Student engagement and higher order skill proficiency: a comparison of traditional didactic and renewed integrated active learning curricula

• Published in: Advances in physiology education 2018-12, Vol.42 (4), p.685-692
• Main Authors: Hopper, Mari K, Brake, Daniela A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Academic Success; Clinical Competence - standards; Cohort Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Curriculum - standards; Female; Humans; Male; Problem-Based Learning - methods; Problem-Based Learning - standards; Schools, Medical - standards; Students, Medical
• ISSN: 1043-4046; 1522-1229
• DOI: 10.1152/advan.00149.2018

A large, multicampus, public medical school underwent curricular renewal, emphasizing a student-centered approach with 50% of all course contact time devoted to active learning. Determining the impact of active learning on student engagement and higher order skill (HOS) proficiency was the primary aim of this study. Following Institutional Review Board approval, two cohort groups of first-year medical students were enrolled. The first cohort ( n = 54) included students before curriculum reform in the legacy curriculum (LC). The second cohort ( n = 73) included students completing studies in the renewed curriculum (RC). Near the end of the first year of medical school, both cohorts completed a validated survey of student engagement, and a proctored problem-based assessment of HOS proficiency [Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA+)]. Results indicated RC students perceived greater levels of engagement than LC (39.5+5.8 vs. 33.3+5.6), and greater reliance on HOS, including analysis, synthesis, and application. However, there were no significant differences between cohorts in proficiency of HOS when assessed by the CLA+ (LC = 1,878 ± 161 vs. RC = 1,900 ± 157). Additionally, poor correlation between engagement and HOS for both LC and RC indicated more engaged students do not necessarily possess greater HOS proficiency. Ceiling effect may explain results as medical students enter medical school as highly skilled learners with potentially little room for improvement. It will be informative to continue to track engagement and HOS of both cohort groups as they continue their medical studies.