Loading…
Evaluation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based approaches for determining gene copy and gene transcript numbers in environmental samples
Summary Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q‐PCR) amplification is widely applied for determining gene and transcript numbers within environmental samples. This research evaluated Q‐PCR reproducibility via TaqMan assays quantifying 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers in sediments, within and b...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental microbiology 2006-05, Vol.8 (5), p.804-815 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5013-9d01a6e911521dfa3df82cfb3a6ae5389998264621b150718fa3fc6c09b76fda3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5013-9d01a6e911521dfa3df82cfb3a6ae5389998264621b150718fa3fc6c09b76fda3 |
container_end_page | 815 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 804 |
container_title | Environmental microbiology |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Smith, Cindy J. Nedwell, David B. Dong, Liang F. Osborn, A. Mark |
description | Summary
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q‐PCR) amplification is widely applied for determining gene and transcript numbers within environmental samples. This research evaluated Q‐PCR reproducibility via TaqMan assays quantifying 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers in sediments, within and between replicate Q‐PCR assays. Intra‐assay variation in 16S rRNA gene numbers in replicate DNA samples was low (coefficients of variation; CV from 3.2 to 5.2%). However, variability increased using replicated standard curves within separate Q‐PCR assays (CV from 11.2% to 26%), indicating absolute comparison of gene numbers between Q‐PCR assays was less reliable. 16S rRNA transcript quantification was evaluated using standard curves of diluted RNA or cDNA (before, or following, reverse transcription). These standard curves were statistically different with cDNA‐derived curves giving higher r2 values and Q‐PCR efficiencies. Template concentrations used in Q‐PCR also affected 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers. For DNA, 10−3 dilutions yielded higher gene numbers than 10−1 and 10−2 dilutions. Conversely, RNA template dilution reduced numbers of transcripts detected. Finally, different nucleic acid isolation methods also resulted in gene and transcript number variability. This research demonstrates Q‐PCR determination of absolute numbers of genes and transcripts using environmental nucleic acids should be treated cautiously. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00963.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20851541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20851541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5013-9d01a6e911521dfa3df82cfb3a6ae5389998264621b150718fa3fc6c09b76fda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwCsgrdgn-GTuJxAZVM6ViCixALK0b56b1kDipnQwz78ED4zSjYYs3vtc-37F8T5IQRjMW1_tdxlaKp7zkNOOUyozSUons8Cy5PF88P9eMXySvQthRynKR05fJBVOKi1wUl8mf9R7aCUbbO9I35HECN9ox9nskQ98eO_QQkJgHsI54BDMr0yqe1QSGwfdgHjCQpvekxhF9Z5119-QeXYT64UjA1Us3enDBeDuMxE1dhT6QaIlub33vOnQjtCRAN7QYXicvGmgDvjntV8mPzfr79ad0-_Xm9vrjNjWSMpGWNWWgsGRMclY3IOqm4KapBChAKYqyLAuu4gxYxSTNWREljVGGllWumhrEVfJu8Y3_eJwwjLqzwWDbgsN-CprTQjK5YlFYLELj-xA8NnrwtgN_1IzqORG90_Ow9Tx4PSeinxLRh4i-Pb0xVR3W_8BTBFHwYRH8ti0e_9tYr-9uYxHxdMFtGPFwxsH_0iqmLfXPLzd69Y1t5FZ-1hvxF2BMrMM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20851541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based approaches for determining gene copy and gene transcript numbers in environmental samples</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Smith, Cindy J. ; Nedwell, David B. ; Dong, Liang F. ; Osborn, A. Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Cindy J. ; Nedwell, David B. ; Dong, Liang F. ; Osborn, A. Mark</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q‐PCR) amplification is widely applied for determining gene and transcript numbers within environmental samples. This research evaluated Q‐PCR reproducibility via TaqMan assays quantifying 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers in sediments, within and between replicate Q‐PCR assays. Intra‐assay variation in 16S rRNA gene numbers in replicate DNA samples was low (coefficients of variation; CV from 3.2 to 5.2%). However, variability increased using replicated standard curves within separate Q‐PCR assays (CV from 11.2% to 26%), indicating absolute comparison of gene numbers between Q‐PCR assays was less reliable. 16S rRNA transcript quantification was evaluated using standard curves of diluted RNA or cDNA (before, or following, reverse transcription). These standard curves were statistically different with cDNA‐derived curves giving higher r2 values and Q‐PCR efficiencies. Template concentrations used in Q‐PCR also affected 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers. For DNA, 10−3 dilutions yielded higher gene numbers than 10−1 and 10−2 dilutions. Conversely, RNA template dilution reduced numbers of transcripts detected. Finally, different nucleic acid isolation methods also resulted in gene and transcript number variability. This research demonstrates Q‐PCR determination of absolute numbers of genes and transcripts using environmental nucleic acids should be treated cautiously.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-2912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1462-2920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00963.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16623738</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>DNA, Complementary - genetics ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Geologic Sediments - analysis ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; Soil - analysis ; Transcription, Genetic</subject><ispartof>Environmental microbiology, 2006-05, Vol.8 (5), p.804-815</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5013-9d01a6e911521dfa3df82cfb3a6ae5389998264621b150718fa3fc6c09b76fda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5013-9d01a6e911521dfa3df82cfb3a6ae5389998264621b150718fa3fc6c09b76fda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16623738$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Cindy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedwell, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Liang F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborn, A. Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based approaches for determining gene copy and gene transcript numbers in environmental samples</title><title>Environmental microbiology</title><addtitle>Environ Microbiol</addtitle><description>Summary
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q‐PCR) amplification is widely applied for determining gene and transcript numbers within environmental samples. This research evaluated Q‐PCR reproducibility via TaqMan assays quantifying 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers in sediments, within and between replicate Q‐PCR assays. Intra‐assay variation in 16S rRNA gene numbers in replicate DNA samples was low (coefficients of variation; CV from 3.2 to 5.2%). However, variability increased using replicated standard curves within separate Q‐PCR assays (CV from 11.2% to 26%), indicating absolute comparison of gene numbers between Q‐PCR assays was less reliable. 16S rRNA transcript quantification was evaluated using standard curves of diluted RNA or cDNA (before, or following, reverse transcription). These standard curves were statistically different with cDNA‐derived curves giving higher r2 values and Q‐PCR efficiencies. Template concentrations used in Q‐PCR also affected 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers. For DNA, 10−3 dilutions yielded higher gene numbers than 10−1 and 10−2 dilutions. Conversely, RNA template dilution reduced numbers of transcripts detected. Finally, different nucleic acid isolation methods also resulted in gene and transcript number variability. This research demonstrates Q‐PCR determination of absolute numbers of genes and transcripts using environmental nucleic acids should be treated cautiously.</description><subject>DNA, Complementary - genetics</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments - analysis</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>Soil - analysis</subject><subject>Transcription, Genetic</subject><issn>1462-2912</issn><issn>1462-2920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwCsgrdgn-GTuJxAZVM6ViCixALK0b56b1kDipnQwz78ED4zSjYYs3vtc-37F8T5IQRjMW1_tdxlaKp7zkNOOUyozSUons8Cy5PF88P9eMXySvQthRynKR05fJBVOKi1wUl8mf9R7aCUbbO9I35HECN9ox9nskQ98eO_QQkJgHsI54BDMr0yqe1QSGwfdgHjCQpvekxhF9Z5119-QeXYT64UjA1Us3enDBeDuMxE1dhT6QaIlub33vOnQjtCRAN7QYXicvGmgDvjntV8mPzfr79ad0-_Xm9vrjNjWSMpGWNWWgsGRMclY3IOqm4KapBChAKYqyLAuu4gxYxSTNWREljVGGllWumhrEVfJu8Y3_eJwwjLqzwWDbgsN-CprTQjK5YlFYLELj-xA8NnrwtgN_1IzqORG90_Ow9Tx4PSeinxLRh4i-Pb0xVR3W_8BTBFHwYRH8ti0e_9tYr-9uYxHxdMFtGPFwxsH_0iqmLfXPLzd69Y1t5FZ-1hvxF2BMrMM</recordid><startdate>200605</startdate><enddate>200605</enddate><creator>Smith, Cindy J.</creator><creator>Nedwell, David B.</creator><creator>Dong, Liang F.</creator><creator>Osborn, A. Mark</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200605</creationdate><title>Evaluation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based approaches for determining gene copy and gene transcript numbers in environmental samples</title><author>Smith, Cindy J. ; Nedwell, David B. ; Dong, Liang F. ; Osborn, A. Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5013-9d01a6e911521dfa3df82cfb3a6ae5389998264621b150718fa3fc6c09b76fda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>DNA, Complementary - genetics</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments - analysis</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>Soil - analysis</topic><topic>Transcription, Genetic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Cindy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedwell, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Liang F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborn, A. Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Cindy J.</au><au>Nedwell, David B.</au><au>Dong, Liang F.</au><au>Osborn, A. Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based approaches for determining gene copy and gene transcript numbers in environmental samples</atitle><jtitle>Environmental microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Microbiol</addtitle><date>2006-05</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>804</spage><epage>815</epage><pages>804-815</pages><issn>1462-2912</issn><eissn>1462-2920</eissn><abstract>Summary
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q‐PCR) amplification is widely applied for determining gene and transcript numbers within environmental samples. This research evaluated Q‐PCR reproducibility via TaqMan assays quantifying 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers in sediments, within and between replicate Q‐PCR assays. Intra‐assay variation in 16S rRNA gene numbers in replicate DNA samples was low (coefficients of variation; CV from 3.2 to 5.2%). However, variability increased using replicated standard curves within separate Q‐PCR assays (CV from 11.2% to 26%), indicating absolute comparison of gene numbers between Q‐PCR assays was less reliable. 16S rRNA transcript quantification was evaluated using standard curves of diluted RNA or cDNA (before, or following, reverse transcription). These standard curves were statistically different with cDNA‐derived curves giving higher r2 values and Q‐PCR efficiencies. Template concentrations used in Q‐PCR also affected 16S rRNA gene and transcript numbers. For DNA, 10−3 dilutions yielded higher gene numbers than 10−1 and 10−2 dilutions. Conversely, RNA template dilution reduced numbers of transcripts detected. Finally, different nucleic acid isolation methods also resulted in gene and transcript number variability. This research demonstrates Q‐PCR determination of absolute numbers of genes and transcripts using environmental nucleic acids should be treated cautiously.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16623738</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00963.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1462-2912 |
ispartof | Environmental microbiology, 2006-05, Vol.8 (5), p.804-815 |
issn | 1462-2912 1462-2920 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20851541 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | DNA, Complementary - genetics Environmental Monitoring - methods Geologic Sediments - analysis Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics Soil - analysis Transcription, Genetic |
title | Evaluation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based approaches for determining gene copy and gene transcript numbers in environmental samples |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A27%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20quantitative%20polymerase%20chain%20reaction-based%20approaches%20for%20determining%20gene%20copy%20and%20gene%20transcript%20numbers%20in%20environmental%20samples&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20microbiology&rft.au=Smith,%20Cindy%20J.&rft.date=2006-05&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=804&rft.epage=815&rft.pages=804-815&rft.issn=1462-2912&rft.eissn=1462-2920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00963.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20851541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5013-9d01a6e911521dfa3df82cfb3a6ae5389998264621b150718fa3fc6c09b76fda3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20851541&rft_id=info:pmid/16623738&rfr_iscdi=true |