Loading…

Nitrogen retention in a floodplain backwater of the upper Mississippi River (USA)

Backwaters connected to large rivers retain nitrate and may play an important role in reducing downstream loading to coastal marine environments. A summer nitrogen (N) inflow-outflow budget was examined for a flow-regulated backwater of the upper Mississippi River in conjunction with laboratory esti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aquatic sciences 2010, Vol.72 (1), p.61-69
Main Author: James, William F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-62d349026b164af78e536d2159398c92abd0ac8052b987d044b0b90055b898053
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-62d349026b164af78e536d2159398c92abd0ac8052b987d044b0b90055b898053
container_end_page 69
container_issue 1
container_start_page 61
container_title Aquatic sciences
container_volume 72
creator James, William F.
description Backwaters connected to large rivers retain nitrate and may play an important role in reducing downstream loading to coastal marine environments. A summer nitrogen (N) inflow-outflow budget was examined for a flow-regulated backwater of the upper Mississippi River in conjunction with laboratory estimates of sediment ammonium and nitrate fluxes, organic N mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification to provide further insight into N retention processes. External N loading was overwhelmingly dominated by nitrate and 54% of the input was retained (137 mg m −2  day −1 ). Ammonium and dissolved organic N were exported from the backwater (14 and 9 mg m −2  day −1 , respectively). Nitrate influx to sediment increased as a function of increasing initial nitrate concentration in the overlying water. Rates were greater under anoxic versus oxic conditions. Ammonium effluxes from sediment were 26.7 and 50.6 mg m −2  day −1 under oxic and anoxic conditions, respectively. Since anoxia inhibited nitrification, the difference between ammonium anoxic–oxic fluxes approximated a nitrification rate of 29.1 mg m −2  day −1 . Organic N mineralization was 64 mg m −2  day −1 . Denitrification, estimated from regression relationships between oxic nitrate influx versus initial nitrate concentration and a summer lakewide mean nitrate concentration of 1.27 mg l −1 , was 94 mg m −2  day −1 . Denitrification was equivalent to only 57% of the retained nitrate, suggesting that another portion was assimilated by biota. The high sediment organic N mineralization and ammonium efflux rate coupled with the occurrence of ammonium export from the system suggested a possible link between biotic assimilation of nitrate, mineralization, and export.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00027-009-0113-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21264149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21264149</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-62d349026b164af78e536d2159398c92abd0ac8052b987d044b0b90055b898053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kNtKxDAQhosouK4-gHdFUPSiOpP0kFwuiydYFQ97HdI2XbN2m5q0im9vli4ighCYzMw3PzN_EBwinCNAduEAgGQRAI8AkUZ0KxhhTCDikCTb_g-YRJgS3A32nFsCIGEZGwWP97qzZqGa0KpONZ02TaibUIZVbUzZ1tInuSzePmWnbGiqsHtVYd-2PrnTzq1f2-rwSX_4yun8eXK2H-xUsnbqYBPHwfzq8mV6E80erm-nk1lU0CztopSUNOZA0hzTWFYZUwlNS4IJp5wVnMi8BFkwSEjOWVZCHOeQc_DX5Iz7Mh0HJ4Nua817r1wnVtoVqq5lo0zvBEGSxhhzDx79AZemt43fTSDnXjJjsYdwgAprnLOqEq3VK2m_BIJYOywGh4V3WKwdFtTPHG-EpStkXVnZFNr9DBJCkSUJeo4MnPOtZqHsrwX-Ff8GPYiIUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199900784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nitrogen retention in a floodplain backwater of the upper Mississippi River (USA)</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>James, William F.</creator><creatorcontrib>James, William F.</creatorcontrib><description>Backwaters connected to large rivers retain nitrate and may play an important role in reducing downstream loading to coastal marine environments. A summer nitrogen (N) inflow-outflow budget was examined for a flow-regulated backwater of the upper Mississippi River in conjunction with laboratory estimates of sediment ammonium and nitrate fluxes, organic N mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification to provide further insight into N retention processes. External N loading was overwhelmingly dominated by nitrate and 54% of the input was retained (137 mg m −2  day −1 ). Ammonium and dissolved organic N were exported from the backwater (14 and 9 mg m −2  day −1 , respectively). Nitrate influx to sediment increased as a function of increasing initial nitrate concentration in the overlying water. Rates were greater under anoxic versus oxic conditions. Ammonium effluxes from sediment were 26.7 and 50.6 mg m −2  day −1 under oxic and anoxic conditions, respectively. Since anoxia inhibited nitrification, the difference between ammonium anoxic–oxic fluxes approximated a nitrification rate of 29.1 mg m −2  day −1 . Organic N mineralization was 64 mg m −2  day −1 . Denitrification, estimated from regression relationships between oxic nitrate influx versus initial nitrate concentration and a summer lakewide mean nitrate concentration of 1.27 mg l −1 , was 94 mg m −2  day −1 . Denitrification was equivalent to only 57% of the retained nitrate, suggesting that another portion was assimilated by biota. The high sediment organic N mineralization and ammonium efflux rate coupled with the occurrence of ammonium export from the system suggested a possible link between biotic assimilation of nitrate, mineralization, and export.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1015-1621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00027-009-0113-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; Ammonium ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Anoxia ; Anoxic conditions ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Backwaters ; Biogeochemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biota ; Denitrification ; Ecology ; Floodplains ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Freshwater ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Life Sciences ; Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences ; Marine environment ; Mineralization ; Nitrates ; Nitrification ; Nitrogen ; Oceanography ; Research Article ; Retention ; Rivers ; Sediments ; Synecology</subject><ispartof>Aquatic sciences, 2010, Vol.72 (1), p.61-69</ispartof><rights>Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel/Switzerland 2009</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel/Switzerland 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-62d349026b164af78e536d2159398c92abd0ac8052b987d044b0b90055b898053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-62d349026b164af78e536d2159398c92abd0ac8052b987d044b0b90055b898053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22318551$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>James, William F.</creatorcontrib><title>Nitrogen retention in a floodplain backwater of the upper Mississippi River (USA)</title><title>Aquatic sciences</title><addtitle>Aquat. Sci</addtitle><description>Backwaters connected to large rivers retain nitrate and may play an important role in reducing downstream loading to coastal marine environments. A summer nitrogen (N) inflow-outflow budget was examined for a flow-regulated backwater of the upper Mississippi River in conjunction with laboratory estimates of sediment ammonium and nitrate fluxes, organic N mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification to provide further insight into N retention processes. External N loading was overwhelmingly dominated by nitrate and 54% of the input was retained (137 mg m −2  day −1 ). Ammonium and dissolved organic N were exported from the backwater (14 and 9 mg m −2  day −1 , respectively). Nitrate influx to sediment increased as a function of increasing initial nitrate concentration in the overlying water. Rates were greater under anoxic versus oxic conditions. Ammonium effluxes from sediment were 26.7 and 50.6 mg m −2  day −1 under oxic and anoxic conditions, respectively. Since anoxia inhibited nitrification, the difference between ammonium anoxic–oxic fluxes approximated a nitrification rate of 29.1 mg m −2  day −1 . Organic N mineralization was 64 mg m −2  day −1 . Denitrification, estimated from regression relationships between oxic nitrate influx versus initial nitrate concentration and a summer lakewide mean nitrate concentration of 1.27 mg l −1 , was 94 mg m −2  day −1 . Denitrification was equivalent to only 57% of the retained nitrate, suggesting that another portion was assimilated by biota. The high sediment organic N mineralization and ammonium efflux rate coupled with the occurrence of ammonium export from the system suggested a possible link between biotic assimilation of nitrate, mineralization, and export.</description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Anoxia</subject><subject>Anoxic conditions</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Backwaters</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Floodplains</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Marine environment</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrification</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><issn>1015-1621</issn><issn>1420-9055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kNtKxDAQhosouK4-gHdFUPSiOpP0kFwuiydYFQ97HdI2XbN2m5q0im9vli4ighCYzMw3PzN_EBwinCNAduEAgGQRAI8AkUZ0KxhhTCDikCTb_g-YRJgS3A32nFsCIGEZGwWP97qzZqGa0KpONZ02TaibUIZVbUzZ1tInuSzePmWnbGiqsHtVYd-2PrnTzq1f2-rwSX_4yun8eXK2H-xUsnbqYBPHwfzq8mV6E80erm-nk1lU0CztopSUNOZA0hzTWFYZUwlNS4IJp5wVnMi8BFkwSEjOWVZCHOeQc_DX5Iz7Mh0HJ4Nua817r1wnVtoVqq5lo0zvBEGSxhhzDx79AZemt43fTSDnXjJjsYdwgAprnLOqEq3VK2m_BIJYOywGh4V3WKwdFtTPHG-EpStkXVnZFNr9DBJCkSUJeo4MnPOtZqHsrwX-Ff8GPYiIUg</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>James, William F.</creator><general>SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Nitrogen retention in a floodplain backwater of the upper Mississippi River (USA)</title><author>James, William F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-62d349026b164af78e536d2159398c92abd0ac8052b987d044b0b90055b898053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Anoxia</topic><topic>Anoxic conditions</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Backwaters</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Floodplains</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Marine environment</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrification</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>James, William F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Aquatic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>James, William F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nitrogen retention in a floodplain backwater of the upper Mississippi River (USA)</atitle><jtitle>Aquatic sciences</jtitle><stitle>Aquat. Sci</stitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>61-69</pages><issn>1015-1621</issn><eissn>1420-9055</eissn><abstract>Backwaters connected to large rivers retain nitrate and may play an important role in reducing downstream loading to coastal marine environments. A summer nitrogen (N) inflow-outflow budget was examined for a flow-regulated backwater of the upper Mississippi River in conjunction with laboratory estimates of sediment ammonium and nitrate fluxes, organic N mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification to provide further insight into N retention processes. External N loading was overwhelmingly dominated by nitrate and 54% of the input was retained (137 mg m −2  day −1 ). Ammonium and dissolved organic N were exported from the backwater (14 and 9 mg m −2  day −1 , respectively). Nitrate influx to sediment increased as a function of increasing initial nitrate concentration in the overlying water. Rates were greater under anoxic versus oxic conditions. Ammonium effluxes from sediment were 26.7 and 50.6 mg m −2  day −1 under oxic and anoxic conditions, respectively. Since anoxia inhibited nitrification, the difference between ammonium anoxic–oxic fluxes approximated a nitrification rate of 29.1 mg m −2  day −1 . Organic N mineralization was 64 mg m −2  day −1 . Denitrification, estimated from regression relationships between oxic nitrate influx versus initial nitrate concentration and a summer lakewide mean nitrate concentration of 1.27 mg l −1 , was 94 mg m −2  day −1 . Denitrification was equivalent to only 57% of the retained nitrate, suggesting that another portion was assimilated by biota. The high sediment organic N mineralization and ammonium efflux rate coupled with the occurrence of ammonium export from the system suggested a possible link between biotic assimilation of nitrate, mineralization, and export.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel</pub><doi>10.1007/s00027-009-0113-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1015-1621
ispartof Aquatic sciences, 2010, Vol.72 (1), p.61-69
issn 1015-1621
1420-9055
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21264149
source Springer Nature
subjects Ammonia
Ammonium
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Anoxia
Anoxic conditions
Aquatic ecosystems
Backwaters
Biogeochemistry
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biota
Denitrification
Ecology
Floodplains
Fresh water ecosystems
Freshwater
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Life Sciences
Marine & Freshwater Sciences
Marine environment
Mineralization
Nitrates
Nitrification
Nitrogen
Oceanography
Research Article
Retention
Rivers
Sediments
Synecology
title Nitrogen retention in a floodplain backwater of the upper Mississippi River (USA)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A51%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nitrogen%20retention%20in%20a%20floodplain%20backwater%20of%20the%20upper%20Mississippi%20River%20(USA)&rft.jtitle=Aquatic%20sciences&rft.au=James,%20William%20F.&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=61-69&rft.issn=1015-1621&rft.eissn=1420-9055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00027-009-0113-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21264149%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-62d349026b164af78e536d2159398c92abd0ac8052b987d044b0b90055b898053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199900784&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true