Loading…

Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: first results from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2013

What were utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Africa in 2013? To initiate a data registry in Africa, retrospective summary data were collected in a cross-sectional survey. Forty ART centres from 13 countries collectively reported 25,770 initiated cycles....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Reproductive biomedicine online 2019-02, Vol.38 (2), p.216-224
Main Authors: Dyer, Silke, Archary, Paversan, de Mouzon, Jacques, Fiadjoe, Moise, Ashiru, Oladapo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3649346905fb92cce5c8b58c7d3fc28963bb1b2727fd4325973e0c87c3d557093
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3649346905fb92cce5c8b58c7d3fc28963bb1b2727fd4325973e0c87c3d557093
container_end_page 224
container_issue 2
container_start_page 216
container_title Reproductive biomedicine online
container_volume 38
creator Dyer, Silke
Archary, Paversan
de Mouzon, Jacques
Fiadjoe, Moise
Ashiru, Oladapo
description What were utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Africa in 2013? To initiate a data registry in Africa, retrospective summary data were collected in a cross-sectional survey. Forty ART centres from 13 countries collectively reported 25,770 initiated cycles. Regional ART utilization could not be established due to large inter-country variations and insufficient data. The pregnancy rate per aspiration for fresh non-donor IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection was 28.0% and 35.8%, with a preponderance of women under 35 years (57.3%). Deliveries were reported for only 56.1% of pregnancies; the remainder were lost to follow-up. A mean of 2.41 embryos were transferred. The multiple delivery rate was 26.7% (25.5% twins and 1.2% triplets). Most twins (52.7%) and triplets (73.7%) were born pre-term. Oocyte donation represented 7% of all fresh and frozen transfers. This marks the beginning of an ART registry in Africa, Since ART utilization could not be established, the degree of access to ART remains speculative. Pregnancy rates were favourable but underpinned by a preponderance of young women and the transfer of multiple embryos. Efforts are needed to explore treatment barriers, improve pregnancy follow-up and reduce the high rate of multiples. This inaugural report from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ANARA) indicates a willingness and ability of ART centres to voluntarily report and monitor utilization and outcomes of ART, which reflects a rising standard of ART in Africa. It is anticipated that more centres and countries will join ANARA to continue this trend.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2157661888</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1472648318305716</els_id><sourcerecordid>2157661888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3649346905fb92cce5c8b58c7d3fc28963bb1b2727fd4325973e0c87c3d557093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1O3DAUha2qVaHQF2CBvOyCCf4ZOw5iM0LQVkJFQnRtJfY1eEhisB3QvEMfGo9mGHXFypb83XN87kHoiJKKEipPl1XshlAxQlVFaUUI_YT26bxmMzlv6OfdXfE99C2lZQEUUfwr2uNECC6F3Ef_Fin5lMHiCE8x2Mlk_wI4g3kYQx_uPSTsR7xw0Zv2DDsfUy5omvqcsIthwPkBts8j_gP5NcRH3I4W38J9EY4r7ELEO5fb_13u3l1WJ7ik4Ifoi2v7BN-35wH6e3V5d_Frdn3z8_fF4npmuJB5xks8PpcNEa5rmDEgjOqEMrXlzjDVSN51tGM1q52dcyaamgMxqjbcClGThh-gHxvd8pfnCVLWg08G-r4dIUxJMypqKalSqqBsg5oYUorg9FP0QxtXmhK9bkEv9boFvW5BU6rLksvQ8VZ_6gawu5H3tRfgfANASfniIepkPIwGrI9gsrbBf6T_But3miE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2157661888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: first results from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2013</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Dyer, Silke ; Archary, Paversan ; de Mouzon, Jacques ; Fiadjoe, Moise ; Ashiru, Oladapo</creator><creatorcontrib>Dyer, Silke ; Archary, Paversan ; de Mouzon, Jacques ; Fiadjoe, Moise ; Ashiru, Oladapo ; African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology</creatorcontrib><description>What were utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Africa in 2013? To initiate a data registry in Africa, retrospective summary data were collected in a cross-sectional survey. Forty ART centres from 13 countries collectively reported 25,770 initiated cycles. Regional ART utilization could not be established due to large inter-country variations and insufficient data. The pregnancy rate per aspiration for fresh non-donor IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection was 28.0% and 35.8%, with a preponderance of women under 35 years (57.3%). Deliveries were reported for only 56.1% of pregnancies; the remainder were lost to follow-up. A mean of 2.41 embryos were transferred. The multiple delivery rate was 26.7% (25.5% twins and 1.2% triplets). Most twins (52.7%) and triplets (73.7%) were born pre-term. Oocyte donation represented 7% of all fresh and frozen transfers. This marks the beginning of an ART registry in Africa, Since ART utilization could not be established, the degree of access to ART remains speculative. Pregnancy rates were favourable but underpinned by a preponderance of young women and the transfer of multiple embryos. Efforts are needed to explore treatment barriers, improve pregnancy follow-up and reduce the high rate of multiples. This inaugural report from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ANARA) indicates a willingness and ability of ART centres to voluntarily report and monitor utilization and outcomes of ART, which reflects a rising standard of ART in Africa. It is anticipated that more centres and countries will join ANARA to continue this trend.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30553656</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Africa ; Assisted reproductive technology ; Embryo Transfer - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Health Services Accessibility ; Humans ; Infertility ; IVF/ICSI outcome ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Pregnancy Rate ; Registries ; Registry ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>Reproductive biomedicine online, 2019-02, Vol.38 (2), p.216-224</ispartof><rights>2018 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3649346905fb92cce5c8b58c7d3fc28963bb1b2727fd4325973e0c87c3d557093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3649346905fb92cce5c8b58c7d3fc28963bb1b2727fd4325973e0c87c3d557093</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9465-3488 ; 0000-0003-3338-4189 ; 0000-0002-3595-2955</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30553656$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dyer, Silke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archary, Paversan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mouzon, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiadjoe, Moise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashiru, Oladapo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology</creatorcontrib><title>Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: first results from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2013</title><title>Reproductive biomedicine online</title><addtitle>Reprod Biomed Online</addtitle><description>What were utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Africa in 2013? To initiate a data registry in Africa, retrospective summary data were collected in a cross-sectional survey. Forty ART centres from 13 countries collectively reported 25,770 initiated cycles. Regional ART utilization could not be established due to large inter-country variations and insufficient data. The pregnancy rate per aspiration for fresh non-donor IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection was 28.0% and 35.8%, with a preponderance of women under 35 years (57.3%). Deliveries were reported for only 56.1% of pregnancies; the remainder were lost to follow-up. A mean of 2.41 embryos were transferred. The multiple delivery rate was 26.7% (25.5% twins and 1.2% triplets). Most twins (52.7%) and triplets (73.7%) were born pre-term. Oocyte donation represented 7% of all fresh and frozen transfers. This marks the beginning of an ART registry in Africa, Since ART utilization could not be established, the degree of access to ART remains speculative. Pregnancy rates were favourable but underpinned by a preponderance of young women and the transfer of multiple embryos. Efforts are needed to explore treatment barriers, improve pregnancy follow-up and reduce the high rate of multiples. This inaugural report from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ANARA) indicates a willingness and ability of ART centres to voluntarily report and monitor utilization and outcomes of ART, which reflects a rising standard of ART in Africa. It is anticipated that more centres and countries will join ANARA to continue this trend.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Assisted reproductive technology</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility</subject><subject>IVF/ICSI outcome</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Registry</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>1472-6483</issn><issn>1472-6491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1O3DAUha2qVaHQF2CBvOyCCf4ZOw5iM0LQVkJFQnRtJfY1eEhisB3QvEMfGo9mGHXFypb83XN87kHoiJKKEipPl1XshlAxQlVFaUUI_YT26bxmMzlv6OfdXfE99C2lZQEUUfwr2uNECC6F3Ef_Fin5lMHiCE8x2Mlk_wI4g3kYQx_uPSTsR7xw0Zv2DDsfUy5omvqcsIthwPkBts8j_gP5NcRH3I4W38J9EY4r7ELEO5fb_13u3l1WJ7ik4Ifoi2v7BN-35wH6e3V5d_Frdn3z8_fF4npmuJB5xks8PpcNEa5rmDEgjOqEMrXlzjDVSN51tGM1q52dcyaamgMxqjbcClGThh-gHxvd8pfnCVLWg08G-r4dIUxJMypqKalSqqBsg5oYUorg9FP0QxtXmhK9bkEv9boFvW5BU6rLksvQ8VZ_6gawu5H3tRfgfANASfniIepkPIwGrI9gsrbBf6T_But3miE</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Dyer, Silke</creator><creator>Archary, Paversan</creator><creator>de Mouzon, Jacques</creator><creator>Fiadjoe, Moise</creator><creator>Ashiru, Oladapo</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9465-3488</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3338-4189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3595-2955</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: first results from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2013</title><author>Dyer, Silke ; Archary, Paversan ; de Mouzon, Jacques ; Fiadjoe, Moise ; Ashiru, Oladapo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3649346905fb92cce5c8b58c7d3fc28963bb1b2727fd4325973e0c87c3d557093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Assisted reproductive technology</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility</topic><topic>IVF/ICSI outcome</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Registry</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dyer, Silke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archary, Paversan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mouzon, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiadjoe, Moise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashiru, Oladapo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Reproductive biomedicine online</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dyer, Silke</au><au>Archary, Paversan</au><au>de Mouzon, Jacques</au><au>Fiadjoe, Moise</au><au>Ashiru, Oladapo</au><aucorp>African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: first results from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2013</atitle><jtitle>Reproductive biomedicine online</jtitle><addtitle>Reprod Biomed Online</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>216</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>216-224</pages><issn>1472-6483</issn><eissn>1472-6491</eissn><abstract>What were utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Africa in 2013? To initiate a data registry in Africa, retrospective summary data were collected in a cross-sectional survey. Forty ART centres from 13 countries collectively reported 25,770 initiated cycles. Regional ART utilization could not be established due to large inter-country variations and insufficient data. The pregnancy rate per aspiration for fresh non-donor IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection was 28.0% and 35.8%, with a preponderance of women under 35 years (57.3%). Deliveries were reported for only 56.1% of pregnancies; the remainder were lost to follow-up. A mean of 2.41 embryos were transferred. The multiple delivery rate was 26.7% (25.5% twins and 1.2% triplets). Most twins (52.7%) and triplets (73.7%) were born pre-term. Oocyte donation represented 7% of all fresh and frozen transfers. This marks the beginning of an ART registry in Africa, Since ART utilization could not be established, the degree of access to ART remains speculative. Pregnancy rates were favourable but underpinned by a preponderance of young women and the transfer of multiple embryos. Efforts are needed to explore treatment barriers, improve pregnancy follow-up and reduce the high rate of multiples. This inaugural report from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ANARA) indicates a willingness and ability of ART centres to voluntarily report and monitor utilization and outcomes of ART, which reflects a rising standard of ART in Africa. It is anticipated that more centres and countries will join ANARA to continue this trend.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30553656</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.001</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9465-3488</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3338-4189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3595-2955</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1472-6483
ispartof Reproductive biomedicine online, 2019-02, Vol.38 (2), p.216-224
issn 1472-6483
1472-6491
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2157661888
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Adult
Africa
Assisted reproductive technology
Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data
Epidemiology
Female
Fertilization in Vitro - statistics & numerical data
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Infertility
IVF/ICSI outcome
Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy Rate
Registries
Registry
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics & numerical data
Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - statistics & numerical data
title Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: first results from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2013
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T15%3A13%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assisted%20reproductive%20technologies%20in%20Africa:%20first%20results%20from%20the%20African%20Network%20and%20Registry%20for%20Assisted%20Reproductive%20Technology,%202013&rft.jtitle=Reproductive%20biomedicine%20online&rft.au=Dyer,%20Silke&rft.aucorp=African%20Network%20and%20Registry%20for%20Assisted%20Reproductive%20Technology&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=216&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=216-224&rft.issn=1472-6483&rft.eissn=1472-6491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2157661888%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3649346905fb92cce5c8b58c7d3fc28963bb1b2727fd4325973e0c87c3d557093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2157661888&rft_id=info:pmid/30553656&rfr_iscdi=true