Loading…

The Generation Effect and Experimental Design

The generation effect is moderated by experimental design, as are a number of other encoding variables, such that the generation effect recall is typically larger in mixed-list than pure-list designs. In typical experiments on design effects, each study list is followed by its own recall test. Rowla...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2019-08, Vol.45 (8), p.1422-1431
Main Authors: Mulligan, Neil W, Smith, S. Adam, Buchin, Zachary L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-1b548c6c8a0da657118ed167fee694946480e1ff5767b14be00264f7a92d637e3
cites
container_end_page 1431
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1422
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
container_volume 45
creator Mulligan, Neil W
Smith, S. Adam
Buchin, Zachary L
description The generation effect is moderated by experimental design, as are a number of other encoding variables, such that the generation effect recall is typically larger in mixed-list than pure-list designs. In typical experiments on design effects, each study list is followed by its own recall test. Rowland, Littrell-Baez, Sensenig, and DeLosh (2014) found that the testing effect was not moderated by experimental design using a procedures in which multiple study lists were followed by a single, end-of-session recall test over all lists. This may indicate an important difference between the testing effect and the set of effects (including generation) moderated by experimental design, or it may signal a more general limitation of design effects. Three experiments used the procedures of Rowland et al. and found that the generation effect was likewise unmoderated by experimental design: The generation effect was robust for pure lists and of equivalent size as with mixed lists. This was found for both a perceptual (letter transposition) and semantic (antonym) generation task. Along with prior research, these results constitute similarities between the generation and testing manipulations with respect to design effects and their limitations. This, in turn, implies a parallel between the mnemonic effects of retrieving information from semantic (generation effect) and episodic (testing effect) memory.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/xlm0000663
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2116118708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1219997</ericid><sourcerecordid>2116118708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-1b548c6c8a0da657118ed167fee694946480e1ff5767b14be00264f7a92d637e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LwzAYh4Mobk4v3pWCFxGr-Wo-jqJzKoKXeQ5Z-lY7urYmLeh_b8rmBA_mksPv4Ul4EDom-IpgJq8_qxWORwi2g8ZEM50SqrJdNMZUqlQyzUboIITlAGGm9tGIYaq4EmqM0vk7JDOowduubOpkWhTgusTWeTL9bMGXK6g7WyV3EMq3-hDtFbYKcLS5J-j1fjq_fUifX2aPtzfPqeWYdilZZFw54ZTFuRWZJERBToQsAITmmguuMJCiyKSQC8IXgDEVvJBW01wwCWyCztfe1jcfPYTOrMrgoKpsDU0fDCVERKnEKqJnf9Bl0_s6_s5QKqnMlMzov9Tg0hnlg-tiTTnfhOChMG0MYP2XIdgMqc1v6gifbpT9YgX5Fv1pG4GTNRAruu08fSKUaK1l3C_Xu22tacOXs74rXQXB9d7H6sNjhmdGGcIpZd8lTo5o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2116195248</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Generation Effect and Experimental Design</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Mulligan, Neil W ; Smith, S. Adam ; Buchin, Zachary L</creator><contributor>Benjamin, Aaron S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Neil W ; Smith, S. Adam ; Buchin, Zachary L ; Benjamin, Aaron S</creatorcontrib><description>The generation effect is moderated by experimental design, as are a number of other encoding variables, such that the generation effect recall is typically larger in mixed-list than pure-list designs. In typical experiments on design effects, each study list is followed by its own recall test. Rowland, Littrell-Baez, Sensenig, and DeLosh (2014) found that the testing effect was not moderated by experimental design using a procedures in which multiple study lists were followed by a single, end-of-session recall test over all lists. This may indicate an important difference between the testing effect and the set of effects (including generation) moderated by experimental design, or it may signal a more general limitation of design effects. Three experiments used the procedures of Rowland et al. and found that the generation effect was likewise unmoderated by experimental design: The generation effect was robust for pure lists and of equivalent size as with mixed lists. This was found for both a perceptual (letter transposition) and semantic (antonym) generation task. Along with prior research, these results constitute similarities between the generation and testing manipulations with respect to design effects and their limitations. This, in turn, implies a parallel between the mnemonic effects of retrieving information from semantic (generation effect) and episodic (testing effect) memory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000663</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30284868</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention ; Cognitive Processes ; Cohort Effect ; Effects ; Electricity generation ; Episodic Memory ; Experimental Design ; Female ; Generation Effect (Learning) ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Memory ; Mental Recall ; Mnemonic Learning ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Placebo effect ; Recall ; Recall (Learning) ; Recall (Psychology) ; Research Design ; Semantic Memory ; Semantics ; Test Construction ; Testing ; Undergraduate Students ; Verbal Learning ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2019-08, Vol.45 (8), p.1422-1431</ispartof><rights>2018 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2018, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-1b548c6c8a0da657118ed167fee694946480e1ff5767b14be00264f7a92d637e3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3059-0411</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1219997$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30284868$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Benjamin, Aaron S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Neil W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, S. Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchin, Zachary L</creatorcontrib><title>The Generation Effect and Experimental Design</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>The generation effect is moderated by experimental design, as are a number of other encoding variables, such that the generation effect recall is typically larger in mixed-list than pure-list designs. In typical experiments on design effects, each study list is followed by its own recall test. Rowland, Littrell-Baez, Sensenig, and DeLosh (2014) found that the testing effect was not moderated by experimental design using a procedures in which multiple study lists were followed by a single, end-of-session recall test over all lists. This may indicate an important difference between the testing effect and the set of effects (including generation) moderated by experimental design, or it may signal a more general limitation of design effects. Three experiments used the procedures of Rowland et al. and found that the generation effect was likewise unmoderated by experimental design: The generation effect was robust for pure lists and of equivalent size as with mixed lists. This was found for both a perceptual (letter transposition) and semantic (antonym) generation task. Along with prior research, these results constitute similarities between the generation and testing manipulations with respect to design effects and their limitations. This, in turn, implies a parallel between the mnemonic effects of retrieving information from semantic (generation effect) and episodic (testing effect) memory.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Cohort Effect</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>Electricity generation</subject><subject>Episodic Memory</subject><subject>Experimental Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Generation Effect (Learning)</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Mnemonic Learning</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Placebo effect</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Recall (Learning)</subject><subject>Recall (Psychology)</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Semantic Memory</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Verbal Learning</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LwzAYh4Mobk4v3pWCFxGr-Wo-jqJzKoKXeQ5Z-lY7urYmLeh_b8rmBA_mksPv4Ul4EDom-IpgJq8_qxWORwi2g8ZEM50SqrJdNMZUqlQyzUboIITlAGGm9tGIYaq4EmqM0vk7JDOowduubOpkWhTgusTWeTL9bMGXK6g7WyV3EMq3-hDtFbYKcLS5J-j1fjq_fUifX2aPtzfPqeWYdilZZFw54ZTFuRWZJERBToQsAITmmguuMJCiyKSQC8IXgDEVvJBW01wwCWyCztfe1jcfPYTOrMrgoKpsDU0fDCVERKnEKqJnf9Bl0_s6_s5QKqnMlMzov9Tg0hnlg-tiTTnfhOChMG0MYP2XIdgMqc1v6gifbpT9YgX5Fv1pG4GTNRAruu08fSKUaK1l3C_Xu22tacOXs74rXQXB9d7H6sNjhmdGGcIpZd8lTo5o</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Mulligan, Neil W</creator><creator>Smith, S. Adam</creator><creator>Buchin, Zachary L</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3059-0411</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>The Generation Effect and Experimental Design</title><author>Mulligan, Neil W ; Smith, S. Adam ; Buchin, Zachary L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-1b548c6c8a0da657118ed167fee694946480e1ff5767b14be00264f7a92d637e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Cohort Effect</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>Electricity generation</topic><topic>Episodic Memory</topic><topic>Experimental Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Generation Effect (Learning)</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Mnemonic Learning</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Placebo effect</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Recall (Learning)</topic><topic>Recall (Psychology)</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Semantic Memory</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Verbal Learning</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Neil W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, S. Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchin, Zachary L</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mulligan, Neil W</au><au>Smith, S. Adam</au><au>Buchin, Zachary L</au><au>Benjamin, Aaron S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1219997</ericid><atitle>The Generation Effect and Experimental Design</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1422</spage><epage>1431</epage><pages>1422-1431</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>The generation effect is moderated by experimental design, as are a number of other encoding variables, such that the generation effect recall is typically larger in mixed-list than pure-list designs. In typical experiments on design effects, each study list is followed by its own recall test. Rowland, Littrell-Baez, Sensenig, and DeLosh (2014) found that the testing effect was not moderated by experimental design using a procedures in which multiple study lists were followed by a single, end-of-session recall test over all lists. This may indicate an important difference between the testing effect and the set of effects (including generation) moderated by experimental design, or it may signal a more general limitation of design effects. Three experiments used the procedures of Rowland et al. and found that the generation effect was likewise unmoderated by experimental design: The generation effect was robust for pure lists and of equivalent size as with mixed lists. This was found for both a perceptual (letter transposition) and semantic (antonym) generation task. Along with prior research, these results constitute similarities between the generation and testing manipulations with respect to design effects and their limitations. This, in turn, implies a parallel between the mnemonic effects of retrieving information from semantic (generation effect) and episodic (testing effect) memory.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>30284868</pmid><doi>10.1037/xlm0000663</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3059-0411</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7393
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2019-08, Vol.45 (8), p.1422-1431
issn 0278-7393
1939-1285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2116118708
source APA PsycARTICLES; ERIC
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Attention
Cognitive Processes
Cohort Effect
Effects
Electricity generation
Episodic Memory
Experimental Design
Female
Generation Effect (Learning)
Human
Humans
Male
Memory
Mental Recall
Mnemonic Learning
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Placebo effect
Recall
Recall (Learning)
Recall (Psychology)
Research Design
Semantic Memory
Semantics
Test Construction
Testing
Undergraduate Students
Verbal Learning
Young Adult
title The Generation Effect and Experimental Design
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T11%3A50%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Generation%20Effect%20and%20Experimental%20Design&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Mulligan,%20Neil%20W&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1422&rft.epage=1431&rft.pages=1422-1431&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xlm0000663&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2116118708%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-1b548c6c8a0da657118ed167fee694946480e1ff5767b14be00264f7a92d637e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2116195248&rft_id=info:pmid/30284868&rft_ericid=EJ1219997&rfr_iscdi=true