Loading…

The method used to dry washed hands affects the number and type of transient and residential bacteria remaining on the skin

Widespread antibiotic resistance has led to fears that we are entering a post-antibiotic era and the relatively simple premise of hand washing to reduce transfer of bacteria and viruses has never been more important. Much of the emphasis has been on hand-washing technique, type of soap, and maintain...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of hospital infection 2019-04, Vol.101 (4), p.408-413
Main Authors: Mutters, R., Warnes, S.L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-546053bf9eac7b8a0ddf5e43b1726e5d1eb8e9976834d1549ef526924a40f9a33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-546053bf9eac7b8a0ddf5e43b1726e5d1eb8e9976834d1549ef526924a40f9a33
container_end_page 413
container_issue 4
container_start_page 408
container_title The Journal of hospital infection
container_volume 101
creator Mutters, R.
Warnes, S.L.
description Widespread antibiotic resistance has led to fears that we are entering a post-antibiotic era and the relatively simple premise of hand washing to reduce transfer of bacteria and viruses has never been more important. Much of the emphasis has been on hand-washing technique, type of soap, and maintaining compliance but effective drying of the hands is just as important. To compare the efficacy of drying washed hands with a jet air dryer or paper towels to remove transient bacterial contamination and to determine the effect on residential flora. Eighty volunteers were recruited. The entire surfaces of volunteers' hands were artificially contaminated with Escherichia coli before being washed and dried; then bacteria remaining on the skin were recovered and enumerated. In the second part of the study the number and types of bacteria comprising the natural flora remaining on washed and dried hands were determined. Significantly fewer transient and residential bacteria remained on the skin if hands were dried with a jet air dryer (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.12.005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2155167973</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670118306820</els_id><sourcerecordid>2155167973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-546053bf9eac7b8a0ddf5e43b1726e5d1eb8e9976834d1549ef526924a40f9a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOxCAUhonROOPlBVwYlm5agZZ2SNwY4y0xcaNrQsvBMk7pCFQz8eVlLrp0Rc6f7_zhfAidUZJTQqvLeT7vrMsZobOcspwQvoemlBcsY6IQ-2hKqOBZVRM6QUchzAkhKeeHaFIQXtSclVP0_dIB7iF2g8ZjAI3jgLVf4S8VujR1yumAlTHQxoBjYt3YN-BxynFcLQEPBkevXLDg4ib1EKxOg1UL3Kg2grcqhb2yzro3PLhNTXi37gQdGLUIcLp7j9Hr3e3LzUP29Hz_eHP9lLUlITHjZZW-2xgBqq2bmSJaGw5l0dCaVcA1hWYGQtTVrCg15aUAw1klWKlKYoQqimN0se1d-uFjhBBlb0MLi4VyMIxBMso5rWpRr1G2RVs_hODByKW3vfIrSYlcS5dzuZYu19IlZTJJT0vnu_6x6UH_rfxaTsDVFoB05acFL0ObfLWgrU9ipR7sf_0_NmKUHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2155167973</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The method used to dry washed hands affects the number and type of transient and residential bacteria remaining on the skin</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Mutters, R. ; Warnes, S.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mutters, R. ; Warnes, S.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Widespread antibiotic resistance has led to fears that we are entering a post-antibiotic era and the relatively simple premise of hand washing to reduce transfer of bacteria and viruses has never been more important. Much of the emphasis has been on hand-washing technique, type of soap, and maintaining compliance but effective drying of the hands is just as important. To compare the efficacy of drying washed hands with a jet air dryer or paper towels to remove transient bacterial contamination and to determine the effect on residential flora. Eighty volunteers were recruited. The entire surfaces of volunteers' hands were artificially contaminated with Escherichia coli before being washed and dried; then bacteria remaining on the skin were recovered and enumerated. In the second part of the study the number and types of bacteria comprising the natural flora remaining on washed and dried hands were determined. Significantly fewer transient and residential bacteria remained on the skin if hands were dried with a jet air dryer (P &lt; 0.001). Drying hands with paper towels increased the number of resident bacteria, including potentially pathogenic species, released from the volunteers' skin, compared to a jet air dryer. The number and types of bacteria remaining on washed hands were affected by the drying method. Hands dried with a jet air dryer harboured fewer viable bacteria, reducing the risk of infection transmission via touch. This could be especially important for healthcare workers who are constantly in contact with large numbers of vulnerable patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30537524</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; Bacterial Load ; Desiccation - methods ; Hand - microbiology ; Hand Disinfection - methods ; Hand drying ; Hand hygiene ; Humans ; Jet air dryer ; Resident bacterial flora ; Skin - microbiology ; Transient bacterial flora ; Volunteers</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2019-04, Vol.101 (4), p.408-413</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-546053bf9eac7b8a0ddf5e43b1726e5d1eb8e9976834d1549ef526924a40f9a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-546053bf9eac7b8a0ddf5e43b1726e5d1eb8e9976834d1549ef526924a40f9a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30537524$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mutters, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warnes, S.L.</creatorcontrib><title>The method used to dry washed hands affects the number and type of transient and residential bacteria remaining on the skin</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>Widespread antibiotic resistance has led to fears that we are entering a post-antibiotic era and the relatively simple premise of hand washing to reduce transfer of bacteria and viruses has never been more important. Much of the emphasis has been on hand-washing technique, type of soap, and maintaining compliance but effective drying of the hands is just as important. To compare the efficacy of drying washed hands with a jet air dryer or paper towels to remove transient bacterial contamination and to determine the effect on residential flora. Eighty volunteers were recruited. The entire surfaces of volunteers' hands were artificially contaminated with Escherichia coli before being washed and dried; then bacteria remaining on the skin were recovered and enumerated. In the second part of the study the number and types of bacteria comprising the natural flora remaining on washed and dried hands were determined. Significantly fewer transient and residential bacteria remained on the skin if hands were dried with a jet air dryer (P &lt; 0.001). Drying hands with paper towels increased the number of resident bacteria, including potentially pathogenic species, released from the volunteers' skin, compared to a jet air dryer. The number and types of bacteria remaining on washed hands were affected by the drying method. Hands dried with a jet air dryer harboured fewer viable bacteria, reducing the risk of infection transmission via touch. This could be especially important for healthcare workers who are constantly in contact with large numbers of vulnerable patients.</description><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Bacterial Load</subject><subject>Desiccation - methods</subject><subject>Hand - microbiology</subject><subject>Hand Disinfection - methods</subject><subject>Hand drying</subject><subject>Hand hygiene</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jet air dryer</subject><subject>Resident bacterial flora</subject><subject>Skin - microbiology</subject><subject>Transient bacterial flora</subject><subject>Volunteers</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOxCAUhonROOPlBVwYlm5agZZ2SNwY4y0xcaNrQsvBMk7pCFQz8eVlLrp0Rc6f7_zhfAidUZJTQqvLeT7vrMsZobOcspwQvoemlBcsY6IQ-2hKqOBZVRM6QUchzAkhKeeHaFIQXtSclVP0_dIB7iF2g8ZjAI3jgLVf4S8VujR1yumAlTHQxoBjYt3YN-BxynFcLQEPBkevXLDg4ib1EKxOg1UL3Kg2grcqhb2yzro3PLhNTXi37gQdGLUIcLp7j9Hr3e3LzUP29Hz_eHP9lLUlITHjZZW-2xgBqq2bmSJaGw5l0dCaVcA1hWYGQtTVrCg15aUAw1klWKlKYoQqimN0se1d-uFjhBBlb0MLi4VyMIxBMso5rWpRr1G2RVs_hODByKW3vfIrSYlcS5dzuZYu19IlZTJJT0vnu_6x6UH_rfxaTsDVFoB05acFL0ObfLWgrU9ipR7sf_0_NmKUHw</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Mutters, R.</creator><creator>Warnes, S.L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>The method used to dry washed hands affects the number and type of transient and residential bacteria remaining on the skin</title><author>Mutters, R. ; Warnes, S.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-546053bf9eac7b8a0ddf5e43b1726e5d1eb8e9976834d1549ef526924a40f9a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Bacterial Load</topic><topic>Desiccation - methods</topic><topic>Hand - microbiology</topic><topic>Hand Disinfection - methods</topic><topic>Hand drying</topic><topic>Hand hygiene</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jet air dryer</topic><topic>Resident bacterial flora</topic><topic>Skin - microbiology</topic><topic>Transient bacterial flora</topic><topic>Volunteers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mutters, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warnes, S.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mutters, R.</au><au>Warnes, S.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The method used to dry washed hands affects the number and type of transient and residential bacteria remaining on the skin</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>408</spage><epage>413</epage><pages>408-413</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>Widespread antibiotic resistance has led to fears that we are entering a post-antibiotic era and the relatively simple premise of hand washing to reduce transfer of bacteria and viruses has never been more important. Much of the emphasis has been on hand-washing technique, type of soap, and maintaining compliance but effective drying of the hands is just as important. To compare the efficacy of drying washed hands with a jet air dryer or paper towels to remove transient bacterial contamination and to determine the effect on residential flora. Eighty volunteers were recruited. The entire surfaces of volunteers' hands were artificially contaminated with Escherichia coli before being washed and dried; then bacteria remaining on the skin were recovered and enumerated. In the second part of the study the number and types of bacteria comprising the natural flora remaining on washed and dried hands were determined. Significantly fewer transient and residential bacteria remained on the skin if hands were dried with a jet air dryer (P &lt; 0.001). Drying hands with paper towels increased the number of resident bacteria, including potentially pathogenic species, released from the volunteers' skin, compared to a jet air dryer. The number and types of bacteria remaining on washed hands were affected by the drying method. Hands dried with a jet air dryer harboured fewer viable bacteria, reducing the risk of infection transmission via touch. This could be especially important for healthcare workers who are constantly in contact with large numbers of vulnerable patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30537524</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhin.2018.12.005</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6701
ispartof The Journal of hospital infection, 2019-04, Vol.101 (4), p.408-413
issn 0195-6701
1532-2939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2155167973
source Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects Bacteria - classification
Bacteria - isolation & purification
Bacterial Load
Desiccation - methods
Hand - microbiology
Hand Disinfection - methods
Hand drying
Hand hygiene
Humans
Jet air dryer
Resident bacterial flora
Skin - microbiology
Transient bacterial flora
Volunteers
title The method used to dry washed hands affects the number and type of transient and residential bacteria remaining on the skin
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T11%3A43%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20method%20used%20to%20dry%20washed%20hands%20affects%20the%20number%20and%20type%20of%20transient%20and%20residential%20bacteria%20remaining%20on%20the%20skin&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Mutters,%20R.&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=408&rft.epage=413&rft.pages=408-413&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhin.2018.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2155167973%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-546053bf9eac7b8a0ddf5e43b1726e5d1eb8e9976834d1549ef526924a40f9a33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2155167973&rft_id=info:pmid/30537524&rfr_iscdi=true