Loading…

Kinetic aspects of inhibition of the phytopathogenic fungi growth by rhizosphere bacteria

Kinetics of growth inhibition of fungi Fusarium and Bipolaris caused by bacteria Pseudomonas sp. V-6798 and Azotobacter chroococum V-2272 D on dense nutrient media, both in single-crop system and by coinoculation, was demonstrated. The speed of fungal colonies growth as a function of bacteria concen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied biochemistry and microbiology 2008-09, Vol.44 (5), p.512-517
Main Authors: Minaeva, O. M., Akimova, E. L., Evdokimov, E. V.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-aae3f527b1a2622ff6db1a54b0778b263dfe326706175d727ae4c80eefb62763
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-aae3f527b1a2622ff6db1a54b0778b263dfe326706175d727ae4c80eefb62763
container_end_page 517
container_issue 5
container_start_page 512
container_title Applied biochemistry and microbiology
container_volume 44
creator Minaeva, O. M.
Akimova, E. L.
Evdokimov, E. V.
description Kinetics of growth inhibition of fungi Fusarium and Bipolaris caused by bacteria Pseudomonas sp. V-6798 and Azotobacter chroococum V-2272 D on dense nutrient media, both in single-crop system and by coinoculation, was demonstrated. The speed of fungal colonies growth as a function of bacteria concentration in inoculate was shown to be in accordance with the Ierysalimskii modified equation. The degree of antagonistic activity was suggested to be assessed by the constant of inhibition ( K i ) and residual rate of fungi growth. Constant of inhibition of fungal growth by bacteria varied within 10–100 cells/ml for observed species. More effective fungistatic influence of bacterial strains in combined culture was observed. Parameters reported in the present study allow comparing the degree of bacteria antifungal activity in vitro. Suggested screening method could be used for selection of bacteria as activity biofungicide and while selecting biomedication for defined plant pathogen disruption.
doi_str_mv 10.1134/S0003683808050104
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21298478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1896992381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-aae3f527b1a2622ff6db1a54b0778b263dfe326706175d727ae4c80eefb62763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHfBhbtqHm2SLmXwhYILZ-OqpJ2bNsNMU5MUGX-9KSMIiqt7L-c7h8tB6JySK0p5fv1KCOFCcUUUKQgl-QGaUUFUxgnLD9FskrNJP0YnIazTWQpVztDbk-0h2gbrMEATA3YG276ztY3W9dMVO8BDt4tu0LFzLfQJNmPfWtx69xE7XO-w7-ynC0MHHnCtmwje6lN0ZPQmwNn3nKPl3e1y8ZA9v9w_Lm6es4bnImZaAzcFkzXVTDBmjFiltchrIqWqmeArA5wJSQSVxUoyqSFvFAEwtWBS8Dm63McO3r2PEGK1taGBzUb34MZQMcpKlUuVwItf4NqNvk-vVYwTVVIiaYLoHmq8C8GDqQZvt9rvKkqqqejqT9HJw_aekNi-Bf8T_L_pC5k_f-I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230891071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Kinetic aspects of inhibition of the phytopathogenic fungi growth by rhizosphere bacteria</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Minaeva, O. M. ; Akimova, E. L. ; Evdokimov, E. V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Minaeva, O. M. ; Akimova, E. L. ; Evdokimov, E. V.</creatorcontrib><description>Kinetics of growth inhibition of fungi Fusarium and Bipolaris caused by bacteria Pseudomonas sp. V-6798 and Azotobacter chroococum V-2272 D on dense nutrient media, both in single-crop system and by coinoculation, was demonstrated. The speed of fungal colonies growth as a function of bacteria concentration in inoculate was shown to be in accordance with the Ierysalimskii modified equation. The degree of antagonistic activity was suggested to be assessed by the constant of inhibition ( K i ) and residual rate of fungi growth. Constant of inhibition of fungal growth by bacteria varied within 10–100 cells/ml for observed species. More effective fungistatic influence of bacterial strains in combined culture was observed. Parameters reported in the present study allow comparing the degree of bacteria antifungal activity in vitro. Suggested screening method could be used for selection of bacteria as activity biofungicide and while selecting biomedication for defined plant pathogen disruption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1608-3024</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S0003683808050104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: SP MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica</publisher><subject>Azotobacter ; Bacteria ; Biochemistry ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bipolaris ; Fungi ; Fusarium ; Growth kinetics ; Kinetics ; Life Sciences ; Medical Microbiology ; Microbiology ; Plant pathology ; Pseudomonas ; Rhizosphere</subject><ispartof>Applied biochemistry and microbiology, 2008-09, Vol.44 (5), p.512-517</ispartof><rights>MAIK Nauka 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-aae3f527b1a2622ff6db1a54b0778b263dfe326706175d727ae4c80eefb62763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-aae3f527b1a2622ff6db1a54b0778b263dfe326706175d727ae4c80eefb62763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Minaeva, O. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akimova, E. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evdokimov, E. V.</creatorcontrib><title>Kinetic aspects of inhibition of the phytopathogenic fungi growth by rhizosphere bacteria</title><title>Applied biochemistry and microbiology</title><addtitle>Appl Biochem Microbiol</addtitle><description>Kinetics of growth inhibition of fungi Fusarium and Bipolaris caused by bacteria Pseudomonas sp. V-6798 and Azotobacter chroococum V-2272 D on dense nutrient media, both in single-crop system and by coinoculation, was demonstrated. The speed of fungal colonies growth as a function of bacteria concentration in inoculate was shown to be in accordance with the Ierysalimskii modified equation. The degree of antagonistic activity was suggested to be assessed by the constant of inhibition ( K i ) and residual rate of fungi growth. Constant of inhibition of fungal growth by bacteria varied within 10–100 cells/ml for observed species. More effective fungistatic influence of bacterial strains in combined culture was observed. Parameters reported in the present study allow comparing the degree of bacteria antifungal activity in vitro. Suggested screening method could be used for selection of bacteria as activity biofungicide and while selecting biomedication for defined plant pathogen disruption.</description><subject>Azotobacter</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bipolaris</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Fusarium</subject><subject>Growth kinetics</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Plant pathology</subject><subject>Pseudomonas</subject><subject>Rhizosphere</subject><issn>0003-6838</issn><issn>1608-3024</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHfBhbtqHm2SLmXwhYILZ-OqpJ2bNsNMU5MUGX-9KSMIiqt7L-c7h8tB6JySK0p5fv1KCOFCcUUUKQgl-QGaUUFUxgnLD9FskrNJP0YnIazTWQpVztDbk-0h2gbrMEATA3YG276ztY3W9dMVO8BDt4tu0LFzLfQJNmPfWtx69xE7XO-w7-ynC0MHHnCtmwje6lN0ZPQmwNn3nKPl3e1y8ZA9v9w_Lm6es4bnImZaAzcFkzXVTDBmjFiltchrIqWqmeArA5wJSQSVxUoyqSFvFAEwtWBS8Dm63McO3r2PEGK1taGBzUb34MZQMcpKlUuVwItf4NqNvk-vVYwTVVIiaYLoHmq8C8GDqQZvt9rvKkqqqejqT9HJw_aekNi-Bf8T_L_pC5k_f-I</recordid><startdate>20080901</startdate><enddate>20080901</enddate><creator>Minaeva, O. M.</creator><creator>Akimova, E. L.</creator><creator>Evdokimov, E. V.</creator><general>SP MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080901</creationdate><title>Kinetic aspects of inhibition of the phytopathogenic fungi growth by rhizosphere bacteria</title><author>Minaeva, O. M. ; Akimova, E. L. ; Evdokimov, E. V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-aae3f527b1a2622ff6db1a54b0778b263dfe326706175d727ae4c80eefb62763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Azotobacter</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bipolaris</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Fusarium</topic><topic>Growth kinetics</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Plant pathology</topic><topic>Pseudomonas</topic><topic>Rhizosphere</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Minaeva, O. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akimova, E. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evdokimov, E. V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Applied biochemistry and microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Minaeva, O. M.</au><au>Akimova, E. L.</au><au>Evdokimov, E. V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Kinetic aspects of inhibition of the phytopathogenic fungi growth by rhizosphere bacteria</atitle><jtitle>Applied biochemistry and microbiology</jtitle><stitle>Appl Biochem Microbiol</stitle><date>2008-09-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>512</spage><epage>517</epage><pages>512-517</pages><issn>0003-6838</issn><eissn>1608-3024</eissn><abstract>Kinetics of growth inhibition of fungi Fusarium and Bipolaris caused by bacteria Pseudomonas sp. V-6798 and Azotobacter chroococum V-2272 D on dense nutrient media, both in single-crop system and by coinoculation, was demonstrated. The speed of fungal colonies growth as a function of bacteria concentration in inoculate was shown to be in accordance with the Ierysalimskii modified equation. The degree of antagonistic activity was suggested to be assessed by the constant of inhibition ( K i ) and residual rate of fungi growth. Constant of inhibition of fungal growth by bacteria varied within 10–100 cells/ml for observed species. More effective fungistatic influence of bacterial strains in combined culture was observed. Parameters reported in the present study allow comparing the degree of bacteria antifungal activity in vitro. Suggested screening method could be used for selection of bacteria as activity biofungicide and while selecting biomedication for defined plant pathogen disruption.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>SP MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica</pub><doi>10.1134/S0003683808050104</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-6838
ispartof Applied biochemistry and microbiology, 2008-09, Vol.44 (5), p.512-517
issn 0003-6838
1608-3024
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21298478
source Springer Nature
subjects Azotobacter
Bacteria
Biochemistry
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Bipolaris
Fungi
Fusarium
Growth kinetics
Kinetics
Life Sciences
Medical Microbiology
Microbiology
Plant pathology
Pseudomonas
Rhizosphere
title Kinetic aspects of inhibition of the phytopathogenic fungi growth by rhizosphere bacteria
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A03%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Kinetic%20aspects%20of%20inhibition%20of%20the%20phytopathogenic%20fungi%20growth%20by%20rhizosphere%20bacteria&rft.jtitle=Applied%20biochemistry%20and%20microbiology&rft.au=Minaeva,%20O.%20M.&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=512&rft.epage=517&rft.pages=512-517&rft.issn=0003-6838&rft.eissn=1608-3024&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S0003683808050104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1896992381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-aae3f527b1a2622ff6db1a54b0778b263dfe326706175d727ae4c80eefb62763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230891071&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true