Comparative biosensing of glycosaminoglycan hyaluronic acid oligo- and polysaccharides using aerolysin and [Formula: see text]-hemolysin nanopores

• Published in: The European physical journal. E, Soft matter and biological physics Soft matter and biological physics, 2018-10, Vol.41 (10), p.127-127
• Main Authors: Fennouri, Aziz, Ramiandrisoa, Joana, Bacri, Laurent, Mathé, Jérôme, Daniel, Régis
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bacterial Toxins - chemistry; Biosensing Techniques - methods; Hemolysin Proteins - chemistry; Hyaluronic Acid - analysis; Hyaluronic Acid - chemistry; Nanopores; Polymerization; Pore Forming Cytotoxic Proteins - chemistry
• ISSN: 1292-895X
• DOI: 10.1140/epje/i2018-11733-5

Seeking new tools for the analysis of glycosaminoglycans, we have compared the translocation of anionic oligosaccharides from hyaluronic acid using aerolysin and [Formula: see text]-hemolysin nanopores. We show that pores of similar channel length and diameter lead to distinct translocation behavior of the same macromolecules, due to different structural properties of the nanopores. When passing from the vestibule side of the nanopores, short hyaluronic acid oligosaccharides could be detected during their translocation across an aerolysin nanopore but not across an [Formula: see text]-hemolysin nanopore. We were however able to detect longer oligosaccharide fragments, resulting from the in situ enzymatic depolymerization of hyaluronic acid polysaccharides, with both nanopores, meaning that short oligosaccharides were crossing the [Formula: see text]-hemolysin nanopore with a speed too high to be detected. The translocation speed was an order of magnitude higher across [Formula: see text]-hemolysin compared to aerolysin. These results show that the choice of a nanopore to be used for resistive pulse sensing experiments should not rely only on the diameter of the channel but also on other parameters such as the charge repartition within the pore lumen.