Improving Emergency Department Care for Pediatric Victims of Sexual Abuse

• Published in: Pediatrics (Evanston) 2018-12, Vol.142 (6), p.1
• Main Authors: Hoehn, Erin F, Overmann, Kevin M, Fananapazir, Nafeh, Simonton, Kirsten, Makoroff, Kathi L, Bennett, Berkeley L, Duma, Elena M, Murtagh Kurowski, Eileen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algorithms; Analysis; Care and treatment; Child; Child abuse & neglect; Child Abuse - therapy; Company business management; Disease control; Emergency medical care; Emergency medical services; Emergency Medical Services - standards; Emergency service; Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Forensic science; Guideline Adherence; Guidelines; Hepatitis; Hospital emergency services; Hospitals; Hospitals, Pediatric; Humans; Male; Management; Patients; Pediatric research; Pediatrics; Practice guidelines (Medicine); Pregnancy; Quality Improvement; Quality of care; Retrospective Studies; Sex crimes; Sexual abuse; Sexual assault; Social aspects; Syphilis; United States; Victims
• ISSN: 0031-4005; 1098-4275
• DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-1811

Evidence-based medical care of sexual abuse victims who present to the pediatric emergency department (PED) is necessary to facilitate forensic evidence collection and prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. Adherence to testing and treatment guidelines remains low in PEDs, despite recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We aimed to increase the proportion of patient encounters at a PED for reported sexual abuse that receive algorithm-adherent care from 57% to 90% within 12 months. Our team of PED and child abuse pediatricians outlined our theory for improvement, and multiple plan-do-study-act cycles were conducted to test interventions that were aimed at key drivers. Interventions included the construction of a best practice algorithm derived from published guidelines, targeted clinician education, and integration of an electronic order set. Our primary outcome was the proportion of patient encounters in which care adhered to algorithm recommendations. Data were abstracted from the records of all patient encounters evaluated in the PED for reported sexual abuse. We analyzed 657 visits between July 2015 and January 2018. The proportion of patient encounters with algorithm-adherent care improved from 57% to 87% during the study period. This improvement has been sustained for 13 months. Failure to test for hepatitis and syphilis constituted the majority of nonadherent care. Using improvement methodology, we successfully increased algorithm-adherent evaluation and management of patients presenting for sexual abuse. Targeted education and an electronic order set were associated with improved adherence to a novel care algorithm.