Loading…

Difference between recommended retail price and sales price for tobacco products in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK

AimRecommended retail price (RRP) is a marketing strategy used by tobacco companies to maintain competitiveness, communicate product positioning and drive sales. We explored small retailer adherence to RRP before and after the introduction of the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tobacco control 2019-07, Vol.28 (4), p.449-456
Main Authors: Critchlow, Nathan, Stead, Martine, Moodie, Crawford, Angus, Kathryn, Eadie, Douglas, MacKintosh, Anne-Marie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b492t-fe0cc0c0617f912f9da04e5ffe0ab2f3e72f864b5ff4fe646c206a3af180a15c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b492t-fe0cc0c0617f912f9da04e5ffe0ab2f3e72f864b5ff4fe646c206a3af180a15c3
container_end_page 456
container_issue 4
container_start_page 449
container_title Tobacco control
container_volume 28
creator Critchlow, Nathan
Stead, Martine
Moodie, Crawford
Angus, Kathryn
Eadie, Douglas
MacKintosh, Anne-Marie
description AimRecommended retail price (RRP) is a marketing strategy used by tobacco companies to maintain competitiveness, communicate product positioning and drive sales. We explored small retailer adherence to RRP before and after the introduction of the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations in the UK (fully implemented on 20 May 2017) which mandated standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco, set minimum pack/pouch sizes and prohibited price-marking.MethodMonthly electronic point of sale data from 500 small retailers in England, Scotland and Wales were analysed. From May 2016 to October 2017, we monitored 20 of the best-selling fully branded tobacco products (15 factory-made cigarettes, 5 rolling tobacco) and their standardised equivalents. Adherence to RRP was measured as the average difference (%) between monthly RRPs and sales prices by pack type (fully branded vs standardised), price-marking on packaging and price segment.ResultsThe average difference between RRP and sales price increased from +0.36% above RRP (SD=0.72) in May 2016, when only fully branded packs were sold, to +1.37% in October 2017 (SD=0.30), when standardised packs were mandatory. Increases above RRP for fully branded packs increased as they were phased out, with deviation greater for non-price-marked packs and premium products.DiscussionDespite tobacco companies emphasising the importance of RRP, small retailers implemented small increases above RRP as standardised packaging was introduced. Consequently, any intended price changes by tobacco companies in response to the legislation (ie, to increase affordability or brand positioning) may be confounded by retailer behaviour, and such deviation may increase consumer price sensitivity.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054409
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2089860920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2089860920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b492t-fe0cc0c0617f912f9da04e5ffe0ab2f3e72f864b5ff4fe646c206a3af180a15c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVUclu1TAUtRCIPgq_gCLYlEXgeohfwg6VUVRiQ9eR41yXPBK72A6Ir-SXuGnCQ7ACyZKnM9mHsUccnnIu9bMcOmNtsMHnGMZSAK9LqJSC5hbbcaXrUkpe32Y7aLQqVaXlCbuX0gGAy33F77ITCVyAANixHy8H5zCit1h0mL8h-iKiDdOEvsee1tkMY3EdBwIY3xfJjJi2vQux2MLQSehnm1MxeBo9Xi98n284lPQr-uHG5CxNZhyfbMIYE9mSzipuXEaS_IQkkVfBIfgiuCJlujexHxKFOnoa-9lcDf5qMV1Yl-_vszvOjAkfbPMpu3z96uP52_Liw5t35y8uyk41IpcOwVqwoPneNVy4pjegsKKvANMJJ3EvXK1VRyfKoVbaCtBGGsdrMLyy8pSdrbr07i8zptxOQ7I4jsZjmFMroG5qDY0Agj7-C3oIc_SUrhWCWuNcNw2hnq8oG0NKEV1LfzyZ-L3l0C61t3_W3i61t2vtRH64WczdhP2R-qtnAlQroJsO_yesf_OOsf-B-BO4FNaa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2244011699</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Difference between recommended retail price and sales price for tobacco products in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Critchlow, Nathan ; Stead, Martine ; Moodie, Crawford ; Angus, Kathryn ; Eadie, Douglas ; MacKintosh, Anne-Marie</creator><creatorcontrib>Critchlow, Nathan ; Stead, Martine ; Moodie, Crawford ; Angus, Kathryn ; Eadie, Douglas ; MacKintosh, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><description>AimRecommended retail price (RRP) is a marketing strategy used by tobacco companies to maintain competitiveness, communicate product positioning and drive sales. We explored small retailer adherence to RRP before and after the introduction of the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations in the UK (fully implemented on 20 May 2017) which mandated standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco, set minimum pack/pouch sizes and prohibited price-marking.MethodMonthly electronic point of sale data from 500 small retailers in England, Scotland and Wales were analysed. From May 2016 to October 2017, we monitored 20 of the best-selling fully branded tobacco products (15 factory-made cigarettes, 5 rolling tobacco) and their standardised equivalents. Adherence to RRP was measured as the average difference (%) between monthly RRPs and sales prices by pack type (fully branded vs standardised), price-marking on packaging and price segment.ResultsThe average difference between RRP and sales price increased from +0.36% above RRP (SD=0.72) in May 2016, when only fully branded packs were sold, to +1.37% in October 2017 (SD=0.30), when standardised packs were mandatory. Increases above RRP for fully branded packs increased as they were phased out, with deviation greater for non-price-marked packs and premium products.DiscussionDespite tobacco companies emphasising the importance of RRP, small retailers implemented small increases above RRP as standardised packaging was introduced. Consequently, any intended price changes by tobacco companies in response to the legislation (ie, to increase affordability or brand positioning) may be confounded by retailer behaviour, and such deviation may increase consumer price sensitivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054409</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30120200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Advertising - methods ; Advertising - trends ; advertising and promotion ; Cancer ; Cigarettes ; Commerce - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Competitiveness ; Consumers ; Convenience stores ; Corporate profits ; Costs and Cost Analysis - economics ; Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Deviation ; Humans ; Legislation ; Linens ; Marketing ; Marketing - methods ; Marketing - standards ; Marking ; Packaging ; packaging and labelling ; price ; Prices ; Pricing policies ; Product Packaging - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Product Packaging - methods ; Product Packaging - standards ; Profitability ; public policy ; Research paper ; Retail stores ; Sales ; Smoking ; Tobacco ; Tobacco industry ; Tobacco Industry - economics ; Tobacco Industry - methods ; Tobacco Industry - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Tobacco Products - economics ; Tobacco Products - standards ; Tobacco Products - supply &amp; distribution ; United Kingdom ; Wholesalers</subject><ispartof>Tobacco control, 2019-07, Vol.28 (4), p.449-456</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b492t-fe0cc0c0617f912f9da04e5ffe0ab2f3e72f864b5ff4fe646c206a3af180a15c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b492t-fe0cc0c0617f912f9da04e5ffe0ab2f3e72f864b5ff4fe646c206a3af180a15c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9145-8874</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30120200$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Critchlow, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stead, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moodie, Crawford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angus, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eadie, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKintosh, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><title>Difference between recommended retail price and sales price for tobacco products in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK</title><title>Tobacco control</title><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><description>AimRecommended retail price (RRP) is a marketing strategy used by tobacco companies to maintain competitiveness, communicate product positioning and drive sales. We explored small retailer adherence to RRP before and after the introduction of the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations in the UK (fully implemented on 20 May 2017) which mandated standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco, set minimum pack/pouch sizes and prohibited price-marking.MethodMonthly electronic point of sale data from 500 small retailers in England, Scotland and Wales were analysed. From May 2016 to October 2017, we monitored 20 of the best-selling fully branded tobacco products (15 factory-made cigarettes, 5 rolling tobacco) and their standardised equivalents. Adherence to RRP was measured as the average difference (%) between monthly RRPs and sales prices by pack type (fully branded vs standardised), price-marking on packaging and price segment.ResultsThe average difference between RRP and sales price increased from +0.36% above RRP (SD=0.72) in May 2016, when only fully branded packs were sold, to +1.37% in October 2017 (SD=0.30), when standardised packs were mandatory. Increases above RRP for fully branded packs increased as they were phased out, with deviation greater for non-price-marked packs and premium products.DiscussionDespite tobacco companies emphasising the importance of RRP, small retailers implemented small increases above RRP as standardised packaging was introduced. Consequently, any intended price changes by tobacco companies in response to the legislation (ie, to increase affordability or brand positioning) may be confounded by retailer behaviour, and such deviation may increase consumer price sensitivity.</description><subject>Advertising - methods</subject><subject>Advertising - trends</subject><subject>advertising and promotion</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cigarettes</subject><subject>Commerce - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Convenience stores</subject><subject>Corporate profits</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis - economics</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Deviation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Linens</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Marketing - methods</subject><subject>Marketing - standards</subject><subject>Marking</subject><subject>Packaging</subject><subject>packaging and labelling</subject><subject>price</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>Product Packaging - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Product Packaging - methods</subject><subject>Product Packaging - standards</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>public policy</subject><subject>Research paper</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco industry</subject><subject>Tobacco Industry - economics</subject><subject>Tobacco Industry - methods</subject><subject>Tobacco Industry - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Tobacco Products - economics</subject><subject>Tobacco Products - standards</subject><subject>Tobacco Products - supply &amp; distribution</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Wholesalers</subject><issn>0964-4563</issn><issn>1468-3318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVUclu1TAUtRCIPgq_gCLYlEXgeohfwg6VUVRiQ9eR41yXPBK72A6Ir-SXuGnCQ7ACyZKnM9mHsUccnnIu9bMcOmNtsMHnGMZSAK9LqJSC5hbbcaXrUkpe32Y7aLQqVaXlCbuX0gGAy33F77ITCVyAANixHy8H5zCit1h0mL8h-iKiDdOEvsee1tkMY3EdBwIY3xfJjJi2vQux2MLQSehnm1MxeBo9Xi98n284lPQr-uHG5CxNZhyfbMIYE9mSzipuXEaS_IQkkVfBIfgiuCJlujexHxKFOnoa-9lcDf5qMV1Yl-_vszvOjAkfbPMpu3z96uP52_Liw5t35y8uyk41IpcOwVqwoPneNVy4pjegsKKvANMJJ3EvXK1VRyfKoVbaCtBGGsdrMLyy8pSdrbr07i8zptxOQ7I4jsZjmFMroG5qDY0Agj7-C3oIc_SUrhWCWuNcNw2hnq8oG0NKEV1LfzyZ-L3l0C61t3_W3i61t2vtRH64WczdhP2R-qtnAlQroJsO_yesf_OOsf-B-BO4FNaa</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Critchlow, Nathan</creator><creator>Stead, Martine</creator><creator>Moodie, Crawford</creator><creator>Angus, Kathryn</creator><creator>Eadie, Douglas</creator><creator>MacKintosh, Anne-Marie</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9145-8874</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Difference between recommended retail price and sales price for tobacco products in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK</title><author>Critchlow, Nathan ; Stead, Martine ; Moodie, Crawford ; Angus, Kathryn ; Eadie, Douglas ; MacKintosh, Anne-Marie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b492t-fe0cc0c0617f912f9da04e5ffe0ab2f3e72f864b5ff4fe646c206a3af180a15c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Advertising - methods</topic><topic>Advertising - trends</topic><topic>advertising and promotion</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cigarettes</topic><topic>Commerce - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Convenience stores</topic><topic>Corporate profits</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis - economics</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Deviation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Linens</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Marketing - methods</topic><topic>Marketing - standards</topic><topic>Marking</topic><topic>Packaging</topic><topic>packaging and labelling</topic><topic>price</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>Product Packaging - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Product Packaging - methods</topic><topic>Product Packaging - standards</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>public policy</topic><topic>Research paper</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco industry</topic><topic>Tobacco Industry - economics</topic><topic>Tobacco Industry - methods</topic><topic>Tobacco Industry - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Tobacco Products - economics</topic><topic>Tobacco Products - standards</topic><topic>Tobacco Products - supply &amp; distribution</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Wholesalers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Critchlow, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stead, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moodie, Crawford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angus, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eadie, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKintosh, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Critchlow, Nathan</au><au>Stead, Martine</au><au>Moodie, Crawford</au><au>Angus, Kathryn</au><au>Eadie, Douglas</au><au>MacKintosh, Anne-Marie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Difference between recommended retail price and sales price for tobacco products in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK</atitle><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle><stitle>Tob Control</stitle><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>456</epage><pages>449-456</pages><issn>0964-4563</issn><eissn>1468-3318</eissn><abstract>AimRecommended retail price (RRP) is a marketing strategy used by tobacco companies to maintain competitiveness, communicate product positioning and drive sales. We explored small retailer adherence to RRP before and after the introduction of the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations in the UK (fully implemented on 20 May 2017) which mandated standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco, set minimum pack/pouch sizes and prohibited price-marking.MethodMonthly electronic point of sale data from 500 small retailers in England, Scotland and Wales were analysed. From May 2016 to October 2017, we monitored 20 of the best-selling fully branded tobacco products (15 factory-made cigarettes, 5 rolling tobacco) and their standardised equivalents. Adherence to RRP was measured as the average difference (%) between monthly RRPs and sales prices by pack type (fully branded vs standardised), price-marking on packaging and price segment.ResultsThe average difference between RRP and sales price increased from +0.36% above RRP (SD=0.72) in May 2016, when only fully branded packs were sold, to +1.37% in October 2017 (SD=0.30), when standardised packs were mandatory. Increases above RRP for fully branded packs increased as they were phased out, with deviation greater for non-price-marked packs and premium products.DiscussionDespite tobacco companies emphasising the importance of RRP, small retailers implemented small increases above RRP as standardised packaging was introduced. Consequently, any intended price changes by tobacco companies in response to the legislation (ie, to increase affordability or brand positioning) may be confounded by retailer behaviour, and such deviation may increase consumer price sensitivity.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>30120200</pmid><doi>10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054409</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9145-8874</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-4563
ispartof Tobacco control, 2019-07, Vol.28 (4), p.449-456
issn 0964-4563
1468-3318
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2089860920
source JSTOR Archival Journals
subjects Advertising - methods
Advertising - trends
advertising and promotion
Cancer
Cigarettes
Commerce - legislation & jurisprudence
Competitiveness
Consumers
Convenience stores
Corporate profits
Costs and Cost Analysis - economics
Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics & numerical data
Deviation
Humans
Legislation
Linens
Marketing
Marketing - methods
Marketing - standards
Marking
Packaging
packaging and labelling
price
Prices
Pricing policies
Product Packaging - legislation & jurisprudence
Product Packaging - methods
Product Packaging - standards
Profitability
public policy
Research paper
Retail stores
Sales
Smoking
Tobacco
Tobacco industry
Tobacco Industry - economics
Tobacco Industry - methods
Tobacco Industry - statistics & numerical data
Tobacco Products - economics
Tobacco Products - standards
Tobacco Products - supply & distribution
United Kingdom
Wholesalers
title Difference between recommended retail price and sales price for tobacco products in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T15%3A01%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Difference%20between%20recommended%20retail%20price%20and%20sales%20price%20for%20tobacco%20products%20in%20independent%20and%20convenience%20(small)%20retailers%20before%20and%20after%20the%20introduction%20of%20standardised%20tobacco%20packaging%20in%20the%20UK&rft.jtitle=Tobacco%20control&rft.au=Critchlow,%20Nathan&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=456&rft.pages=449-456&rft.issn=0964-4563&rft.eissn=1468-3318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054409&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2089860920%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b492t-fe0cc0c0617f912f9da04e5ffe0ab2f3e72f864b5ff4fe646c206a3af180a15c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2244011699&rft_id=info:pmid/30120200&rfr_iscdi=true