Loading…
The Effects of Task-Irrelevant Olfactory Information on the Planning and the Execution of Reach-to-Grasp Movements
Previous evidence indicates that, when reaching to grasp a target object, the presence of nontarget irrelevant information (i.e., distractor) presented either in the visual or olfactory modality determines significant interference effects on temporal parameters, such as reaction time and movement ti...
Saved in:
Published in: | Chemosensory perception 2009-03, Vol.2 (1), p.25-31 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-fa404fdfa5e4f71557277667104af9e6a8f3cd5ab9a8fafb583538958a0271cb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-fa404fdfa5e4f71557277667104af9e6a8f3cd5ab9a8fafb583538958a0271cb3 |
container_end_page | 31 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 25 |
container_title | Chemosensory perception |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Tubaldi, Federico Ansuini, Caterina Tirindelli, Roberto Castiello, Umberto |
description | Previous evidence indicates that, when reaching to grasp a target object, the presence of nontarget irrelevant information (i.e., distractor) presented either in the visual or olfactory modality determines significant interference effects on temporal parameters, such as reaction time and movement time, and on movement kinematics. While research on “visual” distractor has also revealed that such interference effects disappear when prior knowledge about the target is given to participants, this aspect for olfactory distractors has yet to be investigated. Therefore, here we asked participants to reach towards and grasp a small or a large visual target following the delivery of an odor evoking either a small or a large object. When the type of grasp evoked by the odor did not coincide with that for the visual target, interference effects were evident on reach duration and reaction time, but kinematics of hand shaping remained unaltered. This study demonstrates that, when participants knew in advance which object was the target, olfactory nontargets produced no interference effects on movement kinematics, but they did on key temporal measures, i.e., reaction time and reach duration. These findings are discussed in light of current theories put forward to explain the sensory processes underlying the control of action. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12078-009-9039-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21228997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21228997</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-fa404fdfa5e4f71557277667104af9e6a8f3cd5ab9a8fafb583538958a0271cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9LAzEQxRdR8O8H8BY8eItmspvN5ihStaAoUs9hmiZa3SY1SYt-e6MrIoIwMMPwe48Hr6oOgZ0AY_I0AWeyo4wpqlitaL1R7YCqWyo6YJs_N-Pb1W5Kz4y1rAHYqeLkyZKRc9bkRIIjE0wvdByj7e0afSa3vUOTQ3wnY-9CXGCeB0_K5KK769H7uX8k6Gdfj9GbNauBcOTeonmiOdDLiGlJbsLaLqzPab_actgne_C996qHi9Hk_Ipe316Oz8-uqWmAZ-qwYY2bORS2cRKEkFzKtpXAGnTKtti52swETlW50E1FV4u6U6JDxiWYab1XHQ--yxheVzZlvZgnY_sS2oZV0hw475SSBTz6Az6HVfQlmwalFDQCRIFggEwMKUXr9DLOFxjfNTD9WYEeKtClAv1Zga6Lhg-aVFj_aOMv439FH_ZNias</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199914515</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Task-Irrelevant Olfactory Information on the Planning and the Execution of Reach-to-Grasp Movements</title><source>SpringerLink Contemporary</source><creator>Tubaldi, Federico ; Ansuini, Caterina ; Tirindelli, Roberto ; Castiello, Umberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Tubaldi, Federico ; Ansuini, Caterina ; Tirindelli, Roberto ; Castiello, Umberto</creatorcontrib><description>Previous evidence indicates that, when reaching to grasp a target object, the presence of nontarget irrelevant information (i.e., distractor) presented either in the visual or olfactory modality determines significant interference effects on temporal parameters, such as reaction time and movement time, and on movement kinematics. While research on “visual” distractor has also revealed that such interference effects disappear when prior knowledge about the target is given to participants, this aspect for olfactory distractors has yet to be investigated. Therefore, here we asked participants to reach towards and grasp a small or a large visual target following the delivery of an odor evoking either a small or a large object. When the type of grasp evoked by the odor did not coincide with that for the visual target, interference effects were evident on reach duration and reaction time, but kinematics of hand shaping remained unaltered. This study demonstrates that, when participants knew in advance which object was the target, olfactory nontargets produced no interference effects on movement kinematics, but they did on key temporal measures, i.e., reaction time and reach duration. These findings are discussed in light of current theories put forward to explain the sensory processes underlying the control of action.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1936-5802</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-5810</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12078-009-9039-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Clinical Nutrition ; Food Science ; Kinematics ; Neurosciences ; Sensory perception ; Smell ; Visual task performance</subject><ispartof>Chemosensory perception, 2009-03, Vol.2 (1), p.25-31</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-fa404fdfa5e4f71557277667104af9e6a8f3cd5ab9a8fafb583538958a0271cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-fa404fdfa5e4f71557277667104af9e6a8f3cd5ab9a8fafb583538958a0271cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12078-009-9039-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12078-009-9039-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1644,27923,27924,41417,42486,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tubaldi, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ansuini, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tirindelli, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castiello, Umberto</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Task-Irrelevant Olfactory Information on the Planning and the Execution of Reach-to-Grasp Movements</title><title>Chemosensory perception</title><addtitle>Chem. Percept</addtitle><description>Previous evidence indicates that, when reaching to grasp a target object, the presence of nontarget irrelevant information (i.e., distractor) presented either in the visual or olfactory modality determines significant interference effects on temporal parameters, such as reaction time and movement time, and on movement kinematics. While research on “visual” distractor has also revealed that such interference effects disappear when prior knowledge about the target is given to participants, this aspect for olfactory distractors has yet to be investigated. Therefore, here we asked participants to reach towards and grasp a small or a large visual target following the delivery of an odor evoking either a small or a large object. When the type of grasp evoked by the odor did not coincide with that for the visual target, interference effects were evident on reach duration and reaction time, but kinematics of hand shaping remained unaltered. This study demonstrates that, when participants knew in advance which object was the target, olfactory nontargets produced no interference effects on movement kinematics, but they did on key temporal measures, i.e., reaction time and reach duration. These findings are discussed in light of current theories put forward to explain the sensory processes underlying the control of action.</description><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Clinical Nutrition</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Smell</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><issn>1936-5802</issn><issn>1936-5810</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU9LAzEQxRdR8O8H8BY8eItmspvN5ihStaAoUs9hmiZa3SY1SYt-e6MrIoIwMMPwe48Hr6oOgZ0AY_I0AWeyo4wpqlitaL1R7YCqWyo6YJs_N-Pb1W5Kz4y1rAHYqeLkyZKRc9bkRIIjE0wvdByj7e0afSa3vUOTQ3wnY-9CXGCeB0_K5KK769H7uX8k6Gdfj9GbNauBcOTeonmiOdDLiGlJbsLaLqzPab_actgne_C996qHi9Hk_Ipe316Oz8-uqWmAZ-qwYY2bORS2cRKEkFzKtpXAGnTKtti52swETlW50E1FV4u6U6JDxiWYab1XHQ--yxheVzZlvZgnY_sS2oZV0hw475SSBTz6Az6HVfQlmwalFDQCRIFggEwMKUXr9DLOFxjfNTD9WYEeKtClAv1Zga6Lhg-aVFj_aOMv439FH_ZNias</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Tubaldi, Federico</creator><creator>Ansuini, Caterina</creator><creator>Tirindelli, Roberto</creator><creator>Castiello, Umberto</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>The Effects of Task-Irrelevant Olfactory Information on the Planning and the Execution of Reach-to-Grasp Movements</title><author>Tubaldi, Federico ; Ansuini, Caterina ; Tirindelli, Roberto ; Castiello, Umberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-fa404fdfa5e4f71557277667104af9e6a8f3cd5ab9a8fafb583538958a0271cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Clinical Nutrition</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Smell</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tubaldi, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ansuini, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tirindelli, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castiello, Umberto</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Chemosensory perception</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tubaldi, Federico</au><au>Ansuini, Caterina</au><au>Tirindelli, Roberto</au><au>Castiello, Umberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Task-Irrelevant Olfactory Information on the Planning and the Execution of Reach-to-Grasp Movements</atitle><jtitle>Chemosensory perception</jtitle><stitle>Chem. Percept</stitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>25-31</pages><issn>1936-5802</issn><eissn>1936-5810</eissn><abstract>Previous evidence indicates that, when reaching to grasp a target object, the presence of nontarget irrelevant information (i.e., distractor) presented either in the visual or olfactory modality determines significant interference effects on temporal parameters, such as reaction time and movement time, and on movement kinematics. While research on “visual” distractor has also revealed that such interference effects disappear when prior knowledge about the target is given to participants, this aspect for olfactory distractors has yet to be investigated. Therefore, here we asked participants to reach towards and grasp a small or a large visual target following the delivery of an odor evoking either a small or a large object. When the type of grasp evoked by the odor did not coincide with that for the visual target, interference effects were evident on reach duration and reaction time, but kinematics of hand shaping remained unaltered. This study demonstrates that, when participants knew in advance which object was the target, olfactory nontargets produced no interference effects on movement kinematics, but they did on key temporal measures, i.e., reaction time and reach duration. These findings are discussed in light of current theories put forward to explain the sensory processes underlying the control of action.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s12078-009-9039-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1936-5802 |
ispartof | Chemosensory perception, 2009-03, Vol.2 (1), p.25-31 |
issn | 1936-5802 1936-5810 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21228997 |
source | SpringerLink Contemporary |
subjects | Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Clinical Nutrition Food Science Kinematics Neurosciences Sensory perception Smell Visual task performance |
title | The Effects of Task-Irrelevant Olfactory Information on the Planning and the Execution of Reach-to-Grasp Movements |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T02%3A15%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Task-Irrelevant%20Olfactory%20Information%20on%20the%20Planning%20and%20the%20Execution%20of%20Reach-to-Grasp%20Movements&rft.jtitle=Chemosensory%20perception&rft.au=Tubaldi,%20Federico&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=25-31&rft.issn=1936-5802&rft.eissn=1936-5810&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12078-009-9039-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21228997%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-fa404fdfa5e4f71557277667104af9e6a8f3cd5ab9a8fafb583538958a0271cb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199914515&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |