Transparency in Residency Education: Nominating Residents for Fellowships and Awards

In a study concerning methods of job promotion in various private sector organizations, transparency was positively associated with perceptions of procedural justice and job satisfaction [1]. The Institutional Review Board of the New York State Psychiatric Institute reviewed this study (NYSPI IRB pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Academic psychiatry 2019-04, Vol.43 (2), p.252-253
Main Authors: Cabaniss, Deborah L., Devlin, Michael, Rim, James I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Awards
Awards & honors
Committees
Decision making
Departments
Employee promotions
Ethics
Evaluators
Feature: Letter to the Editor
Fellowships
Focus Groups
Graduates
Human subjects
Job satisfaction
Justice
Leadership
Medical Education
Medical School Faculty
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Morale
Nominations
Opportunities
Procedural justice
Promotion (Occupational)
Psychiatry
Review boards
School faculty
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In a study concerning methods of job promotion in various private sector organizations, transparency was positively associated with perceptions of procedural justice and job satisfaction [1]. The Institutional Review Board of the New York State Psychiatric Institute reviewed this study (NYSPI IRB project number 7723) and determined that it did not meet the definition of human subject research. Compliance with Ethical Standards Ethical Considerations The Institutional Review Board of the New York State Psychiatric Institute reviewed this study (NYSPI IRB project number 7723) and determined that it did not meet the definition of human subject research.
ISSN:1042-9670
1545-7230
DOI:10.1007/s40596-018-0999-y