Loading…

Transition from Intensive Tillage to No-Tillage and Organic Diversified Annual Cropping Systems

Transition to no-till (NT) and organic (ORG) farming systems may enhance sustainability. Our objectives were to compare transitional crop productivity and soil nutrient status among diversified NT and ORG cropping systems in Montana. Three NT systems were designed as 4-yr rotations, including a puls...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agronomy journal 2008-05, Vol.100 (3), p.591-599
Main Authors: Miller, P.R, Buschena, D.E, Jones, C.A, Holmes, J.A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4440-3442300c14a9d04ce2484b5d4953a52bc591ad6c140db1c8bb89c3259917f6683
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4440-3442300c14a9d04ce2484b5d4953a52bc591ad6c140db1c8bb89c3259917f6683
container_end_page 599
container_issue 3
container_start_page 591
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 100
creator Miller, P.R
Buschena, D.E
Jones, C.A
Holmes, J.A
description Transition to no-till (NT) and organic (ORG) farming systems may enhance sustainability. Our objectives were to compare transitional crop productivity and soil nutrient status among diversified NT and ORG cropping systems in Montana. Three NT systems were designed as 4-yr rotations, including a pulse (lentil [Lens culinaris Medik.] or pea [Pisum sativum L.]), an oilseed (canola [Brassica napus L.] or sunflower [Helianthus annuus L.]) and two cereal crops (corn [Zea mays L.], proso millet [Panicum miliaceum L.], or wheat [Triticum aestivum L.]). No-till continuous wheat was also included. The ORG system included a green manure (pea), wheat, lentil, and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and received no inputs. Winter wheat in the ORG system yielded equal or greater than in the NT systems, and had superior grain quality, even though 117 kg N ha-1 was applied to the NT winter wheat. After 4 yr, soil nitrate-N and Olsen-P were 41 and 14% lower in the ORG system, whereas potentially mineralizable N was 23% higher in the ORG system. After 4 yr, total economic net returns were equal between NT and ORG systems on a per-ha basis. Studying simultaneous transition to diversified NT and ORG cropping systems was instructive for increased sustainability.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2007.0190
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20941679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20941679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4440-3442300c14a9d04ce2484b5d4953a52bc591ad6c140db1c8bb89c3259917f6683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWD_OHg2C3lYnH7vdnKRUrYpY0HoO2Wy2pGyTmmyV_ntTWhW8eAqZPPPO5EHohMAlJYxfqWnwbkYB-pdABOygHuEsz6Dg-S7qAQDNiCjoPjqIcQZAiOCkh-QkKBdtZ73DTfBz_OA6kwofBk9s26qpwZ3Hzz77vilX43GYKmc1vklYiLaxpsYD55aqxcPgFwvrpvh1FTszj0dor1FtNMfb8xC93d1OhvfZ03j0MBw8ZZpzDhnjnDIATbgSNXBtKC95lddc5EzltNK5IKou0jvUFdFlVZVCM5oLQfpNUZTsEF1schfBvy9N7OTcRm3Szs74ZZQU0neLvkjg2R9w5pfBpd1kMpJzUpYkQVcbSAcfYzCNXAQ7V2ElCci1bflrW65tp47zbayKWrVNsqpt_GmjwErBCpa46w33aVuz-i9WDkaPdDB6GT8_rmvbSaebhEb5NZ-mvL1SIEmfAN5nJfsCF3ebxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194541881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transition from Intensive Tillage to No-Tillage and Organic Diversified Annual Cropping Systems</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Miller, P.R ; Buschena, D.E ; Jones, C.A ; Holmes, J.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, P.R ; Buschena, D.E ; Jones, C.A ; Holmes, J.A</creatorcontrib><description>Transition to no-till (NT) and organic (ORG) farming systems may enhance sustainability. Our objectives were to compare transitional crop productivity and soil nutrient status among diversified NT and ORG cropping systems in Montana. Three NT systems were designed as 4-yr rotations, including a pulse (lentil [Lens culinaris Medik.] or pea [Pisum sativum L.]), an oilseed (canola [Brassica napus L.] or sunflower [Helianthus annuus L.]) and two cereal crops (corn [Zea mays L.], proso millet [Panicum miliaceum L.], or wheat [Triticum aestivum L.]). No-till continuous wheat was also included. The ORG system included a green manure (pea), wheat, lentil, and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and received no inputs. Winter wheat in the ORG system yielded equal or greater than in the NT systems, and had superior grain quality, even though 117 kg N ha-1 was applied to the NT winter wheat. After 4 yr, soil nitrate-N and Olsen-P were 41 and 14% lower in the ORG system, whereas potentially mineralizable N was 23% higher in the ORG system. After 4 yr, total economic net returns were equal between NT and ORG systems on a per-ha basis. Studying simultaneous transition to diversified NT and ORG cropping systems was instructive for increased sustainability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2007.0190</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brassica napus ; crop quality ; crop rotation ; Cropping systems ; Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage ; crops ; fertilizer rates ; field crops ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Cropping systems and patterns ; grain crops ; grain yield ; green manures ; Helianthus ; Helianthus annuus ; Hordeum vulgare ; legumes ; Lens culinaris ; mineralization ; nitrate nitrogen ; nitrogen fertilizers ; no-tillage ; oil crops ; organic production ; Panicum miliaceum ; phosphorus ; Pisum sativum ; profitability ; soil fertility ; soil test values ; Soil tillage ; Tillage ; Tillage. Tending. Growth control ; Triticum aestivum ; winter wheat ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2008-05, Vol.100 (3), p.591-599</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy May/Jun 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4440-3442300c14a9d04ce2484b5d4953a52bc591ad6c140db1c8bb89c3259917f6683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4440-3442300c14a9d04ce2484b5d4953a52bc591ad6c140db1c8bb89c3259917f6683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20389363$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, P.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buschena, D.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, J.A</creatorcontrib><title>Transition from Intensive Tillage to No-Tillage and Organic Diversified Annual Cropping Systems</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Transition to no-till (NT) and organic (ORG) farming systems may enhance sustainability. Our objectives were to compare transitional crop productivity and soil nutrient status among diversified NT and ORG cropping systems in Montana. Three NT systems were designed as 4-yr rotations, including a pulse (lentil [Lens culinaris Medik.] or pea [Pisum sativum L.]), an oilseed (canola [Brassica napus L.] or sunflower [Helianthus annuus L.]) and two cereal crops (corn [Zea mays L.], proso millet [Panicum miliaceum L.], or wheat [Triticum aestivum L.]). No-till continuous wheat was also included. The ORG system included a green manure (pea), wheat, lentil, and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and received no inputs. Winter wheat in the ORG system yielded equal or greater than in the NT systems, and had superior grain quality, even though 117 kg N ha-1 was applied to the NT winter wheat. After 4 yr, soil nitrate-N and Olsen-P were 41 and 14% lower in the ORG system, whereas potentially mineralizable N was 23% higher in the ORG system. After 4 yr, total economic net returns were equal between NT and ORG systems on a per-ha basis. Studying simultaneous transition to diversified NT and ORG cropping systems was instructive for increased sustainability.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brassica napus</subject><subject>crop quality</subject><subject>crop rotation</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage</subject><subject>crops</subject><subject>fertilizer rates</subject><subject>field crops</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Cropping systems and patterns</subject><subject>grain crops</subject><subject>grain yield</subject><subject>green manures</subject><subject>Helianthus</subject><subject>Helianthus annuus</subject><subject>Hordeum vulgare</subject><subject>legumes</subject><subject>Lens culinaris</subject><subject>mineralization</subject><subject>nitrate nitrogen</subject><subject>nitrogen fertilizers</subject><subject>no-tillage</subject><subject>oil crops</subject><subject>organic production</subject><subject>Panicum miliaceum</subject><subject>phosphorus</subject><subject>Pisum sativum</subject><subject>profitability</subject><subject>soil fertility</subject><subject>soil test values</subject><subject>Soil tillage</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Tillage. Tending. Growth control</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>winter wheat</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWD_OHg2C3lYnH7vdnKRUrYpY0HoO2Wy2pGyTmmyV_ntTWhW8eAqZPPPO5EHohMAlJYxfqWnwbkYB-pdABOygHuEsz6Dg-S7qAQDNiCjoPjqIcQZAiOCkh-QkKBdtZ73DTfBz_OA6kwofBk9s26qpwZ3Hzz77vilX43GYKmc1vklYiLaxpsYD55aqxcPgFwvrpvh1FTszj0dor1FtNMfb8xC93d1OhvfZ03j0MBw8ZZpzDhnjnDIATbgSNXBtKC95lddc5EzltNK5IKou0jvUFdFlVZVCM5oLQfpNUZTsEF1schfBvy9N7OTcRm3Szs74ZZQU0neLvkjg2R9w5pfBpd1kMpJzUpYkQVcbSAcfYzCNXAQ7V2ElCci1bflrW65tp47zbayKWrVNsqpt_GmjwErBCpa46w33aVuz-i9WDkaPdDB6GT8_rmvbSaebhEb5NZ-mvL1SIEmfAN5nJfsCF3ebxg</recordid><startdate>200805</startdate><enddate>200805</enddate><creator>Miller, P.R</creator><creator>Buschena, D.E</creator><creator>Jones, C.A</creator><creator>Holmes, J.A</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200805</creationdate><title>Transition from Intensive Tillage to No-Tillage and Organic Diversified Annual Cropping Systems</title><author>Miller, P.R ; Buschena, D.E ; Jones, C.A ; Holmes, J.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4440-3442300c14a9d04ce2484b5d4953a52bc591ad6c140db1c8bb89c3259917f6683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brassica napus</topic><topic>crop quality</topic><topic>crop rotation</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage</topic><topic>crops</topic><topic>fertilizer rates</topic><topic>field crops</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Cropping systems and patterns</topic><topic>grain crops</topic><topic>grain yield</topic><topic>green manures</topic><topic>Helianthus</topic><topic>Helianthus annuus</topic><topic>Hordeum vulgare</topic><topic>legumes</topic><topic>Lens culinaris</topic><topic>mineralization</topic><topic>nitrate nitrogen</topic><topic>nitrogen fertilizers</topic><topic>no-tillage</topic><topic>oil crops</topic><topic>organic production</topic><topic>Panicum miliaceum</topic><topic>phosphorus</topic><topic>Pisum sativum</topic><topic>profitability</topic><topic>soil fertility</topic><topic>soil test values</topic><topic>Soil tillage</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Tillage. Tending. Growth control</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>winter wheat</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, P.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buschena, D.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, J.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, P.R</au><au>Buschena, D.E</au><au>Jones, C.A</au><au>Holmes, J.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transition from Intensive Tillage to No-Tillage and Organic Diversified Annual Cropping Systems</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2008-05</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>591</spage><epage>599</epage><pages>591-599</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>Transition to no-till (NT) and organic (ORG) farming systems may enhance sustainability. Our objectives were to compare transitional crop productivity and soil nutrient status among diversified NT and ORG cropping systems in Montana. Three NT systems were designed as 4-yr rotations, including a pulse (lentil [Lens culinaris Medik.] or pea [Pisum sativum L.]), an oilseed (canola [Brassica napus L.] or sunflower [Helianthus annuus L.]) and two cereal crops (corn [Zea mays L.], proso millet [Panicum miliaceum L.], or wheat [Triticum aestivum L.]). No-till continuous wheat was also included. The ORG system included a green manure (pea), wheat, lentil, and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and received no inputs. Winter wheat in the ORG system yielded equal or greater than in the NT systems, and had superior grain quality, even though 117 kg N ha-1 was applied to the NT winter wheat. After 4 yr, soil nitrate-N and Olsen-P were 41 and 14% lower in the ORG system, whereas potentially mineralizable N was 23% higher in the ORG system. After 4 yr, total economic net returns were equal between NT and ORG systems on a per-ha basis. Studying simultaneous transition to diversified NT and ORG cropping systems was instructive for increased sustainability.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2007.0190</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2008-05, Vol.100 (3), p.591-599
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20941679
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
Brassica napus
crop quality
crop rotation
Cropping systems
Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage
crops
fertilizer rates
field crops
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
Generalities. Cropping systems and patterns
grain crops
grain yield
green manures
Helianthus
Helianthus annuus
Hordeum vulgare
legumes
Lens culinaris
mineralization
nitrate nitrogen
nitrogen fertilizers
no-tillage
oil crops
organic production
Panicum miliaceum
phosphorus
Pisum sativum
profitability
soil fertility
soil test values
Soil tillage
Tillage
Tillage. Tending. Growth control
Triticum aestivum
winter wheat
Zea mays
title Transition from Intensive Tillage to No-Tillage and Organic Diversified Annual Cropping Systems
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A59%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transition%20from%20Intensive%20Tillage%20to%20No-Tillage%20and%20Organic%20Diversified%20Annual%20Cropping%20Systems&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Miller,%20P.R&rft.date=2008-05&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=591&rft.epage=599&rft.pages=591-599&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2007.0190&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20941679%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4440-3442300c14a9d04ce2484b5d4953a52bc591ad6c140db1c8bb89c3259917f6683%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194541881&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true