Loading…

Characterization of CO and NO2 exposures of ice skating rink maintenance workers

Air quality is a common concern among indoor ice rink facilities due to the use of gasoline/propane ice resurfacing equipment. Although previous studies have investigated spectator, guest, and skater exposures, a review of the literature revealed little published research regarding ice maintenance e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene 2019-02, Vol.16 (2), p.101-108
Main Authors: Cox, Aaron, Sleeth, Darrah, Handy, Rodney, Alaves, Victor
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 108
container_issue 2
container_start_page 101
container_title Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene
container_volume 16
creator Cox, Aaron
Sleeth, Darrah
Handy, Rodney
Alaves, Victor
description Air quality is a common concern among indoor ice rink facilities due to the use of gasoline/propane ice resurfacing equipment. Although previous studies have investigated spectator, guest, and skater exposures, a review of the literature revealed little published research regarding ice maintenance employees' exposures. Ice maintenance includes edging and resurfacing. The resurfacer is commonly referred to as a Zamboni®. Edging is almost always followed by resurfacing, but resurfacing frequently happens independently of edging. The purpose of this study was to characterize ice rink maintenance employees' exposures to CO and NO2. Employees from four ice rinks in Salt Lake County, Utah were sampled using direct reading instruments during routine ice maintenance activities. Maintenance was divided into four activities: 1) Edging only, 2) Resurfacing after edging (not including edging), 3) Edging and resurfacing (Activities 1 and 2 combined), and 4) Resurfacing only (independent of edging). Activities 1, 2 and 3 were sampled twenty-four (n = 24) times. Activity 4 was sampled eight times. Sampling results were graphed and summarized using descriptive statistics. The highest measured CO concentration was 202 ppm, which occurred during edging. Average CO concentrations for all activities ranged from 0 ppm to 60.4 ppm. Minimal CO exposure was observed when resurfacing occurred without edging, which implies that elevated CO exposure measured while using the resurfacer may be residual CO from prior edging activities. NO2 concentrations were negligible for all rinks and all activities. Results confirmed that gasoline edgers significantly contribute to indoor CO levels, with peak levels exceeding some recommended exposure levels. Indoor ice rink facilities should monitor employees' CO exposures and implement procedures to limit exposures. This may be achieved by limiting the number of laps taken with the edger or replacing gasoline powered edgers with electric edgers.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/15459624.2018.1540875
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2133437502</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2204844083</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p146t-941e0175f035d78282a3f4e92dfd83dfc8ef8e547eed8ebddb12f06892d4ecdc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1LxDAQxYMouK7-CULAi5euySRp06MUv2CxHvS8ZJuJdj-SNWlR_OvNonjw9Oa9-TEMj5BzzmacaXbFlVR1CXIGjOtZdkxX6oBM9nlRlwIO_2aQx-QkpRVjUHJRTshT82ai6QaM_ZcZ-uBpcLRpqfGWPrZA8XMX0hgx7fO-Q5rWGfOvNPZ-Tbem9wN64_PiI8Q1xnRKjpzZJDz71Sl5ub15bu6LeXv30FzPix2X5VDUkiPjlXJMKFtp0GCEk1iDdVYL6zqNTqOSFaLVuLR2ycGxUmdAYmc7MSWXP3d3MbyPmIbFtk8dbjbGYxjTArgQUlSKQUYv_qGrMEafv1sAMKllLkyIb6htYFM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2204844083</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of CO and NO2 exposures of ice skating rink maintenance workers</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Cox, Aaron ; Sleeth, Darrah ; Handy, Rodney ; Alaves, Victor</creator><creatorcontrib>Cox, Aaron ; Sleeth, Darrah ; Handy, Rodney ; Alaves, Victor</creatorcontrib><description>Air quality is a common concern among indoor ice rink facilities due to the use of gasoline/propane ice resurfacing equipment. Although previous studies have investigated spectator, guest, and skater exposures, a review of the literature revealed little published research regarding ice maintenance employees' exposures. Ice maintenance includes edging and resurfacing. The resurfacer is commonly referred to as a Zamboni®. Edging is almost always followed by resurfacing, but resurfacing frequently happens independently of edging. The purpose of this study was to characterize ice rink maintenance employees' exposures to CO and NO2. Employees from four ice rinks in Salt Lake County, Utah were sampled using direct reading instruments during routine ice maintenance activities. Maintenance was divided into four activities: 1) Edging only, 2) Resurfacing after edging (not including edging), 3) Edging and resurfacing (Activities 1 and 2 combined), and 4) Resurfacing only (independent of edging). Activities 1, 2 and 3 were sampled twenty-four (n = 24) times. Activity 4 was sampled eight times. Sampling results were graphed and summarized using descriptive statistics. The highest measured CO concentration was 202 ppm, which occurred during edging. Average CO concentrations for all activities ranged from 0 ppm to 60.4 ppm. Minimal CO exposure was observed when resurfacing occurred without edging, which implies that elevated CO exposure measured while using the resurfacer may be residual CO from prior edging activities. NO2 concentrations were negligible for all rinks and all activities. Results confirmed that gasoline edgers significantly contribute to indoor CO levels, with peak levels exceeding some recommended exposure levels. Indoor ice rink facilities should monitor employees' CO exposures and implement procedures to limit exposures. This may be achieved by limiting the number of laps taken with the edger or replacing gasoline powered edgers with electric edgers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-9624</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-9632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2018.1540875</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</publisher><subject>Air quality ; Employees ; Exposure ; Gasoline ; Ice ; Ice rinks ; Ice skating ; Indoor air pollution ; Literature reviews ; Maintenance ; Nitrogen dioxide ; Occupational exposure ; Resurfacing ; Surfacing</subject><ispartof>Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 2019-02, Vol.16 (2), p.101-108</ispartof><rights>2019 JOEH, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cox, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sleeth, Darrah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handy, Rodney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alaves, Victor</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of CO and NO2 exposures of ice skating rink maintenance workers</title><title>Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene</title><description>Air quality is a common concern among indoor ice rink facilities due to the use of gasoline/propane ice resurfacing equipment. Although previous studies have investigated spectator, guest, and skater exposures, a review of the literature revealed little published research regarding ice maintenance employees' exposures. Ice maintenance includes edging and resurfacing. The resurfacer is commonly referred to as a Zamboni®. Edging is almost always followed by resurfacing, but resurfacing frequently happens independently of edging. The purpose of this study was to characterize ice rink maintenance employees' exposures to CO and NO2. Employees from four ice rinks in Salt Lake County, Utah were sampled using direct reading instruments during routine ice maintenance activities. Maintenance was divided into four activities: 1) Edging only, 2) Resurfacing after edging (not including edging), 3) Edging and resurfacing (Activities 1 and 2 combined), and 4) Resurfacing only (independent of edging). Activities 1, 2 and 3 were sampled twenty-four (n = 24) times. Activity 4 was sampled eight times. Sampling results were graphed and summarized using descriptive statistics. The highest measured CO concentration was 202 ppm, which occurred during edging. Average CO concentrations for all activities ranged from 0 ppm to 60.4 ppm. Minimal CO exposure was observed when resurfacing occurred without edging, which implies that elevated CO exposure measured while using the resurfacer may be residual CO from prior edging activities. NO2 concentrations were negligible for all rinks and all activities. Results confirmed that gasoline edgers significantly contribute to indoor CO levels, with peak levels exceeding some recommended exposure levels. Indoor ice rink facilities should monitor employees' CO exposures and implement procedures to limit exposures. This may be achieved by limiting the number of laps taken with the edger or replacing gasoline powered edgers with electric edgers.</description><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Gasoline</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Ice rinks</subject><subject>Ice skating</subject><subject>Indoor air pollution</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>Nitrogen dioxide</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>Resurfacing</subject><subject>Surfacing</subject><issn>1545-9624</issn><issn>1545-9632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkM1LxDAQxYMouK7-CULAi5euySRp06MUv2CxHvS8ZJuJdj-SNWlR_OvNonjw9Oa9-TEMj5BzzmacaXbFlVR1CXIGjOtZdkxX6oBM9nlRlwIO_2aQx-QkpRVjUHJRTshT82ai6QaM_ZcZ-uBpcLRpqfGWPrZA8XMX0hgx7fO-Q5rWGfOvNPZ-Tbem9wN64_PiI8Q1xnRKjpzZJDz71Sl5ub15bu6LeXv30FzPix2X5VDUkiPjlXJMKFtp0GCEk1iDdVYL6zqNTqOSFaLVuLR2ycGxUmdAYmc7MSWXP3d3MbyPmIbFtk8dbjbGYxjTArgQUlSKQUYv_qGrMEafv1sAMKllLkyIb6htYFM</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Cox, Aaron</creator><creator>Sleeth, Darrah</creator><creator>Handy, Rodney</creator><creator>Alaves, Victor</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Characterization of CO and NO2 exposures of ice skating rink maintenance workers</title><author>Cox, Aaron ; Sleeth, Darrah ; Handy, Rodney ; Alaves, Victor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p146t-941e0175f035d78282a3f4e92dfd83dfc8ef8e547eed8ebddb12f06892d4ecdc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Gasoline</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Ice rinks</topic><topic>Ice skating</topic><topic>Indoor air pollution</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>Nitrogen dioxide</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>Resurfacing</topic><topic>Surfacing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cox, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sleeth, Darrah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handy, Rodney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alaves, Victor</creatorcontrib><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cox, Aaron</au><au>Sleeth, Darrah</au><au>Handy, Rodney</au><au>Alaves, Victor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of CO and NO2 exposures of ice skating rink maintenance workers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene</jtitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>108</epage><pages>101-108</pages><issn>1545-9624</issn><eissn>1545-9632</eissn><abstract>Air quality is a common concern among indoor ice rink facilities due to the use of gasoline/propane ice resurfacing equipment. Although previous studies have investigated spectator, guest, and skater exposures, a review of the literature revealed little published research regarding ice maintenance employees' exposures. Ice maintenance includes edging and resurfacing. The resurfacer is commonly referred to as a Zamboni®. Edging is almost always followed by resurfacing, but resurfacing frequently happens independently of edging. The purpose of this study was to characterize ice rink maintenance employees' exposures to CO and NO2. Employees from four ice rinks in Salt Lake County, Utah were sampled using direct reading instruments during routine ice maintenance activities. Maintenance was divided into four activities: 1) Edging only, 2) Resurfacing after edging (not including edging), 3) Edging and resurfacing (Activities 1 and 2 combined), and 4) Resurfacing only (independent of edging). Activities 1, 2 and 3 were sampled twenty-four (n = 24) times. Activity 4 was sampled eight times. Sampling results were graphed and summarized using descriptive statistics. The highest measured CO concentration was 202 ppm, which occurred during edging. Average CO concentrations for all activities ranged from 0 ppm to 60.4 ppm. Minimal CO exposure was observed when resurfacing occurred without edging, which implies that elevated CO exposure measured while using the resurfacer may be residual CO from prior edging activities. NO2 concentrations were negligible for all rinks and all activities. Results confirmed that gasoline edgers significantly contribute to indoor CO levels, with peak levels exceeding some recommended exposure levels. Indoor ice rink facilities should monitor employees' CO exposures and implement procedures to limit exposures. This may be achieved by limiting the number of laps taken with the edger or replacing gasoline powered edgers with electric edgers.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</pub><doi>10.1080/15459624.2018.1540875</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1545-9624
ispartof Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 2019-02, Vol.16 (2), p.101-108
issn 1545-9624
1545-9632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2133437502
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Air quality
Employees
Exposure
Gasoline
Ice
Ice rinks
Ice skating
Indoor air pollution
Literature reviews
Maintenance
Nitrogen dioxide
Occupational exposure
Resurfacing
Surfacing
title Characterization of CO and NO2 exposures of ice skating rink maintenance workers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A46%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20CO%20and%20NO2%20exposures%20of%20ice%20skating%20rink%20maintenance%20workers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20occupational%20and%20environmental%20hygiene&rft.au=Cox,%20Aaron&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=108&rft.pages=101-108&rft.issn=1545-9624&rft.eissn=1545-9632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/15459624.2018.1540875&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2204844083%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p146t-941e0175f035d78282a3f4e92dfd83dfc8ef8e547eed8ebddb12f06892d4ecdc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2204844083&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true