Loading…
Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: first results from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2013
What were utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Africa in 2013? To initiate a data registry in Africa, retrospective summary data were collected in a cross-sectional survey. Forty ART centres from 13 countries collectively reported 25,770 initiated cycles....
Saved in:
Published in: | Reproductive biomedicine online 2019-02, Vol.38 (2), p.216-224 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3649346905fb92cce5c8b58c7d3fc28963bb1b2727fd4325973e0c87c3d557093 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3649346905fb92cce5c8b58c7d3fc28963bb1b2727fd4325973e0c87c3d557093 |
container_end_page | 224 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 216 |
container_title | Reproductive biomedicine online |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Dyer, Silke Archary, Paversan de Mouzon, Jacques Fiadjoe, Moise Ashiru, Oladapo |
description | What were utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Africa in 2013?
To initiate a data registry in Africa, retrospective summary data were collected in a cross-sectional survey.
Forty ART centres from 13 countries collectively reported 25,770 initiated cycles. Regional ART utilization could not be established due to large inter-country variations and insufficient data. The pregnancy rate per aspiration for fresh non-donor IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection was 28.0% and 35.8%, with a preponderance of women under 35 years (57.3%). Deliveries were reported for only 56.1% of pregnancies; the remainder were lost to follow-up. A mean of 2.41 embryos were transferred. The multiple delivery rate was 26.7% (25.5% twins and 1.2% triplets). Most twins (52.7%) and triplets (73.7%) were born pre-term. Oocyte donation represented 7% of all fresh and frozen transfers.
This marks the beginning of an ART registry in Africa, Since ART utilization could not be established, the degree of access to ART remains speculative. Pregnancy rates were favourable but underpinned by a preponderance of young women and the transfer of multiple embryos. Efforts are needed to explore treatment barriers, improve pregnancy follow-up and reduce the high rate of multiples. This inaugural report from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ANARA) indicates a willingness and ability of ART centres to voluntarily report and monitor utilization and outcomes of ART, which reflects a rising standard of ART in Africa. It is anticipated that more centres and countries will join ANARA to continue this trend. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2157661888</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1472648318305716</els_id><sourcerecordid>2157661888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3649346905fb92cce5c8b58c7d3fc28963bb1b2727fd4325973e0c87c3d557093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1O3DAUha2qVaHQF2CBvOyCCf4ZOw5iM0LQVkJFQnRtJfY1eEhisB3QvEMfGo9mGHXFypb83XN87kHoiJKKEipPl1XshlAxQlVFaUUI_YT26bxmMzlv6OfdXfE99C2lZQEUUfwr2uNECC6F3Ef_Fin5lMHiCE8x2Mlk_wI4g3kYQx_uPSTsR7xw0Zv2DDsfUy5omvqcsIthwPkBts8j_gP5NcRH3I4W38J9EY4r7ELEO5fb_13u3l1WJ7ik4Ifoi2v7BN-35wH6e3V5d_Frdn3z8_fF4npmuJB5xks8PpcNEa5rmDEgjOqEMrXlzjDVSN51tGM1q52dcyaamgMxqjbcClGThh-gHxvd8pfnCVLWg08G-r4dIUxJMypqKalSqqBsg5oYUorg9FP0QxtXmhK9bkEv9boFvW5BU6rLksvQ8VZ_6gawu5H3tRfgfANASfniIepkPIwGrI9gsrbBf6T_But3miE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2157661888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: first results from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2013</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Dyer, Silke ; Archary, Paversan ; de Mouzon, Jacques ; Fiadjoe, Moise ; Ashiru, Oladapo</creator><creatorcontrib>Dyer, Silke ; Archary, Paversan ; de Mouzon, Jacques ; Fiadjoe, Moise ; Ashiru, Oladapo ; African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology</creatorcontrib><description>What were utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Africa in 2013?
To initiate a data registry in Africa, retrospective summary data were collected in a cross-sectional survey.
Forty ART centres from 13 countries collectively reported 25,770 initiated cycles. Regional ART utilization could not be established due to large inter-country variations and insufficient data. The pregnancy rate per aspiration for fresh non-donor IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection was 28.0% and 35.8%, with a preponderance of women under 35 years (57.3%). Deliveries were reported for only 56.1% of pregnancies; the remainder were lost to follow-up. A mean of 2.41 embryos were transferred. The multiple delivery rate was 26.7% (25.5% twins and 1.2% triplets). Most twins (52.7%) and triplets (73.7%) were born pre-term. Oocyte donation represented 7% of all fresh and frozen transfers.
This marks the beginning of an ART registry in Africa, Since ART utilization could not be established, the degree of access to ART remains speculative. Pregnancy rates were favourable but underpinned by a preponderance of young women and the transfer of multiple embryos. Efforts are needed to explore treatment barriers, improve pregnancy follow-up and reduce the high rate of multiples. This inaugural report from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ANARA) indicates a willingness and ability of ART centres to voluntarily report and monitor utilization and outcomes of ART, which reflects a rising standard of ART in Africa. It is anticipated that more centres and countries will join ANARA to continue this trend.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30553656</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Africa ; Assisted reproductive technology ; Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - statistics & numerical data ; Health Services Accessibility ; Humans ; Infertility ; IVF/ICSI outcome ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Pregnancy Rate ; Registries ; Registry ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics & numerical data ; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>Reproductive biomedicine online, 2019-02, Vol.38 (2), p.216-224</ispartof><rights>2018 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3649346905fb92cce5c8b58c7d3fc28963bb1b2727fd4325973e0c87c3d557093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3649346905fb92cce5c8b58c7d3fc28963bb1b2727fd4325973e0c87c3d557093</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9465-3488 ; 0000-0003-3338-4189 ; 0000-0002-3595-2955</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30553656$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dyer, Silke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archary, Paversan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mouzon, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiadjoe, Moise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashiru, Oladapo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology</creatorcontrib><title>Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: first results from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2013</title><title>Reproductive biomedicine online</title><addtitle>Reprod Biomed Online</addtitle><description>What were utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Africa in 2013?
To initiate a data registry in Africa, retrospective summary data were collected in a cross-sectional survey.
Forty ART centres from 13 countries collectively reported 25,770 initiated cycles. Regional ART utilization could not be established due to large inter-country variations and insufficient data. The pregnancy rate per aspiration for fresh non-donor IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection was 28.0% and 35.8%, with a preponderance of women under 35 years (57.3%). Deliveries were reported for only 56.1% of pregnancies; the remainder were lost to follow-up. A mean of 2.41 embryos were transferred. The multiple delivery rate was 26.7% (25.5% twins and 1.2% triplets). Most twins (52.7%) and triplets (73.7%) were born pre-term. Oocyte donation represented 7% of all fresh and frozen transfers.
This marks the beginning of an ART registry in Africa, Since ART utilization could not be established, the degree of access to ART remains speculative. Pregnancy rates were favourable but underpinned by a preponderance of young women and the transfer of multiple embryos. Efforts are needed to explore treatment barriers, improve pregnancy follow-up and reduce the high rate of multiples. This inaugural report from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ANARA) indicates a willingness and ability of ART centres to voluntarily report and monitor utilization and outcomes of ART, which reflects a rising standard of ART in Africa. It is anticipated that more centres and countries will join ANARA to continue this trend.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Assisted reproductive technology</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility</subject><subject>IVF/ICSI outcome</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Registry</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>1472-6483</issn><issn>1472-6491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1O3DAUha2qVaHQF2CBvOyCCf4ZOw5iM0LQVkJFQnRtJfY1eEhisB3QvEMfGo9mGHXFypb83XN87kHoiJKKEipPl1XshlAxQlVFaUUI_YT26bxmMzlv6OfdXfE99C2lZQEUUfwr2uNECC6F3Ef_Fin5lMHiCE8x2Mlk_wI4g3kYQx_uPSTsR7xw0Zv2DDsfUy5omvqcsIthwPkBts8j_gP5NcRH3I4W38J9EY4r7ELEO5fb_13u3l1WJ7ik4Ifoi2v7BN-35wH6e3V5d_Frdn3z8_fF4npmuJB5xks8PpcNEa5rmDEgjOqEMrXlzjDVSN51tGM1q52dcyaamgMxqjbcClGThh-gHxvd8pfnCVLWg08G-r4dIUxJMypqKalSqqBsg5oYUorg9FP0QxtXmhK9bkEv9boFvW5BU6rLksvQ8VZ_6gawu5H3tRfgfANASfniIepkPIwGrI9gsrbBf6T_But3miE</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Dyer, Silke</creator><creator>Archary, Paversan</creator><creator>de Mouzon, Jacques</creator><creator>Fiadjoe, Moise</creator><creator>Ashiru, Oladapo</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9465-3488</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3338-4189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3595-2955</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: first results from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2013</title><author>Dyer, Silke ; Archary, Paversan ; de Mouzon, Jacques ; Fiadjoe, Moise ; Ashiru, Oladapo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3649346905fb92cce5c8b58c7d3fc28963bb1b2727fd4325973e0c87c3d557093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Assisted reproductive technology</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility</topic><topic>IVF/ICSI outcome</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Registry</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dyer, Silke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archary, Paversan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mouzon, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiadjoe, Moise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashiru, Oladapo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Reproductive biomedicine online</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dyer, Silke</au><au>Archary, Paversan</au><au>de Mouzon, Jacques</au><au>Fiadjoe, Moise</au><au>Ashiru, Oladapo</au><aucorp>African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: first results from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2013</atitle><jtitle>Reproductive biomedicine online</jtitle><addtitle>Reprod Biomed Online</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>216</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>216-224</pages><issn>1472-6483</issn><eissn>1472-6491</eissn><abstract>What were utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Africa in 2013?
To initiate a data registry in Africa, retrospective summary data were collected in a cross-sectional survey.
Forty ART centres from 13 countries collectively reported 25,770 initiated cycles. Regional ART utilization could not be established due to large inter-country variations and insufficient data. The pregnancy rate per aspiration for fresh non-donor IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection was 28.0% and 35.8%, with a preponderance of women under 35 years (57.3%). Deliveries were reported for only 56.1% of pregnancies; the remainder were lost to follow-up. A mean of 2.41 embryos were transferred. The multiple delivery rate was 26.7% (25.5% twins and 1.2% triplets). Most twins (52.7%) and triplets (73.7%) were born pre-term. Oocyte donation represented 7% of all fresh and frozen transfers.
This marks the beginning of an ART registry in Africa, Since ART utilization could not be established, the degree of access to ART remains speculative. Pregnancy rates were favourable but underpinned by a preponderance of young women and the transfer of multiple embryos. Efforts are needed to explore treatment barriers, improve pregnancy follow-up and reduce the high rate of multiples. This inaugural report from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ANARA) indicates a willingness and ability of ART centres to voluntarily report and monitor utilization and outcomes of ART, which reflects a rising standard of ART in Africa. It is anticipated that more centres and countries will join ANARA to continue this trend.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30553656</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.001</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9465-3488</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3338-4189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3595-2955</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1472-6483 |
ispartof | Reproductive biomedicine online, 2019-02, Vol.38 (2), p.216-224 |
issn | 1472-6483 1472-6491 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2157661888 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Adult Africa Assisted reproductive technology Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data Epidemiology Female Fertilization in Vitro - statistics & numerical data Health Services Accessibility Humans Infertility IVF/ICSI outcome Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Pregnancy Rate Registries Registry Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics & numerical data Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - statistics & numerical data |
title | Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: first results from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2013 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T15%3A13%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assisted%20reproductive%20technologies%20in%20Africa:%20first%20results%20from%20the%20African%20Network%20and%20Registry%20for%20Assisted%20Reproductive%20Technology,%202013&rft.jtitle=Reproductive%20biomedicine%20online&rft.au=Dyer,%20Silke&rft.aucorp=African%20Network%20and%20Registry%20for%20Assisted%20Reproductive%20Technology&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=216&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=216-224&rft.issn=1472-6483&rft.eissn=1472-6491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2157661888%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3649346905fb92cce5c8b58c7d3fc28963bb1b2727fd4325973e0c87c3d557093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2157661888&rft_id=info:pmid/30553656&rfr_iscdi=true |