Loading…
Comparative evaluation of DNA extraction kit, matrix sample and qPCR assays for bovine babesiosis monitoring
Bovine babesiosis caused by protozoan parasites Babesia bovis and B. bigemina is one of the most important causes of losses for the livestock industry in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Therefore, highly sensitive and specific tools for these hemoparasites detection and monitoring are...
Saved in:
Published in: | Molecular biology reports 2018-12, Vol.45 (6), p.2671-2680 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8e235b8beb8e1ba795b8cc4f0d42cda3f18e2ee7ccb1f850077e4a10a53a96403 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8e235b8beb8e1ba795b8cc4f0d42cda3f18e2ee7ccb1f850077e4a10a53a96403 |
container_end_page | 2680 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2671 |
container_title | Molecular biology reports |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Okino, Cintia Hiromi Giglioti, Rodrigo Silva, Pamella Cristini de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina |
description | Bovine babesiosis caused by protozoan parasites
Babesia bovis
and
B. bigemina
is one of the most important causes of losses for the livestock industry in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Therefore, highly sensitive and specific tools for these hemoparasites detection and monitoring are required, especially in carrier animals, in which low parasite levels were usually present. In this context, qPCR assays have been successfully and fairly used in last years. Aiming to improve the performance of
Babesia
levels monitoring by qPCR, some of main aspects of this methodology that may influence results were tested: DNA extraction kits, whole blood EDTA pre-treatment, blood source (tip of tail or jugular vein), erythrocytes isolation, FTA card interference and qPCR system of detection. Under our experimental conditions, both EDTA pre-treatment and FTA card application have no influence on the sensitivity of detection, and two DNA extraction kits provided higher sensitivity compared to others. As expected, blood samples collected from the tip of tail vessels presented higher levels of
B. bovis
DNA compared to those obtained from the jugular vein, and erythrocytes processed isolated has also improved the sensitivity compared to whole blood. Moreover, both qPCR assays here developed using hydrolysis probes for
B. bovis
and
B. bigemina
detection, presented enhanced reproducibility compared to qPCR assays using intercalating dye system. Even, qPCR for
B. bigemina
using hydrolysis probe here developed presented higher sensitivity compared to intercalating dye system. This study has contributed to the improvement of molecular diagnosis of bovine babesiosis, which may improve epidemiological studies related to these pathogens. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11033-018-4436-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2126900888</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2126900888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8e235b8beb8e1ba795b8cc4f0d42cda3f18e2ee7ccb1f850077e4a10a53a96403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EotvCB-CCLHHhQOhM7KydY7WFglS1CMHZsr0T5JLEqZ2s2m9fL1tAQuLkP_q9N6P3GHuF8B4B1GlGBCEqQF1JKdZV-4StsFGikq3ST9kKBGAldYNH7DjnGwCQqJrn7EiAWNeg6hXrN3GYbLJz2BGnne2Xco0jjx0_vzrjdDcn63_9_AzzOz7YOYU7nu0w9cTtuOW3XzZfuc3Z3mfexcRd3IWRuLOOcog5ZD7EMcwxhfHHC_ass32ml4_nCfv-8cO3zafq8vri8-bssvJC1XOlqRaN046cJnRWteXhvexgK2u_taLDQhAp7x12uilJKJIWwTbCtmsJ4oS9PfhOKd4ulGczhOyp7-1IccmmxnrdAmitC_rmH_QmLmks2-2pBrFpQRYKD5RPMedEnZlSGGy6NwhmX4U5VGFKFWZfhWmL5vWj8-IG2v5R_M6-APUByNM-HEp_R__f9QGb2pR-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2125115904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative evaluation of DNA extraction kit, matrix sample and qPCR assays for bovine babesiosis monitoring</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Okino, Cintia Hiromi ; Giglioti, Rodrigo ; Silva, Pamella Cristini ; de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes ; de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina</creator><creatorcontrib>Okino, Cintia Hiromi ; Giglioti, Rodrigo ; Silva, Pamella Cristini ; de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes ; de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina</creatorcontrib><description>Bovine babesiosis caused by protozoan parasites
Babesia bovis
and
B. bigemina
is one of the most important causes of losses for the livestock industry in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Therefore, highly sensitive and specific tools for these hemoparasites detection and monitoring are required, especially in carrier animals, in which low parasite levels were usually present. In this context, qPCR assays have been successfully and fairly used in last years. Aiming to improve the performance of
Babesia
levels monitoring by qPCR, some of main aspects of this methodology that may influence results were tested: DNA extraction kits, whole blood EDTA pre-treatment, blood source (tip of tail or jugular vein), erythrocytes isolation, FTA card interference and qPCR system of detection. Under our experimental conditions, both EDTA pre-treatment and FTA card application have no influence on the sensitivity of detection, and two DNA extraction kits provided higher sensitivity compared to others. As expected, blood samples collected from the tip of tail vessels presented higher levels of
B. bovis
DNA compared to those obtained from the jugular vein, and erythrocytes processed isolated has also improved the sensitivity compared to whole blood. Moreover, both qPCR assays here developed using hydrolysis probes for
B. bovis
and
B. bigemina
detection, presented enhanced reproducibility compared to qPCR assays using intercalating dye system. Even, qPCR for
B. bigemina
using hydrolysis probe here developed presented higher sensitivity compared to intercalating dye system. This study has contributed to the improvement of molecular diagnosis of bovine babesiosis, which may improve epidemiological studies related to these pathogens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-4978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11033-018-4436-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30362072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animal Anatomy ; Animal Biochemistry ; Babesiosis ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA probes ; Dyes ; Edetic acid ; Erythrocytes ; Histology ; Hydrolysis ; Jugular vein ; Life Sciences ; Livestock ; Morphology ; Original Article ; Parasites ; Protozoa</subject><ispartof>Molecular biology reports, 2018-12, Vol.45 (6), p.2671-2680</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2018</rights><rights>Molecular Biology Reports is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8e235b8beb8e1ba795b8cc4f0d42cda3f18e2ee7ccb1f850077e4a10a53a96403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8e235b8beb8e1ba795b8cc4f0d42cda3f18e2ee7ccb1f850077e4a10a53a96403</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1700-0547 ; 0000-0003-3718-3157 ; 0000-0002-3181-1223 ; 0000-0002-3692-3902 ; 0000-0002-7038-4607</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30362072$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Okino, Cintia Hiromi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giglioti, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Pamella Cristini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative evaluation of DNA extraction kit, matrix sample and qPCR assays for bovine babesiosis monitoring</title><title>Molecular biology reports</title><addtitle>Mol Biol Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Mol Biol Rep</addtitle><description>Bovine babesiosis caused by protozoan parasites
Babesia bovis
and
B. bigemina
is one of the most important causes of losses for the livestock industry in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Therefore, highly sensitive and specific tools for these hemoparasites detection and monitoring are required, especially in carrier animals, in which low parasite levels were usually present. In this context, qPCR assays have been successfully and fairly used in last years. Aiming to improve the performance of
Babesia
levels monitoring by qPCR, some of main aspects of this methodology that may influence results were tested: DNA extraction kits, whole blood EDTA pre-treatment, blood source (tip of tail or jugular vein), erythrocytes isolation, FTA card interference and qPCR system of detection. Under our experimental conditions, both EDTA pre-treatment and FTA card application have no influence on the sensitivity of detection, and two DNA extraction kits provided higher sensitivity compared to others. As expected, blood samples collected from the tip of tail vessels presented higher levels of
B. bovis
DNA compared to those obtained from the jugular vein, and erythrocytes processed isolated has also improved the sensitivity compared to whole blood. Moreover, both qPCR assays here developed using hydrolysis probes for
B. bovis
and
B. bigemina
detection, presented enhanced reproducibility compared to qPCR assays using intercalating dye system. Even, qPCR for
B. bigemina
using hydrolysis probe here developed presented higher sensitivity compared to intercalating dye system. This study has contributed to the improvement of molecular diagnosis of bovine babesiosis, which may improve epidemiological studies related to these pathogens.</description><subject>Animal Anatomy</subject><subject>Animal Biochemistry</subject><subject>Babesiosis</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA probes</subject><subject>Dyes</subject><subject>Edetic acid</subject><subject>Erythrocytes</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Hydrolysis</subject><subject>Jugular vein</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Protozoa</subject><issn>0301-4851</issn><issn>1573-4978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EotvCB-CCLHHhQOhM7KydY7WFglS1CMHZsr0T5JLEqZ2s2m9fL1tAQuLkP_q9N6P3GHuF8B4B1GlGBCEqQF1JKdZV-4StsFGikq3ST9kKBGAldYNH7DjnGwCQqJrn7EiAWNeg6hXrN3GYbLJz2BGnne2Xco0jjx0_vzrjdDcn63_9_AzzOz7YOYU7nu0w9cTtuOW3XzZfuc3Z3mfexcRd3IWRuLOOcog5ZD7EMcwxhfHHC_ass32ml4_nCfv-8cO3zafq8vri8-bssvJC1XOlqRaN046cJnRWteXhvexgK2u_taLDQhAp7x12uilJKJIWwTbCtmsJ4oS9PfhOKd4ulGczhOyp7-1IccmmxnrdAmitC_rmH_QmLmks2-2pBrFpQRYKD5RPMedEnZlSGGy6NwhmX4U5VGFKFWZfhWmL5vWj8-IG2v5R_M6-APUByNM-HEp_R__f9QGb2pR-</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Okino, Cintia Hiromi</creator><creator>Giglioti, Rodrigo</creator><creator>Silva, Pamella Cristini</creator><creator>de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes</creator><creator>de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1700-0547</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3718-3157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3181-1223</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3692-3902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7038-4607</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Comparative evaluation of DNA extraction kit, matrix sample and qPCR assays for bovine babesiosis monitoring</title><author>Okino, Cintia Hiromi ; Giglioti, Rodrigo ; Silva, Pamella Cristini ; de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes ; de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8e235b8beb8e1ba795b8cc4f0d42cda3f18e2ee7ccb1f850077e4a10a53a96403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal Anatomy</topic><topic>Animal Biochemistry</topic><topic>Babesiosis</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA probes</topic><topic>Dyes</topic><topic>Edetic acid</topic><topic>Erythrocytes</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Hydrolysis</topic><topic>Jugular vein</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Protozoa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okino, Cintia Hiromi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giglioti, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Pamella Cristini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Molecular biology reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okino, Cintia Hiromi</au><au>Giglioti, Rodrigo</au><au>Silva, Pamella Cristini</au><au>de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes</au><au>de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative evaluation of DNA extraction kit, matrix sample and qPCR assays for bovine babesiosis monitoring</atitle><jtitle>Molecular biology reports</jtitle><stitle>Mol Biol Rep</stitle><addtitle>Mol Biol Rep</addtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2671</spage><epage>2680</epage><pages>2671-2680</pages><issn>0301-4851</issn><eissn>1573-4978</eissn><abstract>Bovine babesiosis caused by protozoan parasites
Babesia bovis
and
B. bigemina
is one of the most important causes of losses for the livestock industry in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Therefore, highly sensitive and specific tools for these hemoparasites detection and monitoring are required, especially in carrier animals, in which low parasite levels were usually present. In this context, qPCR assays have been successfully and fairly used in last years. Aiming to improve the performance of
Babesia
levels monitoring by qPCR, some of main aspects of this methodology that may influence results were tested: DNA extraction kits, whole blood EDTA pre-treatment, blood source (tip of tail or jugular vein), erythrocytes isolation, FTA card interference and qPCR system of detection. Under our experimental conditions, both EDTA pre-treatment and FTA card application have no influence on the sensitivity of detection, and two DNA extraction kits provided higher sensitivity compared to others. As expected, blood samples collected from the tip of tail vessels presented higher levels of
B. bovis
DNA compared to those obtained from the jugular vein, and erythrocytes processed isolated has also improved the sensitivity compared to whole blood. Moreover, both qPCR assays here developed using hydrolysis probes for
B. bovis
and
B. bigemina
detection, presented enhanced reproducibility compared to qPCR assays using intercalating dye system. Even, qPCR for
B. bigemina
using hydrolysis probe here developed presented higher sensitivity compared to intercalating dye system. This study has contributed to the improvement of molecular diagnosis of bovine babesiosis, which may improve epidemiological studies related to these pathogens.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>30362072</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11033-018-4436-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1700-0547</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3718-3157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3181-1223</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3692-3902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7038-4607</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4851 |
ispartof | Molecular biology reports, 2018-12, Vol.45 (6), p.2671-2680 |
issn | 0301-4851 1573-4978 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2126900888 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Animal Anatomy Animal Biochemistry Babesiosis Biomedical and Life Sciences Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA DNA probes Dyes Edetic acid Erythrocytes Histology Hydrolysis Jugular vein Life Sciences Livestock Morphology Original Article Parasites Protozoa |
title | Comparative evaluation of DNA extraction kit, matrix sample and qPCR assays for bovine babesiosis monitoring |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A05%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20evaluation%20of%20DNA%20extraction%20kit,%20matrix%20sample%20and%20qPCR%20assays%20for%20bovine%20babesiosis%20monitoring&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20biology%20reports&rft.au=Okino,%20Cintia%20Hiromi&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2671&rft.epage=2680&rft.pages=2671-2680&rft.issn=0301-4851&rft.eissn=1573-4978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11033-018-4436-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2126900888%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8e235b8beb8e1ba795b8cc4f0d42cda3f18e2ee7ccb1f850077e4a10a53a96403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2125115904&rft_id=info:pmid/30362072&rfr_iscdi=true |