Loading…
The Generation Effect and Experimental Design
The generation effect is moderated by experimental design, as are a number of other encoding variables, such that the generation effect recall is typically larger in mixed-list than pure-list designs. In typical experiments on design effects, each study list is followed by its own recall test. Rowla...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2019-08, Vol.45 (8), p.1422-1431 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-1b548c6c8a0da657118ed167fee694946480e1ff5767b14be00264f7a92d637e3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1431 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1422 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Mulligan, Neil W Smith, S. Adam Buchin, Zachary L |
description | The generation effect is moderated by experimental design, as are a number of other encoding variables, such that the generation effect recall is typically larger in mixed-list than pure-list designs. In typical experiments on design effects, each study list is followed by its own recall test. Rowland, Littrell-Baez, Sensenig, and DeLosh (2014) found that the testing effect was not moderated by experimental design using a procedures in which multiple study lists were followed by a single, end-of-session recall test over all lists. This may indicate an important difference between the testing effect and the set of effects (including generation) moderated by experimental design, or it may signal a more general limitation of design effects. Three experiments used the procedures of Rowland et al. and found that the generation effect was likewise unmoderated by experimental design: The generation effect was robust for pure lists and of equivalent size as with mixed lists. This was found for both a perceptual (letter transposition) and semantic (antonym) generation task. Along with prior research, these results constitute similarities between the generation and testing manipulations with respect to design effects and their limitations. This, in turn, implies a parallel between the mnemonic effects of retrieving information from semantic (generation effect) and episodic (testing effect) memory. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/xlm0000663 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2116118708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1219997</ericid><sourcerecordid>2116118708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-1b548c6c8a0da657118ed167fee694946480e1ff5767b14be00264f7a92d637e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LwzAYh4Mobk4v3pWCFxGr-Wo-jqJzKoKXeQ5Z-lY7urYmLeh_b8rmBA_mksPv4Ul4EDom-IpgJq8_qxWORwi2g8ZEM50SqrJdNMZUqlQyzUboIITlAGGm9tGIYaq4EmqM0vk7JDOowduubOpkWhTgusTWeTL9bMGXK6g7WyV3EMq3-hDtFbYKcLS5J-j1fjq_fUifX2aPtzfPqeWYdilZZFw54ZTFuRWZJERBToQsAITmmguuMJCiyKSQC8IXgDEVvJBW01wwCWyCztfe1jcfPYTOrMrgoKpsDU0fDCVERKnEKqJnf9Bl0_s6_s5QKqnMlMzov9Tg0hnlg-tiTTnfhOChMG0MYP2XIdgMqc1v6gifbpT9YgX5Fv1pG4GTNRAruu08fSKUaK1l3C_Xu22tacOXs74rXQXB9d7H6sNjhmdGGcIpZd8lTo5o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2116195248</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Generation Effect and Experimental Design</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Mulligan, Neil W ; Smith, S. Adam ; Buchin, Zachary L</creator><contributor>Benjamin, Aaron S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Neil W ; Smith, S. Adam ; Buchin, Zachary L ; Benjamin, Aaron S</creatorcontrib><description>The generation effect is moderated by experimental design, as are a number of other encoding variables, such that the generation effect recall is typically larger in mixed-list than pure-list designs. In typical experiments on design effects, each study list is followed by its own recall test. Rowland, Littrell-Baez, Sensenig, and DeLosh (2014) found that the testing effect was not moderated by experimental design using a procedures in which multiple study lists were followed by a single, end-of-session recall test over all lists. This may indicate an important difference between the testing effect and the set of effects (including generation) moderated by experimental design, or it may signal a more general limitation of design effects. Three experiments used the procedures of Rowland et al. and found that the generation effect was likewise unmoderated by experimental design: The generation effect was robust for pure lists and of equivalent size as with mixed lists. This was found for both a perceptual (letter transposition) and semantic (antonym) generation task. Along with prior research, these results constitute similarities between the generation and testing manipulations with respect to design effects and their limitations. This, in turn, implies a parallel between the mnemonic effects of retrieving information from semantic (generation effect) and episodic (testing effect) memory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000663</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30284868</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention ; Cognitive Processes ; Cohort Effect ; Effects ; Electricity generation ; Episodic Memory ; Experimental Design ; Female ; Generation Effect (Learning) ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Memory ; Mental Recall ; Mnemonic Learning ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Placebo effect ; Recall ; Recall (Learning) ; Recall (Psychology) ; Research Design ; Semantic Memory ; Semantics ; Test Construction ; Testing ; Undergraduate Students ; Verbal Learning ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2019-08, Vol.45 (8), p.1422-1431</ispartof><rights>2018 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2018, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-1b548c6c8a0da657118ed167fee694946480e1ff5767b14be00264f7a92d637e3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3059-0411</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1219997$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30284868$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Benjamin, Aaron S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Neil W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, S. Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchin, Zachary L</creatorcontrib><title>The Generation Effect and Experimental Design</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>The generation effect is moderated by experimental design, as are a number of other encoding variables, such that the generation effect recall is typically larger in mixed-list than pure-list designs. In typical experiments on design effects, each study list is followed by its own recall test. Rowland, Littrell-Baez, Sensenig, and DeLosh (2014) found that the testing effect was not moderated by experimental design using a procedures in which multiple study lists were followed by a single, end-of-session recall test over all lists. This may indicate an important difference between the testing effect and the set of effects (including generation) moderated by experimental design, or it may signal a more general limitation of design effects. Three experiments used the procedures of Rowland et al. and found that the generation effect was likewise unmoderated by experimental design: The generation effect was robust for pure lists and of equivalent size as with mixed lists. This was found for both a perceptual (letter transposition) and semantic (antonym) generation task. Along with prior research, these results constitute similarities between the generation and testing manipulations with respect to design effects and their limitations. This, in turn, implies a parallel between the mnemonic effects of retrieving information from semantic (generation effect) and episodic (testing effect) memory.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Cohort Effect</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>Electricity generation</subject><subject>Episodic Memory</subject><subject>Experimental Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Generation Effect (Learning)</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Mnemonic Learning</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Placebo effect</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Recall (Learning)</subject><subject>Recall (Psychology)</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Semantic Memory</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Verbal Learning</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LwzAYh4Mobk4v3pWCFxGr-Wo-jqJzKoKXeQ5Z-lY7urYmLeh_b8rmBA_mksPv4Ul4EDom-IpgJq8_qxWORwi2g8ZEM50SqrJdNMZUqlQyzUboIITlAGGm9tGIYaq4EmqM0vk7JDOowduubOpkWhTgusTWeTL9bMGXK6g7WyV3EMq3-hDtFbYKcLS5J-j1fjq_fUifX2aPtzfPqeWYdilZZFw54ZTFuRWZJERBToQsAITmmguuMJCiyKSQC8IXgDEVvJBW01wwCWyCztfe1jcfPYTOrMrgoKpsDU0fDCVERKnEKqJnf9Bl0_s6_s5QKqnMlMzov9Tg0hnlg-tiTTnfhOChMG0MYP2XIdgMqc1v6gifbpT9YgX5Fv1pG4GTNRAruu08fSKUaK1l3C_Xu22tacOXs74rXQXB9d7H6sNjhmdGGcIpZd8lTo5o</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Mulligan, Neil W</creator><creator>Smith, S. Adam</creator><creator>Buchin, Zachary L</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3059-0411</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>The Generation Effect and Experimental Design</title><author>Mulligan, Neil W ; Smith, S. Adam ; Buchin, Zachary L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-1b548c6c8a0da657118ed167fee694946480e1ff5767b14be00264f7a92d637e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Cohort Effect</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>Electricity generation</topic><topic>Episodic Memory</topic><topic>Experimental Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Generation Effect (Learning)</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Mnemonic Learning</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Placebo effect</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Recall (Learning)</topic><topic>Recall (Psychology)</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Semantic Memory</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Verbal Learning</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Neil W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, S. Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchin, Zachary L</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mulligan, Neil W</au><au>Smith, S. Adam</au><au>Buchin, Zachary L</au><au>Benjamin, Aaron S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1219997</ericid><atitle>The Generation Effect and Experimental Design</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1422</spage><epage>1431</epage><pages>1422-1431</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>The generation effect is moderated by experimental design, as are a number of other encoding variables, such that the generation effect recall is typically larger in mixed-list than pure-list designs. In typical experiments on design effects, each study list is followed by its own recall test. Rowland, Littrell-Baez, Sensenig, and DeLosh (2014) found that the testing effect was not moderated by experimental design using a procedures in which multiple study lists were followed by a single, end-of-session recall test over all lists. This may indicate an important difference between the testing effect and the set of effects (including generation) moderated by experimental design, or it may signal a more general limitation of design effects. Three experiments used the procedures of Rowland et al. and found that the generation effect was likewise unmoderated by experimental design: The generation effect was robust for pure lists and of equivalent size as with mixed lists. This was found for both a perceptual (letter transposition) and semantic (antonym) generation task. Along with prior research, these results constitute similarities between the generation and testing manipulations with respect to design effects and their limitations. This, in turn, implies a parallel between the mnemonic effects of retrieving information from semantic (generation effect) and episodic (testing effect) memory.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>30284868</pmid><doi>10.1037/xlm0000663</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3059-0411</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-7393 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2019-08, Vol.45 (8), p.1422-1431 |
issn | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2116118708 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; ERIC |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Attention Cognitive Processes Cohort Effect Effects Electricity generation Episodic Memory Experimental Design Female Generation Effect (Learning) Human Humans Male Memory Mental Recall Mnemonic Learning Pattern Recognition, Visual Placebo effect Recall Recall (Learning) Recall (Psychology) Research Design Semantic Memory Semantics Test Construction Testing Undergraduate Students Verbal Learning Young Adult |
title | The Generation Effect and Experimental Design |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T11%3A50%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Generation%20Effect%20and%20Experimental%20Design&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Mulligan,%20Neil%20W&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1422&rft.epage=1431&rft.pages=1422-1431&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xlm0000663&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2116118708%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-1b548c6c8a0da657118ed167fee694946480e1ff5767b14be00264f7a92d637e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2116195248&rft_id=info:pmid/30284868&rft_ericid=EJ1219997&rfr_iscdi=true |