Loading…

Indexing peak rapid filling velocity to both relaxation and filling volume to estimate left ventricular filling pressures

The peak transmitral velocity/peak mitral annular velocity (E/e') ratio has been used as a left ventricular (LV) filling pressure (LVFP) correlate. However, the E/e' and its changes with haemodynamic alterations have not always correlated with changes in LVFP's. We hypothesized that i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European heart journal cardiovascular imaging 2019-06, Vol.20 (6), p.646-654
Main Authors: Lavine, Steven J, Sivaganam, Kamesh, Strom, Joel A
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The peak transmitral velocity/peak mitral annular velocity (E/e') ratio has been used as a left ventricular (LV) filling pressure (LVFP) correlate. However, the E/e' and its changes with haemodynamic alterations have not always correlated with changes in LVFP's. We hypothesized that indexing E/e' to a measure of LV filling volume may enhance the correlation with LVFP and LVFP changes. We summarized previously obtained haemodynamic and Doppler echo data in 137 dogs with coronary microsphere embolization induced-chronic LV dysfunction prior to and following haemodynamic induced alterations in LVFP's. E/e' values were obtained as E*tau where tau is the inverse logarithmic LV pressure decay. E*tau was indexed to LV filling volume by dividing by the diastolic time velocity integral (DVI) and correlated with LV mean diastolic pressure (LVmDP). Similarly, the relationship of E/e' and E/e'/DVI to LV pre A wave pressure was evaluated in 84 patients by invasive haemodynamics and Doppler echo. Combining data from all interventions, LVmDP correlated with E*tau (r = 0.408) but more strongly with E*tau/DVI (r = 0.667, z = 3.03, P = 0.0008). The change in LVmDP correlated with the change in E*tau/DVI (r = 0.742) more strongly than E*Tau (r = 0.187, Z = 4.01, P 
ISSN:2047-2404
2047-2412
DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jey154