Prevalence of visceral leishmaniasis in A population of free-roaming dogs as determined by multiple sampling efforts: A longitudinal study analyzing the effectiveness of euthanasia

• Published in: Preventive veterinary medicine 2018-12, Vol.161, p.19-24
• Main Authors: Melo, Saulo N., Teixeira-Neto, Rafael G., Werneck, Guilherme L., Struchiner, Claudio J., Ribeiro, Renata A.N., Sousa, Lorena R., de Melo, Marcella O.G., Carvalho Júnior, Clóvis G., Penaforte, Klauber M., Manhani, Marianna N., Aquino, Vanessa V., Silva, Eduardo S., Belo, Vinícius S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Animals, Wild - parasitology; Antibodies, Protozoan - blood; Brazil - epidemiology; Canine visceral leishmaniasis; Communicable Disease Control - methods; Disease control by euthanasia; Dog Diseases - blood; Dog Diseases - epidemiology; Dog Diseases - parasitology; Dog Diseases - prevention & control; Dogs; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - veterinary; Euthanasia, Animal; Female; Free-roaming dogs; Geographic Information Systems; Leishmaniasis, Visceral - blood; Leishmaniasis, Visceral - epidemiology; Leishmaniasis, Visceral - prevention & control; Leishmaniasis, Visceral - veterinary; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Prevalence; Responsible ownership; Spatial Analysis
• ISSN: 0167-5877; 1873-1716
• DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.10.010

Free-roaming dogs affected by visceral leishmaniasis (VL) contribute to the geographical expansion of the disease and require special attention from health authorities. The objectives of the present study were to determine the prevalences of VL in a population of free-roaming dogs in an endemic region of Brazil, to establish the spatial distribution of infected dogs, and to examine the effectiveness of euthanasia of infected dogs in controlling the disease in this particular population. Dogs were captured every two months during seven sampling efforts. Capture locations were georeferenced and captured dogs were assessed for the presence of anti-Leishmania antibodies using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as a screening test and the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) as the confirmatory procedure. Dogs that were seropositive by both assays were considered infected and were submitted to immediate euthanasia. After the end of the collection period, stored sera were evaluated with the Dual-Path Platform test (DPP). Animals positive by this method and by ELISA were also considered infected as currently recommended by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Spatial analysis was performed using the Kernel technique. A total of 328 dogs were captured at least once during the sampling period, 25 (7.6%) of them were seropositive by ELISA and IFAT and 27 (8.2%) by DPP and ELISA. The prevalence of VL showed an overall decreasing trend. However, even with periodical euthanasia, it was not possible to eliminate the infection and increased prevalences were observed in the fourth and seventh samplings. There was a high overall agreement between the two criteria for defining infection. None of the dogs that tested negative by IFAT at the first capture seroconverted in the subsequent captures but a number of dogs exhibited changes in serological status over time. From the three dogs initially tested negative by ELISA and IFAT, but tested positive by the protocol currently adopted in Brazil, two became negative in subsequent recaptures. Spatial analysis revealed that infected animals concentrated in areas with a high density of free-roaming dogs. The existence of VL among homeless dogs may contribute significantly in the persistence of the disease among the human population, despite the practice of periodical euthanasia. The operational and ethical implications associated with euthanasia of free-roaming dogs, and the failure to control the transmission of VL amo