Prevalence of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis infections in Canadian dairy herds

• Published in: Journal of dairy science 2018-12, Vol.101 (12), p.11218-11228
• Main Authors: Corbett, Caroline S., Naqvi, S. Ali, Bauman, Cathy A., De Buck, Jeroen, Orsel, Karin, Uehlinger, Fabienne, Kelton, David F., Barkema, Herman W.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Breeding; Canada; Canada - epidemiology; Cattle; Cattle Diseases - epidemiology; Cattle Diseases - microbiology; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dairying; environmental samples; Farms; Female; herd characteristics; Johne's disease; Lactation; Manure - microbiology; Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis - isolation & purification; Paratuberculosis - epidemiology; Paratuberculosis - microbiology; Prevalence; Sensitivity and Specificity
• ISSN: 0022-0302; 1525-3198
• DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-14854

Johne's disease is a progressive, chronic disease with inflammation of the small intestine of ruminants caused by Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP). Accurately estimating prevalence of MAP infections is important when controlling spread of infection or monitoring effectiveness of control programs. In the absence of a consistent test method used in prevalence studies across Canada, prevalence estimates among regions and programs cannot be compared. The aim of the current study was to estimate and compare prevalence of MAP infection in Western Canada, Ontario, Québec, and the Atlantic provinces, as well as among varying herd sizes and housing types. On 362 dairy farms located in all 10 provinces of Canada, environmental samples were collected and cultured for detection of MAP. For each herd, 1 sample was collected from the lactating cow area and manure storage. An additional environmental sample was collected from the area where breeding-age heifers were housed. Using prior distributions from previous research, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were calculated to assess the ability of only 2 environmental samples (manure storage and lactating cow area) to identify MAP-positive farms, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 38 and 100%, respectively. We found no difference in sensitivity and specificity when including breeding-age heifers environmental samples. Test characteristics were applied to environmental culture results from the 362 participating farms in all 4 regions, resulting in true prevalence estimates of 66% for farms in Western Canada, 54% in Ontario, 24% in Québec, and 47% in Atlantic Canada. Herds housed in tiestalls had lower prevalence than freestall-housed herds, and herds with 101–150 and >151 cows had higher prevalence than herds with ≤100 cows. This was the first time MAP prevalence was determined using 1 detection method, performed in 1 laboratory, and within a single year across Canada, enabling direct comparisons of prevalence among regions, housing types, and herd sizes.