Loading…

Evaluation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based approaches for determining gene copy and gene transcript numbers in environmental samples

Summary Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q‐PCR) amplification is widely applied for determining gene and transcript numbers within environmental samples. This research evaluated Q‐PCR reproducibility via TaqMan assays quantifying 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers in sediments, within and b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental microbiology 2006-05, Vol.8 (5), p.804-815
Main Authors: Smith, Cindy J., Nedwell, David B., Dong, Liang F., Osborn, A. Mark
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5013-9d01a6e911521dfa3df82cfb3a6ae5389998264621b150718fa3fc6c09b76fda3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5013-9d01a6e911521dfa3df82cfb3a6ae5389998264621b150718fa3fc6c09b76fda3
container_end_page 815
container_issue 5
container_start_page 804
container_title Environmental microbiology
container_volume 8
creator Smith, Cindy J.
Nedwell, David B.
Dong, Liang F.
Osborn, A. Mark
description Summary Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q‐PCR) amplification is widely applied for determining gene and transcript numbers within environmental samples. This research evaluated Q‐PCR reproducibility via TaqMan assays quantifying 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers in sediments, within and between replicate Q‐PCR assays. Intra‐assay variation in 16S rRNA gene numbers in replicate DNA samples was low (coefficients of variation; CV from 3.2 to 5.2%). However, variability increased using replicated standard curves within separate Q‐PCR assays (CV from 11.2% to 26%), indicating absolute comparison of gene numbers between Q‐PCR assays was less reliable. 16S rRNA transcript quantification was evaluated using standard curves of diluted RNA or cDNA (before, or following, reverse transcription). These standard curves were statistically different with cDNA‐derived curves giving higher r2 values and Q‐PCR efficiencies. Template concentrations used in Q‐PCR also affected 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers. For DNA, 10−3 dilutions yielded higher gene numbers than 10−1 and 10−2 dilutions. Conversely, RNA template dilution reduced numbers of transcripts detected. Finally, different nucleic acid isolation methods also resulted in gene and transcript number variability. This research demonstrates Q‐PCR determination of absolute numbers of genes and transcripts using environmental nucleic acids should be treated cautiously.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00963.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20851541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20851541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5013-9d01a6e911521dfa3df82cfb3a6ae5389998264621b150718fa3fc6c09b76fda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwCsgrdgn-GTuJxAZVM6ViCixALK0b56b1kDipnQwz78ED4zSjYYs3vtc-37F8T5IQRjMW1_tdxlaKp7zkNOOUyozSUons8Cy5PF88P9eMXySvQthRynKR05fJBVOKi1wUl8mf9R7aCUbbO9I35HECN9ox9nskQ98eO_QQkJgHsI54BDMr0yqe1QSGwfdgHjCQpvekxhF9Z5119-QeXYT64UjA1Us3enDBeDuMxE1dhT6QaIlub33vOnQjtCRAN7QYXicvGmgDvjntV8mPzfr79ad0-_Xm9vrjNjWSMpGWNWWgsGRMclY3IOqm4KapBChAKYqyLAuu4gxYxSTNWREljVGGllWumhrEVfJu8Y3_eJwwjLqzwWDbgsN-CprTQjK5YlFYLELj-xA8NnrwtgN_1IzqORG90_Ow9Tx4PSeinxLRh4i-Pb0xVR3W_8BTBFHwYRH8ti0e_9tYr-9uYxHxdMFtGPFwxsH_0iqmLfXPLzd69Y1t5FZ-1hvxF2BMrMM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20851541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based approaches for determining gene copy and gene transcript numbers in environmental samples</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Smith, Cindy J. ; Nedwell, David B. ; Dong, Liang F. ; Osborn, A. Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Cindy J. ; Nedwell, David B. ; Dong, Liang F. ; Osborn, A. Mark</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q‐PCR) amplification is widely applied for determining gene and transcript numbers within environmental samples. This research evaluated Q‐PCR reproducibility via TaqMan assays quantifying 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers in sediments, within and between replicate Q‐PCR assays. Intra‐assay variation in 16S rRNA gene numbers in replicate DNA samples was low (coefficients of variation; CV from 3.2 to 5.2%). However, variability increased using replicated standard curves within separate Q‐PCR assays (CV from 11.2% to 26%), indicating absolute comparison of gene numbers between Q‐PCR assays was less reliable. 16S rRNA transcript quantification was evaluated using standard curves of diluted RNA or cDNA (before, or following, reverse transcription). These standard curves were statistically different with cDNA‐derived curves giving higher r2 values and Q‐PCR efficiencies. Template concentrations used in Q‐PCR also affected 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers. For DNA, 10−3 dilutions yielded higher gene numbers than 10−1 and 10−2 dilutions. Conversely, RNA template dilution reduced numbers of transcripts detected. Finally, different nucleic acid isolation methods also resulted in gene and transcript number variability. This research demonstrates Q‐PCR determination of absolute numbers of genes and transcripts using environmental nucleic acids should be treated cautiously.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-2912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1462-2920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00963.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16623738</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>DNA, Complementary - genetics ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Geologic Sediments - analysis ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; Soil - analysis ; Transcription, Genetic</subject><ispartof>Environmental microbiology, 2006-05, Vol.8 (5), p.804-815</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5013-9d01a6e911521dfa3df82cfb3a6ae5389998264621b150718fa3fc6c09b76fda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5013-9d01a6e911521dfa3df82cfb3a6ae5389998264621b150718fa3fc6c09b76fda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16623738$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Cindy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedwell, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Liang F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborn, A. Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based approaches for determining gene copy and gene transcript numbers in environmental samples</title><title>Environmental microbiology</title><addtitle>Environ Microbiol</addtitle><description>Summary Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q‐PCR) amplification is widely applied for determining gene and transcript numbers within environmental samples. This research evaluated Q‐PCR reproducibility via TaqMan assays quantifying 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers in sediments, within and between replicate Q‐PCR assays. Intra‐assay variation in 16S rRNA gene numbers in replicate DNA samples was low (coefficients of variation; CV from 3.2 to 5.2%). However, variability increased using replicated standard curves within separate Q‐PCR assays (CV from 11.2% to 26%), indicating absolute comparison of gene numbers between Q‐PCR assays was less reliable. 16S rRNA transcript quantification was evaluated using standard curves of diluted RNA or cDNA (before, or following, reverse transcription). These standard curves were statistically different with cDNA‐derived curves giving higher r2 values and Q‐PCR efficiencies. Template concentrations used in Q‐PCR also affected 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers. For DNA, 10−3 dilutions yielded higher gene numbers than 10−1 and 10−2 dilutions. Conversely, RNA template dilution reduced numbers of transcripts detected. Finally, different nucleic acid isolation methods also resulted in gene and transcript number variability. This research demonstrates Q‐PCR determination of absolute numbers of genes and transcripts using environmental nucleic acids should be treated cautiously.</description><subject>DNA, Complementary - genetics</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments - analysis</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>Soil - analysis</subject><subject>Transcription, Genetic</subject><issn>1462-2912</issn><issn>1462-2920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwCsgrdgn-GTuJxAZVM6ViCixALK0b56b1kDipnQwz78ED4zSjYYs3vtc-37F8T5IQRjMW1_tdxlaKp7zkNOOUyozSUons8Cy5PF88P9eMXySvQthRynKR05fJBVOKi1wUl8mf9R7aCUbbO9I35HECN9ox9nskQ98eO_QQkJgHsI54BDMr0yqe1QSGwfdgHjCQpvekxhF9Z5119-QeXYT64UjA1Us3enDBeDuMxE1dhT6QaIlub33vOnQjtCRAN7QYXicvGmgDvjntV8mPzfr79ad0-_Xm9vrjNjWSMpGWNWWgsGRMclY3IOqm4KapBChAKYqyLAuu4gxYxSTNWREljVGGllWumhrEVfJu8Y3_eJwwjLqzwWDbgsN-CprTQjK5YlFYLELj-xA8NnrwtgN_1IzqORG90_Ow9Tx4PSeinxLRh4i-Pb0xVR3W_8BTBFHwYRH8ti0e_9tYr-9uYxHxdMFtGPFwxsH_0iqmLfXPLzd69Y1t5FZ-1hvxF2BMrMM</recordid><startdate>200605</startdate><enddate>200605</enddate><creator>Smith, Cindy J.</creator><creator>Nedwell, David B.</creator><creator>Dong, Liang F.</creator><creator>Osborn, A. Mark</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200605</creationdate><title>Evaluation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based approaches for determining gene copy and gene transcript numbers in environmental samples</title><author>Smith, Cindy J. ; Nedwell, David B. ; Dong, Liang F. ; Osborn, A. Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5013-9d01a6e911521dfa3df82cfb3a6ae5389998264621b150718fa3fc6c09b76fda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>DNA, Complementary - genetics</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments - analysis</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>Soil - analysis</topic><topic>Transcription, Genetic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Cindy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedwell, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Liang F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborn, A. Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Cindy J.</au><au>Nedwell, David B.</au><au>Dong, Liang F.</au><au>Osborn, A. Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based approaches for determining gene copy and gene transcript numbers in environmental samples</atitle><jtitle>Environmental microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Microbiol</addtitle><date>2006-05</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>804</spage><epage>815</epage><pages>804-815</pages><issn>1462-2912</issn><eissn>1462-2920</eissn><abstract>Summary Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q‐PCR) amplification is widely applied for determining gene and transcript numbers within environmental samples. This research evaluated Q‐PCR reproducibility via TaqMan assays quantifying 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers in sediments, within and between replicate Q‐PCR assays. Intra‐assay variation in 16S rRNA gene numbers in replicate DNA samples was low (coefficients of variation; CV from 3.2 to 5.2%). However, variability increased using replicated standard curves within separate Q‐PCR assays (CV from 11.2% to 26%), indicating absolute comparison of gene numbers between Q‐PCR assays was less reliable. 16S rRNA transcript quantification was evaluated using standard curves of diluted RNA or cDNA (before, or following, reverse transcription). These standard curves were statistically different with cDNA‐derived curves giving higher r2 values and Q‐PCR efficiencies. Template concentrations used in Q‐PCR also affected 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers. For DNA, 10−3 dilutions yielded higher gene numbers than 10−1 and 10−2 dilutions. Conversely, RNA template dilution reduced numbers of transcripts detected. Finally, different nucleic acid isolation methods also resulted in gene and transcript number variability. This research demonstrates Q‐PCR determination of absolute numbers of genes and transcripts using environmental nucleic acids should be treated cautiously.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16623738</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00963.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-2912
ispartof Environmental microbiology, 2006-05, Vol.8 (5), p.804-815
issn 1462-2912
1462-2920
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20851541
source Wiley
subjects DNA, Complementary - genetics
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Geologic Sediments - analysis
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
Soil - analysis
Transcription, Genetic
title Evaluation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based approaches for determining gene copy and gene transcript numbers in environmental samples
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A27%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20quantitative%20polymerase%20chain%20reaction-based%20approaches%20for%20determining%20gene%20copy%20and%20gene%20transcript%20numbers%20in%20environmental%20samples&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20microbiology&rft.au=Smith,%20Cindy%20J.&rft.date=2006-05&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=804&rft.epage=815&rft.pages=804-815&rft.issn=1462-2912&rft.eissn=1462-2920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00963.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20851541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5013-9d01a6e911521dfa3df82cfb3a6ae5389998264621b150718fa3fc6c09b76fda3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20851541&rft_id=info:pmid/16623738&rfr_iscdi=true