Loading…
Dose-dependent 60Co γ-radiation Effects on Human Endothelial Cell Mechanical Properties
Exposure to ionizing radiation is unavoidable for noncancerous cells during the external radiotherapy process. Increasing the dose delivery fraction times leads to increasing the endothelial cell damage. Vascular abnormalities are commonly associated with the alternation of endothelium biomechanical...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cell biochemistry and biophysics 2019-06, Vol.77 (2), p.179-186 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1943-74287217b644bacf339f834234a1981dc931e3b80d2dae71bb856d422cf539313 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1943-74287217b644bacf339f834234a1981dc931e3b80d2dae71bb856d422cf539313 |
container_end_page | 186 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 179 |
container_title | Cell biochemistry and biophysics |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Mohammadkarim, Alireza Mokhtari-Dizaji, Manijhe Kazemian, Ali Saberi, Hazhir Khani, Mohammad Mehdi Bakhshandeh, Mohsen |
description | Exposure to ionizing radiation is unavoidable for noncancerous cells during the external radiotherapy process. Increasing the dose delivery fraction times leads to increasing the endothelial cell damage. Vascular abnormalities are commonly associated with the alternation of endothelium biomechanical properties. The goal of the present study was to quantify the elastic and viscoelastic properties of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) using the micropipette aspiration technique in conjunction with a theoretical model while an 8 Gy dose was given in four fractions. Confocal imaging was performed for evaluation of cytoskeletal changes during fractionation
60
Co radiotherapy. The results indicated an increase in elastic modulus from 29.87 ± 1.04 Pa to 46.69 ± 1.17 Pa while the fractional doses increased from 0 Gy to 8 Gy along with the obvious cytoskeletal changes. Moreover, in the creep behavior of radiated groups, a significant decrease was shown in the time constant and viscoelastic properties. On the other hand, it was observed that the change in the biomechanical properties of the cells while applying a single fraction of 8 Gy was not exactly the same as that in the properties of the radiation-exposed cells while delivering an 8 Gy dose at 2 Gy per fraction. The observed differences in the biomechanical behavior of endothelium provide a quantitative description of radiobiological effects for evaluating the dose-response relationship as a biological dosimetry procedure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12013-018-0864-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2158556631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2158556631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1943-74287217b644bacf339f834234a1981dc931e3b80d2dae71bb856d422cf539313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gLuCGzfR_LbpUuroCIouFNyFNL11OnSamrQLn8v38JnMTAVBcHX_vnO4HIROKbmghGSXgTJCOSZUYaJSgfkemlEpc0yY4vuxJ0rinObyEB2FsCaEMSLEDL1euwC4gh66CrohSUnhkq9P7E3VmKFxXbKoa7BDSGK7HDcmLrrKDStoG9MmBbRt8gB2ZbrGxvnJux780EA4Rge1aQOc_NQ5erlZPBdLfP94e1dc3WNLc8FxJpjKGM3KVIjS2JrzvFZcMC4MzRWtbM4p8FKRilUGMlqWSqaVYMzWkscbn6Pzybf37n2EMOhNE2x8y3TgxqAZlUrKNN2hZ3_QtRt9F7_bUWRLkUjRibLeheCh1r1vNsZ_aEr0Nms9Za1j1nqbteZRwyZNiGz3Bv7X-X_RN8uBf6E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2158056630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dose-dependent 60Co γ-radiation Effects on Human Endothelial Cell Mechanical Properties</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Mohammadkarim, Alireza ; Mokhtari-Dizaji, Manijhe ; Kazemian, Ali ; Saberi, Hazhir ; Khani, Mohammad Mehdi ; Bakhshandeh, Mohsen</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohammadkarim, Alireza ; Mokhtari-Dizaji, Manijhe ; Kazemian, Ali ; Saberi, Hazhir ; Khani, Mohammad Mehdi ; Bakhshandeh, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><description>Exposure to ionizing radiation is unavoidable for noncancerous cells during the external radiotherapy process. Increasing the dose delivery fraction times leads to increasing the endothelial cell damage. Vascular abnormalities are commonly associated with the alternation of endothelium biomechanical properties. The goal of the present study was to quantify the elastic and viscoelastic properties of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) using the micropipette aspiration technique in conjunction with a theoretical model while an 8 Gy dose was given in four fractions. Confocal imaging was performed for evaluation of cytoskeletal changes during fractionation
60
Co radiotherapy. The results indicated an increase in elastic modulus from 29.87 ± 1.04 Pa to 46.69 ± 1.17 Pa while the fractional doses increased from 0 Gy to 8 Gy along with the obvious cytoskeletal changes. Moreover, in the creep behavior of radiated groups, a significant decrease was shown in the time constant and viscoelastic properties. On the other hand, it was observed that the change in the biomechanical properties of the cells while applying a single fraction of 8 Gy was not exactly the same as that in the properties of the radiation-exposed cells while delivering an 8 Gy dose at 2 Gy per fraction. The observed differences in the biomechanical behavior of endothelium provide a quantitative description of radiobiological effects for evaluating the dose-response relationship as a biological dosimetry procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1085-9195</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-0283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12013-018-0864-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abnormalities ; Biochemistry ; Biological and Medical Physics ; Biomechanics ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biophysics ; Biotechnology ; Cell Biology ; Creep (materials) ; Cytoskeleton ; Dosimeters ; Dosimetry ; Elastic properties ; Endothelial cells ; Endothelium ; Fractionation ; Ionizing radiation ; Life Sciences ; Mechanical properties ; Modulus of elasticity ; Original Paper ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Radiation dosage ; Radiation effects ; Radiation therapy ; Time constant ; Umbilical vein ; Viscoelasticity ; γ Radiation</subject><ispartof>Cell biochemistry and biophysics, 2019-06, Vol.77 (2), p.179-186</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1943-74287217b644bacf339f834234a1981dc931e3b80d2dae71bb856d422cf539313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1943-74287217b644bacf339f834234a1981dc931e3b80d2dae71bb856d422cf539313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohammadkarim, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokhtari-Dizaji, Manijhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazemian, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saberi, Hazhir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khani, Mohammad Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakhshandeh, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><title>Dose-dependent 60Co γ-radiation Effects on Human Endothelial Cell Mechanical Properties</title><title>Cell biochemistry and biophysics</title><addtitle>Cell Biochem Biophys</addtitle><description>Exposure to ionizing radiation is unavoidable for noncancerous cells during the external radiotherapy process. Increasing the dose delivery fraction times leads to increasing the endothelial cell damage. Vascular abnormalities are commonly associated with the alternation of endothelium biomechanical properties. The goal of the present study was to quantify the elastic and viscoelastic properties of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) using the micropipette aspiration technique in conjunction with a theoretical model while an 8 Gy dose was given in four fractions. Confocal imaging was performed for evaluation of cytoskeletal changes during fractionation
60
Co radiotherapy. The results indicated an increase in elastic modulus from 29.87 ± 1.04 Pa to 46.69 ± 1.17 Pa while the fractional doses increased from 0 Gy to 8 Gy along with the obvious cytoskeletal changes. Moreover, in the creep behavior of radiated groups, a significant decrease was shown in the time constant and viscoelastic properties. On the other hand, it was observed that the change in the biomechanical properties of the cells while applying a single fraction of 8 Gy was not exactly the same as that in the properties of the radiation-exposed cells while delivering an 8 Gy dose at 2 Gy per fraction. The observed differences in the biomechanical behavior of endothelium provide a quantitative description of radiobiological effects for evaluating the dose-response relationship as a biological dosimetry procedure.</description><subject>Abnormalities</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and Medical Physics</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Creep (materials)</subject><subject>Cytoskeleton</subject><subject>Dosimeters</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Elastic properties</subject><subject>Endothelial cells</subject><subject>Endothelium</subject><subject>Fractionation</subject><subject>Ionizing radiation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Radiation dosage</subject><subject>Radiation effects</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Time constant</subject><subject>Umbilical vein</subject><subject>Viscoelasticity</subject><subject>γ Radiation</subject><issn>1085-9195</issn><issn>1559-0283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gLuCGzfR_LbpUuroCIouFNyFNL11OnSamrQLn8v38JnMTAVBcHX_vnO4HIROKbmghGSXgTJCOSZUYaJSgfkemlEpc0yY4vuxJ0rinObyEB2FsCaEMSLEDL1euwC4gh66CrohSUnhkq9P7E3VmKFxXbKoa7BDSGK7HDcmLrrKDStoG9MmBbRt8gB2ZbrGxvnJux780EA4Rge1aQOc_NQ5erlZPBdLfP94e1dc3WNLc8FxJpjKGM3KVIjS2JrzvFZcMC4MzRWtbM4p8FKRilUGMlqWSqaVYMzWkscbn6Pzybf37n2EMOhNE2x8y3TgxqAZlUrKNN2hZ3_QtRt9F7_bUWRLkUjRibLeheCh1r1vNsZ_aEr0Nms9Za1j1nqbteZRwyZNiGz3Bv7X-X_RN8uBf6E</recordid><startdate>20190615</startdate><enddate>20190615</enddate><creator>Mohammadkarim, Alireza</creator><creator>Mokhtari-Dizaji, Manijhe</creator><creator>Kazemian, Ali</creator><creator>Saberi, Hazhir</creator><creator>Khani, Mohammad Mehdi</creator><creator>Bakhshandeh, Mohsen</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190615</creationdate><title>Dose-dependent 60Co γ-radiation Effects on Human Endothelial Cell Mechanical Properties</title><author>Mohammadkarim, Alireza ; Mokhtari-Dizaji, Manijhe ; Kazemian, Ali ; Saberi, Hazhir ; Khani, Mohammad Mehdi ; Bakhshandeh, Mohsen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1943-74287217b644bacf339f834234a1981dc931e3b80d2dae71bb856d422cf539313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and Medical Physics</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Creep (materials)</topic><topic>Cytoskeleton</topic><topic>Dosimeters</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Elastic properties</topic><topic>Endothelial cells</topic><topic>Endothelium</topic><topic>Fractionation</topic><topic>Ionizing radiation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Radiation dosage</topic><topic>Radiation effects</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Time constant</topic><topic>Umbilical vein</topic><topic>Viscoelasticity</topic><topic>γ Radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohammadkarim, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokhtari-Dizaji, Manijhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazemian, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saberi, Hazhir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khani, Mohammad Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakhshandeh, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cell biochemistry and biophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohammadkarim, Alireza</au><au>Mokhtari-Dizaji, Manijhe</au><au>Kazemian, Ali</au><au>Saberi, Hazhir</au><au>Khani, Mohammad Mehdi</au><au>Bakhshandeh, Mohsen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dose-dependent 60Co γ-radiation Effects on Human Endothelial Cell Mechanical Properties</atitle><jtitle>Cell biochemistry and biophysics</jtitle><stitle>Cell Biochem Biophys</stitle><date>2019-06-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>179-186</pages><issn>1085-9195</issn><eissn>1559-0283</eissn><abstract>Exposure to ionizing radiation is unavoidable for noncancerous cells during the external radiotherapy process. Increasing the dose delivery fraction times leads to increasing the endothelial cell damage. Vascular abnormalities are commonly associated with the alternation of endothelium biomechanical properties. The goal of the present study was to quantify the elastic and viscoelastic properties of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) using the micropipette aspiration technique in conjunction with a theoretical model while an 8 Gy dose was given in four fractions. Confocal imaging was performed for evaluation of cytoskeletal changes during fractionation
60
Co radiotherapy. The results indicated an increase in elastic modulus from 29.87 ± 1.04 Pa to 46.69 ± 1.17 Pa while the fractional doses increased from 0 Gy to 8 Gy along with the obvious cytoskeletal changes. Moreover, in the creep behavior of radiated groups, a significant decrease was shown in the time constant and viscoelastic properties. On the other hand, it was observed that the change in the biomechanical properties of the cells while applying a single fraction of 8 Gy was not exactly the same as that in the properties of the radiation-exposed cells while delivering an 8 Gy dose at 2 Gy per fraction. The observed differences in the biomechanical behavior of endothelium provide a quantitative description of radiobiological effects for evaluating the dose-response relationship as a biological dosimetry procedure.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12013-018-0864-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1085-9195 |
ispartof | Cell biochemistry and biophysics, 2019-06, Vol.77 (2), p.179-186 |
issn | 1085-9195 1559-0283 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2158556631 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Abnormalities Biochemistry Biological and Medical Physics Biomechanics Biomedical and Life Sciences Biophysics Biotechnology Cell Biology Creep (materials) Cytoskeleton Dosimeters Dosimetry Elastic properties Endothelial cells Endothelium Fractionation Ionizing radiation Life Sciences Mechanical properties Modulus of elasticity Original Paper Pharmacology/Toxicology Radiation dosage Radiation effects Radiation therapy Time constant Umbilical vein Viscoelasticity γ Radiation |
title | Dose-dependent 60Co γ-radiation Effects on Human Endothelial Cell Mechanical Properties |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T10%3A46%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dose-dependent%2060Co%20%CE%B3-radiation%20Effects%20on%20Human%20Endothelial%20Cell%20Mechanical%20Properties&rft.jtitle=Cell%20biochemistry%20and%20biophysics&rft.au=Mohammadkarim,%20Alireza&rft.date=2019-06-15&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=179-186&rft.issn=1085-9195&rft.eissn=1559-0283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12013-018-0864-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2158556631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1943-74287217b644bacf339f834234a1981dc931e3b80d2dae71bb856d422cf539313%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2158056630&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |