Loading…

Effects of Extreme Variation in Female Morph Frequencies on the Mating Behaviour of Male Damselflies

Female-limited polymorphism is often attributed to selection to avoid excessive male mating attempts. It is encountered in various taxonomic groups, but is particularly common in damselflies, where one female morph (andromorph) typically resembles the conspecific male in colour pattern, while the ot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2009-12, Vol.64 (2), p.225-236
Main Authors: Ting, Janice J., Bots, Jessica, Jvostov, Felipe Pérez, van Gossum, Hans, Sherratt, Thomas N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-ff8a13577389221665cd4d7eee650206c087ed53decb3a9666ff6320999da1263
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-ff8a13577389221665cd4d7eee650206c087ed53decb3a9666ff6320999da1263
container_end_page 236
container_issue 2
container_start_page 225
container_title Behavioral ecology and sociobiology
container_volume 64
creator Ting, Janice J.
Bots, Jessica
Jvostov, Felipe Pérez
van Gossum, Hans
Sherratt, Thomas N.
description Female-limited polymorphism is often attributed to selection to avoid excessive male mating attempts. It is encountered in various taxonomic groups, but is particularly common in damselflies, where one female morph (andromorph) typically resembles the conspecific male in colour pattern, while the other(s) (gynomorph(s)) do not. Two sets of theories have been proposed to explain the phenomenon in damselflies, which can be classified as the learned mate recognition (LMR) and male mimicry (MM) hypotheses. To test predictions of these hypotheses, we evaluated the rate of male sexual response towards female morphs and conspecific males in the damselfly Nehalennia irene. The LMR hypothesis predicts that males should respond sexually to andromorphs at greater rates in populations containing a higher relative frequency of andromorphs. The MM hypothesis predicts that males respond more often sexually to both andromorphs and males as the ratio of andromorphs to males increases. While LMR predicts that the rate of mating attempts towards gynomorphs should vary, the MM predicts that it should be relatively fixed. On experimentally presenting live specimens to focal males in five different populations with extreme variation in female morph frequencies, we observed that as the andromorph frequency and ratio of andromorphs to males increased, the proportion of male mating attempts increased on both andromorphs and males, whereas it decreased on gynomorphs. While the simplest form of the MM hypothesis is rejected, the results support specific predictions of both hypotheses and suggest that future studies should not treat these hypotheses as mutually exclusive.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00265-009-0839-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21266894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20640508</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20640508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-ff8a13577389221665cd4d7eee650206c087ed53decb3a9666ff6320999da1263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1OwzAYRS0EEqXwAAxIFgNb4LOdOPbITwtIrViA1TLJ5zZVfoqdovL2uAoCiYHJg8-5vr6EnDK4ZAD5VQDgMksAdAJK6GS7R0YsFTyBXPJ9MgKRQpKlqTgkRyGsAEAypUaknDiHRR9o5-hk23tskL5aX9m-6lpatXSKja2Rzju_XtKpx_cNtkWFUWhpv4wXkWwX9AaX9qPqNn4XNN8Zd7YJWLs6ssfkwNk64Mn3OSYv08nz7UMye7p_vL2eJYWQqk-cU5aJLM-F0pwzKbOiTMscEWUGHGQBKscyEyUWb8JqKaVzUnDQWpeWcSnG5GLIXfsu9gy9aapQYF3bFrtNMDxCUuk0gud_wFWs3sZuhoNQkguACLEBKnwXgkdn1r5qrP80DMxudDOMbuLoZje62UaHD06IbLtA_xv8n3Q2SKvQd_7nlfjjFLLIfAHvj42w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203862300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Extreme Variation in Female Morph Frequencies on the Mating Behaviour of Male Damselflies</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Ting, Janice J. ; Bots, Jessica ; Jvostov, Felipe Pérez ; van Gossum, Hans ; Sherratt, Thomas N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ting, Janice J. ; Bots, Jessica ; Jvostov, Felipe Pérez ; van Gossum, Hans ; Sherratt, Thomas N.</creatorcontrib><description>Female-limited polymorphism is often attributed to selection to avoid excessive male mating attempts. It is encountered in various taxonomic groups, but is particularly common in damselflies, where one female morph (andromorph) typically resembles the conspecific male in colour pattern, while the other(s) (gynomorph(s)) do not. Two sets of theories have been proposed to explain the phenomenon in damselflies, which can be classified as the learned mate recognition (LMR) and male mimicry (MM) hypotheses. To test predictions of these hypotheses, we evaluated the rate of male sexual response towards female morphs and conspecific males in the damselfly Nehalennia irene. The LMR hypothesis predicts that males should respond sexually to andromorphs at greater rates in populations containing a higher relative frequency of andromorphs. The MM hypothesis predicts that males respond more often sexually to both andromorphs and males as the ratio of andromorphs to males increases. While LMR predicts that the rate of mating attempts towards gynomorphs should vary, the MM predicts that it should be relatively fixed. On experimentally presenting live specimens to focal males in five different populations with extreme variation in female morph frequencies, we observed that as the andromorph frequency and ratio of andromorphs to males increased, the proportion of male mating attempts increased on both andromorphs and males, whereas it decreased on gynomorphs. While the simplest form of the MM hypothesis is rejected, the results support specific predictions of both hypotheses and suggest that future studies should not treat these hypotheses as mutually exclusive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-009-0839-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Animal Ecology ; Animal populations ; Animal reproduction ; Aquatic insects ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Evolution ; Experimentation ; Female animals ; Freshwater ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Harassment ; Insect behavior ; Insects ; Life Sciences ; Male animals ; Mating behavior ; Mimicry ; Modeling ; Nehalennia irene ; Original Paper ; Polymorphism ; Ratios ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2009-12, Vol.64 (2), p.225-236</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-ff8a13577389221665cd4d7eee650206c087ed53decb3a9666ff6320999da1263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-ff8a13577389221665cd4d7eee650206c087ed53decb3a9666ff6320999da1263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/203862300/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/203862300?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21394,21395,27924,27925,33611,33612,34530,34531,43733,44115,58238,58471,74221,74639</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ting, Janice J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bots, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jvostov, Felipe Pérez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Gossum, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherratt, Thomas N.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Extreme Variation in Female Morph Frequencies on the Mating Behaviour of Male Damselflies</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><addtitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</addtitle><description>Female-limited polymorphism is often attributed to selection to avoid excessive male mating attempts. It is encountered in various taxonomic groups, but is particularly common in damselflies, where one female morph (andromorph) typically resembles the conspecific male in colour pattern, while the other(s) (gynomorph(s)) do not. Two sets of theories have been proposed to explain the phenomenon in damselflies, which can be classified as the learned mate recognition (LMR) and male mimicry (MM) hypotheses. To test predictions of these hypotheses, we evaluated the rate of male sexual response towards female morphs and conspecific males in the damselfly Nehalennia irene. The LMR hypothesis predicts that males should respond sexually to andromorphs at greater rates in populations containing a higher relative frequency of andromorphs. The MM hypothesis predicts that males respond more often sexually to both andromorphs and males as the ratio of andromorphs to males increases. While LMR predicts that the rate of mating attempts towards gynomorphs should vary, the MM predicts that it should be relatively fixed. On experimentally presenting live specimens to focal males in five different populations with extreme variation in female morph frequencies, we observed that as the andromorph frequency and ratio of andromorphs to males increased, the proportion of male mating attempts increased on both andromorphs and males, whereas it decreased on gynomorphs. While the simplest form of the MM hypothesis is rejected, the results support specific predictions of both hypotheses and suggest that future studies should not treat these hypotheses as mutually exclusive.</description><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Aquatic insects</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Harassment</subject><subject>Insect behavior</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Mimicry</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Nehalennia irene</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Polymorphism</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kL1OwzAYRS0EEqXwAAxIFgNb4LOdOPbITwtIrViA1TLJ5zZVfoqdovL2uAoCiYHJg8-5vr6EnDK4ZAD5VQDgMksAdAJK6GS7R0YsFTyBXPJ9MgKRQpKlqTgkRyGsAEAypUaknDiHRR9o5-hk23tskL5aX9m-6lpatXSKja2Rzju_XtKpx_cNtkWFUWhpv4wXkWwX9AaX9qPqNn4XNN8Zd7YJWLs6ssfkwNk64Mn3OSYv08nz7UMye7p_vL2eJYWQqk-cU5aJLM-F0pwzKbOiTMscEWUGHGQBKscyEyUWb8JqKaVzUnDQWpeWcSnG5GLIXfsu9gy9aapQYF3bFrtNMDxCUuk0gud_wFWs3sZuhoNQkguACLEBKnwXgkdn1r5qrP80DMxudDOMbuLoZje62UaHD06IbLtA_xv8n3Q2SKvQd_7nlfjjFLLIfAHvj42w</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>Ting, Janice J.</creator><creator>Bots, Jessica</creator><creator>Jvostov, Felipe Pérez</creator><creator>van Gossum, Hans</creator><creator>Sherratt, Thomas N.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>Effects of Extreme Variation in Female Morph Frequencies on the Mating Behaviour of Male Damselflies</title><author>Ting, Janice J. ; Bots, Jessica ; Jvostov, Felipe Pérez ; van Gossum, Hans ; Sherratt, Thomas N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-ff8a13577389221665cd4d7eee650206c087ed53decb3a9666ff6320999da1263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Aquatic insects</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Harassment</topic><topic>Insect behavior</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Mimicry</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Nehalennia irene</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Polymorphism</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ting, Janice J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bots, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jvostov, Felipe Pérez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Gossum, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherratt, Thomas N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ting, Janice J.</au><au>Bots, Jessica</au><au>Jvostov, Felipe Pérez</au><au>van Gossum, Hans</au><au>Sherratt, Thomas N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Extreme Variation in Female Morph Frequencies on the Mating Behaviour of Male Damselflies</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><stitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</stitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>236</epage><pages>225-236</pages><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><abstract>Female-limited polymorphism is often attributed to selection to avoid excessive male mating attempts. It is encountered in various taxonomic groups, but is particularly common in damselflies, where one female morph (andromorph) typically resembles the conspecific male in colour pattern, while the other(s) (gynomorph(s)) do not. Two sets of theories have been proposed to explain the phenomenon in damselflies, which can be classified as the learned mate recognition (LMR) and male mimicry (MM) hypotheses. To test predictions of these hypotheses, we evaluated the rate of male sexual response towards female morphs and conspecific males in the damselfly Nehalennia irene. The LMR hypothesis predicts that males should respond sexually to andromorphs at greater rates in populations containing a higher relative frequency of andromorphs. The MM hypothesis predicts that males respond more often sexually to both andromorphs and males as the ratio of andromorphs to males increases. While LMR predicts that the rate of mating attempts towards gynomorphs should vary, the MM predicts that it should be relatively fixed. On experimentally presenting live specimens to focal males in five different populations with extreme variation in female morph frequencies, we observed that as the andromorph frequency and ratio of andromorphs to males increased, the proportion of male mating attempts increased on both andromorphs and males, whereas it decreased on gynomorphs. While the simplest form of the MM hypothesis is rejected, the results support specific predictions of both hypotheses and suggest that future studies should not treat these hypotheses as mutually exclusive.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-009-0839-x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-5443
ispartof Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2009-12, Vol.64 (2), p.225-236
issn 0340-5443
1432-0762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21266894
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; Springer Link
subjects Animal Ecology
Animal populations
Animal reproduction
Aquatic insects
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Evolution
Experimentation
Female animals
Freshwater
Genotype & phenotype
Harassment
Insect behavior
Insects
Life Sciences
Male animals
Mating behavior
Mimicry
Modeling
Nehalennia irene
Original Paper
Polymorphism
Ratios
Zoology
title Effects of Extreme Variation in Female Morph Frequencies on the Mating Behaviour of Male Damselflies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T15%3A22%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Extreme%20Variation%20in%20Female%20Morph%20Frequencies%20on%20the%20Mating%20Behaviour%20of%20Male%20Damselflies&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Ting,%20Janice%20J.&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=236&rft.pages=225-236&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-009-0839-x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20640508%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-ff8a13577389221665cd4d7eee650206c087ed53decb3a9666ff6320999da1263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203862300&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20640508&rfr_iscdi=true