Loading…

Bi-directional Control of Walking Behavior by Horizontal Optic Flow Sensors

Moving animals experience constant sensory feedback, such as panoramic image shifts on the retina, termed optic flow. Underlying neuronal signals are thought to be important for exploratory behavior by signaling unintended course deviations and by providing spatial information about the environment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current biology 2018-12, Vol.28 (24), p.4037-4045.e5
Main Authors: Busch, Christian, Borst, Alexander, Mauss, Alex S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b0036272dcdb40f53bf0c7192a9118f7fb783b040326f324a010a628b84baba23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b0036272dcdb40f53bf0c7192a9118f7fb783b040326f324a010a628b84baba23
container_end_page 4045.e5
container_issue 24
container_start_page 4037
container_title Current biology
container_volume 28
creator Busch, Christian
Borst, Alexander
Mauss, Alex S.
description Moving animals experience constant sensory feedback, such as panoramic image shifts on the retina, termed optic flow. Underlying neuronal signals are thought to be important for exploratory behavior by signaling unintended course deviations and by providing spatial information about the environment [1, 2]. Particularly in insects, the encoding of self-motion-related optic flow is well understood [1–5]. However, a gap remains in understanding how the associated neuronal activity controls locomotor trajectories. In flies, visual projection neurons belonging to two groups encode panoramic horizontal motion: horizontal system (HS) cells respond with depolarization to front-to-back motion and hyperpolarization to the opposite direction [6, 7], and other neurons have the mirror-symmetrical response profile [6, 8, 9]. With primarily monocular sensitivity, the neurons’ responses are ambiguous for different rotational and translational self-movement components. Such ambiguities can be greatly reduced by combining signals from both eyes [10–12] to determine turning and movement speed [13–16]. Here, we explore the underlying functional logic by optogenetic HS cell manipulation in tethered walking Drosophila. We show that de- and hyperpolarization evoke opposite turning behavior, indicating that both direction-selective signals are transmitted to descending pathways for course control. Further experiments reveal a negative effect of bilaterally symmetric de- and hyperpolarization on walking velocity. Our results are therefore consistent with a functional architecture in which the HS cells’ membrane potential influences walking behavior bi-directionally via two decelerating pathways. [Display omitted] •Horizontal optic flow detectors (HS cells) affect turning in walking flies•De- and hyperpolarization evoke opposite turning•Both signals negatively influence walking speed•HS cells thus mediate bi-directional turning via asymmetric deceleration Busch et al. study the behavioral effects of manipulating optic flow-sensing HS cells in tethered walking Drosophila. Both de- and hyperpolarization elicit turning syndirectional with the mimicked visual motion. Therefore, two steering signals are encoded in the HS cell-response sign, likely mediating the fly’s tendency to follow a rotating pattern.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.010
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2155165775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960982218314763</els_id><sourcerecordid>2155165775</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b0036272dcdb40f53bf0c7192a9118f7fb783b040326f324a010a628b84baba23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EglL4ASwoI0vCvXYejpig4iUqdQDEaNmOAy5pXOwUBL8eoxZGprt851ydj5AjhAwBy9N5plcqo4A8Q8wAYYuMkFd1CnlebJMR1CWkNad0j-yHMAdAyutyl-wxKCgvOBuRuwubNtYbPVjXyy6ZuH7wrktcmzzJ7tX2z8mFeZHv1vlEfSY3ztuviERythysTq4695Hcmz44Hw7ITiu7YA43d0wery4fJjfpdHZ9OzmfpprV5ZAqAFbSija6UTm0BVMt6AprKmtE3latqjhTkAOjZctoLuMwWVKueK6kkpSNycm6d-nd28qEQSxs0KbrZG_cKgiKRYFlUVVFRHGNau9C8KYVS28X0n8KBPHjUMxFdCh-HApEEV_FzPGmfqUWpvlL_EqLwNkaMHHkuzVeBG1Nr81apGic_af-G8GqgJk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2155165775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bi-directional Control of Walking Behavior by Horizontal Optic Flow Sensors</title><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><creator>Busch, Christian ; Borst, Alexander ; Mauss, Alex S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Busch, Christian ; Borst, Alexander ; Mauss, Alex S.</creatorcontrib><description>Moving animals experience constant sensory feedback, such as panoramic image shifts on the retina, termed optic flow. Underlying neuronal signals are thought to be important for exploratory behavior by signaling unintended course deviations and by providing spatial information about the environment [1, 2]. Particularly in insects, the encoding of self-motion-related optic flow is well understood [1–5]. However, a gap remains in understanding how the associated neuronal activity controls locomotor trajectories. In flies, visual projection neurons belonging to two groups encode panoramic horizontal motion: horizontal system (HS) cells respond with depolarization to front-to-back motion and hyperpolarization to the opposite direction [6, 7], and other neurons have the mirror-symmetrical response profile [6, 8, 9]. With primarily monocular sensitivity, the neurons’ responses are ambiguous for different rotational and translational self-movement components. Such ambiguities can be greatly reduced by combining signals from both eyes [10–12] to determine turning and movement speed [13–16]. Here, we explore the underlying functional logic by optogenetic HS cell manipulation in tethered walking Drosophila. We show that de- and hyperpolarization evoke opposite turning behavior, indicating that both direction-selective signals are transmitted to descending pathways for course control. Further experiments reveal a negative effect of bilaterally symmetric de- and hyperpolarization on walking velocity. Our results are therefore consistent with a functional architecture in which the HS cells’ membrane potential influences walking behavior bi-directionally via two decelerating pathways. [Display omitted] •Horizontal optic flow detectors (HS cells) affect turning in walking flies•De- and hyperpolarization evoke opposite turning•Both signals negatively influence walking speed•HS cells thus mediate bi-directional turning via asymmetric deceleration Busch et al. study the behavioral effects of manipulating optic flow-sensing HS cells in tethered walking Drosophila. Both de- and hyperpolarization elicit turning syndirectional with the mimicked visual motion. Therefore, two steering signals are encoded in the HS cell-response sign, likely mediating the fly’s tendency to follow a rotating pattern.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-9822</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0445</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30528583</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Drosophila ; horizontal system cells ; null direction hyperpolarization ; optic flow ; optogenetics ; optomotor response ; preferred direction depolarization ; steering ; tethered walking</subject><ispartof>Current biology, 2018-12, Vol.28 (24), p.4037-4045.e5</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b0036272dcdb40f53bf0c7192a9118f7fb783b040326f324a010a628b84baba23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b0036272dcdb40f53bf0c7192a9118f7fb783b040326f324a010a628b84baba23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30528583$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Busch, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borst, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauss, Alex S.</creatorcontrib><title>Bi-directional Control of Walking Behavior by Horizontal Optic Flow Sensors</title><title>Current biology</title><addtitle>Curr Biol</addtitle><description>Moving animals experience constant sensory feedback, such as panoramic image shifts on the retina, termed optic flow. Underlying neuronal signals are thought to be important for exploratory behavior by signaling unintended course deviations and by providing spatial information about the environment [1, 2]. Particularly in insects, the encoding of self-motion-related optic flow is well understood [1–5]. However, a gap remains in understanding how the associated neuronal activity controls locomotor trajectories. In flies, visual projection neurons belonging to two groups encode panoramic horizontal motion: horizontal system (HS) cells respond with depolarization to front-to-back motion and hyperpolarization to the opposite direction [6, 7], and other neurons have the mirror-symmetrical response profile [6, 8, 9]. With primarily monocular sensitivity, the neurons’ responses are ambiguous for different rotational and translational self-movement components. Such ambiguities can be greatly reduced by combining signals from both eyes [10–12] to determine turning and movement speed [13–16]. Here, we explore the underlying functional logic by optogenetic HS cell manipulation in tethered walking Drosophila. We show that de- and hyperpolarization evoke opposite turning behavior, indicating that both direction-selective signals are transmitted to descending pathways for course control. Further experiments reveal a negative effect of bilaterally symmetric de- and hyperpolarization on walking velocity. Our results are therefore consistent with a functional architecture in which the HS cells’ membrane potential influences walking behavior bi-directionally via two decelerating pathways. [Display omitted] •Horizontal optic flow detectors (HS cells) affect turning in walking flies•De- and hyperpolarization evoke opposite turning•Both signals negatively influence walking speed•HS cells thus mediate bi-directional turning via asymmetric deceleration Busch et al. study the behavioral effects of manipulating optic flow-sensing HS cells in tethered walking Drosophila. Both de- and hyperpolarization elicit turning syndirectional with the mimicked visual motion. Therefore, two steering signals are encoded in the HS cell-response sign, likely mediating the fly’s tendency to follow a rotating pattern.</description><subject>Drosophila</subject><subject>horizontal system cells</subject><subject>null direction hyperpolarization</subject><subject>optic flow</subject><subject>optogenetics</subject><subject>optomotor response</subject><subject>preferred direction depolarization</subject><subject>steering</subject><subject>tethered walking</subject><issn>0960-9822</issn><issn>1879-0445</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EglL4ASwoI0vCvXYejpig4iUqdQDEaNmOAy5pXOwUBL8eoxZGprt851ydj5AjhAwBy9N5plcqo4A8Q8wAYYuMkFd1CnlebJMR1CWkNad0j-yHMAdAyutyl-wxKCgvOBuRuwubNtYbPVjXyy6ZuH7wrktcmzzJ7tX2z8mFeZHv1vlEfSY3ztuviERythysTq4695Hcmz44Hw7ITiu7YA43d0wery4fJjfpdHZ9OzmfpprV5ZAqAFbSija6UTm0BVMt6AprKmtE3latqjhTkAOjZctoLuMwWVKueK6kkpSNycm6d-nd28qEQSxs0KbrZG_cKgiKRYFlUVVFRHGNau9C8KYVS28X0n8KBPHjUMxFdCh-HApEEV_FzPGmfqUWpvlL_EqLwNkaMHHkuzVeBG1Nr81apGic_af-G8GqgJk</recordid><startdate>20181217</startdate><enddate>20181217</enddate><creator>Busch, Christian</creator><creator>Borst, Alexander</creator><creator>Mauss, Alex S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181217</creationdate><title>Bi-directional Control of Walking Behavior by Horizontal Optic Flow Sensors</title><author>Busch, Christian ; Borst, Alexander ; Mauss, Alex S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b0036272dcdb40f53bf0c7192a9118f7fb783b040326f324a010a628b84baba23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Drosophila</topic><topic>horizontal system cells</topic><topic>null direction hyperpolarization</topic><topic>optic flow</topic><topic>optogenetics</topic><topic>optomotor response</topic><topic>preferred direction depolarization</topic><topic>steering</topic><topic>tethered walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Busch, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borst, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauss, Alex S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Busch, Christian</au><au>Borst, Alexander</au><au>Mauss, Alex S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bi-directional Control of Walking Behavior by Horizontal Optic Flow Sensors</atitle><jtitle>Current biology</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Biol</addtitle><date>2018-12-17</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>4037</spage><epage>4045.e5</epage><pages>4037-4045.e5</pages><issn>0960-9822</issn><eissn>1879-0445</eissn><abstract>Moving animals experience constant sensory feedback, such as panoramic image shifts on the retina, termed optic flow. Underlying neuronal signals are thought to be important for exploratory behavior by signaling unintended course deviations and by providing spatial information about the environment [1, 2]. Particularly in insects, the encoding of self-motion-related optic flow is well understood [1–5]. However, a gap remains in understanding how the associated neuronal activity controls locomotor trajectories. In flies, visual projection neurons belonging to two groups encode panoramic horizontal motion: horizontal system (HS) cells respond with depolarization to front-to-back motion and hyperpolarization to the opposite direction [6, 7], and other neurons have the mirror-symmetrical response profile [6, 8, 9]. With primarily monocular sensitivity, the neurons’ responses are ambiguous for different rotational and translational self-movement components. Such ambiguities can be greatly reduced by combining signals from both eyes [10–12] to determine turning and movement speed [13–16]. Here, we explore the underlying functional logic by optogenetic HS cell manipulation in tethered walking Drosophila. We show that de- and hyperpolarization evoke opposite turning behavior, indicating that both direction-selective signals are transmitted to descending pathways for course control. Further experiments reveal a negative effect of bilaterally symmetric de- and hyperpolarization on walking velocity. Our results are therefore consistent with a functional architecture in which the HS cells’ membrane potential influences walking behavior bi-directionally via two decelerating pathways. [Display omitted] •Horizontal optic flow detectors (HS cells) affect turning in walking flies•De- and hyperpolarization evoke opposite turning•Both signals negatively influence walking speed•HS cells thus mediate bi-directional turning via asymmetric deceleration Busch et al. study the behavioral effects of manipulating optic flow-sensing HS cells in tethered walking Drosophila. Both de- and hyperpolarization elicit turning syndirectional with the mimicked visual motion. Therefore, two steering signals are encoded in the HS cell-response sign, likely mediating the fly’s tendency to follow a rotating pattern.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30528583</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.010</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-9822
ispartof Current biology, 2018-12, Vol.28 (24), p.4037-4045.e5
issn 0960-9822
1879-0445
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2155165775
source BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS
subjects Drosophila
horizontal system cells
null direction hyperpolarization
optic flow
optogenetics
optomotor response
preferred direction depolarization
steering
tethered walking
title Bi-directional Control of Walking Behavior by Horizontal Optic Flow Sensors
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A28%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bi-directional%20Control%20of%20Walking%20Behavior%20by%20Horizontal%20Optic%20Flow%20Sensors&rft.jtitle=Current%20biology&rft.au=Busch,%20Christian&rft.date=2018-12-17&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=4037&rft.epage=4045.e5&rft.pages=4037-4045.e5&rft.issn=0960-9822&rft.eissn=1879-0445&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2155165775%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-b0036272dcdb40f53bf0c7192a9118f7fb783b040326f324a010a628b84baba23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2155165775&rft_id=info:pmid/30528583&rfr_iscdi=true