Loading…
The desert at Zait Bay, Egypt: a bird migration bottleneck of global importance
The study area at Zait Bay, Egypt (c. 700 km2) is situated in the middle of the West Asian-East African migration flyway used by very large numbers of soaring migrants. At this site the corridor narrows into a bottleneck. There exist only very few bottlenecks of this magnitude in the world. Observat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Bird conservation international 2009-12, Vol.19 (4), p.338-352 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-d521a6c9387a91587257d1fe4fdb5f38b00d25e1b38a8ea07d36991b0fc0d6c53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-d521a6c9387a91587257d1fe4fdb5f38b00d25e1b38a8ea07d36991b0fc0d6c53 |
container_end_page | 352 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 338 |
container_title | Bird conservation international |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | HILGERLOH, GUDRUN |
description | The study area at Zait Bay, Egypt (c. 700 km2) is situated in the middle of the West Asian-East African migration flyway used by very large numbers of soaring migrants. At this site the corridor narrows into a bottleneck. There exist only very few bottlenecks of this magnitude in the world. Observations were performed at all hours between sunrise and sunset at 26 observation sites, situated 5 km apart. The northern part of the area under investigation (19 observation sites) was situated within the Gebel El Zeit IBA (criteria A1 and A4iv), while the southernmost part (8 observation sites) was outside. The overall evaluation has shown that 179,681 soaring birds including 122,454 storks and 36,976 raptors were observed in total. Within a radius of 2.5 km from each observation site 97,143 soaring birds including 59,308 storks and 30,489 raptors were observed during the 604 hours of observation. Eleven species were recorded in numbers that exceed 1% of their flyway populations. Of special concern regarding bird conservation are those birds resting or flying in the first 200 m of elevation. In total 6,624 soaring birds were seen resting (2,252 within a radius of 2.5 km). Thirty-three percent of the storks and 47% of the raptors were observed resting or flying at heights within the lowest 200 m. The median height of flying birds varied between 5 m (harriers) and 500 m (Common Crane Grus grus). According to the raw data, criteria for nomination of the area as an IBA (20,000 raptors and storks in one migration season, globally threatened species) were fully met outside the existing IBA. Also, to the south of the study area, very high numbers of migrants were confirmed by spontaneous, non-systematic observations. Accordingly, a change of the boundaries is suggested. The regional analysis, based on extrapolations, has to be regarded as a preliminary study. The analysis failed to show a geographical trend for any single species. The data from this study establish a high concentration of gliding and soaring birds in the study area, within and adjacent to the already designated IBA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0959270909008430 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21192806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0959270909008430</cupid><sourcerecordid>1906580151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-d521a6c9387a91587257d1fe4fdb5f38b00d25e1b38a8ea07d36991b0fc0d6c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouH78AG_Bgyerk6ZJWm8qfoG4LK4XLyFt0jXaNmuSBfffm2VFQZE5DMw877zDi9ABgRMCRJw-QsWqXECVCsqCwgYakUIUGQCQTTRarbPVfhvthPCappRRPkLj6YvB2gTjI1YRPysb8YVaHuOr2XIez7DCtfUa93bmVbRuwLWLsTODad6wa_Gsc7XqsO3nzkc1NGYPbbWqC2b_q--ip-ur6eVtdj--ubs8v8-aIi9jpllOFG8qWgpVEVaKnAlNWlO0umYtLWsAnTNDalqq0igQmvKqIjW0DWjeMLqLjtZ35969L0yIsrehMV2nBuMWQeaEVHkJPIGHv8BXt_BD-i0xlKfsKE0QWUONdyF408q5t73yS0lArvKVf_JNmmytsSGaj2-B8m-SCyqY5DcTKeDhoaATLqeJp18eqq-91TPz88n_Lp8CAom_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213601733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The desert at Zait Bay, Egypt: a bird migration bottleneck of global importance</title><source>Cambridge University Press:Jisc Collections:Cambridge University Press Read and Publish Agreement 2021-24 (Reading list)</source><creator>HILGERLOH, GUDRUN</creator><creatorcontrib>HILGERLOH, GUDRUN</creatorcontrib><description>The study area at Zait Bay, Egypt (c. 700 km2) is situated in the middle of the West Asian-East African migration flyway used by very large numbers of soaring migrants. At this site the corridor narrows into a bottleneck. There exist only very few bottlenecks of this magnitude in the world. Observations were performed at all hours between sunrise and sunset at 26 observation sites, situated 5 km apart. The northern part of the area under investigation (19 observation sites) was situated within the Gebel El Zeit IBA (criteria A1 and A4iv), while the southernmost part (8 observation sites) was outside. The overall evaluation has shown that 179,681 soaring birds including 122,454 storks and 36,976 raptors were observed in total. Within a radius of 2.5 km from each observation site 97,143 soaring birds including 59,308 storks and 30,489 raptors were observed during the 604 hours of observation. Eleven species were recorded in numbers that exceed 1% of their flyway populations. Of special concern regarding bird conservation are those birds resting or flying in the first 200 m of elevation. In total 6,624 soaring birds were seen resting (2,252 within a radius of 2.5 km). Thirty-three percent of the storks and 47% of the raptors were observed resting or flying at heights within the lowest 200 m. The median height of flying birds varied between 5 m (harriers) and 500 m (Common Crane Grus grus). According to the raw data, criteria for nomination of the area as an IBA (20,000 raptors and storks in one migration season, globally threatened species) were fully met outside the existing IBA. Also, to the south of the study area, very high numbers of migrants were confirmed by spontaneous, non-systematic observations. Accordingly, a change of the boundaries is suggested. The regional analysis, based on extrapolations, has to be regarded as a preliminary study. The analysis failed to show a geographical trend for any single species. The data from this study establish a high concentration of gliding and soaring birds in the study area, within and adjacent to the already designated IBA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-2709</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0001</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0959270909008430</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Aquatic birds ; Bird migration ; Grus grus ; Regional analysis ; Regional planning ; Threatened species</subject><ispartof>Bird conservation international, 2009-12, Vol.19 (4), p.338-352</ispartof><rights>Copyright © BirdLife International 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-d521a6c9387a91587257d1fe4fdb5f38b00d25e1b38a8ea07d36991b0fc0d6c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-d521a6c9387a91587257d1fe4fdb5f38b00d25e1b38a8ea07d36991b0fc0d6c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0959270909008430/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HILGERLOH, GUDRUN</creatorcontrib><title>The desert at Zait Bay, Egypt: a bird migration bottleneck of global importance</title><title>Bird conservation international</title><addtitle>Bird Conservation International</addtitle><description>The study area at Zait Bay, Egypt (c. 700 km2) is situated in the middle of the West Asian-East African migration flyway used by very large numbers of soaring migrants. At this site the corridor narrows into a bottleneck. There exist only very few bottlenecks of this magnitude in the world. Observations were performed at all hours between sunrise and sunset at 26 observation sites, situated 5 km apart. The northern part of the area under investigation (19 observation sites) was situated within the Gebel El Zeit IBA (criteria A1 and A4iv), while the southernmost part (8 observation sites) was outside. The overall evaluation has shown that 179,681 soaring birds including 122,454 storks and 36,976 raptors were observed in total. Within a radius of 2.5 km from each observation site 97,143 soaring birds including 59,308 storks and 30,489 raptors were observed during the 604 hours of observation. Eleven species were recorded in numbers that exceed 1% of their flyway populations. Of special concern regarding bird conservation are those birds resting or flying in the first 200 m of elevation. In total 6,624 soaring birds were seen resting (2,252 within a radius of 2.5 km). Thirty-three percent of the storks and 47% of the raptors were observed resting or flying at heights within the lowest 200 m. The median height of flying birds varied between 5 m (harriers) and 500 m (Common Crane Grus grus). According to the raw data, criteria for nomination of the area as an IBA (20,000 raptors and storks in one migration season, globally threatened species) were fully met outside the existing IBA. Also, to the south of the study area, very high numbers of migrants were confirmed by spontaneous, non-systematic observations. Accordingly, a change of the boundaries is suggested. The regional analysis, based on extrapolations, has to be regarded as a preliminary study. The analysis failed to show a geographical trend for any single species. The data from this study establish a high concentration of gliding and soaring birds in the study area, within and adjacent to the already designated IBA.</description><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Bird migration</subject><subject>Grus grus</subject><subject>Regional analysis</subject><subject>Regional planning</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><issn>0959-2709</issn><issn>1474-0001</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouH78AG_Bgyerk6ZJWm8qfoG4LK4XLyFt0jXaNmuSBfffm2VFQZE5DMw877zDi9ABgRMCRJw-QsWqXECVCsqCwgYakUIUGQCQTTRarbPVfhvthPCappRRPkLj6YvB2gTjI1YRPysb8YVaHuOr2XIez7DCtfUa93bmVbRuwLWLsTODad6wa_Gsc7XqsO3nzkc1NGYPbbWqC2b_q--ip-ur6eVtdj--ubs8v8-aIi9jpllOFG8qWgpVEVaKnAlNWlO0umYtLWsAnTNDalqq0igQmvKqIjW0DWjeMLqLjtZ35969L0yIsrehMV2nBuMWQeaEVHkJPIGHv8BXt_BD-i0xlKfsKE0QWUONdyF408q5t73yS0lArvKVf_JNmmytsSGaj2-B8m-SCyqY5DcTKeDhoaATLqeJp18eqq-91TPz88n_Lp8CAom_</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>HILGERLOH, GUDRUN</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>The desert at Zait Bay, Egypt: a bird migration bottleneck of global importance</title><author>HILGERLOH, GUDRUN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-d521a6c9387a91587257d1fe4fdb5f38b00d25e1b38a8ea07d36991b0fc0d6c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Bird migration</topic><topic>Grus grus</topic><topic>Regional analysis</topic><topic>Regional planning</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HILGERLOH, GUDRUN</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Bird conservation international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HILGERLOH, GUDRUN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The desert at Zait Bay, Egypt: a bird migration bottleneck of global importance</atitle><jtitle>Bird conservation international</jtitle><addtitle>Bird Conservation International</addtitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>338</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>338-352</pages><issn>0959-2709</issn><eissn>1474-0001</eissn><abstract>The study area at Zait Bay, Egypt (c. 700 km2) is situated in the middle of the West Asian-East African migration flyway used by very large numbers of soaring migrants. At this site the corridor narrows into a bottleneck. There exist only very few bottlenecks of this magnitude in the world. Observations were performed at all hours between sunrise and sunset at 26 observation sites, situated 5 km apart. The northern part of the area under investigation (19 observation sites) was situated within the Gebel El Zeit IBA (criteria A1 and A4iv), while the southernmost part (8 observation sites) was outside. The overall evaluation has shown that 179,681 soaring birds including 122,454 storks and 36,976 raptors were observed in total. Within a radius of 2.5 km from each observation site 97,143 soaring birds including 59,308 storks and 30,489 raptors were observed during the 604 hours of observation. Eleven species were recorded in numbers that exceed 1% of their flyway populations. Of special concern regarding bird conservation are those birds resting or flying in the first 200 m of elevation. In total 6,624 soaring birds were seen resting (2,252 within a radius of 2.5 km). Thirty-three percent of the storks and 47% of the raptors were observed resting or flying at heights within the lowest 200 m. The median height of flying birds varied between 5 m (harriers) and 500 m (Common Crane Grus grus). According to the raw data, criteria for nomination of the area as an IBA (20,000 raptors and storks in one migration season, globally threatened species) were fully met outside the existing IBA. Also, to the south of the study area, very high numbers of migrants were confirmed by spontaneous, non-systematic observations. Accordingly, a change of the boundaries is suggested. The regional analysis, based on extrapolations, has to be regarded as a preliminary study. The analysis failed to show a geographical trend for any single species. The data from this study establish a high concentration of gliding and soaring birds in the study area, within and adjacent to the already designated IBA.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0959270909008430</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-2709 |
ispartof | Bird conservation international, 2009-12, Vol.19 (4), p.338-352 |
issn | 0959-2709 1474-0001 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21192806 |
source | Cambridge University Press:Jisc Collections:Cambridge University Press Read and Publish Agreement 2021-24 (Reading list) |
subjects | Aquatic birds Bird migration Grus grus Regional analysis Regional planning Threatened species |
title | The desert at Zait Bay, Egypt: a bird migration bottleneck of global importance |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A04%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20desert%20at%20Zait%20Bay,%20Egypt:%20a%20bird%20migration%20bottleneck%20of%20global%20importance&rft.jtitle=Bird%20conservation%20international&rft.au=HILGERLOH,%20GUDRUN&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=338&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=338-352&rft.issn=0959-2709&rft.eissn=1474-0001&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0959270909008430&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1906580151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-d521a6c9387a91587257d1fe4fdb5f38b00d25e1b38a8ea07d36991b0fc0d6c53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213601733&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0959270909008430&rfr_iscdi=true |