Loading…

Stereotactic radiosurgery for hypervascular intracranial tumors

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of SRS treatment of central neurocytomas (CNCs), cavernous sinus hemangiomas (CSHs), and glomus tumors (GTs); and to compare upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and adjuvant SRS in the treatment of these hypervascular tumors. Methods This was a retro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neuro-oncology 2018-12, Vol.140 (3), p.547-558
Main Authors: Lee, Cheng-Chia, Chou, Chun-Lung, Chen, Ching-Jen, Yang, Huai-Che, Wu, Hsiu-Mei, Shiau, Cheng-Ying, Pan, David Hung-Chi, Chung, Wen-Yuh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of SRS treatment of central neurocytomas (CNCs), cavernous sinus hemangiomas (CSHs), and glomus tumors (GTs); and to compare upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and adjuvant SRS in the treatment of these hypervascular tumors. Methods This was a retrospective review of consecutive CNCs, CSHs, and GTs treated with SRS between 1993 and 2017. Tumor response was categorized based on volumetric analysis on magnetic resonance imaging: (1) tumor regression [> 10% decrease in tumor volume (TV)]; (2) stable tumor (≤ 10% change in TV); or (3) tumor progression (> 10% increase in TV). Results Sixty hypervascular tumors (CNC: 28; CSH: 16; GT: 16) underwent SRS between 1993 and 2017. Margin doses were 13 Gy, 12 Gy, and 14 Gy for CNCs, CSHs, and GTs, respectively. Tumor regression was observed in 54 tumors (90%) with initial SRS after a median follow-up of 82 months. Relative reductions in TVs for CNCs were 38%, 52%, and 73% at 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively. Relative reductions in TVs for CSHs were 51%, 68%, and 88% at 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively. Relative reductions in TVs for GTs were 22%, 31%, and 47% at 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively. Upfront SRS was performed in 26 patients (43%). No difference in relative TV reductions were found between upfront and adjuvant SRS. Adverse radiation effects were observed in five patients. No mortality was encountered. Conclusion SRS for hypervascular tumors is associated with high rates of tumor regression with low risk of complications. No significant difference in rates of relative TV reduction were found between upfront and adjuvant SRS. Hence, upfront SRS may be considered in select patients.
ISSN:0167-594X
1573-7373
DOI:10.1007/s11060-018-2980-8