Loading…
An Inconvenient Truth: The Unconsidered Benefits of Convenience Polyandry
Polyandry, or multiple mating by females with different males, is commonplace. One explanation is that females engage in convenience polyandry, mating multiple times to reduce the costs of sexual harassment. Although the logic underlying convenience polyandry is clear, and harassment often seems to...
Saved in:
Published in: | Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) 2018-12, Vol.33 (12), p.904-915 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-26552275d4eb70db57e8725435a5d5a8511224c09fb5dd7a8ec688c4e5c038993 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-26552275d4eb70db57e8725435a5d5a8511224c09fb5dd7a8ec688c4e5c038993 |
container_end_page | 915 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 904 |
container_title | Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Boulton, Rebecca A. Zuk, Marlene Shuker, David M. |
description | Polyandry, or multiple mating by females with different males, is commonplace. One explanation is that females engage in convenience polyandry, mating multiple times to reduce the costs of sexual harassment. Although the logic underlying convenience polyandry is clear, and harassment often seems to influence mating outcomes, it has not been subjected to as thorough theoretical or empirical attention as other explanations for polyandry. We re-examine here convenience polyandry in the light of new studies demonstrating previously unconsidered benefits of polyandry. We suggest that true convenience polyandry is likely to be a fleeting phenomenon, even though it can profoundly shape mating-system evolution via potential feedback loops between resistance to males and the costs and benefits of mating.
Convenience polyandry can occur when resistance is more costly than mating.
When females do not benefit from polyandry it is sometimes suggested as being convenient.
Convenience polyandry is rarely explicitly tested.
New studies show cryptic benefits to females that negate convenience polyandry.
Convenience polyandry may be a fleeting phenomenon that has the potential to shape mating system evolution.
We provide a framework in which to test whether or not polyandry is convenient. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.002 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2127659613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169534718302477</els_id><sourcerecordid>2127659613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-26552275d4eb70db57e8725435a5d5a8511224c09fb5dd7a8ec688c4e5c038993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQlmwS_IgTG7GBikelSrBo11ZiT1RXaVLspFL_Hoe2LJmNpaszV-OD0C3BCcEke1gnnQNIKCYiBAnG9AyNichpLJhg52gcIBlzluYjdOX9GoeRqbxEI4ZZnkkhxmj23ESzRrfNDhoLTRctXN-tHqPFCqLlkHtrwIGJXqCBynY-aqtoesI1RF9tvS8a4_bX6KIqag83x3eClm-vi-lHPP98n02f57FOMe5imnFOac5NCmWOTclzCBfzlPGCG14ITgilqcayKrkxeSFAZ0LoFLjGTEjJJuj-0Lt17XcPvlMb6zXUddFA23tFCc0zLjPCAkoPqHat9w4qtXV2U7i9IlgNCtVaDQrVoHDIgsKwdHfs78sNmL-Vk7MAPB0ACL_cWXDK618XxjrQnTKt_a__B3C3gUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2127659613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Inconvenient Truth: The Unconsidered Benefits of Convenience Polyandry</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Boulton, Rebecca A. ; Zuk, Marlene ; Shuker, David M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boulton, Rebecca A. ; Zuk, Marlene ; Shuker, David M.</creatorcontrib><description>Polyandry, or multiple mating by females with different males, is commonplace. One explanation is that females engage in convenience polyandry, mating multiple times to reduce the costs of sexual harassment. Although the logic underlying convenience polyandry is clear, and harassment often seems to influence mating outcomes, it has not been subjected to as thorough theoretical or empirical attention as other explanations for polyandry. We re-examine here convenience polyandry in the light of new studies demonstrating previously unconsidered benefits of polyandry. We suggest that true convenience polyandry is likely to be a fleeting phenomenon, even though it can profoundly shape mating-system evolution via potential feedback loops between resistance to males and the costs and benefits of mating.
Convenience polyandry can occur when resistance is more costly than mating.
When females do not benefit from polyandry it is sometimes suggested as being convenient.
Convenience polyandry is rarely explicitly tested.
New studies show cryptic benefits to females that negate convenience polyandry.
Convenience polyandry may be a fleeting phenomenon that has the potential to shape mating system evolution.
We provide a framework in which to test whether or not polyandry is convenient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-5347</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30376988</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>convenience polyandry ; mating systems ; sexual conflict ; sexual harassment</subject><ispartof>Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam), 2018-12, Vol.33 (12), p.904-915</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-26552275d4eb70db57e8725435a5d5a8511224c09fb5dd7a8ec688c4e5c038993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-26552275d4eb70db57e8725435a5d5a8511224c09fb5dd7a8ec688c4e5c038993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376988$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boulton, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuk, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuker, David M.</creatorcontrib><title>An Inconvenient Truth: The Unconsidered Benefits of Convenience Polyandry</title><title>Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Trends Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Polyandry, or multiple mating by females with different males, is commonplace. One explanation is that females engage in convenience polyandry, mating multiple times to reduce the costs of sexual harassment. Although the logic underlying convenience polyandry is clear, and harassment often seems to influence mating outcomes, it has not been subjected to as thorough theoretical or empirical attention as other explanations for polyandry. We re-examine here convenience polyandry in the light of new studies demonstrating previously unconsidered benefits of polyandry. We suggest that true convenience polyandry is likely to be a fleeting phenomenon, even though it can profoundly shape mating-system evolution via potential feedback loops between resistance to males and the costs and benefits of mating.
Convenience polyandry can occur when resistance is more costly than mating.
When females do not benefit from polyandry it is sometimes suggested as being convenient.
Convenience polyandry is rarely explicitly tested.
New studies show cryptic benefits to females that negate convenience polyandry.
Convenience polyandry may be a fleeting phenomenon that has the potential to shape mating system evolution.
We provide a framework in which to test whether or not polyandry is convenient.</description><subject>convenience polyandry</subject><subject>mating systems</subject><subject>sexual conflict</subject><subject>sexual harassment</subject><issn>0169-5347</issn><issn>1872-8383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQlmwS_IgTG7GBikelSrBo11ZiT1RXaVLspFL_Hoe2LJmNpaszV-OD0C3BCcEke1gnnQNIKCYiBAnG9AyNichpLJhg52gcIBlzluYjdOX9GoeRqbxEI4ZZnkkhxmj23ESzRrfNDhoLTRctXN-tHqPFCqLlkHtrwIGJXqCBynY-aqtoesI1RF9tvS8a4_bX6KIqag83x3eClm-vi-lHPP98n02f57FOMe5imnFOac5NCmWOTclzCBfzlPGCG14ITgilqcayKrkxeSFAZ0LoFLjGTEjJJuj-0Lt17XcPvlMb6zXUddFA23tFCc0zLjPCAkoPqHat9w4qtXV2U7i9IlgNCtVaDQrVoHDIgsKwdHfs78sNmL-Vk7MAPB0ACL_cWXDK618XxjrQnTKt_a__B3C3gUQ</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Boulton, Rebecca A.</creator><creator>Zuk, Marlene</creator><creator>Shuker, David M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>An Inconvenient Truth: The Unconsidered Benefits of Convenience Polyandry</title><author>Boulton, Rebecca A. ; Zuk, Marlene ; Shuker, David M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-26552275d4eb70db57e8725435a5d5a8511224c09fb5dd7a8ec688c4e5c038993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>convenience polyandry</topic><topic>mating systems</topic><topic>sexual conflict</topic><topic>sexual harassment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boulton, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuk, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuker, David M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boulton, Rebecca A.</au><au>Zuk, Marlene</au><au>Shuker, David M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Inconvenient Truth: The Unconsidered Benefits of Convenience Polyandry</atitle><jtitle>Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>904</spage><epage>915</epage><pages>904-915</pages><issn>0169-5347</issn><eissn>1872-8383</eissn><abstract>Polyandry, or multiple mating by females with different males, is commonplace. One explanation is that females engage in convenience polyandry, mating multiple times to reduce the costs of sexual harassment. Although the logic underlying convenience polyandry is clear, and harassment often seems to influence mating outcomes, it has not been subjected to as thorough theoretical or empirical attention as other explanations for polyandry. We re-examine here convenience polyandry in the light of new studies demonstrating previously unconsidered benefits of polyandry. We suggest that true convenience polyandry is likely to be a fleeting phenomenon, even though it can profoundly shape mating-system evolution via potential feedback loops between resistance to males and the costs and benefits of mating.
Convenience polyandry can occur when resistance is more costly than mating.
When females do not benefit from polyandry it is sometimes suggested as being convenient.
Convenience polyandry is rarely explicitly tested.
New studies show cryptic benefits to females that negate convenience polyandry.
Convenience polyandry may be a fleeting phenomenon that has the potential to shape mating system evolution.
We provide a framework in which to test whether or not polyandry is convenient.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30376988</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.002</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-5347 |
ispartof | Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam), 2018-12, Vol.33 (12), p.904-915 |
issn | 0169-5347 1872-8383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2127659613 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | convenience polyandry mating systems sexual conflict sexual harassment |
title | An Inconvenient Truth: The Unconsidered Benefits of Convenience Polyandry |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A15%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Inconvenient%20Truth:%20The%20Unconsidered%20Benefits%20of%20Convenience%20Polyandry&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20ecology%20&%20evolution%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Boulton,%20Rebecca%20A.&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=904&rft.epage=915&rft.pages=904-915&rft.issn=0169-5347&rft.eissn=1872-8383&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2127659613%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-26552275d4eb70db57e8725435a5d5a8511224c09fb5dd7a8ec688c4e5c038993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2127659613&rft_id=info:pmid/30376988&rfr_iscdi=true |