Loading…

Electromagnetic scattering from grassland. Part II: Measurement and modeling results

The validity of a coherent, grassland scattering model is determined by comparing the model predictions with direct measurements of a representative grass canopy. A wheat field was selected as the test target, and polarimetric, multifrequency backscattering data were collected over an entire growing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 2000, Vol.38 (1), p.349-356
Main Authors: STILES, J. M, SARABANDI, K, ULABY, F. T
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 356
container_issue 1
container_start_page 349
container_title IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing
container_volume 38
creator STILES, J. M
SARABANDI, K
ULABY, F. T
description The validity of a coherent, grassland scattering model is determined by comparing the model predictions with direct measurements of a representative grass canopy. A wheat field was selected as the test target, and polarimetric, multifrequency backscattering data were collected over an entire growing season, along with a complete set of ground-truth data. The L-band measured data demonstrated a strong dependence on azimuthal look direction in relation to the row direction of the wheat. The C-band measurements likewise showed an interesting backscattering response, wherein sigma super(o) sub(v) sub(v) actually increased with incidence angle for many cases. The coherent scattering model provides backscattering data that match and predict these measured data and most of the other measured data well. The model shows that at L-band, the incoherent scattering power alone is insufficient for predicting the measured results, as the coherent terms can dominate the total scattered energy. Additionally, the model, which accounts for this nonuniform illumination of the wheat elements, demonstrates the peculiar data observed for C-band. Likewise, it is demonstrated that the fidelity used to model grass constituents (e.g., curvature) is required to match the scattering measurements accurately.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/36.823930
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21395818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>452404</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p213t-36e9515260e319f9e67fed4495bc5875d8294d26cbacf38a7030f1a9378db7fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0tPwzAQhC0EEqVw4B_4gLil-BE7NjdUFahUBIdyjhxnHQU5D2znwL_HiJ5G2vl2dwahW0o2lBL9wOVGMa45OUMrKoQqiCzLc7QiVMuCKc0u0VWMX4TQUtBqhY47DzaFaTDdCKm3OFqTEoR-7LDLY9wFE6M3Y7vBHyYkvN8_4jcwcQkwwJhwdvAwteD_NgLExad4jS6c8RFuTrpGn8-74_a1OLy_7LdPh2JmlKeCS9CCCiYJcKqdBlk5aMtSi8YKVYlWMV22TNrGWMeVqQgnjhrNK9U2lWv4Gt3_353D9L1ATPXQRws-x4VpiXX-ooWiKoN3J9Dkft4FM9o-1nPoBxN-asoEyzn4Lw30Xz4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21395818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electromagnetic scattering from grassland. Part II: Measurement and modeling results</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>STILES, J. M ; SARABANDI, K ; ULABY, F. T</creator><creatorcontrib>STILES, J. M ; SARABANDI, K ; ULABY, F. T</creatorcontrib><description>The validity of a coherent, grassland scattering model is determined by comparing the model predictions with direct measurements of a representative grass canopy. A wheat field was selected as the test target, and polarimetric, multifrequency backscattering data were collected over an entire growing season, along with a complete set of ground-truth data. The L-band measured data demonstrated a strong dependence on azimuthal look direction in relation to the row direction of the wheat. The C-band measurements likewise showed an interesting backscattering response, wherein sigma super(o) sub(v) sub(v) actually increased with incidence angle for many cases. The coherent scattering model provides backscattering data that match and predict these measured data and most of the other measured data well. The model shows that at L-band, the incoherent scattering power alone is insufficient for predicting the measured results, as the coherent terms can dominate the total scattered energy. Additionally, the model, which accounts for this nonuniform illumination of the wheat elements, demonstrates the peculiar data observed for C-band. Likewise, it is demonstrated that the fidelity used to model grass constituents (e.g., curvature) is required to match the scattering measurements accurately.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-2892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0644</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/36.823930</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IGRSD2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied geophysics ; Data reduction ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Electromagnetic wave backscattering ; Exact sciences and technology ; Internal geophysics ; Mathematical models ; Soils ; Surficial geology ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2000, Vol.38 (1), p.349-356</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1252152$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>STILES, J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARABANDI, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ULABY, F. T</creatorcontrib><title>Electromagnetic scattering from grassland. Part II: Measurement and modeling results</title><title>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</title><description>The validity of a coherent, grassland scattering model is determined by comparing the model predictions with direct measurements of a representative grass canopy. A wheat field was selected as the test target, and polarimetric, multifrequency backscattering data were collected over an entire growing season, along with a complete set of ground-truth data. The L-band measured data demonstrated a strong dependence on azimuthal look direction in relation to the row direction of the wheat. The C-band measurements likewise showed an interesting backscattering response, wherein sigma super(o) sub(v) sub(v) actually increased with incidence angle for many cases. The coherent scattering model provides backscattering data that match and predict these measured data and most of the other measured data well. The model shows that at L-band, the incoherent scattering power alone is insufficient for predicting the measured results, as the coherent terms can dominate the total scattered energy. Additionally, the model, which accounts for this nonuniform illumination of the wheat elements, demonstrates the peculiar data observed for C-band. Likewise, it is demonstrated that the fidelity used to model grass constituents (e.g., curvature) is required to match the scattering measurements accurately.</description><subject>Applied geophysics</subject><subject>Data reduction</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Electromagnetic wave backscattering</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Surficial geology</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0196-2892</issn><issn>1558-0644</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotj0tPwzAQhC0EEqVw4B_4gLil-BE7NjdUFahUBIdyjhxnHQU5D2znwL_HiJ5G2vl2dwahW0o2lBL9wOVGMa45OUMrKoQqiCzLc7QiVMuCKc0u0VWMX4TQUtBqhY47DzaFaTDdCKm3OFqTEoR-7LDLY9wFE6M3Y7vBHyYkvN8_4jcwcQkwwJhwdvAwteD_NgLExad4jS6c8RFuTrpGn8-74_a1OLy_7LdPh2JmlKeCS9CCCiYJcKqdBlk5aMtSi8YKVYlWMV22TNrGWMeVqQgnjhrNK9U2lWv4Gt3_353D9L1ATPXQRws-x4VpiXX-ooWiKoN3J9Dkft4FM9o-1nPoBxN-asoEyzn4Lw30Xz4</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>STILES, J. M</creator><creator>SARABANDI, K</creator><creator>ULABY, F. T</creator><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Electromagnetic scattering from grassland. Part II: Measurement and modeling results</title><author>STILES, J. M ; SARABANDI, K ; ULABY, F. T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p213t-36e9515260e319f9e67fed4495bc5875d8294d26cbacf38a7030f1a9378db7fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Applied geophysics</topic><topic>Data reduction</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Electromagnetic wave backscattering</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Surficial geology</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>STILES, J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARABANDI, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ULABY, F. T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>STILES, J. M</au><au>SARABANDI, K</au><au>ULABY, F. T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electromagnetic scattering from grassland. Part II: Measurement and modeling results</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</jtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>349</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>349-356</pages><issn>0196-2892</issn><eissn>1558-0644</eissn><coden>IGRSD2</coden><abstract>The validity of a coherent, grassland scattering model is determined by comparing the model predictions with direct measurements of a representative grass canopy. A wheat field was selected as the test target, and polarimetric, multifrequency backscattering data were collected over an entire growing season, along with a complete set of ground-truth data. The L-band measured data demonstrated a strong dependence on azimuthal look direction in relation to the row direction of the wheat. The C-band measurements likewise showed an interesting backscattering response, wherein sigma super(o) sub(v) sub(v) actually increased with incidence angle for many cases. The coherent scattering model provides backscattering data that match and predict these measured data and most of the other measured data well. The model shows that at L-band, the incoherent scattering power alone is insufficient for predicting the measured results, as the coherent terms can dominate the total scattered energy. Additionally, the model, which accounts for this nonuniform illumination of the wheat elements, demonstrates the peculiar data observed for C-band. Likewise, it is demonstrated that the fidelity used to model grass constituents (e.g., curvature) is required to match the scattering measurements accurately.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</pub><doi>10.1109/36.823930</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-2892
ispartof IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2000, Vol.38 (1), p.349-356
issn 0196-2892
1558-0644
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21395818
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals
subjects Applied geophysics
Data reduction
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Electromagnetic wave backscattering
Exact sciences and technology
Internal geophysics
Mathematical models
Soils
Surficial geology
Vegetation
title Electromagnetic scattering from grassland. Part II: Measurement and modeling results
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T02%3A22%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electromagnetic%20scattering%20from%20grassland.%20Part%20II:%20Measurement%20and%20modeling%20results&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20geoscience%20and%20remote%20sensing&rft.au=STILES,%20J.%20M&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=349&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=349-356&rft.issn=0196-2892&rft.eissn=1558-0644&rft.coden=IGRSD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/36.823930&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E452404%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p213t-36e9515260e319f9e67fed4495bc5875d8294d26cbacf38a7030f1a9378db7fb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21395818&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true