Loading…
Mother-Infant Studies: Subject Refusals and Sampling Bias
Do sampling biases introduced in studies requiring a large amount of time make those samples less representative than the samples in studies requiring less subject involvement? This question was explored in the context of mother-infant interaction studies by eomparing maternal attitudes of two group...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of behavioral development 1980-04, Vol.3 (1), p.83-89 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-9a8d92211c481c81a67e466ba07a6b10e668416c07416082977220d9721e26283 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-9a8d92211c481c81a67e466ba07a6b10e668416c07416082977220d9721e26283 |
container_end_page | 89 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 83 |
container_title | International journal of behavioral development |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Freese, Margaret P. Thoman, Evelyn B. Becker, Patricia T. |
description | Do sampling biases introduced in studies requiring a large amount of time make those
samples less representative than the samples in studies requiring less subject
involvement? This question was explored in the context of mother-infant interaction
studies by eomparing maternal attitudes of two groups of mothers: 20 mothers who
participated with their infants in 35 hours of observation and testing, and 17
mothers who refused to participate in that study, but did spend 30 minutes
completing a questionnaire. These two groups of mothers differ widely in their
willingness to be involved in a study. All subjects completed the Pregnancy Research
Inventory at the end of the eighth month of pregnancy. There were no significant
differences between the two groups on any scale. The importance of developing
procedures to assess important biases introduced into studies requiring substantial
commitments of time is discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/016502548000300108 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21225683</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_016502548000300108</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1311845791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-9a8d92211c481c81a67e466ba07a6b10e668416c07416082977220d9721e26283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_gKeA4C12ZrPZ3XjT4kehIlg9L9vNpKakSdxNDv57E-pBFC8zh3mel-Fl7BzhClGpGaBMgadCA0ACgKAP2ASFFDHIFA_ZZATikThmJyFsYeQUTFj21HTv5ONFXdi6i1Zdn5cUrqNVv96S66IXKvpgqxDZOo9WdtdWZb2JbksbTtlRMRzo7HtP2dv93ev8MV4-PyzmN8vYJUJ2cWZ1nnGO6IRGp9FKRULKtQVl5RqBpNQCpQM1TNA8U4pzyDPFkbjkOpmyy31u65uPnkJndmVwVFW2pqYPhiPnqdTJAF78ArdN7-vhN4MJohapynCg-J5yvgnBU2FaX-6s_zQIZuzS_O1ykGZ7KdgN_Yj93_gC2KFvbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311845791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mother-Infant Studies: Subject Refusals and Sampling Bias</title><source>SAGE Complete Deep Backfile Purchase 2012</source><creator>Freese, Margaret P. ; Thoman, Evelyn B. ; Becker, Patricia T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Freese, Margaret P. ; Thoman, Evelyn B. ; Becker, Patricia T.</creatorcontrib><description>Do sampling biases introduced in studies requiring a large amount of time make those
samples less representative than the samples in studies requiring less subject
involvement? This question was explored in the context of mother-infant interaction
studies by eomparing maternal attitudes of two groups of mothers: 20 mothers who
participated with their infants in 35 hours of observation and testing, and 17
mothers who refused to participate in that study, but did spend 30 minutes
completing a questionnaire. These two groups of mothers differ widely in their
willingness to be involved in a study. All subjects completed the Pregnancy Research
Inventory at the end of the eighth month of pregnancy. There were no significant
differences between the two groups on any scale. The importance of developing
procedures to assess important biases introduced into studies requiring substantial
commitments of time is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0651</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/016502548000300108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><ispartof>International journal of behavioral development, 1980-04, Vol.3 (1), p.83-89</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-9a8d92211c481c81a67e466ba07a6b10e668416c07416082977220d9721e26283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-9a8d92211c481c81a67e466ba07a6b10e668416c07416082977220d9721e26283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/016502548000300108$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016502548000300108$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21826,27905,27906,45063,45451</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freese, Margaret P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoman, Evelyn B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Patricia T.</creatorcontrib><title>Mother-Infant Studies: Subject Refusals and Sampling Bias</title><title>International journal of behavioral development</title><description>Do sampling biases introduced in studies requiring a large amount of time make those
samples less representative than the samples in studies requiring less subject
involvement? This question was explored in the context of mother-infant interaction
studies by eomparing maternal attitudes of two groups of mothers: 20 mothers who
participated with their infants in 35 hours of observation and testing, and 17
mothers who refused to participate in that study, but did spend 30 minutes
completing a questionnaire. These two groups of mothers differ widely in their
willingness to be involved in a study. All subjects completed the Pregnancy Research
Inventory at the end of the eighth month of pregnancy. There were no significant
differences between the two groups on any scale. The importance of developing
procedures to assess important biases introduced into studies requiring substantial
commitments of time is discussed.</description><issn>0165-0254</issn><issn>1464-0651</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_gKeA4C12ZrPZ3XjT4kehIlg9L9vNpKakSdxNDv57E-pBFC8zh3mel-Fl7BzhClGpGaBMgadCA0ACgKAP2ASFFDHIFA_ZZATikThmJyFsYeQUTFj21HTv5ONFXdi6i1Zdn5cUrqNVv96S66IXKvpgqxDZOo9WdtdWZb2JbksbTtlRMRzo7HtP2dv93ev8MV4-PyzmN8vYJUJ2cWZ1nnGO6IRGp9FKRULKtQVl5RqBpNQCpQM1TNA8U4pzyDPFkbjkOpmyy31u65uPnkJndmVwVFW2pqYPhiPnqdTJAF78ArdN7-vhN4MJohapynCg-J5yvgnBU2FaX-6s_zQIZuzS_O1ykGZ7KdgN_Yj93_gC2KFvbw</recordid><startdate>198004</startdate><enddate>198004</enddate><creator>Freese, Margaret P.</creator><creator>Thoman, Evelyn B.</creator><creator>Becker, Patricia T.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>North-Holland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JRZRW</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198004</creationdate><title>Mother-Infant Studies: Subject Refusals and Sampling Bias</title><author>Freese, Margaret P. ; Thoman, Evelyn B. ; Becker, Patricia T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-9a8d92211c481c81a67e466ba07a6b10e668416c07416082977220d9721e26283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freese, Margaret P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoman, Evelyn B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Patricia T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 35</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of behavioral development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freese, Margaret P.</au><au>Thoman, Evelyn B.</au><au>Becker, Patricia T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mother-Infant Studies: Subject Refusals and Sampling Bias</atitle><jtitle>International journal of behavioral development</jtitle><date>1980-04</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>83-89</pages><issn>0165-0254</issn><eissn>1464-0651</eissn><abstract>Do sampling biases introduced in studies requiring a large amount of time make those
samples less representative than the samples in studies requiring less subject
involvement? This question was explored in the context of mother-infant interaction
studies by eomparing maternal attitudes of two groups of mothers: 20 mothers who
participated with their infants in 35 hours of observation and testing, and 17
mothers who refused to participate in that study, but did spend 30 minutes
completing a questionnaire. These two groups of mothers differ widely in their
willingness to be involved in a study. All subjects completed the Pregnancy Research
Inventory at the end of the eighth month of pregnancy. There were no significant
differences between the two groups on any scale. The importance of developing
procedures to assess important biases introduced into studies requiring substantial
commitments of time is discussed.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/016502548000300108</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0254 |
ispartof | International journal of behavioral development, 1980-04, Vol.3 (1), p.83-89 |
issn | 0165-0254 1464-0651 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21225683 |
source | SAGE Complete Deep Backfile Purchase 2012 |
title | Mother-Infant Studies: Subject Refusals and Sampling Bias |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T09%3A15%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mother-Infant%20Studies:%20Subject%20Refusals%20and%20Sampling%20Bias&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20behavioral%20development&rft.au=Freese,%20Margaret%20P.&rft.date=1980-04&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=83-89&rft.issn=0165-0254&rft.eissn=1464-0651&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/016502548000300108&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1311845791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-9a8d92211c481c81a67e466ba07a6b10e668416c07416082977220d9721e26283%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311845791&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_016502548000300108&rfr_iscdi=true |