In vitro comparison of microleakge between preformed metal crowns and aesthetic crowns of primary molars using different adhesive luting cements

Aim To assess and compare the microleakage extent between preformed metal crowns (PMCs), preveneered PMCs and zirconia crowns using different adhesive luting cements. Methods Thirty-six primary first molars were divided into three groups (n = 12) each prepared to receive different crowns (PMCs, prev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European archives of paediatric dentistry 2018-12, Vol.19 (6), p.387-392
Main Authors: Al-Haj Ali, S. N., Farah, R. I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adhesives
Bond strength
Cement
Cementation - methods
Cold
Composite materials
Crowns
Dental crowns
Dental Leakage
Dental Prosthesis Design
Dental Veneers
Dentistry
Esthetics, Dental
Fluid penetrant testing
Glass Ionomer Cements
Humans
Light emitting diodes
Materials Testing
Medicine
Metals
Molar
Original Scientific Article
Resin Cements
Resins
Stainless steel
Statistical tests
Teeth
Tooth, Deciduous
Zirconium
Zirconium dioxide
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim To assess and compare the microleakage extent between preformed metal crowns (PMCs), preveneered PMCs and zirconia crowns using different adhesive luting cements. Methods Thirty-six primary first molars were divided into three groups (n = 12) each prepared to receive different crowns (PMCs, preveneered PMCs, or zirconia crowns). Each group was further sub-grouped (n = 4) according to the luting cement (resin cement, resin modified glass ionomer cement, or glass ionomer cement). After cementation, the teeth were thermocycled, placed in 0.5% basic fuchsin, and sectioned to assess dye penetration. The results were analysed using ANOVA and Bonferroni statistical tests. The level of significance was set at p 
ISSN:1818-6300
1996-9805
DOI:10.1007/s40368-018-0369-1