Surgical management of early and late esophageal perforation

• Published in: Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals 2018-11, Vol.26 (9), p.685-689
• Main Authors: Fattahi Masoom, Seyed Hossein, Nouri Dalouee, Marziyeh, Fattahi, Asieh Sadat, Hajebi Khaniki, Saeedeh
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Child, Preschool; Early Diagnosis; Esophageal Perforation - diagnostic imaging; Esophageal Perforation - etiology; Esophageal Perforation - mortality; Esophageal Perforation - surgery; Esophagectomy - adverse effects; Esophagectomy - mortality; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - mortality; Risk Factors; Stents; Surgical Flaps - adverse effects; Time Factors; Time-to-Treatment; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0218-4923; 1816-5370
• DOI: 10.1177/0218492318808199

Introduction Esophageal perforation is a rare and life-threating problem with a 10%–40% mortality rate. Early diagnosis and treatment are important for prevention of complications. Strategies for treatment of esophageal perforation have been controversial for many years, especially in cases of late presentation. Methods We prospectively studied 27 patients (12 male, 17 female, mean age 42.7 ± 17.8 years) who presented with esophageal perforation from 1996 to 2015, and evaluated the results of surgical treatment. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to time of presentation: early (72 h). We also considered the etiology and site of esophageal perforation, complications, and mortality. Results Surgery was performed in 5 patients in the early group, 7 in the moderate group, and 15 in the late group. Primary repair was carried out in 5 cases, primary repair and reinforcement with a flap in 10, esophageal resection and reconstruction in 8, and a T-tube stent was used in 4. Four patients developed a fistula postoperatively, and there was one death due to respiratory failure. No relationship was found between complications and the cause of perforation, time of presentation, or type of treatment. Conclusion In patients without sepsis, primary repair can be an option even in those presenting late after esophageal perforation, with an acceptable result.