Loading…

Regional anesthesia with epinephrine‐containing lidocaine reduces pericatheter bleeding after tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement

Introduction: Pericatheter bleeding (PB) following tunneled hemodialysis catheter (THC) placement is a common phenomenon. In addition to complicating securement of the THC, the PB may loosen the adhesive catheter dressing and delay wound healing. The primary aim of this study was to determine whethe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hemodialysis international 2019-01, Vol.23 (1), p.26-32
Main Authors: Mutlu, Ilhan Nahit, Kocak, Burak, Baykara Ulusan, Melis, Ulusan, Kivilcim, Cakir, Mehmet Semih, Kilickesmez, Ozgur
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-18d61be37e1ff710e44b4c6ce6a5a7ea91bd1ad9a353ff35e20df0ab858433b63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-18d61be37e1ff710e44b4c6ce6a5a7ea91bd1ad9a353ff35e20df0ab858433b63
container_end_page 32
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title Hemodialysis international
container_volume 23
creator Mutlu, Ilhan Nahit
Kocak, Burak
Baykara Ulusan, Melis
Ulusan, Kivilcim
Cakir, Mehmet Semih
Kilickesmez, Ozgur
description Introduction: Pericatheter bleeding (PB) following tunneled hemodialysis catheter (THC) placement is a common phenomenon. In addition to complicating securement of the THC, the PB may loosen the adhesive catheter dressing and delay wound healing. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether epinephrine‐containing local anesthetics rather than plain ones reduce superficial PB after THC placement. Methods: The study was based on the retrospective analysis of the prospectively gathered data. Forty‐six patients receiving local analgesia during THC placement were randomly assigned in a double‐blind manner to two groups according to local anesthetic mixtures used (n =22 to prilocaine group [group 1]; n =24 to epinephrine‐containing lidocaine group [group 2]). Presence or absence of PB after the THC placement was evaluated. Differences between groups with and without controlling other variables were statistically analyzed. Findings: Epinephrine‐containing lidocaine (group 2) significantly reduced PB in comparison with prilocaine, P = 0.003. Use of epinephrine‐containing lidocaine (group 2) was associated with a reduction in the likelihood of PB (Odds ratio = 0.017). Meanwhile, use of prilocaine (group 1) had 59.7 times higher odds in the likelihood of PB after THC placement. Lower rate of systolic blood pressure (SBP) in group 2 patients after 5 minutes of injections was also noted, P = 0.008. Epinephrine‐containing lidocaine was well tolerated and caused no significant cardiovascular disturbance. Discussion: Local infiltration of epinephrine‐containing lidocaine instead of plain local anesthetics during THC insertion may reduce superficial PB and improve patient comfort.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/hdi.12686
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2111146710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2111146710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-18d61be37e1ff710e44b4c6ce6a5a7ea91bd1ad9a353ff35e20df0ab858433b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EouVj4A8gjzCktePESUdUvipVQkIwR459IUaOE-xEVTdGRn4jvwSXQjc8nO-k5x7pXoTOKJnQ8Ka10hMa85zvoTFNkzhKsjTfD30yi6MsZekIHXn_SkhMCeGHaMRIzGaUsjH6eIQX3VphsLDg-xq8Fnil-xpDpy10tQv16_1TtrYX2mr7go1WrQw9YAdqkOBxB05LEZZ7cLg0AGrDiWoz9oO1YEDhGppWaWHWXnu8ozsjJDRg-xN0UAnj4fT3P0bPtzdP8_to-XC3mF8tI8lyziOaK05LYBnQqsoogSQpE8klcJGKDMSMlooKNRMsZVXFUoiJqogo8zRPGCs5O0YXW2_n2rchnFw02kswJtzfDr6IN4kmPKgDerlFpWu9d1AVndONcOuCkmKDFSH44if4wJ7_aoeyAbUj_5IOwHQLrLSB9f-m4v56sVV-A9Ygkik</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2111146710</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regional anesthesia with epinephrine‐containing lidocaine reduces pericatheter bleeding after tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Mutlu, Ilhan Nahit ; Kocak, Burak ; Baykara Ulusan, Melis ; Ulusan, Kivilcim ; Cakir, Mehmet Semih ; Kilickesmez, Ozgur</creator><creatorcontrib>Mutlu, Ilhan Nahit ; Kocak, Burak ; Baykara Ulusan, Melis ; Ulusan, Kivilcim ; Cakir, Mehmet Semih ; Kilickesmez, Ozgur</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Pericatheter bleeding (PB) following tunneled hemodialysis catheter (THC) placement is a common phenomenon. In addition to complicating securement of the THC, the PB may loosen the adhesive catheter dressing and delay wound healing. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether epinephrine‐containing local anesthetics rather than plain ones reduce superficial PB after THC placement. Methods: The study was based on the retrospective analysis of the prospectively gathered data. Forty‐six patients receiving local analgesia during THC placement were randomly assigned in a double‐blind manner to two groups according to local anesthetic mixtures used (n =22 to prilocaine group [group 1]; n =24 to epinephrine‐containing lidocaine group [group 2]). Presence or absence of PB after the THC placement was evaluated. Differences between groups with and without controlling other variables were statistically analyzed. Findings: Epinephrine‐containing lidocaine (group 2) significantly reduced PB in comparison with prilocaine, P = 0.003. Use of epinephrine‐containing lidocaine (group 2) was associated with a reduction in the likelihood of PB (Odds ratio = 0.017). Meanwhile, use of prilocaine (group 1) had 59.7 times higher odds in the likelihood of PB after THC placement. Lower rate of systolic blood pressure (SBP) in group 2 patients after 5 minutes of injections was also noted, P = 0.008. Epinephrine‐containing lidocaine was well tolerated and caused no significant cardiovascular disturbance. Discussion: Local infiltration of epinephrine‐containing lidocaine instead of plain local anesthetics during THC insertion may reduce superficial PB and improve patient comfort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1492-7535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-4758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/hdi.12686</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30239113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada</publisher><subject>Anesthetics ; bleeding ; catheter ; epinephrine ; hemodialysis ; lidocaine</subject><ispartof>Hemodialysis international, 2019-01, Vol.23 (1), p.26-32</ispartof><rights>2018 International Society for Hemodialysis</rights><rights>2018 International Society for Hemodialysis.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-18d61be37e1ff710e44b4c6ce6a5a7ea91bd1ad9a353ff35e20df0ab858433b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-18d61be37e1ff710e44b4c6ce6a5a7ea91bd1ad9a353ff35e20df0ab858433b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9326-5432</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30239113$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mutlu, Ilhan Nahit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocak, Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baykara Ulusan, Melis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulusan, Kivilcim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakir, Mehmet Semih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilickesmez, Ozgur</creatorcontrib><title>Regional anesthesia with epinephrine‐containing lidocaine reduces pericatheter bleeding after tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement</title><title>Hemodialysis international</title><addtitle>Hemodial Int</addtitle><description>Introduction: Pericatheter bleeding (PB) following tunneled hemodialysis catheter (THC) placement is a common phenomenon. In addition to complicating securement of the THC, the PB may loosen the adhesive catheter dressing and delay wound healing. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether epinephrine‐containing local anesthetics rather than plain ones reduce superficial PB after THC placement. Methods: The study was based on the retrospective analysis of the prospectively gathered data. Forty‐six patients receiving local analgesia during THC placement were randomly assigned in a double‐blind manner to two groups according to local anesthetic mixtures used (n =22 to prilocaine group [group 1]; n =24 to epinephrine‐containing lidocaine group [group 2]). Presence or absence of PB after the THC placement was evaluated. Differences between groups with and without controlling other variables were statistically analyzed. Findings: Epinephrine‐containing lidocaine (group 2) significantly reduced PB in comparison with prilocaine, P = 0.003. Use of epinephrine‐containing lidocaine (group 2) was associated with a reduction in the likelihood of PB (Odds ratio = 0.017). Meanwhile, use of prilocaine (group 1) had 59.7 times higher odds in the likelihood of PB after THC placement. Lower rate of systolic blood pressure (SBP) in group 2 patients after 5 minutes of injections was also noted, P = 0.008. Epinephrine‐containing lidocaine was well tolerated and caused no significant cardiovascular disturbance. Discussion: Local infiltration of epinephrine‐containing lidocaine instead of plain local anesthetics during THC insertion may reduce superficial PB and improve patient comfort.</description><subject>Anesthetics</subject><subject>bleeding</subject><subject>catheter</subject><subject>epinephrine</subject><subject>hemodialysis</subject><subject>lidocaine</subject><issn>1492-7535</issn><issn>1542-4758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EouVj4A8gjzCktePESUdUvipVQkIwR459IUaOE-xEVTdGRn4jvwSXQjc8nO-k5x7pXoTOKJnQ8Ka10hMa85zvoTFNkzhKsjTfD30yi6MsZekIHXn_SkhMCeGHaMRIzGaUsjH6eIQX3VphsLDg-xq8Fnil-xpDpy10tQv16_1TtrYX2mr7go1WrQw9YAdqkOBxB05LEZZ7cLg0AGrDiWoz9oO1YEDhGppWaWHWXnu8ozsjJDRg-xN0UAnj4fT3P0bPtzdP8_to-XC3mF8tI8lyziOaK05LYBnQqsoogSQpE8klcJGKDMSMlooKNRMsZVXFUoiJqogo8zRPGCs5O0YXW2_n2rchnFw02kswJtzfDr6IN4kmPKgDerlFpWu9d1AVndONcOuCkmKDFSH44if4wJ7_aoeyAbUj_5IOwHQLrLSB9f-m4v56sVV-A9Ygkik</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Mutlu, Ilhan Nahit</creator><creator>Kocak, Burak</creator><creator>Baykara Ulusan, Melis</creator><creator>Ulusan, Kivilcim</creator><creator>Cakir, Mehmet Semih</creator><creator>Kilickesmez, Ozgur</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9326-5432</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Regional anesthesia with epinephrine‐containing lidocaine reduces pericatheter bleeding after tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement</title><author>Mutlu, Ilhan Nahit ; Kocak, Burak ; Baykara Ulusan, Melis ; Ulusan, Kivilcim ; Cakir, Mehmet Semih ; Kilickesmez, Ozgur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-18d61be37e1ff710e44b4c6ce6a5a7ea91bd1ad9a353ff35e20df0ab858433b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anesthetics</topic><topic>bleeding</topic><topic>catheter</topic><topic>epinephrine</topic><topic>hemodialysis</topic><topic>lidocaine</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mutlu, Ilhan Nahit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocak, Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baykara Ulusan, Melis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulusan, Kivilcim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakir, Mehmet Semih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilickesmez, Ozgur</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hemodialysis international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mutlu, Ilhan Nahit</au><au>Kocak, Burak</au><au>Baykara Ulusan, Melis</au><au>Ulusan, Kivilcim</au><au>Cakir, Mehmet Semih</au><au>Kilickesmez, Ozgur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regional anesthesia with epinephrine‐containing lidocaine reduces pericatheter bleeding after tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement</atitle><jtitle>Hemodialysis international</jtitle><addtitle>Hemodial Int</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>26-32</pages><issn>1492-7535</issn><eissn>1542-4758</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Pericatheter bleeding (PB) following tunneled hemodialysis catheter (THC) placement is a common phenomenon. In addition to complicating securement of the THC, the PB may loosen the adhesive catheter dressing and delay wound healing. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether epinephrine‐containing local anesthetics rather than plain ones reduce superficial PB after THC placement. Methods: The study was based on the retrospective analysis of the prospectively gathered data. Forty‐six patients receiving local analgesia during THC placement were randomly assigned in a double‐blind manner to two groups according to local anesthetic mixtures used (n =22 to prilocaine group [group 1]; n =24 to epinephrine‐containing lidocaine group [group 2]). Presence or absence of PB after the THC placement was evaluated. Differences between groups with and without controlling other variables were statistically analyzed. Findings: Epinephrine‐containing lidocaine (group 2) significantly reduced PB in comparison with prilocaine, P = 0.003. Use of epinephrine‐containing lidocaine (group 2) was associated with a reduction in the likelihood of PB (Odds ratio = 0.017). Meanwhile, use of prilocaine (group 1) had 59.7 times higher odds in the likelihood of PB after THC placement. Lower rate of systolic blood pressure (SBP) in group 2 patients after 5 minutes of injections was also noted, P = 0.008. Epinephrine‐containing lidocaine was well tolerated and caused no significant cardiovascular disturbance. Discussion: Local infiltration of epinephrine‐containing lidocaine instead of plain local anesthetics during THC insertion may reduce superficial PB and improve patient comfort.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pmid>30239113</pmid><doi>10.1111/hdi.12686</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9326-5432</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1492-7535
ispartof Hemodialysis international, 2019-01, Vol.23 (1), p.26-32
issn 1492-7535
1542-4758
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2111146710
source Wiley
subjects Anesthetics
bleeding
catheter
epinephrine
hemodialysis
lidocaine
title Regional anesthesia with epinephrine‐containing lidocaine reduces pericatheter bleeding after tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T09%3A42%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regional%20anesthesia%20with%20epinephrine%E2%80%90containing%20lidocaine%20reduces%20pericatheter%20bleeding%20after%20tunneled%20hemodialysis%20catheter%20placement&rft.jtitle=Hemodialysis%20international&rft.au=Mutlu,%20Ilhan%20Nahit&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=26-32&rft.issn=1492-7535&rft.eissn=1542-4758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/hdi.12686&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2111146710%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3866-18d61be37e1ff710e44b4c6ce6a5a7ea91bd1ad9a353ff35e20df0ab858433b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2111146710&rft_id=info:pmid/30239113&rfr_iscdi=true