Evaluation of the Clinical Learning Environment in Respiratory Therapy Education: Student Perceptions

• Published in: Respiratory care 2019-02, Vol.64 (2), p.161-168
• Main Authors: Alghamdi, Saeed M, Siraj, Rayan A, Ari, Arzu
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes; Clinical Competence; College students; Education; Educational environment; Educational Status; Female; Humans; Male; Management; Medical education; Medical personnel training; Nurses; Perception; Problem-Based Learning - methods; Respiratory therapy; Respiratory Therapy - education; Students; Students, Health Occupations - psychology; Surveys and Questionnaires; Teachers
• ISSN: 0020-1324; 1943-3654
• DOI: 10.4187/respcare.05055

Clinical facilities are essential components not only of health care delivery systems, but also of health care education programs. The clinical learning environment (CLE) is important in training the future health care workforce. Because respiratory therapy (RT) is a practice-based profession, it is essential to integrate clinical education into RT education. RT education programs face several issues with respect to the need for preparing a proper CLE in various clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to determine the perceptions of RT students on the CLE of clinical facilities affiliated with an RT program at an urban state university and to determine the impact of education level on student perception of the CLE of clinical facilities. We used an exploratory research design to evaluate the essential aspects of a CLE in RT education. An adapted Clinical Learning Environment Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T) evaluation scale was utilized to evaluate 34 RT students' perceptions of clinical facilities in RT education; 32 students participated in the survey, with a response rate of 94.1%. Responses included 2 groups of students: second-year undergraduates (68.8%), in which women accounted for 81% and men 19%, and graduate students (31.2%), in which women accounted for 60% and men 40%. Results obtained from the study indicated that both graduate and undergraduate RT students gave high median scores to the CLE, the supervisory relationship, and the role of clinical instructors. A statistically significant difference was obtained between the graduate and undergraduate students regarding multidimensional learning ( = .043). We found that the majority of students positively rated the CLE in RT education. Education level influenced students' perceptions of the CLE of clinical facilities. Overall, respiratory therapy students rated their CLE experiences as positive and they were satisfied with the clinical instructor and team model.