Quali-quantitative characterization and wastewater treatment of a winery located in the mid-west of Santa Catarina state, South of Brazil

• Published in: Water science and technology 2009-01, Vol.60 (4), p.1025-1031
• Main Authors: Ortigara, A R C, Sezerino, P H, Bento, A P, Scaratti, D
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aeration; Animals; Biodegradation, Environmental; Biofilters; Bioreactors; Brazil; Construction materials; Effluents; Filtration; Food industries wastewaters; Industrial Waste - analysis; Marine; Marine molluscs; Organic loading; Ostreidae; Oxygen - isolation & purification; Ozone; Removal; Seasons; Vitaceae; Waste Disposal, Fluid; Wastewater; Wastewater treatment; Water consumption; Water Purification - methods; Water Supply; Water use; Wine; Wineries; Wineries & vineyards
• ISSN: 0273-1223; 1996-9732
• DOI: 10.2166/wst.2009.550

This paper analyses variations in the quali-quantitative characterization of winery wastewater, and the behavior of the treatment of these effluents. The wastewater produced is sent to two disposition systems: Point A receives the wastewater from the production area whereas Point B receives the wastewater from the area where the washing of bottles takes place. Two Aerated Submerged Biofilter (ASB) reactors (with oyster shells as support material) were built at lab scale to promote the treatment of the winery effluent. Water usage and effluent production values of the 2008 harvest season indicate that grape processing accounted for 30% of the total water usage. The median value found for the effluent at Point A was 8,260 mg COD L(-1) and at Point B 358 mg COD L(-1). The average C/N/P ratio found at Point A was 100/0.29/0.28 during the harvest and 100/0.27/0.25 during the non harvest. For ASB 1 the COD removal efficiency ranged from 56% to 90%, with the removed organic load ranging from 1.5 kg COD m(-3) d(-1) to 2.7 kg COD m(-3) d(-1), respectively. For ASB 2 the COD removal efficiency ranged from 63% to 82%, with the removed organic load ranging from 1.8 kg COD m(-3) d(-1) to 1.7 kg COD m(-3) d(-1), respectively.