Loading…
Prioritisation of catchment management in the Sydney catchment - construction of a pathogen budget
A methodology has been developed to apply the materials budget concept, used in sediment and nutrient studies, to construct a pathogen budget for drinking water catchments, taking into consideration pathogen origin, deposition, inactivation and movement within a catchment. These processes can be des...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water science & technology. Water supply 2004-01, Vol.4 (2), p.35-38 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-ccf0a245bf0053a78d6e9af1a661ba354264bf95cd3719f0cc82eb0844cc88703 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 38 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 35 |
container_title | Water science & technology. Water supply |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Ferguson, C M Ashbolt, N J Deere, DA |
description | A methodology has been developed to apply the materials budget concept, used in sediment and nutrient studies, to construct a pathogen budget for drinking water catchments, taking into consideration pathogen origin, deposition, inactivation and movement within a catchment. These processes can be described in terms of stocks (pathogens) and flows (movement of stocks). In south-eastern Australia, the majority of pathogen loading to major tributaries was predicted to occur during and after high intensity rainfall events where in-stream resuspension was not of great relative importance. In contrast, during dry weather the transit time within the studied catchment was sufficiently long that in-stream processes became relatively important. Total pathogen unit (TPU) budgets were constructed for the parasitic protozoa Cryptosporidium and Giardia. This approach enables water utility managers to identify those catchment segments and processes that are contributing or removing the greatest load of pathogens, and thus where management options will be most effective. With improved knowledge of pathogen ecology this approach can be further refined to provide budgets of infectious pathogen units (IPU), more directed to public health risk endpoints. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2166/ws.2004.0025 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20953934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1943129801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-ccf0a245bf0053a78d6e9af1a661ba354264bf95cd3719f0cc82eb0844cc88703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UtLAzEQB_DgA2yrNz_AguDJrZPHJpujFF9QUFDPSzabbbd0k5pkKf327rYK4snTDMxvBoY_QpcYpgRzfrsNUwLApgAkO0IjzEGkIGR-jMY4Z5RKxjM42Q94KgWTZ2gcwqrnQmAyQuWrb5xvYhNUbJxNXJ1oFfWyNTYmrbJqYfZtY5O4NMnbrrJm94ukiXY2RN_pn3WVbFRcuoWxSdlVCxPP0Wmt1sFcfNcJ-ni4f589pfOXx-fZ3TzVlNCYal2DIiwra4CMKpFX3EhVY8U5LhXNGOGsrGWmKyqwrEHrnJgScsb6LhdAJ-j6cHfj3WdnQizaJmizXitrXBcKAjKjkrJ_QNErgXt49QeuXOdt_0SBJaOYyBwGdXNQ2rsQvKmLjW9a5XcFhmIIqdgON4EVQ0j0C_sOgr0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943129801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prioritisation of catchment management in the Sydney catchment - construction of a pathogen budget</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ferguson, C M ; Ashbolt, N J ; Deere, DA</creator><contributor>Marhsall, M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, C M ; Ashbolt, N J ; Deere, DA ; Marhsall, M</creatorcontrib><description>A methodology has been developed to apply the materials budget concept, used in sediment and nutrient studies, to construct a pathogen budget for drinking water catchments, taking into consideration pathogen origin, deposition, inactivation and movement within a catchment. These processes can be described in terms of stocks (pathogens) and flows (movement of stocks). In south-eastern Australia, the majority of pathogen loading to major tributaries was predicted to occur during and after high intensity rainfall events where in-stream resuspension was not of great relative importance. In contrast, during dry weather the transit time within the studied catchment was sufficiently long that in-stream processes became relatively important. Total pathogen unit (TPU) budgets were constructed for the parasitic protozoa Cryptosporidium and Giardia. This approach enables water utility managers to identify those catchment segments and processes that are contributing or removing the greatest load of pathogens, and thus where management options will be most effective. With improved knowledge of pathogen ecology this approach can be further refined to provide budgets of infectious pathogen units (IPU), more directed to public health risk endpoints.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1606-9749</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1843394650</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781843394655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1607-0798</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/ws.2004.0025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Budgeting ; Budgets ; Catchment area ; Catchments ; Cryptosporidium ; Deactivation ; Drinking water ; Ecological effects ; Freshwater ; Giardia ; Health risks ; Inactivation ; Mineral nutrients ; Parasitic diseases ; Pathogens ; Protozoa ; Public health ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Resuspension ; Rivers ; Stocks ; Transit time ; Tributaries</subject><ispartof>Water science & technology. Water supply, 2004-01, Vol.4 (2), p.35-38</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Apr 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-ccf0a245bf0053a78d6e9af1a661ba354264bf95cd3719f0cc82eb0844cc88703</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23928,23929,25138,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Marhsall, M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashbolt, N J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deere, DA</creatorcontrib><title>Prioritisation of catchment management in the Sydney catchment - construction of a pathogen budget</title><title>Water science & technology. Water supply</title><description>A methodology has been developed to apply the materials budget concept, used in sediment and nutrient studies, to construct a pathogen budget for drinking water catchments, taking into consideration pathogen origin, deposition, inactivation and movement within a catchment. These processes can be described in terms of stocks (pathogens) and flows (movement of stocks). In south-eastern Australia, the majority of pathogen loading to major tributaries was predicted to occur during and after high intensity rainfall events where in-stream resuspension was not of great relative importance. In contrast, during dry weather the transit time within the studied catchment was sufficiently long that in-stream processes became relatively important. Total pathogen unit (TPU) budgets were constructed for the parasitic protozoa Cryptosporidium and Giardia. This approach enables water utility managers to identify those catchment segments and processes that are contributing or removing the greatest load of pathogens, and thus where management options will be most effective. With improved knowledge of pathogen ecology this approach can be further refined to provide budgets of infectious pathogen units (IPU), more directed to public health risk endpoints.</description><subject>Budgeting</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Cryptosporidium</subject><subject>Deactivation</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Giardia</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Inactivation</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>Parasitic diseases</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Protozoa</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Resuspension</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Stocks</subject><subject>Transit time</subject><subject>Tributaries</subject><issn>1606-9749</issn><issn>1607-0798</issn><isbn>1843394650</isbn><isbn>9781843394655</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0UtLAzEQB_DgA2yrNz_AguDJrZPHJpujFF9QUFDPSzabbbd0k5pkKf327rYK4snTDMxvBoY_QpcYpgRzfrsNUwLApgAkO0IjzEGkIGR-jMY4Z5RKxjM42Q94KgWTZ2gcwqrnQmAyQuWrb5xvYhNUbJxNXJ1oFfWyNTYmrbJqYfZtY5O4NMnbrrJm94ukiXY2RN_pn3WVbFRcuoWxSdlVCxPP0Wmt1sFcfNcJ-ni4f589pfOXx-fZ3TzVlNCYal2DIiwra4CMKpFX3EhVY8U5LhXNGOGsrGWmKyqwrEHrnJgScsb6LhdAJ-j6cHfj3WdnQizaJmizXitrXBcKAjKjkrJ_QNErgXt49QeuXOdt_0SBJaOYyBwGdXNQ2rsQvKmLjW9a5XcFhmIIqdgON4EVQ0j0C_sOgr0</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Ferguson, C M</creator><creator>Ashbolt, N J</creator><creator>Deere, DA</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Prioritisation of catchment management in the Sydney catchment - construction of a pathogen budget</title><author>Ferguson, C M ; Ashbolt, N J ; Deere, DA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-ccf0a245bf0053a78d6e9af1a661ba354264bf95cd3719f0cc82eb0844cc88703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Budgeting</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Cryptosporidium</topic><topic>Deactivation</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Giardia</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Inactivation</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>Parasitic diseases</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Protozoa</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Resuspension</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Stocks</topic><topic>Transit time</topic><topic>Tributaries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashbolt, N J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deere, DA</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water science & technology. Water supply</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferguson, C M</au><au>Ashbolt, N J</au><au>Deere, DA</au><au>Marhsall, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prioritisation of catchment management in the Sydney catchment - construction of a pathogen budget</atitle><jtitle>Water science & technology. Water supply</jtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>35-38</pages><issn>1606-9749</issn><eissn>1607-0798</eissn><isbn>1843394650</isbn><isbn>9781843394655</isbn><abstract>A methodology has been developed to apply the materials budget concept, used in sediment and nutrient studies, to construct a pathogen budget for drinking water catchments, taking into consideration pathogen origin, deposition, inactivation and movement within a catchment. These processes can be described in terms of stocks (pathogens) and flows (movement of stocks). In south-eastern Australia, the majority of pathogen loading to major tributaries was predicted to occur during and after high intensity rainfall events where in-stream resuspension was not of great relative importance. In contrast, during dry weather the transit time within the studied catchment was sufficiently long that in-stream processes became relatively important. Total pathogen unit (TPU) budgets were constructed for the parasitic protozoa Cryptosporidium and Giardia. This approach enables water utility managers to identify those catchment segments and processes that are contributing or removing the greatest load of pathogens, and thus where management options will be most effective. With improved knowledge of pathogen ecology this approach can be further refined to provide budgets of infectious pathogen units (IPU), more directed to public health risk endpoints.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><doi>10.2166/ws.2004.0025</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1606-9749 |
ispartof | Water science & technology. Water supply, 2004-01, Vol.4 (2), p.35-38 |
issn | 1606-9749 1607-0798 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20953934 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Budgeting Budgets Catchment area Catchments Cryptosporidium Deactivation Drinking water Ecological effects Freshwater Giardia Health risks Inactivation Mineral nutrients Parasitic diseases Pathogens Protozoa Public health Rain Rainfall Resuspension Rivers Stocks Transit time Tributaries |
title | Prioritisation of catchment management in the Sydney catchment - construction of a pathogen budget |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A05%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prioritisation%20of%20catchment%20management%20in%20the%20Sydney%20catchment%20-%20construction%20of%20a%20pathogen%20budget&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20&%20technology.%20Water%20supply&rft.au=Ferguson,%20C%20M&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=35-38&rft.issn=1606-9749&rft.eissn=1607-0798&rft.isbn=1843394650&rft.isbn_list=9781843394655&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/ws.2004.0025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1943129801%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-ccf0a245bf0053a78d6e9af1a661ba354264bf95cd3719f0cc82eb0844cc88703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943129801&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |