Loading…

Prioritisation of catchment management in the Sydney catchment - construction of a pathogen budget

A methodology has been developed to apply the materials budget concept, used in sediment and nutrient studies, to construct a pathogen budget for drinking water catchments, taking into consideration pathogen origin, deposition, inactivation and movement within a catchment. These processes can be des...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water science & technology. Water supply 2004-01, Vol.4 (2), p.35-38
Main Authors: Ferguson, C M, Ashbolt, N J, Deere, DA
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-ccf0a245bf0053a78d6e9af1a661ba354264bf95cd3719f0cc82eb0844cc88703
cites
container_end_page 38
container_issue 2
container_start_page 35
container_title Water science & technology. Water supply
container_volume 4
creator Ferguson, C M
Ashbolt, N J
Deere, DA
description A methodology has been developed to apply the materials budget concept, used in sediment and nutrient studies, to construct a pathogen budget for drinking water catchments, taking into consideration pathogen origin, deposition, inactivation and movement within a catchment. These processes can be described in terms of stocks (pathogens) and flows (movement of stocks). In south-eastern Australia, the majority of pathogen loading to major tributaries was predicted to occur during and after high intensity rainfall events where in-stream resuspension was not of great relative importance. In contrast, during dry weather the transit time within the studied catchment was sufficiently long that in-stream processes became relatively important. Total pathogen unit (TPU) budgets were constructed for the parasitic protozoa Cryptosporidium and Giardia. This approach enables water utility managers to identify those catchment segments and processes that are contributing or removing the greatest load of pathogens, and thus where management options will be most effective. With improved knowledge of pathogen ecology this approach can be further refined to provide budgets of infectious pathogen units (IPU), more directed to public health risk endpoints.
doi_str_mv 10.2166/ws.2004.0025
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20953934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1943129801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-ccf0a245bf0053a78d6e9af1a661ba354264bf95cd3719f0cc82eb0844cc88703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UtLAzEQB_DgA2yrNz_AguDJrZPHJpujFF9QUFDPSzabbbd0k5pkKf327rYK4snTDMxvBoY_QpcYpgRzfrsNUwLApgAkO0IjzEGkIGR-jMY4Z5RKxjM42Q94KgWTZ2gcwqrnQmAyQuWrb5xvYhNUbJxNXJ1oFfWyNTYmrbJqYfZtY5O4NMnbrrJm94ukiXY2RN_pn3WVbFRcuoWxSdlVCxPP0Wmt1sFcfNcJ-ni4f589pfOXx-fZ3TzVlNCYal2DIiwra4CMKpFX3EhVY8U5LhXNGOGsrGWmKyqwrEHrnJgScsb6LhdAJ-j6cHfj3WdnQizaJmizXitrXBcKAjKjkrJ_QNErgXt49QeuXOdt_0SBJaOYyBwGdXNQ2rsQvKmLjW9a5XcFhmIIqdgON4EVQ0j0C_sOgr0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943129801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prioritisation of catchment management in the Sydney catchment - construction of a pathogen budget</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ferguson, C M ; Ashbolt, N J ; Deere, DA</creator><contributor>Marhsall, M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, C M ; Ashbolt, N J ; Deere, DA ; Marhsall, M</creatorcontrib><description>A methodology has been developed to apply the materials budget concept, used in sediment and nutrient studies, to construct a pathogen budget for drinking water catchments, taking into consideration pathogen origin, deposition, inactivation and movement within a catchment. These processes can be described in terms of stocks (pathogens) and flows (movement of stocks). In south-eastern Australia, the majority of pathogen loading to major tributaries was predicted to occur during and after high intensity rainfall events where in-stream resuspension was not of great relative importance. In contrast, during dry weather the transit time within the studied catchment was sufficiently long that in-stream processes became relatively important. Total pathogen unit (TPU) budgets were constructed for the parasitic protozoa Cryptosporidium and Giardia. This approach enables water utility managers to identify those catchment segments and processes that are contributing or removing the greatest load of pathogens, and thus where management options will be most effective. With improved knowledge of pathogen ecology this approach can be further refined to provide budgets of infectious pathogen units (IPU), more directed to public health risk endpoints.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1606-9749</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1843394650</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781843394655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1607-0798</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/ws.2004.0025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Budgeting ; Budgets ; Catchment area ; Catchments ; Cryptosporidium ; Deactivation ; Drinking water ; Ecological effects ; Freshwater ; Giardia ; Health risks ; Inactivation ; Mineral nutrients ; Parasitic diseases ; Pathogens ; Protozoa ; Public health ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Resuspension ; Rivers ; Stocks ; Transit time ; Tributaries</subject><ispartof>Water science &amp; technology. Water supply, 2004-01, Vol.4 (2), p.35-38</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Apr 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-ccf0a245bf0053a78d6e9af1a661ba354264bf95cd3719f0cc82eb0844cc88703</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23928,23929,25138,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Marhsall, M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashbolt, N J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deere, DA</creatorcontrib><title>Prioritisation of catchment management in the Sydney catchment - construction of a pathogen budget</title><title>Water science &amp; technology. Water supply</title><description>A methodology has been developed to apply the materials budget concept, used in sediment and nutrient studies, to construct a pathogen budget for drinking water catchments, taking into consideration pathogen origin, deposition, inactivation and movement within a catchment. These processes can be described in terms of stocks (pathogens) and flows (movement of stocks). In south-eastern Australia, the majority of pathogen loading to major tributaries was predicted to occur during and after high intensity rainfall events where in-stream resuspension was not of great relative importance. In contrast, during dry weather the transit time within the studied catchment was sufficiently long that in-stream processes became relatively important. Total pathogen unit (TPU) budgets were constructed for the parasitic protozoa Cryptosporidium and Giardia. This approach enables water utility managers to identify those catchment segments and processes that are contributing or removing the greatest load of pathogens, and thus where management options will be most effective. With improved knowledge of pathogen ecology this approach can be further refined to provide budgets of infectious pathogen units (IPU), more directed to public health risk endpoints.</description><subject>Budgeting</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Cryptosporidium</subject><subject>Deactivation</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Giardia</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Inactivation</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>Parasitic diseases</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Protozoa</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Resuspension</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Stocks</subject><subject>Transit time</subject><subject>Tributaries</subject><issn>1606-9749</issn><issn>1607-0798</issn><isbn>1843394650</isbn><isbn>9781843394655</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0UtLAzEQB_DgA2yrNz_AguDJrZPHJpujFF9QUFDPSzabbbd0k5pkKf327rYK4snTDMxvBoY_QpcYpgRzfrsNUwLApgAkO0IjzEGkIGR-jMY4Z5RKxjM42Q94KgWTZ2gcwqrnQmAyQuWrb5xvYhNUbJxNXJ1oFfWyNTYmrbJqYfZtY5O4NMnbrrJm94ukiXY2RN_pn3WVbFRcuoWxSdlVCxPP0Wmt1sFcfNcJ-ni4f589pfOXx-fZ3TzVlNCYal2DIiwra4CMKpFX3EhVY8U5LhXNGOGsrGWmKyqwrEHrnJgScsb6LhdAJ-j6cHfj3WdnQizaJmizXitrXBcKAjKjkrJ_QNErgXt49QeuXOdt_0SBJaOYyBwGdXNQ2rsQvKmLjW9a5XcFhmIIqdgON4EVQ0j0C_sOgr0</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Ferguson, C M</creator><creator>Ashbolt, N J</creator><creator>Deere, DA</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Prioritisation of catchment management in the Sydney catchment - construction of a pathogen budget</title><author>Ferguson, C M ; Ashbolt, N J ; Deere, DA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-ccf0a245bf0053a78d6e9af1a661ba354264bf95cd3719f0cc82eb0844cc88703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Budgeting</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Cryptosporidium</topic><topic>Deactivation</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Giardia</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Inactivation</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>Parasitic diseases</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Protozoa</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Resuspension</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Stocks</topic><topic>Transit time</topic><topic>Tributaries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashbolt, N J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deere, DA</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water science &amp; technology. Water supply</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferguson, C M</au><au>Ashbolt, N J</au><au>Deere, DA</au><au>Marhsall, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prioritisation of catchment management in the Sydney catchment - construction of a pathogen budget</atitle><jtitle>Water science &amp; technology. Water supply</jtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>35-38</pages><issn>1606-9749</issn><eissn>1607-0798</eissn><isbn>1843394650</isbn><isbn>9781843394655</isbn><abstract>A methodology has been developed to apply the materials budget concept, used in sediment and nutrient studies, to construct a pathogen budget for drinking water catchments, taking into consideration pathogen origin, deposition, inactivation and movement within a catchment. These processes can be described in terms of stocks (pathogens) and flows (movement of stocks). In south-eastern Australia, the majority of pathogen loading to major tributaries was predicted to occur during and after high intensity rainfall events where in-stream resuspension was not of great relative importance. In contrast, during dry weather the transit time within the studied catchment was sufficiently long that in-stream processes became relatively important. Total pathogen unit (TPU) budgets were constructed for the parasitic protozoa Cryptosporidium and Giardia. This approach enables water utility managers to identify those catchment segments and processes that are contributing or removing the greatest load of pathogens, and thus where management options will be most effective. With improved knowledge of pathogen ecology this approach can be further refined to provide budgets of infectious pathogen units (IPU), more directed to public health risk endpoints.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><doi>10.2166/ws.2004.0025</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1606-9749
ispartof Water science & technology. Water supply, 2004-01, Vol.4 (2), p.35-38
issn 1606-9749
1607-0798
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_20953934
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Budgeting
Budgets
Catchment area
Catchments
Cryptosporidium
Deactivation
Drinking water
Ecological effects
Freshwater
Giardia
Health risks
Inactivation
Mineral nutrients
Parasitic diseases
Pathogens
Protozoa
Public health
Rain
Rainfall
Resuspension
Rivers
Stocks
Transit time
Tributaries
title Prioritisation of catchment management in the Sydney catchment - construction of a pathogen budget
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A05%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prioritisation%20of%20catchment%20management%20in%20the%20Sydney%20catchment%20-%20construction%20of%20a%20pathogen%20budget&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20&%20technology.%20Water%20supply&rft.au=Ferguson,%20C%20M&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=35-38&rft.issn=1606-9749&rft.eissn=1607-0798&rft.isbn=1843394650&rft.isbn_list=9781843394655&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/ws.2004.0025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1943129801%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-ccf0a245bf0053a78d6e9af1a661ba354264bf95cd3719f0cc82eb0844cc88703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943129801&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true