Analysis of impingement-free range of motion of the glenohumeral joint after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using three different implant models

This study aimed to investigate impingement-free range of motion (ROM) of the glenohumeral joint following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) with three types of implant models using computational motion analysis. Three-dimensional (3D) scapulohumeral models were created from preoperative co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2019-01, Vol.24 (1), p.87-94
Main Authors: Kim, Sung-Jae, Jang, Seong-wook, Jung, Koo-Hyun, Kim, Yoon Sang, Lee, Seung-Jin, Yoo, Yon-sik
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods
Humans
Humerus - diagnostic imaging
Humerus - surgery
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Prosthesis Design
Range of Motion, Articular
Retrospective Studies
Scapula - diagnostic imaging
Scapula - surgery
Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - physiopathology
Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging
Shoulder Joint - physiopathology
Shoulder Joint - surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study aimed to investigate impingement-free range of motion (ROM) of the glenohumeral joint following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) with three types of implant models using computational motion analysis. Three-dimensional (3D) scapulohumeral models were created from preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of seven patients by using visualization and computer-aided design software. Three types of implant designs, namely, typical medialization, in between, and lateralization implants, were used for the reconstruction of 3D model; each design was designated as group I, II, and III, respectively. All possible combinations of virtual surgeries were evaluated for impingement-free ROM in all three groups. Maximal ROMs were compared. The effect of implant positions on ROM of the shoulder joints were investigated in each group. The all lateralization group (group III) showed significantly greatest maximal adduction, abduction and external rotation (ER). Adduction and abduction were significantly increased by the glenoid component inferior translation in all three groups. (In group I, p 
ISSN:0949-2658
1436-2023
DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2018.08.016