Loading…
Kinetic aspects of inhibition of the phytopathogenic fungi growth by rhizosphere bacteria
Kinetics of growth inhibition of fungi Fusarium and Bipolaris caused by bacteria Pseudomonas sp. V-6798 and Azotobacter chroococum V-2272 D on dense nutrient media, both in single-crop system and by coinoculation, was demonstrated. The speed of fungal colonies growth as a function of bacteria concen...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied biochemistry and microbiology 2008-09, Vol.44 (5), p.512-517 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-aae3f527b1a2622ff6db1a54b0778b263dfe326706175d727ae4c80eefb62763 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-aae3f527b1a2622ff6db1a54b0778b263dfe326706175d727ae4c80eefb62763 |
container_end_page | 517 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 512 |
container_title | Applied biochemistry and microbiology |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Minaeva, O. M. Akimova, E. L. Evdokimov, E. V. |
description | Kinetics of growth inhibition of fungi
Fusarium
and
Bipolaris
caused by bacteria
Pseudomonas
sp. V-6798 and
Azotobacter chroococum
V-2272 D on dense nutrient media, both in single-crop system and by coinoculation, was demonstrated. The speed of fungal colonies growth as a function of bacteria concentration in inoculate was shown to be in accordance with the Ierysalimskii modified equation. The degree of antagonistic activity was suggested to be assessed by the constant of inhibition (
K
i
) and residual rate of fungi growth. Constant of inhibition of fungal growth by bacteria varied within 10–100 cells/ml for observed species. More effective fungistatic influence of bacterial strains in combined culture was observed. Parameters reported in the present study allow comparing the degree of bacteria antifungal activity in vitro. Suggested screening method could be used for selection of bacteria as activity biofungicide and while selecting biomedication for defined plant pathogen disruption. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1134/S0003683808050104 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21298478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1896992381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-aae3f527b1a2622ff6db1a54b0778b263dfe326706175d727ae4c80eefb62763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHfBhbtqHm2SLmXwhYILZ-OqpJ2bNsNMU5MUGX-9KSMIiqt7L-c7h8tB6JySK0p5fv1KCOFCcUUUKQgl-QGaUUFUxgnLD9FskrNJP0YnIazTWQpVztDbk-0h2gbrMEATA3YG276ztY3W9dMVO8BDt4tu0LFzLfQJNmPfWtx69xE7XO-w7-ynC0MHHnCtmwje6lN0ZPQmwNn3nKPl3e1y8ZA9v9w_Lm6es4bnImZaAzcFkzXVTDBmjFiltchrIqWqmeArA5wJSQSVxUoyqSFvFAEwtWBS8Dm63McO3r2PEGK1taGBzUb34MZQMcpKlUuVwItf4NqNvk-vVYwTVVIiaYLoHmq8C8GDqQZvt9rvKkqqqejqT9HJw_aekNi-Bf8T_L_pC5k_f-I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230891071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Kinetic aspects of inhibition of the phytopathogenic fungi growth by rhizosphere bacteria</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Minaeva, O. M. ; Akimova, E. L. ; Evdokimov, E. V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Minaeva, O. M. ; Akimova, E. L. ; Evdokimov, E. V.</creatorcontrib><description>Kinetics of growth inhibition of fungi
Fusarium
and
Bipolaris
caused by bacteria
Pseudomonas
sp. V-6798 and
Azotobacter chroococum
V-2272 D on dense nutrient media, both in single-crop system and by coinoculation, was demonstrated. The speed of fungal colonies growth as a function of bacteria concentration in inoculate was shown to be in accordance with the Ierysalimskii modified equation. The degree of antagonistic activity was suggested to be assessed by the constant of inhibition (
K
i
) and residual rate of fungi growth. Constant of inhibition of fungal growth by bacteria varied within 10–100 cells/ml for observed species. More effective fungistatic influence of bacterial strains in combined culture was observed. Parameters reported in the present study allow comparing the degree of bacteria antifungal activity in vitro. Suggested screening method could be used for selection of bacteria as activity biofungicide and while selecting biomedication for defined plant pathogen disruption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1608-3024</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S0003683808050104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: SP MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica</publisher><subject>Azotobacter ; Bacteria ; Biochemistry ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bipolaris ; Fungi ; Fusarium ; Growth kinetics ; Kinetics ; Life Sciences ; Medical Microbiology ; Microbiology ; Plant pathology ; Pseudomonas ; Rhizosphere</subject><ispartof>Applied biochemistry and microbiology, 2008-09, Vol.44 (5), p.512-517</ispartof><rights>MAIK Nauka 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-aae3f527b1a2622ff6db1a54b0778b263dfe326706175d727ae4c80eefb62763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-aae3f527b1a2622ff6db1a54b0778b263dfe326706175d727ae4c80eefb62763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Minaeva, O. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akimova, E. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evdokimov, E. V.</creatorcontrib><title>Kinetic aspects of inhibition of the phytopathogenic fungi growth by rhizosphere bacteria</title><title>Applied biochemistry and microbiology</title><addtitle>Appl Biochem Microbiol</addtitle><description>Kinetics of growth inhibition of fungi
Fusarium
and
Bipolaris
caused by bacteria
Pseudomonas
sp. V-6798 and
Azotobacter chroococum
V-2272 D on dense nutrient media, both in single-crop system and by coinoculation, was demonstrated. The speed of fungal colonies growth as a function of bacteria concentration in inoculate was shown to be in accordance with the Ierysalimskii modified equation. The degree of antagonistic activity was suggested to be assessed by the constant of inhibition (
K
i
) and residual rate of fungi growth. Constant of inhibition of fungal growth by bacteria varied within 10–100 cells/ml for observed species. More effective fungistatic influence of bacterial strains in combined culture was observed. Parameters reported in the present study allow comparing the degree of bacteria antifungal activity in vitro. Suggested screening method could be used for selection of bacteria as activity biofungicide and while selecting biomedication for defined plant pathogen disruption.</description><subject>Azotobacter</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bipolaris</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Fusarium</subject><subject>Growth kinetics</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Plant pathology</subject><subject>Pseudomonas</subject><subject>Rhizosphere</subject><issn>0003-6838</issn><issn>1608-3024</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHfBhbtqHm2SLmXwhYILZ-OqpJ2bNsNMU5MUGX-9KSMIiqt7L-c7h8tB6JySK0p5fv1KCOFCcUUUKQgl-QGaUUFUxgnLD9FskrNJP0YnIazTWQpVztDbk-0h2gbrMEATA3YG276ztY3W9dMVO8BDt4tu0LFzLfQJNmPfWtx69xE7XO-w7-ynC0MHHnCtmwje6lN0ZPQmwNn3nKPl3e1y8ZA9v9w_Lm6es4bnImZaAzcFkzXVTDBmjFiltchrIqWqmeArA5wJSQSVxUoyqSFvFAEwtWBS8Dm63McO3r2PEGK1taGBzUb34MZQMcpKlUuVwItf4NqNvk-vVYwTVVIiaYLoHmq8C8GDqQZvt9rvKkqqqejqT9HJw_aekNi-Bf8T_L_pC5k_f-I</recordid><startdate>20080901</startdate><enddate>20080901</enddate><creator>Minaeva, O. M.</creator><creator>Akimova, E. L.</creator><creator>Evdokimov, E. V.</creator><general>SP MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080901</creationdate><title>Kinetic aspects of inhibition of the phytopathogenic fungi growth by rhizosphere bacteria</title><author>Minaeva, O. M. ; Akimova, E. L. ; Evdokimov, E. V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-aae3f527b1a2622ff6db1a54b0778b263dfe326706175d727ae4c80eefb62763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Azotobacter</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bipolaris</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Fusarium</topic><topic>Growth kinetics</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Plant pathology</topic><topic>Pseudomonas</topic><topic>Rhizosphere</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Minaeva, O. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akimova, E. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evdokimov, E. V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Applied biochemistry and microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Minaeva, O. M.</au><au>Akimova, E. L.</au><au>Evdokimov, E. V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Kinetic aspects of inhibition of the phytopathogenic fungi growth by rhizosphere bacteria</atitle><jtitle>Applied biochemistry and microbiology</jtitle><stitle>Appl Biochem Microbiol</stitle><date>2008-09-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>512</spage><epage>517</epage><pages>512-517</pages><issn>0003-6838</issn><eissn>1608-3024</eissn><abstract>Kinetics of growth inhibition of fungi
Fusarium
and
Bipolaris
caused by bacteria
Pseudomonas
sp. V-6798 and
Azotobacter chroococum
V-2272 D on dense nutrient media, both in single-crop system and by coinoculation, was demonstrated. The speed of fungal colonies growth as a function of bacteria concentration in inoculate was shown to be in accordance with the Ierysalimskii modified equation. The degree of antagonistic activity was suggested to be assessed by the constant of inhibition (
K
i
) and residual rate of fungi growth. Constant of inhibition of fungal growth by bacteria varied within 10–100 cells/ml for observed species. More effective fungistatic influence of bacterial strains in combined culture was observed. Parameters reported in the present study allow comparing the degree of bacteria antifungal activity in vitro. Suggested screening method could be used for selection of bacteria as activity biofungicide and while selecting biomedication for defined plant pathogen disruption.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>SP MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica</pub><doi>10.1134/S0003683808050104</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-6838 |
ispartof | Applied biochemistry and microbiology, 2008-09, Vol.44 (5), p.512-517 |
issn | 0003-6838 1608-3024 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21298478 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Azotobacter Bacteria Biochemistry Biomedical and Life Sciences Bipolaris Fungi Fusarium Growth kinetics Kinetics Life Sciences Medical Microbiology Microbiology Plant pathology Pseudomonas Rhizosphere |
title | Kinetic aspects of inhibition of the phytopathogenic fungi growth by rhizosphere bacteria |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A03%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Kinetic%20aspects%20of%20inhibition%20of%20the%20phytopathogenic%20fungi%20growth%20by%20rhizosphere%20bacteria&rft.jtitle=Applied%20biochemistry%20and%20microbiology&rft.au=Minaeva,%20O.%20M.&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=512&rft.epage=517&rft.pages=512-517&rft.issn=0003-6838&rft.eissn=1608-3024&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S0003683808050104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1896992381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-aae3f527b1a2622ff6db1a54b0778b263dfe326706175d727ae4c80eefb62763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230891071&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |