Loading…
Lightning Charge Retrievals: Dimensional Reduction, LDAR Constraints, and a First Comparison with LIS Satellite Data
A “dimensional reduction” (“DR”) method is introduced for analyzing lightning field changes (ΔEs) whereby the number of unknowns in a discrete two-charge model is reduced from the standard eight (x, y, z, Q, x′, y′, z′, Q′) to just four (x, y, z, Q). The four unknowns (x, y, z, Q) are found by perfo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology 2007-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1817-1838 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-f336907fb6016e5a74e135355389b853fa2508b74fe583e91a6ec06b34229a413 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-f336907fb6016e5a74e135355389b853fa2508b74fe583e91a6ec06b34229a413 |
container_end_page | 1838 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1817 |
container_title | Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Koshak, W J Krider, E P Murray, N Boccippio, D J |
description | A “dimensional reduction” (“DR”) method is introduced for analyzing lightning field changes (ΔEs) whereby the number of unknowns in a discrete two-charge model is reduced from the standard eight (x, y, z, Q, x′, y′, z′, Q′) to just four (x, y, z, Q). The four unknowns (x, y, z, Q) are found by performing a numerical minimization of a chi-square function. At each step of the minimization, an overdetermined fixed matrix (OFM) method is used to immediately retrieve the best “residual source” (x′, y′, z′, Q′), given the values of (x, y, z, Q). In this way, all eight parameters (x, y, z, Q, x′, y′, z′, Q′) are found, yet a numerical search of only four parameters (x, y, z, Q) is required. The DR method has been used to analyze lightning-caused ΔEs derived from multiple ground-based electric field measurements at the NASA Kennedy Space Center (KSC) and U.S. Air Force Eastern Range (ER). The accuracy of the DR method has been assessed by comparing retrievals with data provided by the lightning detection and ranging (LDAR) system at the KSC-ER, and from least squares error estimation theory, and the method is shown to be a useful “stand alone” charge retrieval tool. Since more than one charge distribution describes a finite set of ΔEs (i.e., solutions are nonunique), and since there can be appreciable differences in the physical characteristics of these solutions, not all DR solutions are physically acceptable. Hence, an alternative and more accurate method of analysis is introduced that uses LDAR data to constrain the geometry of the charge solutions, thereby removing physically unacceptable retrievals. The charge solutions derived from this method are shown to compare well with independent satellite- and ground-based observations of lightning in several Florida storms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/JTECH2089.1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21065788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21065788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-f336907fb6016e5a74e135355389b853fa2508b74fe583e91a6ec06b34229a413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4gUsDlxoin9ix-FWpS0tioTUlnPkpE7rKnGK7YB4e4yKOHDa1e6n0cwAcIvRGOOEPb5sZtmCIJGO8RkYYEZQhGLCz8EAJTSNEEvIJbhy7oAQwhTzAfC53u290WYHs720OwVXylutPmTjnuBUt8o43RnZhPu2r3zYRzCfTlYw64zzVmrj3QhKs4USzrV1Pjzao7TadQZ-ar-H-XIN19KrptFewan08hpc1EFf3fzOIXibzzbZIspfn5fZJI8qSoSPakp5ipK65AhzxWQSK0wZZYyKtBSM1pIwJMokrhUTVKVYclUhXtKYkFTGmA7B_Un3aLv3XjlftNpVwYg0qutdQTDiLBEigHf_wEPX25A6MIQwnHKMAvRwgirbOWdVXRytbqX9KjAqfuov_uovMP0GAmV2Hw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222519610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lightning Charge Retrievals: Dimensional Reduction, LDAR Constraints, and a First Comparison with LIS Satellite Data</title><source>Freely Accessible Science Journals</source><creator>Koshak, W J ; Krider, E P ; Murray, N ; Boccippio, D J</creator><creatorcontrib>Koshak, W J ; Krider, E P ; Murray, N ; Boccippio, D J</creatorcontrib><description>A “dimensional reduction” (“DR”) method is introduced for analyzing lightning field changes (ΔEs) whereby the number of unknowns in a discrete two-charge model is reduced from the standard eight (x, y, z, Q, x′, y′, z′, Q′) to just four (x, y, z, Q). The four unknowns (x, y, z, Q) are found by performing a numerical minimization of a chi-square function. At each step of the minimization, an overdetermined fixed matrix (OFM) method is used to immediately retrieve the best “residual source” (x′, y′, z′, Q′), given the values of (x, y, z, Q). In this way, all eight parameters (x, y, z, Q, x′, y′, z′, Q′) are found, yet a numerical search of only four parameters (x, y, z, Q) is required. The DR method has been used to analyze lightning-caused ΔEs derived from multiple ground-based electric field measurements at the NASA Kennedy Space Center (KSC) and U.S. Air Force Eastern Range (ER). The accuracy of the DR method has been assessed by comparing retrievals with data provided by the lightning detection and ranging (LDAR) system at the KSC-ER, and from least squares error estimation theory, and the method is shown to be a useful “stand alone” charge retrieval tool. Since more than one charge distribution describes a finite set of ΔEs (i.e., solutions are nonunique), and since there can be appreciable differences in the physical characteristics of these solutions, not all DR solutions are physically acceptable. Hence, an alternative and more accurate method of analysis is introduced that uses LDAR data to constrain the geometry of the charge solutions, thereby removing physically unacceptable retrievals. The charge solutions derived from this method are shown to compare well with independent satellite- and ground-based observations of lightning in several Florida storms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0739-0572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0426</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/JTECH2089.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Electric fields ; Lightning ; Meteorology</subject><ispartof>Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology, 2007-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1817-1838</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Nov 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-f336907fb6016e5a74e135355389b853fa2508b74fe583e91a6ec06b34229a413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-f336907fb6016e5a74e135355389b853fa2508b74fe583e91a6ec06b34229a413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koshak, W J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krider, E P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boccippio, D J</creatorcontrib><title>Lightning Charge Retrievals: Dimensional Reduction, LDAR Constraints, and a First Comparison with LIS Satellite Data</title><title>Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology</title><description>A “dimensional reduction” (“DR”) method is introduced for analyzing lightning field changes (ΔEs) whereby the number of unknowns in a discrete two-charge model is reduced from the standard eight (x, y, z, Q, x′, y′, z′, Q′) to just four (x, y, z, Q). The four unknowns (x, y, z, Q) are found by performing a numerical minimization of a chi-square function. At each step of the minimization, an overdetermined fixed matrix (OFM) method is used to immediately retrieve the best “residual source” (x′, y′, z′, Q′), given the values of (x, y, z, Q). In this way, all eight parameters (x, y, z, Q, x′, y′, z′, Q′) are found, yet a numerical search of only four parameters (x, y, z, Q) is required. The DR method has been used to analyze lightning-caused ΔEs derived from multiple ground-based electric field measurements at the NASA Kennedy Space Center (KSC) and U.S. Air Force Eastern Range (ER). The accuracy of the DR method has been assessed by comparing retrievals with data provided by the lightning detection and ranging (LDAR) system at the KSC-ER, and from least squares error estimation theory, and the method is shown to be a useful “stand alone” charge retrieval tool. Since more than one charge distribution describes a finite set of ΔEs (i.e., solutions are nonunique), and since there can be appreciable differences in the physical characteristics of these solutions, not all DR solutions are physically acceptable. Hence, an alternative and more accurate method of analysis is introduced that uses LDAR data to constrain the geometry of the charge solutions, thereby removing physically unacceptable retrievals. The charge solutions derived from this method are shown to compare well with independent satellite- and ground-based observations of lightning in several Florida storms.</description><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Lightning</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><issn>0739-0572</issn><issn>1520-0426</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4gUsDlxoin9ix-FWpS0tioTUlnPkpE7rKnGK7YB4e4yKOHDa1e6n0cwAcIvRGOOEPb5sZtmCIJGO8RkYYEZQhGLCz8EAJTSNEEvIJbhy7oAQwhTzAfC53u290WYHs720OwVXylutPmTjnuBUt8o43RnZhPu2r3zYRzCfTlYw64zzVmrj3QhKs4USzrV1Pjzao7TadQZ-ar-H-XIN19KrptFewan08hpc1EFf3fzOIXibzzbZIspfn5fZJI8qSoSPakp5ipK65AhzxWQSK0wZZYyKtBSM1pIwJMokrhUTVKVYclUhXtKYkFTGmA7B_Un3aLv3XjlftNpVwYg0qutdQTDiLBEigHf_wEPX25A6MIQwnHKMAvRwgirbOWdVXRytbqX9KjAqfuov_uovMP0GAmV2Hw</recordid><startdate>20071101</startdate><enddate>20071101</enddate><creator>Koshak, W J</creator><creator>Krider, E P</creator><creator>Murray, N</creator><creator>Boccippio, D J</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>H95</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071101</creationdate><title>Lightning Charge Retrievals: Dimensional Reduction, LDAR Constraints, and a First Comparison with LIS Satellite Data</title><author>Koshak, W J ; Krider, E P ; Murray, N ; Boccippio, D J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-f336907fb6016e5a74e135355389b853fa2508b74fe583e91a6ec06b34229a413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Lightning</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koshak, W J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krider, E P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boccippio, D J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koshak, W J</au><au>Krider, E P</au><au>Murray, N</au><au>Boccippio, D J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lightning Charge Retrievals: Dimensional Reduction, LDAR Constraints, and a First Comparison with LIS Satellite Data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology</jtitle><date>2007-11-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1817</spage><epage>1838</epage><pages>1817-1838</pages><issn>0739-0572</issn><eissn>1520-0426</eissn><abstract>A “dimensional reduction” (“DR”) method is introduced for analyzing lightning field changes (ΔEs) whereby the number of unknowns in a discrete two-charge model is reduced from the standard eight (x, y, z, Q, x′, y′, z′, Q′) to just four (x, y, z, Q). The four unknowns (x, y, z, Q) are found by performing a numerical minimization of a chi-square function. At each step of the minimization, an overdetermined fixed matrix (OFM) method is used to immediately retrieve the best “residual source” (x′, y′, z′, Q′), given the values of (x, y, z, Q). In this way, all eight parameters (x, y, z, Q, x′, y′, z′, Q′) are found, yet a numerical search of only four parameters (x, y, z, Q) is required. The DR method has been used to analyze lightning-caused ΔEs derived from multiple ground-based electric field measurements at the NASA Kennedy Space Center (KSC) and U.S. Air Force Eastern Range (ER). The accuracy of the DR method has been assessed by comparing retrievals with data provided by the lightning detection and ranging (LDAR) system at the KSC-ER, and from least squares error estimation theory, and the method is shown to be a useful “stand alone” charge retrieval tool. Since more than one charge distribution describes a finite set of ΔEs (i.e., solutions are nonunique), and since there can be appreciable differences in the physical characteristics of these solutions, not all DR solutions are physically acceptable. Hence, an alternative and more accurate method of analysis is introduced that uses LDAR data to constrain the geometry of the charge solutions, thereby removing physically unacceptable retrievals. The charge solutions derived from this method are shown to compare well with independent satellite- and ground-based observations of lightning in several Florida storms.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/JTECH2089.1</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0739-0572 |
ispartof | Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology, 2007-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1817-1838 |
issn | 0739-0572 1520-0426 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21065788 |
source | Freely Accessible Science Journals |
subjects | Electric fields Lightning Meteorology |
title | Lightning Charge Retrievals: Dimensional Reduction, LDAR Constraints, and a First Comparison with LIS Satellite Data |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A53%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lightning%20Charge%20Retrievals:%20Dimensional%20Reduction,%20LDAR%20Constraints,%20and%20a%20First%20Comparison%20with%20LIS%20Satellite%20Data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20atmospheric%20and%20oceanic%20technology&rft.au=Koshak,%20W%20J&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1817&rft.epage=1838&rft.pages=1817-1838&rft.issn=0739-0572&rft.eissn=1520-0426&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/JTECH2089.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21065788%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-f336907fb6016e5a74e135355389b853fa2508b74fe583e91a6ec06b34229a413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222519610&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |