Attentional bias to pain-related information: a meta-analysis of dot-probe studies

• Published in: Health psychology review 2018-12, Vol.12 (4), p.419-436
• Main Authors: Todd, Jemma, van Ryckeghem, Dimitri M.L., Sharpe, Louise, Crombez, Geert
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acute Pain - psychology; Attentional Bias; Bias; Chronic pain; Chronic Pain - psychology; dot-probe; Humans; Meta-analysis; Pain; Photic Stimulation; Psycholinguistics; Systematic review; Terminology as Topic
• ISSN: 1743-7199; 1743-7202
• DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1521729

Studies investigating attentional biases towards pain information vary widely in both design and results. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the degree to which attentional biases towards pain occur when measured with the dot-probe task. A total of 2168 references were screened, resulting in a final sample of 4466 participants from 52 articles. Participants were grouped according to pain experience: chronic pain, acute pain, anticipating experimental/procedural pain, social concern for pain, or healthy people. In general, results revealed a significant, but small bias towards pain words (d =  0.136), and pain pictures (d =  0.110) in chronic pain patients, but not in those with acute pain, those anticipating pain, or healthy people. Follow-up analyses revealed an attentional bias towards sensory pain words in the chronic pain group (d =  0.198), and the acute pain group (d =  0.303), but not other groups. In contrast, attentional biases towards affective pain stimuli were not significant for any pain groups. This meta-analysis found support for attentional biases towards sensory pain stimuli in patients with chronic pain in comparison to healthy individuals across a range of common parameters. Future researchers need to consider task design when seeking to optimally measure pain-relevant attentional biases.