Pathogens, faecal indicators and human‐specific microbial source‐tracking markers in sewage

• Published in: Journal of applied microbiology 2019-03, Vol.126 (3), p.701-717
• Main Authors: García‐Aljaro, C., Blanch, A.R., Campos, C., Jofre, J., Lucena, F.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bacteria; Contamination; faecal indicators; Fecal coliforms; Feces; Indicators; Intestinal microflora; Markers; microbial source tracking; Microbiota; Microorganisms; Pathogens; Public health; Raw sewage; Sanitation; Sewage; Tracking; Viruses; Water management; water microbiology; Water pollution; Water quality
• ISSN: 1364-5072; 1365-2672
• DOI: 10.1111/jam.14112

Summary The objective of this review is to assess the current state of knowledge of pathogens, general faecal indicators and human‐specific microbial source tracking markers in sewage. Most of the microbes present in sewage are from the microbiota of the human gut, including pathogens. Bacteria and viruses are the most abundant groups of microbes in the human gut microbiota. Most reports on this topic show that raw sewage microbiological profiles reflect the human gut microbiota. Human and animal faeces share many commensal microbes as well as pathogens. Faecal‐orally transmitted pathogens constitute a serious public health problem that can be minimized through sanitation. Assessing both the sanitation processes and the contribution of sewage to the faecal contamination of water bodies requires knowledge of the content of pathogens in sewage, microbes indicating general faecal contamination and microbes that are only present in human faecal remains, which are known as the human‐specific microbial source‐tracking (MST) markers. Detection of pathogens would be the ideal option for managing sanitation and determining the microbiological quality of waters contaminated by sewage; but at present, this is neither practical nor feasible in routine testing. Traditionally, faecal indicator bacteria have been used as surrogate indicators of general faecal residues. However, in many water management circumstances, it becomes necessary to detect both the origin of faecal contamination, for which MST is paramount, and live micro‐organisms, for which molecular methods are not suitable. The presence and concentrations of pathogens, general faecal indicators and human‐specific MST markers most frequently reported in different areas of the world are summarized in this review.