Loading…
Difference between recommended retail price and sales price for tobacco products in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK
AimRecommended retail price (RRP) is a marketing strategy used by tobacco companies to maintain competitiveness, communicate product positioning and drive sales. We explored small retailer adherence to RRP before and after the introduction of the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulation...
Saved in:
Published in: | Tobacco control 2019-07, Vol.28 (4), p.449-456 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b492t-fe0cc0c0617f912f9da04e5ffe0ab2f3e72f864b5ff4fe646c206a3af180a15c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b492t-fe0cc0c0617f912f9da04e5ffe0ab2f3e72f864b5ff4fe646c206a3af180a15c3 |
container_end_page | 456 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 449 |
container_title | Tobacco control |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Critchlow, Nathan Stead, Martine Moodie, Crawford Angus, Kathryn Eadie, Douglas MacKintosh, Anne-Marie |
description | AimRecommended retail price (RRP) is a marketing strategy used by tobacco companies to maintain competitiveness, communicate product positioning and drive sales. We explored small retailer adherence to RRP before and after the introduction of the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations in the UK (fully implemented on 20 May 2017) which mandated standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco, set minimum pack/pouch sizes and prohibited price-marking.MethodMonthly electronic point of sale data from 500 small retailers in England, Scotland and Wales were analysed. From May 2016 to October 2017, we monitored 20 of the best-selling fully branded tobacco products (15 factory-made cigarettes, 5 rolling tobacco) and their standardised equivalents. Adherence to RRP was measured as the average difference (%) between monthly RRPs and sales prices by pack type (fully branded vs standardised), price-marking on packaging and price segment.ResultsThe average difference between RRP and sales price increased from +0.36% above RRP (SD=0.72) in May 2016, when only fully branded packs were sold, to +1.37% in October 2017 (SD=0.30), when standardised packs were mandatory. Increases above RRP for fully branded packs increased as they were phased out, with deviation greater for non-price-marked packs and premium products.DiscussionDespite tobacco companies emphasising the importance of RRP, small retailers implemented small increases above RRP as standardised packaging was introduced. Consequently, any intended price changes by tobacco companies in response to the legislation (ie, to increase affordability or brand positioning) may be confounded by retailer behaviour, and such deviation may increase consumer price sensitivity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054409 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2089860920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2089860920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b492t-fe0cc0c0617f912f9da04e5ffe0ab2f3e72f864b5ff4fe646c206a3af180a15c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVUclu1TAUtRCIPgq_gCLYlEXgeohfwg6VUVRiQ9eR41yXPBK72A6Ir-SXuGnCQ7ACyZKnM9mHsUccnnIu9bMcOmNtsMHnGMZSAK9LqJSC5hbbcaXrUkpe32Y7aLQqVaXlCbuX0gGAy33F77ITCVyAANixHy8H5zCit1h0mL8h-iKiDdOEvsee1tkMY3EdBwIY3xfJjJi2vQux2MLQSehnm1MxeBo9Xi98n284lPQr-uHG5CxNZhyfbMIYE9mSzipuXEaS_IQkkVfBIfgiuCJlujexHxKFOnoa-9lcDf5qMV1Yl-_vszvOjAkfbPMpu3z96uP52_Liw5t35y8uyk41IpcOwVqwoPneNVy4pjegsKKvANMJJ3EvXK1VRyfKoVbaCtBGGsdrMLyy8pSdrbr07i8zptxOQ7I4jsZjmFMroG5qDY0Agj7-C3oIc_SUrhWCWuNcNw2hnq8oG0NKEV1LfzyZ-L3l0C61t3_W3i61t2vtRH64WczdhP2R-qtnAlQroJsO_yesf_OOsf-B-BO4FNaa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2244011699</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Difference between recommended retail price and sales price for tobacco products in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Critchlow, Nathan ; Stead, Martine ; Moodie, Crawford ; Angus, Kathryn ; Eadie, Douglas ; MacKintosh, Anne-Marie</creator><creatorcontrib>Critchlow, Nathan ; Stead, Martine ; Moodie, Crawford ; Angus, Kathryn ; Eadie, Douglas ; MacKintosh, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><description>AimRecommended retail price (RRP) is a marketing strategy used by tobacco companies to maintain competitiveness, communicate product positioning and drive sales. We explored small retailer adherence to RRP before and after the introduction of the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations in the UK (fully implemented on 20 May 2017) which mandated standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco, set minimum pack/pouch sizes and prohibited price-marking.MethodMonthly electronic point of sale data from 500 small retailers in England, Scotland and Wales were analysed. From May 2016 to October 2017, we monitored 20 of the best-selling fully branded tobacco products (15 factory-made cigarettes, 5 rolling tobacco) and their standardised equivalents. Adherence to RRP was measured as the average difference (%) between monthly RRPs and sales prices by pack type (fully branded vs standardised), price-marking on packaging and price segment.ResultsThe average difference between RRP and sales price increased from +0.36% above RRP (SD=0.72) in May 2016, when only fully branded packs were sold, to +1.37% in October 2017 (SD=0.30), when standardised packs were mandatory. Increases above RRP for fully branded packs increased as they were phased out, with deviation greater for non-price-marked packs and premium products.DiscussionDespite tobacco companies emphasising the importance of RRP, small retailers implemented small increases above RRP as standardised packaging was introduced. Consequently, any intended price changes by tobacco companies in response to the legislation (ie, to increase affordability or brand positioning) may be confounded by retailer behaviour, and such deviation may increase consumer price sensitivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054409</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30120200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Advertising - methods ; Advertising - trends ; advertising and promotion ; Cancer ; Cigarettes ; Commerce - legislation & jurisprudence ; Competitiveness ; Consumers ; Convenience stores ; Corporate profits ; Costs and Cost Analysis - economics ; Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics & numerical data ; Deviation ; Humans ; Legislation ; Linens ; Marketing ; Marketing - methods ; Marketing - standards ; Marking ; Packaging ; packaging and labelling ; price ; Prices ; Pricing policies ; Product Packaging - legislation & jurisprudence ; Product Packaging - methods ; Product Packaging - standards ; Profitability ; public policy ; Research paper ; Retail stores ; Sales ; Smoking ; Tobacco ; Tobacco industry ; Tobacco Industry - economics ; Tobacco Industry - methods ; Tobacco Industry - statistics & numerical data ; Tobacco Products - economics ; Tobacco Products - standards ; Tobacco Products - supply & distribution ; United Kingdom ; Wholesalers</subject><ispartof>Tobacco control, 2019-07, Vol.28 (4), p.449-456</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b492t-fe0cc0c0617f912f9da04e5ffe0ab2f3e72f864b5ff4fe646c206a3af180a15c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b492t-fe0cc0c0617f912f9da04e5ffe0ab2f3e72f864b5ff4fe646c206a3af180a15c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9145-8874</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30120200$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Critchlow, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stead, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moodie, Crawford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angus, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eadie, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKintosh, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><title>Difference between recommended retail price and sales price for tobacco products in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK</title><title>Tobacco control</title><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><description>AimRecommended retail price (RRP) is a marketing strategy used by tobacco companies to maintain competitiveness, communicate product positioning and drive sales. We explored small retailer adherence to RRP before and after the introduction of the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations in the UK (fully implemented on 20 May 2017) which mandated standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco, set minimum pack/pouch sizes and prohibited price-marking.MethodMonthly electronic point of sale data from 500 small retailers in England, Scotland and Wales were analysed. From May 2016 to October 2017, we monitored 20 of the best-selling fully branded tobacco products (15 factory-made cigarettes, 5 rolling tobacco) and their standardised equivalents. Adherence to RRP was measured as the average difference (%) between monthly RRPs and sales prices by pack type (fully branded vs standardised), price-marking on packaging and price segment.ResultsThe average difference between RRP and sales price increased from +0.36% above RRP (SD=0.72) in May 2016, when only fully branded packs were sold, to +1.37% in October 2017 (SD=0.30), when standardised packs were mandatory. Increases above RRP for fully branded packs increased as they were phased out, with deviation greater for non-price-marked packs and premium products.DiscussionDespite tobacco companies emphasising the importance of RRP, small retailers implemented small increases above RRP as standardised packaging was introduced. Consequently, any intended price changes by tobacco companies in response to the legislation (ie, to increase affordability or brand positioning) may be confounded by retailer behaviour, and such deviation may increase consumer price sensitivity.</description><subject>Advertising - methods</subject><subject>Advertising - trends</subject><subject>advertising and promotion</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cigarettes</subject><subject>Commerce - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Convenience stores</subject><subject>Corporate profits</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis - economics</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Deviation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Linens</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Marketing - methods</subject><subject>Marketing - standards</subject><subject>Marking</subject><subject>Packaging</subject><subject>packaging and labelling</subject><subject>price</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>Product Packaging - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Product Packaging - methods</subject><subject>Product Packaging - standards</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>public policy</subject><subject>Research paper</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco industry</subject><subject>Tobacco Industry - economics</subject><subject>Tobacco Industry - methods</subject><subject>Tobacco Industry - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Tobacco Products - economics</subject><subject>Tobacco Products - standards</subject><subject>Tobacco Products - supply & distribution</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Wholesalers</subject><issn>0964-4563</issn><issn>1468-3318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVUclu1TAUtRCIPgq_gCLYlEXgeohfwg6VUVRiQ9eR41yXPBK72A6Ir-SXuGnCQ7ACyZKnM9mHsUccnnIu9bMcOmNtsMHnGMZSAK9LqJSC5hbbcaXrUkpe32Y7aLQqVaXlCbuX0gGAy33F77ITCVyAANixHy8H5zCit1h0mL8h-iKiDdOEvsee1tkMY3EdBwIY3xfJjJi2vQux2MLQSehnm1MxeBo9Xi98n284lPQr-uHG5CxNZhyfbMIYE9mSzipuXEaS_IQkkVfBIfgiuCJlujexHxKFOnoa-9lcDf5qMV1Yl-_vszvOjAkfbPMpu3z96uP52_Liw5t35y8uyk41IpcOwVqwoPneNVy4pjegsKKvANMJJ3EvXK1VRyfKoVbaCtBGGsdrMLyy8pSdrbr07i8zptxOQ7I4jsZjmFMroG5qDY0Agj7-C3oIc_SUrhWCWuNcNw2hnq8oG0NKEV1LfzyZ-L3l0C61t3_W3i61t2vtRH64WczdhP2R-qtnAlQroJsO_yesf_OOsf-B-BO4FNaa</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Critchlow, Nathan</creator><creator>Stead, Martine</creator><creator>Moodie, Crawford</creator><creator>Angus, Kathryn</creator><creator>Eadie, Douglas</creator><creator>MacKintosh, Anne-Marie</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9145-8874</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Difference between recommended retail price and sales price for tobacco products in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK</title><author>Critchlow, Nathan ; Stead, Martine ; Moodie, Crawford ; Angus, Kathryn ; Eadie, Douglas ; MacKintosh, Anne-Marie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b492t-fe0cc0c0617f912f9da04e5ffe0ab2f3e72f864b5ff4fe646c206a3af180a15c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Advertising - methods</topic><topic>Advertising - trends</topic><topic>advertising and promotion</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cigarettes</topic><topic>Commerce - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Convenience stores</topic><topic>Corporate profits</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis - economics</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Deviation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Linens</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Marketing - methods</topic><topic>Marketing - standards</topic><topic>Marking</topic><topic>Packaging</topic><topic>packaging and labelling</topic><topic>price</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>Product Packaging - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Product Packaging - methods</topic><topic>Product Packaging - standards</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>public policy</topic><topic>Research paper</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco industry</topic><topic>Tobacco Industry - economics</topic><topic>Tobacco Industry - methods</topic><topic>Tobacco Industry - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Tobacco Products - economics</topic><topic>Tobacco Products - standards</topic><topic>Tobacco Products - supply & distribution</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Wholesalers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Critchlow, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stead, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moodie, Crawford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angus, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eadie, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKintosh, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Critchlow, Nathan</au><au>Stead, Martine</au><au>Moodie, Crawford</au><au>Angus, Kathryn</au><au>Eadie, Douglas</au><au>MacKintosh, Anne-Marie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Difference between recommended retail price and sales price for tobacco products in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK</atitle><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle><stitle>Tob Control</stitle><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>456</epage><pages>449-456</pages><issn>0964-4563</issn><eissn>1468-3318</eissn><abstract>AimRecommended retail price (RRP) is a marketing strategy used by tobacco companies to maintain competitiveness, communicate product positioning and drive sales. We explored small retailer adherence to RRP before and after the introduction of the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations in the UK (fully implemented on 20 May 2017) which mandated standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco, set minimum pack/pouch sizes and prohibited price-marking.MethodMonthly electronic point of sale data from 500 small retailers in England, Scotland and Wales were analysed. From May 2016 to October 2017, we monitored 20 of the best-selling fully branded tobacco products (15 factory-made cigarettes, 5 rolling tobacco) and their standardised equivalents. Adherence to RRP was measured as the average difference (%) between monthly RRPs and sales prices by pack type (fully branded vs standardised), price-marking on packaging and price segment.ResultsThe average difference between RRP and sales price increased from +0.36% above RRP (SD=0.72) in May 2016, when only fully branded packs were sold, to +1.37% in October 2017 (SD=0.30), when standardised packs were mandatory. Increases above RRP for fully branded packs increased as they were phased out, with deviation greater for non-price-marked packs and premium products.DiscussionDespite tobacco companies emphasising the importance of RRP, small retailers implemented small increases above RRP as standardised packaging was introduced. Consequently, any intended price changes by tobacco companies in response to the legislation (ie, to increase affordability or brand positioning) may be confounded by retailer behaviour, and such deviation may increase consumer price sensitivity.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>30120200</pmid><doi>10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054409</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9145-8874</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-4563 |
ispartof | Tobacco control, 2019-07, Vol.28 (4), p.449-456 |
issn | 0964-4563 1468-3318 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2089860920 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals |
subjects | Advertising - methods Advertising - trends advertising and promotion Cancer Cigarettes Commerce - legislation & jurisprudence Competitiveness Consumers Convenience stores Corporate profits Costs and Cost Analysis - economics Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics & numerical data Deviation Humans Legislation Linens Marketing Marketing - methods Marketing - standards Marking Packaging packaging and labelling price Prices Pricing policies Product Packaging - legislation & jurisprudence Product Packaging - methods Product Packaging - standards Profitability public policy Research paper Retail stores Sales Smoking Tobacco Tobacco industry Tobacco Industry - economics Tobacco Industry - methods Tobacco Industry - statistics & numerical data Tobacco Products - economics Tobacco Products - standards Tobacco Products - supply & distribution United Kingdom Wholesalers |
title | Difference between recommended retail price and sales price for tobacco products in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T15%3A01%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Difference%20between%20recommended%20retail%20price%20and%20sales%20price%20for%20tobacco%20products%20in%20independent%20and%20convenience%20(small)%20retailers%20before%20and%20after%20the%20introduction%20of%20standardised%20tobacco%20packaging%20in%20the%20UK&rft.jtitle=Tobacco%20control&rft.au=Critchlow,%20Nathan&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=456&rft.pages=449-456&rft.issn=0964-4563&rft.eissn=1468-3318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054409&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2089860920%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b492t-fe0cc0c0617f912f9da04e5ffe0ab2f3e72f864b5ff4fe646c206a3af180a15c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2244011699&rft_id=info:pmid/30120200&rfr_iscdi=true |