Loading…

Advanced interatrial block is an electrocardiographic marker for recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion

Early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is common following a successful electrical cardioversion (ECV). The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that AF recurrence is related to atrial electrical inhomogeneity, which may influence the P wave characteristics. Two hundred nine...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of cardiology 2018-12, Vol.272, p.113-117
Main Authors: Fujimoto, Yuhi, Yodogawa, Kenji, Maru, Yu-jin, Oka, Eiichiro, Hayashi, Hiroshi, Yamamoto, Teppei, Iwasaki, Yu-ki, Hayashi, Meiso, Shimizu, Wataru
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-d701d9703824155331f7bd259ebdeac6f22f00ad0eb3a3a7f943c7559552ad7d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-d701d9703824155331f7bd259ebdeac6f22f00ad0eb3a3a7f943c7559552ad7d3
container_end_page 117
container_issue
container_start_page 113
container_title International journal of cardiology
container_volume 272
creator Fujimoto, Yuhi
Yodogawa, Kenji
Maru, Yu-jin
Oka, Eiichiro
Hayashi, Hiroshi
Yamamoto, Teppei
Iwasaki, Yu-ki
Hayashi, Meiso
Shimizu, Wataru
description Early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is common following a successful electrical cardioversion (ECV). The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that AF recurrence is related to atrial electrical inhomogeneity, which may influence the P wave characteristics. Two hundred ninety-one consecutive persistent AF patients who underwent ECV were enrolled, and evaluated for AF recurrences one month after the ECV. Patients with open-heart surgery, a history of catheter ablation, and an unsuccessful ECV were excluded. The P wave duration, dispersion and P wave morphology were evaluated by 12‑lead ECGs 30 min after the ECV. In total, 141 patients were investigated. One month after the ECV, 60 (43%) patients maintained sinus rhythm. The advanced interatrial block (aIAB; P wave duration >120 ms and biphasic P waves in the inferior leads) (Hazard ratio [HR], 4.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45–14.01, P = 0.009), P wave dispersion (HR, 1.06; 95%CI 1.02–1.09, P = 0.001), and duration of AF per month (HR, 1.03; 95%CI 1.01–1.04, P = 0.004) were independent predictors of AF recurrence. An aIAB was not associated with structural parameters such as the left atrial volume index or right atrial area. There were no differences in the serum BNP level and frequency of administering anti-arrhythmic drugs between the patients with and without recurrence. The risk of AF recurrence after the ECV can be predicted by the P wave characteristics. A longer P wave dispersion and the duration of AF also had a tendency for recurrence. •Prediction of AF recurrence after cardioversion is important for the clinical therapeutic strategy.•The advanced interatrial block was the strong predictor of AF recurrence.•Patients with a longer P wave dispersion and the duration of AF had a tendency for recurrence.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.135
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2083716351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167527318337483</els_id><sourcerecordid>2083716351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-d701d9703824155331f7bd259ebdeac6f22f00ad0eb3a3a7f943c7559552ad7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi0EotvCGyDkI5eEsR2vkwtSVRWKVIkLnC3HHoO32XgZZ1fiyJvjVRaOnHyYf77f8zH2RkArQGzf79q0845CK0H0LZhWKP2MbURvukYY3T1nmxozjZZGXbHrUnYA0A1D_5JdKQAjhYYN-30bTm72GHiaFyS3UHITH6fsn3gq3M0cJ_QL5XNVyt_JHX4kz_eOnpB4zMQJ_ZEIK4PnyC-AmEZK0-SWlGfuYiVfOMnX6co6IZU6fsVeRDcVfH15b9i3j_df7x6axy-fPt_dPja-k_3SBAMiDAZULzuhtVIimjFIPeAY0PltlDICuAA4KqeciUOnvNF60Fq6YIK6Ye9W7oHyzyOWxe5T8Vg_OWM-FiuhV0ZslRY12q1RT7kUwmgPlOrJv6wAe5Zvd3aVb8_yLRhb5de1t5eG47jH8G_pr-0a-LAGsN55Ski2-HQ2F1K1uNiQ0_8b_gCmKJp-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2083716351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advanced interatrial block is an electrocardiographic marker for recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Fujimoto, Yuhi ; Yodogawa, Kenji ; Maru, Yu-jin ; Oka, Eiichiro ; Hayashi, Hiroshi ; Yamamoto, Teppei ; Iwasaki, Yu-ki ; Hayashi, Meiso ; Shimizu, Wataru</creator><creatorcontrib>Fujimoto, Yuhi ; Yodogawa, Kenji ; Maru, Yu-jin ; Oka, Eiichiro ; Hayashi, Hiroshi ; Yamamoto, Teppei ; Iwasaki, Yu-ki ; Hayashi, Meiso ; Shimizu, Wataru</creatorcontrib><description>Early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is common following a successful electrical cardioversion (ECV). The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that AF recurrence is related to atrial electrical inhomogeneity, which may influence the P wave characteristics. Two hundred ninety-one consecutive persistent AF patients who underwent ECV were enrolled, and evaluated for AF recurrences one month after the ECV. Patients with open-heart surgery, a history of catheter ablation, and an unsuccessful ECV were excluded. The P wave duration, dispersion and P wave morphology were evaluated by 12‑lead ECGs 30 min after the ECV. In total, 141 patients were investigated. One month after the ECV, 60 (43%) patients maintained sinus rhythm. The advanced interatrial block (aIAB; P wave duration &gt;120 ms and biphasic P waves in the inferior leads) (Hazard ratio [HR], 4.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45–14.01, P = 0.009), P wave dispersion (HR, 1.06; 95%CI 1.02–1.09, P = 0.001), and duration of AF per month (HR, 1.03; 95%CI 1.01–1.04, P = 0.004) were independent predictors of AF recurrence. An aIAB was not associated with structural parameters such as the left atrial volume index or right atrial area. There were no differences in the serum BNP level and frequency of administering anti-arrhythmic drugs between the patients with and without recurrence. The risk of AF recurrence after the ECV can be predicted by the P wave characteristics. A longer P wave dispersion and the duration of AF also had a tendency for recurrence. •Prediction of AF recurrence after cardioversion is important for the clinical therapeutic strategy.•The advanced interatrial block was the strong predictor of AF recurrence.•Patients with a longer P wave dispersion and the duration of AF had a tendency for recurrence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-1754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.135</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30072150</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Advanced interatrial block ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Atrial fibrillation ; Atrial Fibrillation - diagnostic imaging ; Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology ; Cardioversion ; Echocardiography - trends ; Electric Countershock - adverse effects ; Electric Countershock - trends ; Electrocardiography ; Electrocardiography - trends ; Female ; Humans ; Interatrial Block - diagnostic imaging ; Interatrial Block - physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; P wave ; Prospective Studies ; Recurrence ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>International journal of cardiology, 2018-12, Vol.272, p.113-117</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-d701d9703824155331f7bd259ebdeac6f22f00ad0eb3a3a7f943c7559552ad7d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-d701d9703824155331f7bd259ebdeac6f22f00ad0eb3a3a7f943c7559552ad7d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0376-7325 ; 0000-0001-9978-7402</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30072150$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fujimoto, Yuhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yodogawa, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maru, Yu-jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oka, Eiichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Teppei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Yu-ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Meiso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Wataru</creatorcontrib><title>Advanced interatrial block is an electrocardiographic marker for recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion</title><title>International journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Int J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is common following a successful electrical cardioversion (ECV). The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that AF recurrence is related to atrial electrical inhomogeneity, which may influence the P wave characteristics. Two hundred ninety-one consecutive persistent AF patients who underwent ECV were enrolled, and evaluated for AF recurrences one month after the ECV. Patients with open-heart surgery, a history of catheter ablation, and an unsuccessful ECV were excluded. The P wave duration, dispersion and P wave morphology were evaluated by 12‑lead ECGs 30 min after the ECV. In total, 141 patients were investigated. One month after the ECV, 60 (43%) patients maintained sinus rhythm. The advanced interatrial block (aIAB; P wave duration &gt;120 ms and biphasic P waves in the inferior leads) (Hazard ratio [HR], 4.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45–14.01, P = 0.009), P wave dispersion (HR, 1.06; 95%CI 1.02–1.09, P = 0.001), and duration of AF per month (HR, 1.03; 95%CI 1.01–1.04, P = 0.004) were independent predictors of AF recurrence. An aIAB was not associated with structural parameters such as the left atrial volume index or right atrial area. There were no differences in the serum BNP level and frequency of administering anti-arrhythmic drugs between the patients with and without recurrence. The risk of AF recurrence after the ECV can be predicted by the P wave characteristics. A longer P wave dispersion and the duration of AF also had a tendency for recurrence. •Prediction of AF recurrence after cardioversion is important for the clinical therapeutic strategy.•The advanced interatrial block was the strong predictor of AF recurrence.•Patients with a longer P wave dispersion and the duration of AF had a tendency for recurrence.</description><subject>Advanced interatrial block</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Atrial fibrillation</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cardioversion</subject><subject>Echocardiography - trends</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - adverse effects</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - trends</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Electrocardiography - trends</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interatrial Block - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Interatrial Block - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>P wave</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0167-5273</issn><issn>1874-1754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi0EotvCGyDkI5eEsR2vkwtSVRWKVIkLnC3HHoO32XgZZ1fiyJvjVRaOnHyYf77f8zH2RkArQGzf79q0845CK0H0LZhWKP2MbURvukYY3T1nmxozjZZGXbHrUnYA0A1D_5JdKQAjhYYN-30bTm72GHiaFyS3UHITH6fsn3gq3M0cJ_QL5XNVyt_JHX4kz_eOnpB4zMQJ_ZEIK4PnyC-AmEZK0-SWlGfuYiVfOMnX6co6IZU6fsVeRDcVfH15b9i3j_df7x6axy-fPt_dPja-k_3SBAMiDAZULzuhtVIimjFIPeAY0PltlDICuAA4KqeciUOnvNF60Fq6YIK6Ye9W7oHyzyOWxe5T8Vg_OWM-FiuhV0ZslRY12q1RT7kUwmgPlOrJv6wAe5Zvd3aVb8_yLRhb5de1t5eG47jH8G_pr-0a-LAGsN55Ski2-HQ2F1K1uNiQ0_8b_gCmKJp-</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Fujimoto, Yuhi</creator><creator>Yodogawa, Kenji</creator><creator>Maru, Yu-jin</creator><creator>Oka, Eiichiro</creator><creator>Hayashi, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Yamamoto, Teppei</creator><creator>Iwasaki, Yu-ki</creator><creator>Hayashi, Meiso</creator><creator>Shimizu, Wataru</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0376-7325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9978-7402</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Advanced interatrial block is an electrocardiographic marker for recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion</title><author>Fujimoto, Yuhi ; Yodogawa, Kenji ; Maru, Yu-jin ; Oka, Eiichiro ; Hayashi, Hiroshi ; Yamamoto, Teppei ; Iwasaki, Yu-ki ; Hayashi, Meiso ; Shimizu, Wataru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-d701d9703824155331f7bd259ebdeac6f22f00ad0eb3a3a7f943c7559552ad7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Advanced interatrial block</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Atrial fibrillation</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cardioversion</topic><topic>Echocardiography - trends</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - adverse effects</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - trends</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Electrocardiography - trends</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interatrial Block - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Interatrial Block - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>P wave</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fujimoto, Yuhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yodogawa, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maru, Yu-jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oka, Eiichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Teppei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Yu-ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Meiso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Wataru</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fujimoto, Yuhi</au><au>Yodogawa, Kenji</au><au>Maru, Yu-jin</au><au>Oka, Eiichiro</au><au>Hayashi, Hiroshi</au><au>Yamamoto, Teppei</au><au>Iwasaki, Yu-ki</au><au>Hayashi, Meiso</au><au>Shimizu, Wataru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advanced interatrial block is an electrocardiographic marker for recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>272</volume><spage>113</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>113-117</pages><issn>0167-5273</issn><eissn>1874-1754</eissn><abstract>Early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is common following a successful electrical cardioversion (ECV). The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that AF recurrence is related to atrial electrical inhomogeneity, which may influence the P wave characteristics. Two hundred ninety-one consecutive persistent AF patients who underwent ECV were enrolled, and evaluated for AF recurrences one month after the ECV. Patients with open-heart surgery, a history of catheter ablation, and an unsuccessful ECV were excluded. The P wave duration, dispersion and P wave morphology were evaluated by 12‑lead ECGs 30 min after the ECV. In total, 141 patients were investigated. One month after the ECV, 60 (43%) patients maintained sinus rhythm. The advanced interatrial block (aIAB; P wave duration &gt;120 ms and biphasic P waves in the inferior leads) (Hazard ratio [HR], 4.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45–14.01, P = 0.009), P wave dispersion (HR, 1.06; 95%CI 1.02–1.09, P = 0.001), and duration of AF per month (HR, 1.03; 95%CI 1.01–1.04, P = 0.004) were independent predictors of AF recurrence. An aIAB was not associated with structural parameters such as the left atrial volume index or right atrial area. There were no differences in the serum BNP level and frequency of administering anti-arrhythmic drugs between the patients with and without recurrence. The risk of AF recurrence after the ECV can be predicted by the P wave characteristics. A longer P wave dispersion and the duration of AF also had a tendency for recurrence. •Prediction of AF recurrence after cardioversion is important for the clinical therapeutic strategy.•The advanced interatrial block was the strong predictor of AF recurrence.•Patients with a longer P wave dispersion and the duration of AF had a tendency for recurrence.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>30072150</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.135</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0376-7325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9978-7402</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-5273
ispartof International journal of cardiology, 2018-12, Vol.272, p.113-117
issn 0167-5273
1874-1754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2083716351
source Elsevier
subjects Advanced interatrial block
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Atrial fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation - diagnostic imaging
Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology
Cardioversion
Echocardiography - trends
Electric Countershock - adverse effects
Electric Countershock - trends
Electrocardiography
Electrocardiography - trends
Female
Humans
Interatrial Block - diagnostic imaging
Interatrial Block - physiopathology
Male
Middle Aged
P wave
Prospective Studies
Recurrence
Treatment Outcome
title Advanced interatrial block is an electrocardiographic marker for recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A17%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advanced%20interatrial%20block%20is%20an%20electrocardiographic%20marker%20for%20recurrence%20of%20atrial%20fibrillation%20after%20electrical%20cardioversion&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Fujimoto,%20Yuhi&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=272&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=113-117&rft.issn=0167-5273&rft.eissn=1874-1754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.135&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2083716351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-d701d9703824155331f7bd259ebdeac6f22f00ad0eb3a3a7f943c7559552ad7d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2083716351&rft_id=info:pmid/30072150&rfr_iscdi=true