Loading…

Estimates of Net Atmospheric Moisture Flux Convergence over the Amazon Basin: A Comparison of Reanalysis Products

Estimates of the net convergence of atmospheric moisture flux over the Amazon Basin, [C], derived using data products from three global reanalyses, the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis (NCEP-1), the NCEP/Department of Energy reanalysis (NCEP-2), and the 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40), are compared. Two types...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hydrometeorology 2008-10, Vol.9 (5), p.1035-1047
Main Authors: Karam, Hanan N., Bras, Rafael L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-51720e2f1bb85467815c9a36186a4a550a1f70557f11d31f8846db0f45098b3e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-51720e2f1bb85467815c9a36186a4a550a1f70557f11d31f8846db0f45098b3e3
container_end_page 1047
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1035
container_title Journal of hydrometeorology
container_volume 9
creator Karam, Hanan N.
Bras, Rafael L.
description Estimates of the net convergence of atmospheric moisture flux over the Amazon Basin, [C], derived using data products from three global reanalyses, the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis (NCEP-1), the NCEP/Department of Energy reanalysis (NCEP-2), and the 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40), are compared. Two types of uncertainty in these [C] estimates are distinguished and quantified: “model-associated uncertainty,” which necessarily arises from imperfections in the numerical weather models or data assimilation algorithms, and “postprocessing uncertainty” introduced by operations performed on the original reanalysis data products to compute [C], particularly the finite-difference approximation of divergence. Model-associated uncertainty is found to overwhelm the postprocessing error. A closer look at the time series of this field extending over the period 1980–2001, and their comparison to basin-averaged precipitation and runoff data, reveals the signatures of two potential sources of model-associated errors. 1) ERA-40 estimates of [C] exhibit an artificial shift in 1987, possibly produced by the start of assimilation of Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) data. The estimates preceding 1988 are negatively biased relative to the remaining time series, and hence subsequent analysis is limited to the 14-yr period 1988–2001. 2) NCEP-1 and NCEP-2 estimates of [C] show a negative bias over the period 1992–98, which likely originates in biased Television and Infrared Observation Satellite (TIROS) Operational Vertical Sounder (TOVS) data assimilated by these reanalyses. A measure of the random error in the [C] time series produced by each reanalysis, computed using river discharge data as reference, indicates that ERA-40 gives the most accurate estimates of net atmospheric moisture flux convergence for the aforementioned 14-yr period.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/2008JHM887.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21041909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24911915</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24911915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-51720e2f1bb85467815c9a36186a4a550a1f70557f11d31f8846db0f45098b3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkDFPwzAUhC0EEqWwsSJ5YiLFz4ljZyxVS0EtLCCxRU76TFMlcbGdCvj1BBWV6W74dNJ9hFwCGwFIccsZU4_zpVJyBEdkAIKLSIoEjg9dvJ2SM-83jLEkAzUgi6kPVaMDemoNfcJAx6GxfrtGV5V0aSsfOod0VnefdGLbHbp3bEuktm80rJGOG_1tW3qnfdWekxOja48Xfzkkr7Ppy2QeLZ7vHybjRVTGPA2RAMkZcgNFoUSSSgWizHScgkp1ooVgGoxkQkgDsIrBKJWkq4KZRLBMFTHGQ3K93906-9GhD3lT-RLrWrdoO59zYAlkLOvBmz1YOuu9Q5NvXf_WfeXA8l9l-b-yHHr8ao9vfLDuwPJeFWQg4h8k12a2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21041909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimates of Net Atmospheric Moisture Flux Convergence over the Amazon Basin: A Comparison of Reanalysis Products</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Karam, Hanan N. ; Bras, Rafael L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Karam, Hanan N. ; Bras, Rafael L.</creatorcontrib><description>Estimates of the net convergence of atmospheric moisture flux over the Amazon Basin, [C], derived using data products from three global reanalyses, the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis (NCEP-1), the NCEP/Department of Energy reanalysis (NCEP-2), and the 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40), are compared. Two types of uncertainty in these [C] estimates are distinguished and quantified: “model-associated uncertainty,” which necessarily arises from imperfections in the numerical weather models or data assimilation algorithms, and “postprocessing uncertainty” introduced by operations performed on the original reanalysis data products to compute [C], particularly the finite-difference approximation of divergence. Model-associated uncertainty is found to overwhelm the postprocessing error. A closer look at the time series of this field extending over the period 1980–2001, and their comparison to basin-averaged precipitation and runoff data, reveals the signatures of two potential sources of model-associated errors. 1) ERA-40 estimates of [C] exhibit an artificial shift in 1987, possibly produced by the start of assimilation of Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) data. The estimates preceding 1988 are negatively biased relative to the remaining time series, and hence subsequent analysis is limited to the 14-yr period 1988–2001. 2) NCEP-1 and NCEP-2 estimates of [C] show a negative bias over the period 1992–98, which likely originates in biased Television and Infrared Observation Satellite (TIROS) Operational Vertical Sounder (TOVS) data assimilated by these reanalyses. A measure of the random error in the [C] time series produced by each reanalysis, computed using river discharge data as reference, indicates that ERA-40 gives the most accurate estimates of net atmospheric moisture flux convergence for the aforementioned 14-yr period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-755X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-7541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/2008JHM887.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Analytical estimating ; Atmospheric moisture ; Atmospherics ; Datasets ; Estimate reliability ; Estimation bias ; Time series ; Water balance ; Water cycle ; Water vapor</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrometeorology, 2008-10, Vol.9 (5), p.1035-1047</ispartof><rights>2008 American Meteorological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-51720e2f1bb85467815c9a36186a4a550a1f70557f11d31f8846db0f45098b3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-51720e2f1bb85467815c9a36186a4a550a1f70557f11d31f8846db0f45098b3e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24911915$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24911915$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karam, Hanan N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bras, Rafael L.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimates of Net Atmospheric Moisture Flux Convergence over the Amazon Basin: A Comparison of Reanalysis Products</title><title>Journal of hydrometeorology</title><description>Estimates of the net convergence of atmospheric moisture flux over the Amazon Basin, [C], derived using data products from three global reanalyses, the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis (NCEP-1), the NCEP/Department of Energy reanalysis (NCEP-2), and the 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40), are compared. Two types of uncertainty in these [C] estimates are distinguished and quantified: “model-associated uncertainty,” which necessarily arises from imperfections in the numerical weather models or data assimilation algorithms, and “postprocessing uncertainty” introduced by operations performed on the original reanalysis data products to compute [C], particularly the finite-difference approximation of divergence. Model-associated uncertainty is found to overwhelm the postprocessing error. A closer look at the time series of this field extending over the period 1980–2001, and their comparison to basin-averaged precipitation and runoff data, reveals the signatures of two potential sources of model-associated errors. 1) ERA-40 estimates of [C] exhibit an artificial shift in 1987, possibly produced by the start of assimilation of Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) data. The estimates preceding 1988 are negatively biased relative to the remaining time series, and hence subsequent analysis is limited to the 14-yr period 1988–2001. 2) NCEP-1 and NCEP-2 estimates of [C] show a negative bias over the period 1992–98, which likely originates in biased Television and Infrared Observation Satellite (TIROS) Operational Vertical Sounder (TOVS) data assimilated by these reanalyses. A measure of the random error in the [C] time series produced by each reanalysis, computed using river discharge data as reference, indicates that ERA-40 gives the most accurate estimates of net atmospheric moisture flux convergence for the aforementioned 14-yr period.</description><subject>Analytical estimating</subject><subject>Atmospheric moisture</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Estimate reliability</subject><subject>Estimation bias</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Water balance</subject><subject>Water cycle</subject><subject>Water vapor</subject><issn>1525-755X</issn><issn>1525-7541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkDFPwzAUhC0EEqWwsSJ5YiLFz4ljZyxVS0EtLCCxRU76TFMlcbGdCvj1BBWV6W74dNJ9hFwCGwFIccsZU4_zpVJyBEdkAIKLSIoEjg9dvJ2SM-83jLEkAzUgi6kPVaMDemoNfcJAx6GxfrtGV5V0aSsfOod0VnefdGLbHbp3bEuktm80rJGOG_1tW3qnfdWekxOja48Xfzkkr7Ppy2QeLZ7vHybjRVTGPA2RAMkZcgNFoUSSSgWizHScgkp1ooVgGoxkQkgDsIrBKJWkq4KZRLBMFTHGQ3K93906-9GhD3lT-RLrWrdoO59zYAlkLOvBmz1YOuu9Q5NvXf_WfeXA8l9l-b-yHHr8ao9vfLDuwPJeFWQg4h8k12a2</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Karam, Hanan N.</creator><creator>Bras, Rafael L.</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Estimates of Net Atmospheric Moisture Flux Convergence over the Amazon Basin</title><author>Karam, Hanan N. ; Bras, Rafael L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-51720e2f1bb85467815c9a36186a4a550a1f70557f11d31f8846db0f45098b3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Analytical estimating</topic><topic>Atmospheric moisture</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Estimate reliability</topic><topic>Estimation bias</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Water balance</topic><topic>Water cycle</topic><topic>Water vapor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karam, Hanan N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bras, Rafael L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrometeorology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karam, Hanan N.</au><au>Bras, Rafael L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimates of Net Atmospheric Moisture Flux Convergence over the Amazon Basin: A Comparison of Reanalysis Products</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrometeorology</jtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1035</spage><epage>1047</epage><pages>1035-1047</pages><issn>1525-755X</issn><eissn>1525-7541</eissn><abstract>Estimates of the net convergence of atmospheric moisture flux over the Amazon Basin, [C], derived using data products from three global reanalyses, the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis (NCEP-1), the NCEP/Department of Energy reanalysis (NCEP-2), and the 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40), are compared. Two types of uncertainty in these [C] estimates are distinguished and quantified: “model-associated uncertainty,” which necessarily arises from imperfections in the numerical weather models or data assimilation algorithms, and “postprocessing uncertainty” introduced by operations performed on the original reanalysis data products to compute [C], particularly the finite-difference approximation of divergence. Model-associated uncertainty is found to overwhelm the postprocessing error. A closer look at the time series of this field extending over the period 1980–2001, and their comparison to basin-averaged precipitation and runoff data, reveals the signatures of two potential sources of model-associated errors. 1) ERA-40 estimates of [C] exhibit an artificial shift in 1987, possibly produced by the start of assimilation of Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) data. The estimates preceding 1988 are negatively biased relative to the remaining time series, and hence subsequent analysis is limited to the 14-yr period 1988–2001. 2) NCEP-1 and NCEP-2 estimates of [C] show a negative bias over the period 1992–98, which likely originates in biased Television and Infrared Observation Satellite (TIROS) Operational Vertical Sounder (TOVS) data assimilated by these reanalyses. A measure of the random error in the [C] time series produced by each reanalysis, computed using river discharge data as reference, indicates that ERA-40 gives the most accurate estimates of net atmospheric moisture flux convergence for the aforementioned 14-yr period.</abstract><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/2008JHM887.1</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-755X
ispartof Journal of hydrometeorology, 2008-10, Vol.9 (5), p.1035-1047
issn 1525-755X
1525-7541
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21041909
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Analytical estimating
Atmospheric moisture
Atmospherics
Datasets
Estimate reliability
Estimation bias
Time series
Water balance
Water cycle
Water vapor
title Estimates of Net Atmospheric Moisture Flux Convergence over the Amazon Basin: A Comparison of Reanalysis Products
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T17%3A56%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimates%20of%20Net%20Atmospheric%20Moisture%20Flux%20Convergence%20over%20the%20Amazon%20Basin:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Reanalysis%20Products&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrometeorology&rft.au=Karam,%20Hanan%20N.&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1035&rft.epage=1047&rft.pages=1035-1047&rft.issn=1525-755X&rft.eissn=1525-7541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/2008JHM887.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24911915%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-51720e2f1bb85467815c9a36186a4a550a1f70557f11d31f8846db0f45098b3e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21041909&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24911915&rfr_iscdi=true