Urophora. Peromyscus maniculatus is insensitive to direct herbicide effects, and herbicide-induced habitat changes could not explain the P. maniculatus response. Treatment-induced reductions of the Urophora food resource offered the most parsimonious explanation for the mouse response. Multistate mark-recapture models indicated that P. maniculatus survival declined where Urophora were removed, and survival rates were more correlated with variation in population size than movement rates. Other demographic and reproductive parameters (sex ratios, reproductive status, pregnancy rates, and juvenile recruitment) were unaffected by treatment. These results suggest the Urophora biocontrol elevated P. maniculatus survival, and the herbicide treatment restored mouse populations by removing the exotic food and reducing survival. This work illustrates the importance of mechanistic understandings of community and population ecology for improving invasive species management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/07-0766.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18488599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animal traps ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; biological control agents ; Centaurea - drug effects ; Centaurea maculosa ; Centaurea stoebe subsp. stoebe ; community ecology ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; demography ; Depopulation ; Ecological invasion ; Ecosystem ; exotic species ; Food ; Food Chain ; food limitation ; Food movements ; food resources ; Food security ; Food supply ; Herbicides ; Herbicides - pharmacology ; Insecta - physiology ; invasive species ; Mice ; movement ; Natural resources ; Peromyscus - physiology ; Peromyscus maniculatus ; Pest Control ; population biology ; Population Dynamics ; population ecology ; spotted knapweed ; survival ; Time Factors ; Urophora ; Urophora spp ; weed control ; weeds ; wildlife food habits ; wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2008-03, Vol.18 (2), p.321-334</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2008 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4051-729a6624348750fe18cbebe635a4adc7b01242204a0b4ca36d01e48a14b512be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4051-729a6624348750fe18cbebe635a4adc7b01242204a0b4ca36d01e48a14b512be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40062133$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40062133$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,58216,58449</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18488599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pearson, D.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, R.J. Jr</creatorcontrib><title>Mitigating exotic impacts: restoring deer mouse populations elevated by an exotic food subsidy</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>The threat posed by exotic organisms to native systems has led to extensive research on exotic invaders, yet management of invasives has progressed relatively slowly. This is partly due to poor understanding of how exotic species management influences native organisms. To address this shortfall, we experimentally evaluated the efficacy of an invasives management tool for restoring native deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) populations elevated by exotic species. The exotic insects, Urophora spp., were introduced in North America for biological control of the Eurasian invader, spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosd), but instead of controlling C. maculosa, Urophora have become an important food resource that doubles P. maniculatus populations, with substantial indirect effects on other organisms. We hypothesized that herbicide suppression of Urophora's host plant would reduce the Urophora food resource and restore P. maniculatus populations to natural levels. Prior to treatment, mouse populations did not differ between controls and treatments, but following treatment, P. maniculatus were half as abundant where treatment reduced Urophora. Peromyscus maniculatus is insensitive to direct herbicide effects, and herbicide-induced habitat changes could not explain the P. maniculatus response. Treatment-induced reductions of the Urophora food resource offered the most parsimonious explanation for the mouse response. Multistate mark-recapture models indicated that P. maniculatus survival declined where Urophora were removed, and survival rates were more correlated with variation in population size than movement rates. Other demographic and reproductive parameters (sex ratios, reproductive status, pregnancy rates, and juvenile recruitment) were unaffected by treatment. These results suggest the Urophora biocontrol elevated P. maniculatus survival, and the herbicide treatment restored mouse populations by removing the exotic food and reducing survival. This work illustrates the importance of mechanistic understandings of community and population ecology for improving invasive species management.</description><subject>Animal traps</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>biological control agents</subject><subject>Centaurea - drug effects</subject><subject>Centaurea maculosa</subject><subject>Centaurea stoebe subsp. stoebe</subject><subject>community ecology</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>demography</subject><subject>Depopulation</subject><subject>Ecological invasion</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>exotic species</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food Chain</subject><subject>food limitation</subject><subject>Food movements</subject><subject>food resources</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Herbicides - pharmacology</subject><subject>Insecta - physiology</subject><subject>invasive species</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>movement</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Peromyscus - physiology</subject><subject>Peromyscus maniculatus</subject><subject>Pest Control</subject><subject>population biology</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>population ecology</subject><subject>spotted knapweed</subject><subject>survival</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Urophora</subject><subject>Urophora spp</subject><subject>weed control</subject><subject>weeds</subject><subject>wildlife food habits</subject><subject>wildlife management</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtr3TAUhEVpyKtZ5Ack1SrQxU2PXrbcXQhJG0hJoc22QrKPLwr2lSPZbe6_j4xv21W1OYL5ZhiGkFMGl0xX8BHKFZRFccnekENWiWqllOZv8x8UmxV2QI5SeoL8OOf75IBpqbWqqkPy86sf_dqOfrOm-BJGX1PfD7Ye0ycaMY0hzkqDGGkfpoR0CMPUZT5sEsUOf9kRG-q21G7--NsQGpoml3yzfUf2WtslPNndY_J4e_Pj-svq_uHz3fXV_aqWc8eSV7YouBRSlwpaZLp26LAQykrb1KUDxiXnIC04WVtRNMBQasukU4w7FMfkYskdYniecm_T-1Rj19kN5tqGg2ZKK57BDwtYx5BSxNYM0fc2bg0DM49poDTzmIZl9nwXOrkem3_kbr0MyAX47Tvc_j_J3Fx945AraC74nHu22J7mff_aJECRVZH194ve2mDsOvpkHr9zYCJHVCVUhXgFg9GRHQ</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Pearson, D.E</creator><creator>Fletcher, R.J. Jr</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Mitigating exotic impacts: restoring deer mouse populations elevated by an exotic food subsidy</title><author>Pearson, D.E ; Fletcher, R.J. Jr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4051-729a6624348750fe18cbebe635a4adc7b01242204a0b4ca36d01e48a14b512be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animal traps</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>biological control agents</topic><topic>Centaurea - drug effects</topic><topic>Centaurea maculosa</topic><topic>Centaurea stoebe subsp. stoebe</topic><topic>community ecology</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>demography</topic><topic>Depopulation</topic><topic>Ecological invasion</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>exotic species</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food Chain</topic><topic>food limitation</topic><topic>Food movements</topic><topic>food resources</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Herbicides - pharmacology</topic><topic>Insecta - physiology</topic><topic>invasive species</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>movement</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Peromyscus - physiology</topic><topic>Peromyscus maniculatus</topic><topic>Pest Control</topic><topic>population biology</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>population ecology</topic><topic>spotted knapweed</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Urophora</topic><topic>Urophora spp</topic><topic>weed control</topic><topic>weeds</topic><topic>wildlife food habits</topic><topic>wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pearson, D.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, R.J. Jr</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pearson, D.E</au><au>Fletcher, R.J. Jr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mitigating exotic impacts: restoring deer mouse populations elevated by an exotic food subsidy</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>321</spage><epage>334</epage><pages>321-334</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>The threat posed by exotic organisms to native systems has led to extensive research on exotic invaders, yet management of invasives has progressed relatively slowly. This is partly due to poor understanding of how exotic species management influences native organisms. To address this shortfall, we experimentally evaluated the efficacy of an invasives management tool for restoring native deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) populations elevated by exotic species. The exotic insects, Urophora spp., were introduced in North America for biological control of the Eurasian invader, spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosd), but instead of controlling C. maculosa, Urophora have become an important food resource that doubles P. maniculatus populations, with substantial indirect effects on other organisms. We hypothesized that herbicide suppression of Urophora's host plant would reduce the Urophora food resource and restore P. maniculatus populations to natural levels. Prior to treatment, mouse populations did not differ between controls and treatments, but following treatment, P. maniculatus were half as abundant where treatment reduced Urophora. Peromyscus maniculatus is insensitive to direct herbicide effects, and herbicide-induced habitat changes could not explain the P. maniculatus response. Treatment-induced reductions of the Urophora food resource offered the most parsimonious explanation for the mouse response. Multistate mark-recapture models indicated that P. maniculatus survival declined where Urophora were removed, and survival rates were more correlated with variation in population size than movement rates. Other demographic and reproductive parameters (sex ratios, reproductive status, pregnancy rates, and juvenile recruitment) were unaffected by treatment. These results suggest the Urophora biocontrol elevated P. maniculatus survival, and the herbicide treatment restored mouse populations by removing the exotic food and reducing survival. This work illustrates the importance of mechanistic understandings of community and population ecology for improving invasive species management.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>18488599</pmid><doi>10.1890/07-0766.1</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 2008-03, Vol.18 (2), p.321-334
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20815852
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; JSTOR Archival Journals
subjects Animal traps
Animals
Applied ecology
biological control agents
Centaurea - drug effects
Centaurea maculosa
Centaurea stoebe subsp. stoebe
community ecology
Conservation of Natural Resources
demography
Depopulation
Ecological invasion
Ecosystem
exotic species
Food
Food Chain
food limitation
Food movements
food resources
Food security
Food supply
Herbicides
Herbicides - pharmacology
Insecta - physiology
invasive species
Mice
movement
Natural resources
Peromyscus - physiology
Peromyscus maniculatus
Pest Control
population biology
Population Dynamics
population ecology
spotted knapweed
survival
Time Factors
Urophora
Urophora spp
weed control
weeds
wildlife food habits
wildlife management
title Mitigating exotic impacts: restoring deer mouse populations elevated by an exotic food subsidy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A38%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mitigating%20exotic%20impacts:%20restoring%20deer%20mouse%20populations%20elevated%20by%20an%20exotic%20food%20subsidy&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Pearson,%20D.E&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=321&rft.epage=334&rft.pages=321-334&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/07-0766.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40062133%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4051-729a6624348750fe18cbebe635a4adc7b01242204a0b4ca36d01e48a14b512be3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20815852&rft_id=info:pmid/18488599&rft_jstor_id=40062133&rfr_iscdi=true