Loading…

Heating sensation in patients with and without spinal fixation devices during MRI examination at different magnetic field strengths

Background Radiofrequency (RF) heating during MRI theoretically increases with magnetic field strength. In addition, implanted metallic devices are reported to further increase RF heating. However, a detailed evaluation of this type of heating remains scarce in clinical practice. Purpose To assess p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2019-02, Vol.49 (2), p.525-533
Main Authors: Yamaguchi, Taiki, Abe, Yuichiro, Ichino, Yoshio, Satoh, Shigenobu, Masuda, Takeshi, Kimura, Shoichi, Ito, Manabu, Yamamoto, Toru
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Radiofrequency (RF) heating during MRI theoretically increases with magnetic field strength. In addition, implanted metallic devices are reported to further increase RF heating. However, a detailed evaluation of this type of heating remains scarce in clinical practice. Purpose To assess possible risks and discomfort related to RF heating during MRI examinations of patients with and without metallic implantable devices. Study Type A retrospective study of previous questionnaire results on the heating sensation during MRI examinations of the lumbar spine. Subjects In all, 715 patients, of whom 101 had implanted lumbar spine fixation devices. Field Strength/Sequence 1T and 3T/T1‐ and T2‐weighted imaging. Assessment The number of patients who perceived heating around the lumbar spine or other regions during the MRI examination. Statistical Tests A chi‐square test with respect to static field strength B0, presence of lumbar spine fixation devices, and duration of the MRI examination. Results The number of patients who perceived heating around the lumbar spine during the MRI examination significantly increased from 5.0% at 1T to 47.5% at 3T (P 
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.26307