Cost analysis of a store-and-forward teledermatology consult system in Philadelphia

Store-and-forward (SAF) teledermatology (TD) has the potential to increase access to timely, high-quality care for underserved populations. However, the cost-effectiveness of TD for underserved populations is uncertain. This study evaluates the potential cost savings associated with an SAF TD progra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2019-09, Vol.81 (3), p.758-764
Main Authors: Yang, Xiaoshi, Barbieri, John S., Kovarik, Carrie L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
access to care
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Child
Child, Preschool
Cities
cost analysis
Cost Savings
Cost-Benefit Analysis
dermatology
Dermatology - economics
Dermatology - methods
Female
Health Services Accessibility - economics
Humans
Infant
Male
mHealth
Middle Aged
Philadelphia
Primary Health Care - economics
Primary Health Care - methods
Remote Consultation - economics
Retrospective Studies
Skin Diseases - diagnosis
Skin Diseases - economics
Skin Diseases - therapy
store-and forward
teledermatology
Vulnerable Populations
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Store-and-forward (SAF) teledermatology (TD) has the potential to increase access to timely, high-quality care for underserved populations. However, the cost-effectiveness of TD for underserved populations is uncertain. This study evaluates the potential cost savings associated with an SAF TD program implemented for an underserved population in the city health clinics of urban Philadelphia. We performed a retrospective analysis of SAF TD consultations for 700 outpatients managed in 12 Philadelphia primary care clinics. Primary care providers were asked to specify a treatment plan, as well as the type of care for the patient, in the absence of the TD service. Analysis compared the cost of each patient case with use of the TD consult model versus with conventional care. In all, 27% of in-person dermatology clinic visits (189 of 700) and 3.29% of emergency room visits (23 of 700) were avoided by using TD. Compared with conventional care, TD had a mean expected cost savings of $10.00 to $52.65 per TD consult. In sensitivity analyses, these estimated savings remained positive across a range of parameters. The cost analysis relies on several assumptions regarding the cost of care, and indirect costs were not included. TD can be a cost-saving model while increasing access to dermatologic care.
ISSN:0190-9622
1097-6787
DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.09.036