Decrease in uterine perforations with ultrasound image-guided applicator insertion in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: Gynecologic oncology 2018-12, Vol.151 (3), p.573-578
• Main Authors: Sapienza, Lucas Gomes, Jhingran, Anuja, Kollmeier, Marisa A., Lin, Lillie L., Calsavara, Vinícius Fernando, Gomes, Maria José Leite, Baiocchi, Glauco
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Brachytherapy; Brachytherapy - instrumentation; Brachytherapy - methods; Cervical cancer; Female; Gynecological cancer; Humans; Image-guided insertion; Meta-analysis; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - adverse effects; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods; Ultrasonography - adverse effects; Ultrasonography - instrumentation; Ultrasonography - methods; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology; Uterine perforation; Uterine Perforation - etiology; Uterine Perforation - pathology; Uterine Perforation - prevention & control
• ISSN: 0090-8258; 1095-6859
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.011

To estimate uterine perforations rates during intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer with and without ultrasound (US) image guidance. A systematic search of databases (PubMed and EMBASE) was performed. The pooled summary uterine perforation rate (detected by postinsertion CT or MRI) for the un-guided insertion group and the guided insertion group was calculated by using the random-effects model weighted by the inverse variance. A total of 690 articles were initially found, resulting in 12 studies that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1757 insertions and 766 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall uterine perforation rate per insertion was 4.56% (95%CI: 2.35–8.67) and per patient was 7.39% (95%CI: 3.92–13.50). The pooled perforation rate per insertion without image guidance was 10.54% (95%CI: 6.12–17.57) versus 1.06% (95%CI: 0.41–2.67) with image guidance (p