Loading…

Comparative evaluation of DNA extraction kit, matrix sample and qPCR assays for bovine babesiosis monitoring

Bovine babesiosis caused by protozoan parasites Babesia bovis and B. bigemina is one of the most important causes of losses for the livestock industry in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Therefore, highly sensitive and specific tools for these hemoparasites detection and monitoring are...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular biology reports 2018-12, Vol.45 (6), p.2671-2680
Main Authors: Okino, Cintia Hiromi, Giglioti, Rodrigo, Silva, Pamella Cristini, de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes, de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8e235b8beb8e1ba795b8cc4f0d42cda3f18e2ee7ccb1f850077e4a10a53a96403
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8e235b8beb8e1ba795b8cc4f0d42cda3f18e2ee7ccb1f850077e4a10a53a96403
container_end_page 2680
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2671
container_title Molecular biology reports
container_volume 45
creator Okino, Cintia Hiromi
Giglioti, Rodrigo
Silva, Pamella Cristini
de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes
de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina
description Bovine babesiosis caused by protozoan parasites Babesia bovis and B. bigemina is one of the most important causes of losses for the livestock industry in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Therefore, highly sensitive and specific tools for these hemoparasites detection and monitoring are required, especially in carrier animals, in which low parasite levels were usually present. In this context, qPCR assays have been successfully and fairly used in last years. Aiming to improve the performance of Babesia levels monitoring by qPCR, some of main aspects of this methodology that may influence results were tested: DNA extraction kits, whole blood EDTA pre-treatment, blood source (tip of tail or jugular vein), erythrocytes isolation, FTA card interference and qPCR system of detection. Under our experimental conditions, both EDTA pre-treatment and FTA card application have no influence on the sensitivity of detection, and two DNA extraction kits provided higher sensitivity compared to others. As expected, blood samples collected from the tip of tail vessels presented higher levels of B. bovis DNA compared to those obtained from the jugular vein, and erythrocytes processed isolated has also improved the sensitivity compared to whole blood. Moreover, both qPCR assays here developed using hydrolysis probes for B. bovis and B. bigemina detection, presented enhanced reproducibility compared to qPCR assays using intercalating dye system. Even, qPCR for B. bigemina using hydrolysis probe here developed presented higher sensitivity compared to intercalating dye system. This study has contributed to the improvement of molecular diagnosis of bovine babesiosis, which may improve epidemiological studies related to these pathogens.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11033-018-4436-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2126900888</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2126900888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8e235b8beb8e1ba795b8cc4f0d42cda3f18e2ee7ccb1f850077e4a10a53a96403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EotvCB-CCLHHhQOhM7KydY7WFglS1CMHZsr0T5JLEqZ2s2m9fL1tAQuLkP_q9N6P3GHuF8B4B1GlGBCEqQF1JKdZV-4StsFGikq3ST9kKBGAldYNH7DjnGwCQqJrn7EiAWNeg6hXrN3GYbLJz2BGnne2Xco0jjx0_vzrjdDcn63_9_AzzOz7YOYU7nu0w9cTtuOW3XzZfuc3Z3mfexcRd3IWRuLOOcog5ZD7EMcwxhfHHC_ass32ml4_nCfv-8cO3zafq8vri8-bssvJC1XOlqRaN046cJnRWteXhvexgK2u_taLDQhAp7x12uilJKJIWwTbCtmsJ4oS9PfhOKd4ulGczhOyp7-1IccmmxnrdAmitC_rmH_QmLmks2-2pBrFpQRYKD5RPMedEnZlSGGy6NwhmX4U5VGFKFWZfhWmL5vWj8-IG2v5R_M6-APUByNM-HEp_R__f9QGb2pR-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2125115904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative evaluation of DNA extraction kit, matrix sample and qPCR assays for bovine babesiosis monitoring</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Okino, Cintia Hiromi ; Giglioti, Rodrigo ; Silva, Pamella Cristini ; de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes ; de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina</creator><creatorcontrib>Okino, Cintia Hiromi ; Giglioti, Rodrigo ; Silva, Pamella Cristini ; de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes ; de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina</creatorcontrib><description>Bovine babesiosis caused by protozoan parasites Babesia bovis and B. bigemina is one of the most important causes of losses for the livestock industry in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Therefore, highly sensitive and specific tools for these hemoparasites detection and monitoring are required, especially in carrier animals, in which low parasite levels were usually present. In this context, qPCR assays have been successfully and fairly used in last years. Aiming to improve the performance of Babesia levels monitoring by qPCR, some of main aspects of this methodology that may influence results were tested: DNA extraction kits, whole blood EDTA pre-treatment, blood source (tip of tail or jugular vein), erythrocytes isolation, FTA card interference and qPCR system of detection. Under our experimental conditions, both EDTA pre-treatment and FTA card application have no influence on the sensitivity of detection, and two DNA extraction kits provided higher sensitivity compared to others. As expected, blood samples collected from the tip of tail vessels presented higher levels of B. bovis DNA compared to those obtained from the jugular vein, and erythrocytes processed isolated has also improved the sensitivity compared to whole blood. Moreover, both qPCR assays here developed using hydrolysis probes for B. bovis and B. bigemina detection, presented enhanced reproducibility compared to qPCR assays using intercalating dye system. Even, qPCR for B. bigemina using hydrolysis probe here developed presented higher sensitivity compared to intercalating dye system. This study has contributed to the improvement of molecular diagnosis of bovine babesiosis, which may improve epidemiological studies related to these pathogens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-4978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11033-018-4436-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30362072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animal Anatomy ; Animal Biochemistry ; Babesiosis ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA probes ; Dyes ; Edetic acid ; Erythrocytes ; Histology ; Hydrolysis ; Jugular vein ; Life Sciences ; Livestock ; Morphology ; Original Article ; Parasites ; Protozoa</subject><ispartof>Molecular biology reports, 2018-12, Vol.45 (6), p.2671-2680</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2018</rights><rights>Molecular Biology Reports is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8e235b8beb8e1ba795b8cc4f0d42cda3f18e2ee7ccb1f850077e4a10a53a96403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8e235b8beb8e1ba795b8cc4f0d42cda3f18e2ee7ccb1f850077e4a10a53a96403</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1700-0547 ; 0000-0003-3718-3157 ; 0000-0002-3181-1223 ; 0000-0002-3692-3902 ; 0000-0002-7038-4607</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30362072$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Okino, Cintia Hiromi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giglioti, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Pamella Cristini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative evaluation of DNA extraction kit, matrix sample and qPCR assays for bovine babesiosis monitoring</title><title>Molecular biology reports</title><addtitle>Mol Biol Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Mol Biol Rep</addtitle><description>Bovine babesiosis caused by protozoan parasites Babesia bovis and B. bigemina is one of the most important causes of losses for the livestock industry in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Therefore, highly sensitive and specific tools for these hemoparasites detection and monitoring are required, especially in carrier animals, in which low parasite levels were usually present. In this context, qPCR assays have been successfully and fairly used in last years. Aiming to improve the performance of Babesia levels monitoring by qPCR, some of main aspects of this methodology that may influence results were tested: DNA extraction kits, whole blood EDTA pre-treatment, blood source (tip of tail or jugular vein), erythrocytes isolation, FTA card interference and qPCR system of detection. Under our experimental conditions, both EDTA pre-treatment and FTA card application have no influence on the sensitivity of detection, and two DNA extraction kits provided higher sensitivity compared to others. As expected, blood samples collected from the tip of tail vessels presented higher levels of B. bovis DNA compared to those obtained from the jugular vein, and erythrocytes processed isolated has also improved the sensitivity compared to whole blood. Moreover, both qPCR assays here developed using hydrolysis probes for B. bovis and B. bigemina detection, presented enhanced reproducibility compared to qPCR assays using intercalating dye system. Even, qPCR for B. bigemina using hydrolysis probe here developed presented higher sensitivity compared to intercalating dye system. This study has contributed to the improvement of molecular diagnosis of bovine babesiosis, which may improve epidemiological studies related to these pathogens.</description><subject>Animal Anatomy</subject><subject>Animal Biochemistry</subject><subject>Babesiosis</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA probes</subject><subject>Dyes</subject><subject>Edetic acid</subject><subject>Erythrocytes</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Hydrolysis</subject><subject>Jugular vein</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Protozoa</subject><issn>0301-4851</issn><issn>1573-4978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EotvCB-CCLHHhQOhM7KydY7WFglS1CMHZsr0T5JLEqZ2s2m9fL1tAQuLkP_q9N6P3GHuF8B4B1GlGBCEqQF1JKdZV-4StsFGikq3ST9kKBGAldYNH7DjnGwCQqJrn7EiAWNeg6hXrN3GYbLJz2BGnne2Xco0jjx0_vzrjdDcn63_9_AzzOz7YOYU7nu0w9cTtuOW3XzZfuc3Z3mfexcRd3IWRuLOOcog5ZD7EMcwxhfHHC_ass32ml4_nCfv-8cO3zafq8vri8-bssvJC1XOlqRaN046cJnRWteXhvexgK2u_taLDQhAp7x12uilJKJIWwTbCtmsJ4oS9PfhOKd4ulGczhOyp7-1IccmmxnrdAmitC_rmH_QmLmks2-2pBrFpQRYKD5RPMedEnZlSGGy6NwhmX4U5VGFKFWZfhWmL5vWj8-IG2v5R_M6-APUByNM-HEp_R__f9QGb2pR-</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Okino, Cintia Hiromi</creator><creator>Giglioti, Rodrigo</creator><creator>Silva, Pamella Cristini</creator><creator>de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes</creator><creator>de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1700-0547</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3718-3157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3181-1223</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3692-3902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7038-4607</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Comparative evaluation of DNA extraction kit, matrix sample and qPCR assays for bovine babesiosis monitoring</title><author>Okino, Cintia Hiromi ; Giglioti, Rodrigo ; Silva, Pamella Cristini ; de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes ; de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8e235b8beb8e1ba795b8cc4f0d42cda3f18e2ee7ccb1f850077e4a10a53a96403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal Anatomy</topic><topic>Animal Biochemistry</topic><topic>Babesiosis</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA probes</topic><topic>Dyes</topic><topic>Edetic acid</topic><topic>Erythrocytes</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Hydrolysis</topic><topic>Jugular vein</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Protozoa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okino, Cintia Hiromi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giglioti, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Pamella Cristini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Molecular biology reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okino, Cintia Hiromi</au><au>Giglioti, Rodrigo</au><au>Silva, Pamella Cristini</au><au>de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes</au><au>de Sena Oliveira, Márcia Cristina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative evaluation of DNA extraction kit, matrix sample and qPCR assays for bovine babesiosis monitoring</atitle><jtitle>Molecular biology reports</jtitle><stitle>Mol Biol Rep</stitle><addtitle>Mol Biol Rep</addtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2671</spage><epage>2680</epage><pages>2671-2680</pages><issn>0301-4851</issn><eissn>1573-4978</eissn><abstract>Bovine babesiosis caused by protozoan parasites Babesia bovis and B. bigemina is one of the most important causes of losses for the livestock industry in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Therefore, highly sensitive and specific tools for these hemoparasites detection and monitoring are required, especially in carrier animals, in which low parasite levels were usually present. In this context, qPCR assays have been successfully and fairly used in last years. Aiming to improve the performance of Babesia levels monitoring by qPCR, some of main aspects of this methodology that may influence results were tested: DNA extraction kits, whole blood EDTA pre-treatment, blood source (tip of tail or jugular vein), erythrocytes isolation, FTA card interference and qPCR system of detection. Under our experimental conditions, both EDTA pre-treatment and FTA card application have no influence on the sensitivity of detection, and two DNA extraction kits provided higher sensitivity compared to others. As expected, blood samples collected from the tip of tail vessels presented higher levels of B. bovis DNA compared to those obtained from the jugular vein, and erythrocytes processed isolated has also improved the sensitivity compared to whole blood. Moreover, both qPCR assays here developed using hydrolysis probes for B. bovis and B. bigemina detection, presented enhanced reproducibility compared to qPCR assays using intercalating dye system. Even, qPCR for B. bigemina using hydrolysis probe here developed presented higher sensitivity compared to intercalating dye system. This study has contributed to the improvement of molecular diagnosis of bovine babesiosis, which may improve epidemiological studies related to these pathogens.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>30362072</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11033-018-4436-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1700-0547</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3718-3157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3181-1223</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3692-3902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7038-4607</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4851
ispartof Molecular biology reports, 2018-12, Vol.45 (6), p.2671-2680
issn 0301-4851
1573-4978
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2126900888
source Springer Link
subjects Animal Anatomy
Animal Biochemistry
Babesiosis
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
DNA probes
Dyes
Edetic acid
Erythrocytes
Histology
Hydrolysis
Jugular vein
Life Sciences
Livestock
Morphology
Original Article
Parasites
Protozoa
title Comparative evaluation of DNA extraction kit, matrix sample and qPCR assays for bovine babesiosis monitoring
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A05%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20evaluation%20of%20DNA%20extraction%20kit,%20matrix%20sample%20and%20qPCR%20assays%20for%20bovine%20babesiosis%20monitoring&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20biology%20reports&rft.au=Okino,%20Cintia%20Hiromi&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2671&rft.epage=2680&rft.pages=2671-2680&rft.issn=0301-4851&rft.eissn=1573-4978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11033-018-4436-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2126900888%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8e235b8beb8e1ba795b8cc4f0d42cda3f18e2ee7ccb1f850077e4a10a53a96403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2125115904&rft_id=info:pmid/30362072&rfr_iscdi=true