Loading…
Nitrogen retention in a floodplain backwater of the upper Mississippi River (USA)
Backwaters connected to large rivers retain nitrate and may play an important role in reducing downstream loading to coastal marine environments. A summer nitrogen (N) inflow-outflow budget was examined for a flow-regulated backwater of the upper Mississippi River in conjunction with laboratory esti...
Saved in:
Published in: | Aquatic sciences 2010, Vol.72 (1), p.61-69 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-62d349026b164af78e536d2159398c92abd0ac8052b987d044b0b90055b898053 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-62d349026b164af78e536d2159398c92abd0ac8052b987d044b0b90055b898053 |
container_end_page | 69 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 61 |
container_title | Aquatic sciences |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | James, William F. |
description | Backwaters connected to large rivers retain nitrate and may play an important role in reducing downstream loading to coastal marine environments. A summer nitrogen (N) inflow-outflow budget was examined for a flow-regulated backwater of the upper Mississippi River in conjunction with laboratory estimates of sediment ammonium and nitrate fluxes, organic N mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification to provide further insight into N retention processes. External N loading was overwhelmingly dominated by nitrate and 54% of the input was retained (137 mg m
−2
day
−1
). Ammonium and dissolved organic N were exported from the backwater (14 and 9 mg m
−2
day
−1
, respectively). Nitrate influx to sediment increased as a function of increasing initial nitrate concentration in the overlying water. Rates were greater under anoxic versus oxic conditions. Ammonium effluxes from sediment were 26.7 and 50.6 mg m
−2
day
−1
under oxic and anoxic conditions, respectively. Since anoxia inhibited nitrification, the difference between ammonium anoxic–oxic fluxes approximated a nitrification rate of 29.1 mg m
−2
day
−1
. Organic N mineralization was 64 mg m
−2
day
−1
. Denitrification, estimated from regression relationships between oxic nitrate influx versus initial nitrate concentration and a summer lakewide mean nitrate concentration of 1.27 mg l
−1
, was 94 mg m
−2
day
−1
. Denitrification was equivalent to only 57% of the retained nitrate, suggesting that another portion was assimilated by biota. The high sediment organic N mineralization and ammonium efflux rate coupled with the occurrence of ammonium export from the system suggested a possible link between biotic assimilation of nitrate, mineralization, and export. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00027-009-0113-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21264149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21264149</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-62d349026b164af78e536d2159398c92abd0ac8052b987d044b0b90055b898053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kNtKxDAQhosouK4-gHdFUPSiOpP0kFwuiydYFQ97HdI2XbN2m5q0im9vli4ighCYzMw3PzN_EBwinCNAduEAgGQRAI8AkUZ0KxhhTCDikCTb_g-YRJgS3A32nFsCIGEZGwWP97qzZqGa0KpONZ02TaibUIZVbUzZ1tInuSzePmWnbGiqsHtVYd-2PrnTzq1f2-rwSX_4yun8eXK2H-xUsnbqYBPHwfzq8mV6E80erm-nk1lU0CztopSUNOZA0hzTWFYZUwlNS4IJp5wVnMi8BFkwSEjOWVZCHOeQc_DX5Iz7Mh0HJ4Nua817r1wnVtoVqq5lo0zvBEGSxhhzDx79AZemt43fTSDnXjJjsYdwgAprnLOqEq3VK2m_BIJYOywGh4V3WKwdFtTPHG-EpStkXVnZFNr9DBJCkSUJeo4MnPOtZqHsrwX-Ff8GPYiIUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199900784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nitrogen retention in a floodplain backwater of the upper Mississippi River (USA)</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>James, William F.</creator><creatorcontrib>James, William F.</creatorcontrib><description>Backwaters connected to large rivers retain nitrate and may play an important role in reducing downstream loading to coastal marine environments. A summer nitrogen (N) inflow-outflow budget was examined for a flow-regulated backwater of the upper Mississippi River in conjunction with laboratory estimates of sediment ammonium and nitrate fluxes, organic N mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification to provide further insight into N retention processes. External N loading was overwhelmingly dominated by nitrate and 54% of the input was retained (137 mg m
−2
day
−1
). Ammonium and dissolved organic N were exported from the backwater (14 and 9 mg m
−2
day
−1
, respectively). Nitrate influx to sediment increased as a function of increasing initial nitrate concentration in the overlying water. Rates were greater under anoxic versus oxic conditions. Ammonium effluxes from sediment were 26.7 and 50.6 mg m
−2
day
−1
under oxic and anoxic conditions, respectively. Since anoxia inhibited nitrification, the difference between ammonium anoxic–oxic fluxes approximated a nitrification rate of 29.1 mg m
−2
day
−1
. Organic N mineralization was 64 mg m
−2
day
−1
. Denitrification, estimated from regression relationships between oxic nitrate influx versus initial nitrate concentration and a summer lakewide mean nitrate concentration of 1.27 mg l
−1
, was 94 mg m
−2
day
−1
. Denitrification was equivalent to only 57% of the retained nitrate, suggesting that another portion was assimilated by biota. The high sediment organic N mineralization and ammonium efflux rate coupled with the occurrence of ammonium export from the system suggested a possible link between biotic assimilation of nitrate, mineralization, and export.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1015-1621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00027-009-0113-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; Ammonium ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Anoxia ; Anoxic conditions ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Backwaters ; Biogeochemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biota ; Denitrification ; Ecology ; Floodplains ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Freshwater ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Life Sciences ; Marine & Freshwater Sciences ; Marine environment ; Mineralization ; Nitrates ; Nitrification ; Nitrogen ; Oceanography ; Research Article ; Retention ; Rivers ; Sediments ; Synecology</subject><ispartof>Aquatic sciences, 2010, Vol.72 (1), p.61-69</ispartof><rights>Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel/Switzerland 2009</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel/Switzerland 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-62d349026b164af78e536d2159398c92abd0ac8052b987d044b0b90055b898053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-62d349026b164af78e536d2159398c92abd0ac8052b987d044b0b90055b898053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22318551$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>James, William F.</creatorcontrib><title>Nitrogen retention in a floodplain backwater of the upper Mississippi River (USA)</title><title>Aquatic sciences</title><addtitle>Aquat. Sci</addtitle><description>Backwaters connected to large rivers retain nitrate and may play an important role in reducing downstream loading to coastal marine environments. A summer nitrogen (N) inflow-outflow budget was examined for a flow-regulated backwater of the upper Mississippi River in conjunction with laboratory estimates of sediment ammonium and nitrate fluxes, organic N mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification to provide further insight into N retention processes. External N loading was overwhelmingly dominated by nitrate and 54% of the input was retained (137 mg m
−2
day
−1
). Ammonium and dissolved organic N were exported from the backwater (14 and 9 mg m
−2
day
−1
, respectively). Nitrate influx to sediment increased as a function of increasing initial nitrate concentration in the overlying water. Rates were greater under anoxic versus oxic conditions. Ammonium effluxes from sediment were 26.7 and 50.6 mg m
−2
day
−1
under oxic and anoxic conditions, respectively. Since anoxia inhibited nitrification, the difference between ammonium anoxic–oxic fluxes approximated a nitrification rate of 29.1 mg m
−2
day
−1
. Organic N mineralization was 64 mg m
−2
day
−1
. Denitrification, estimated from regression relationships between oxic nitrate influx versus initial nitrate concentration and a summer lakewide mean nitrate concentration of 1.27 mg l
−1
, was 94 mg m
−2
day
−1
. Denitrification was equivalent to only 57% of the retained nitrate, suggesting that another portion was assimilated by biota. The high sediment organic N mineralization and ammonium efflux rate coupled with the occurrence of ammonium export from the system suggested a possible link between biotic assimilation of nitrate, mineralization, and export.</description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Anoxia</subject><subject>Anoxic conditions</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Backwaters</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Floodplains</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Marine environment</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrification</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><issn>1015-1621</issn><issn>1420-9055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kNtKxDAQhosouK4-gHdFUPSiOpP0kFwuiydYFQ97HdI2XbN2m5q0im9vli4ighCYzMw3PzN_EBwinCNAduEAgGQRAI8AkUZ0KxhhTCDikCTb_g-YRJgS3A32nFsCIGEZGwWP97qzZqGa0KpONZ02TaibUIZVbUzZ1tInuSzePmWnbGiqsHtVYd-2PrnTzq1f2-rwSX_4yun8eXK2H-xUsnbqYBPHwfzq8mV6E80erm-nk1lU0CztopSUNOZA0hzTWFYZUwlNS4IJp5wVnMi8BFkwSEjOWVZCHOeQc_DX5Iz7Mh0HJ4Nua817r1wnVtoVqq5lo0zvBEGSxhhzDx79AZemt43fTSDnXjJjsYdwgAprnLOqEq3VK2m_BIJYOywGh4V3WKwdFtTPHG-EpStkXVnZFNr9DBJCkSUJeo4MnPOtZqHsrwX-Ff8GPYiIUg</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>James, William F.</creator><general>SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Nitrogen retention in a floodplain backwater of the upper Mississippi River (USA)</title><author>James, William F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-62d349026b164af78e536d2159398c92abd0ac8052b987d044b0b90055b898053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Anoxia</topic><topic>Anoxic conditions</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Backwaters</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Floodplains</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Marine environment</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrification</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>James, William F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Aquatic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>James, William F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nitrogen retention in a floodplain backwater of the upper Mississippi River (USA)</atitle><jtitle>Aquatic sciences</jtitle><stitle>Aquat. Sci</stitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>61-69</pages><issn>1015-1621</issn><eissn>1420-9055</eissn><abstract>Backwaters connected to large rivers retain nitrate and may play an important role in reducing downstream loading to coastal marine environments. A summer nitrogen (N) inflow-outflow budget was examined for a flow-regulated backwater of the upper Mississippi River in conjunction with laboratory estimates of sediment ammonium and nitrate fluxes, organic N mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification to provide further insight into N retention processes. External N loading was overwhelmingly dominated by nitrate and 54% of the input was retained (137 mg m
−2
day
−1
). Ammonium and dissolved organic N were exported from the backwater (14 and 9 mg m
−2
day
−1
, respectively). Nitrate influx to sediment increased as a function of increasing initial nitrate concentration in the overlying water. Rates were greater under anoxic versus oxic conditions. Ammonium effluxes from sediment were 26.7 and 50.6 mg m
−2
day
−1
under oxic and anoxic conditions, respectively. Since anoxia inhibited nitrification, the difference between ammonium anoxic–oxic fluxes approximated a nitrification rate of 29.1 mg m
−2
day
−1
. Organic N mineralization was 64 mg m
−2
day
−1
. Denitrification, estimated from regression relationships between oxic nitrate influx versus initial nitrate concentration and a summer lakewide mean nitrate concentration of 1.27 mg l
−1
, was 94 mg m
−2
day
−1
. Denitrification was equivalent to only 57% of the retained nitrate, suggesting that another portion was assimilated by biota. The high sediment organic N mineralization and ammonium efflux rate coupled with the occurrence of ammonium export from the system suggested a possible link between biotic assimilation of nitrate, mineralization, and export.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel</pub><doi>10.1007/s00027-009-0113-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1015-1621 |
ispartof | Aquatic sciences, 2010, Vol.72 (1), p.61-69 |
issn | 1015-1621 1420-9055 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21264149 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Ammonia Ammonium Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Anoxia Anoxic conditions Aquatic ecosystems Backwaters Biogeochemistry Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Biota Denitrification Ecology Floodplains Fresh water ecosystems Freshwater Freshwater & Marine Ecology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Life Sciences Marine & Freshwater Sciences Marine environment Mineralization Nitrates Nitrification Nitrogen Oceanography Research Article Retention Rivers Sediments Synecology |
title | Nitrogen retention in a floodplain backwater of the upper Mississippi River (USA) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A51%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nitrogen%20retention%20in%20a%20floodplain%20backwater%20of%20the%20upper%20Mississippi%20River%20(USA)&rft.jtitle=Aquatic%20sciences&rft.au=James,%20William%20F.&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=61-69&rft.issn=1015-1621&rft.eissn=1420-9055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00027-009-0113-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21264149%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-62d349026b164af78e536d2159398c92abd0ac8052b987d044b0b90055b898053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199900784&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |