Loading…

An Inconvenient Truth: The Unconsidered Benefits of Convenience Polyandry

Polyandry, or multiple mating by females with different males, is commonplace. One explanation is that females engage in convenience polyandry, mating multiple times to reduce the costs of sexual harassment. Although the logic underlying convenience polyandry is clear, and harassment often seems to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) 2018-12, Vol.33 (12), p.904-915
Main Authors: Boulton, Rebecca A., Zuk, Marlene, Shuker, David M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-26552275d4eb70db57e8725435a5d5a8511224c09fb5dd7a8ec688c4e5c038993
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-26552275d4eb70db57e8725435a5d5a8511224c09fb5dd7a8ec688c4e5c038993
container_end_page 915
container_issue 12
container_start_page 904
container_title Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam)
container_volume 33
creator Boulton, Rebecca A.
Zuk, Marlene
Shuker, David M.
description Polyandry, or multiple mating by females with different males, is commonplace. One explanation is that females engage in convenience polyandry, mating multiple times to reduce the costs of sexual harassment. Although the logic underlying convenience polyandry is clear, and harassment often seems to influence mating outcomes, it has not been subjected to as thorough theoretical or empirical attention as other explanations for polyandry. We re-examine here convenience polyandry in the light of new studies demonstrating previously unconsidered benefits of polyandry. We suggest that true convenience polyandry is likely to be a fleeting phenomenon, even though it can profoundly shape mating-system evolution via potential feedback loops between resistance to males and the costs and benefits of mating. Convenience polyandry can occur when resistance is more costly than mating. When females do not benefit from polyandry it is sometimes suggested as being convenient. Convenience polyandry is rarely explicitly tested. New studies show cryptic benefits to females that negate convenience polyandry. Convenience polyandry may be a fleeting phenomenon that has the potential to shape mating system evolution. We provide a framework in which to test whether or not polyandry is convenient.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2127659613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169534718302477</els_id><sourcerecordid>2127659613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-26552275d4eb70db57e8725435a5d5a8511224c09fb5dd7a8ec688c4e5c038993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQlmwS_IgTG7GBikelSrBo11ZiT1RXaVLspFL_Hoe2LJmNpaszV-OD0C3BCcEke1gnnQNIKCYiBAnG9AyNichpLJhg52gcIBlzluYjdOX9GoeRqbxEI4ZZnkkhxmj23ESzRrfNDhoLTRctXN-tHqPFCqLlkHtrwIGJXqCBynY-aqtoesI1RF9tvS8a4_bX6KIqag83x3eClm-vi-lHPP98n02f57FOMe5imnFOac5NCmWOTclzCBfzlPGCG14ITgilqcayKrkxeSFAZ0LoFLjGTEjJJuj-0Lt17XcPvlMb6zXUddFA23tFCc0zLjPCAkoPqHat9w4qtXV2U7i9IlgNCtVaDQrVoHDIgsKwdHfs78sNmL-Vk7MAPB0ACL_cWXDK618XxjrQnTKt_a__B3C3gUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2127659613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Inconvenient Truth: The Unconsidered Benefits of Convenience Polyandry</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Boulton, Rebecca A. ; Zuk, Marlene ; Shuker, David M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boulton, Rebecca A. ; Zuk, Marlene ; Shuker, David M.</creatorcontrib><description>Polyandry, or multiple mating by females with different males, is commonplace. One explanation is that females engage in convenience polyandry, mating multiple times to reduce the costs of sexual harassment. Although the logic underlying convenience polyandry is clear, and harassment often seems to influence mating outcomes, it has not been subjected to as thorough theoretical or empirical attention as other explanations for polyandry. We re-examine here convenience polyandry in the light of new studies demonstrating previously unconsidered benefits of polyandry. We suggest that true convenience polyandry is likely to be a fleeting phenomenon, even though it can profoundly shape mating-system evolution via potential feedback loops between resistance to males and the costs and benefits of mating. Convenience polyandry can occur when resistance is more costly than mating. When females do not benefit from polyandry it is sometimes suggested as being convenient. Convenience polyandry is rarely explicitly tested. New studies show cryptic benefits to females that negate convenience polyandry. Convenience polyandry may be a fleeting phenomenon that has the potential to shape mating system evolution. We provide a framework in which to test whether or not polyandry is convenient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-5347</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30376988</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>convenience polyandry ; mating systems ; sexual conflict ; sexual harassment</subject><ispartof>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution (Amsterdam), 2018-12, Vol.33 (12), p.904-915</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-26552275d4eb70db57e8725435a5d5a8511224c09fb5dd7a8ec688c4e5c038993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-26552275d4eb70db57e8725435a5d5a8511224c09fb5dd7a8ec688c4e5c038993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376988$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boulton, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuk, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuker, David M.</creatorcontrib><title>An Inconvenient Truth: The Unconsidered Benefits of Convenience Polyandry</title><title>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Trends Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Polyandry, or multiple mating by females with different males, is commonplace. One explanation is that females engage in convenience polyandry, mating multiple times to reduce the costs of sexual harassment. Although the logic underlying convenience polyandry is clear, and harassment often seems to influence mating outcomes, it has not been subjected to as thorough theoretical or empirical attention as other explanations for polyandry. We re-examine here convenience polyandry in the light of new studies demonstrating previously unconsidered benefits of polyandry. We suggest that true convenience polyandry is likely to be a fleeting phenomenon, even though it can profoundly shape mating-system evolution via potential feedback loops between resistance to males and the costs and benefits of mating. Convenience polyandry can occur when resistance is more costly than mating. When females do not benefit from polyandry it is sometimes suggested as being convenient. Convenience polyandry is rarely explicitly tested. New studies show cryptic benefits to females that negate convenience polyandry. Convenience polyandry may be a fleeting phenomenon that has the potential to shape mating system evolution. We provide a framework in which to test whether or not polyandry is convenient.</description><subject>convenience polyandry</subject><subject>mating systems</subject><subject>sexual conflict</subject><subject>sexual harassment</subject><issn>0169-5347</issn><issn>1872-8383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQlmwS_IgTG7GBikelSrBo11ZiT1RXaVLspFL_Hoe2LJmNpaszV-OD0C3BCcEke1gnnQNIKCYiBAnG9AyNichpLJhg52gcIBlzluYjdOX9GoeRqbxEI4ZZnkkhxmj23ESzRrfNDhoLTRctXN-tHqPFCqLlkHtrwIGJXqCBynY-aqtoesI1RF9tvS8a4_bX6KIqag83x3eClm-vi-lHPP98n02f57FOMe5imnFOac5NCmWOTclzCBfzlPGCG14ITgilqcayKrkxeSFAZ0LoFLjGTEjJJuj-0Lt17XcPvlMb6zXUddFA23tFCc0zLjPCAkoPqHat9w4qtXV2U7i9IlgNCtVaDQrVoHDIgsKwdHfs78sNmL-Vk7MAPB0ACL_cWXDK618XxjrQnTKt_a__B3C3gUQ</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Boulton, Rebecca A.</creator><creator>Zuk, Marlene</creator><creator>Shuker, David M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>An Inconvenient Truth: The Unconsidered Benefits of Convenience Polyandry</title><author>Boulton, Rebecca A. ; Zuk, Marlene ; Shuker, David M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-26552275d4eb70db57e8725435a5d5a8511224c09fb5dd7a8ec688c4e5c038993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>convenience polyandry</topic><topic>mating systems</topic><topic>sexual conflict</topic><topic>sexual harassment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boulton, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuk, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuker, David M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boulton, Rebecca A.</au><au>Zuk, Marlene</au><au>Shuker, David M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Inconvenient Truth: The Unconsidered Benefits of Convenience Polyandry</atitle><jtitle>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>904</spage><epage>915</epage><pages>904-915</pages><issn>0169-5347</issn><eissn>1872-8383</eissn><abstract>Polyandry, or multiple mating by females with different males, is commonplace. One explanation is that females engage in convenience polyandry, mating multiple times to reduce the costs of sexual harassment. Although the logic underlying convenience polyandry is clear, and harassment often seems to influence mating outcomes, it has not been subjected to as thorough theoretical or empirical attention as other explanations for polyandry. We re-examine here convenience polyandry in the light of new studies demonstrating previously unconsidered benefits of polyandry. We suggest that true convenience polyandry is likely to be a fleeting phenomenon, even though it can profoundly shape mating-system evolution via potential feedback loops between resistance to males and the costs and benefits of mating. Convenience polyandry can occur when resistance is more costly than mating. When females do not benefit from polyandry it is sometimes suggested as being convenient. Convenience polyandry is rarely explicitly tested. New studies show cryptic benefits to females that negate convenience polyandry. Convenience polyandry may be a fleeting phenomenon that has the potential to shape mating system evolution. We provide a framework in which to test whether or not polyandry is convenient.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30376988</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.002</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-5347
ispartof Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam), 2018-12, Vol.33 (12), p.904-915
issn 0169-5347
1872-8383
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2127659613
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects convenience polyandry
mating systems
sexual conflict
sexual harassment
title An Inconvenient Truth: The Unconsidered Benefits of Convenience Polyandry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A15%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Inconvenient%20Truth:%20The%20Unconsidered%20Benefits%20of%20Convenience%20Polyandry&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20ecology%20&%20evolution%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Boulton,%20Rebecca%20A.&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=904&rft.epage=915&rft.pages=904-915&rft.issn=0169-5347&rft.eissn=1872-8383&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2127659613%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-26552275d4eb70db57e8725435a5d5a8511224c09fb5dd7a8ec688c4e5c038993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2127659613&rft_id=info:pmid/30376988&rfr_iscdi=true