Loading…

Acinetobacter Spp: Resistance and therapeutic decisions at the turn of the novel millennium

This study was planned to evaluate sample wise isolation and antimicrobial resistant trends of Acinetobacter spp in different departments of a tertiary care hospital. This was a transversal descriptive study, carried out in the clinical microbiology laboratory of the Allama Iqbal Medical College/ Ji...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences 2018-11, Vol.31 (6 (Supplementary), p.2749-2754
Main Authors: Saeed, Muhammad, Rasheed, Farhan, Hussain, Shahida, Riaz, Saba, Hanif, Aamir, Ahmad, Maqsood, Ain, Noorul, Khan, Fizza, Iram, Shagufta, Arshad, Muhammad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 2754
container_issue 6 (Supplementary
container_start_page 2749
container_title Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences
container_volume 31
creator Saeed, Muhammad
Rasheed, Farhan
Hussain, Shahida
Riaz, Saba
Hanif, Aamir
Ahmad, Maqsood
Ain, Noorul
Khan, Fizza
Iram, Shagufta
Arshad, Muhammad
description This study was planned to evaluate sample wise isolation and antimicrobial resistant trends of Acinetobacter spp in different departments of a tertiary care hospital. This was a transversal descriptive study, carried out in the clinical microbiology laboratory of the Allama Iqbal Medical College/ Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, during the period of January 2015 to December 2016. Every clinical specimen was processed for bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibly testing. A total of 3590 (2015=1780, 2016=1810) clinical specimens were processed. Of the total, only 54.7% were gram-negative, among these Acinetobacter spp were isolated from 10.1% and 16.5% samples respectively in 2015-16 with an overall rate of 24.3%. The highest occurrence of Acinetobacter spp isolates was reported from Intensive care units (ICU) (54%) followed by surgical units (25%) and medical units (16%). It is noteworthy that ICU and internal medicine showed the highest resistance rates, whereas, lower resistance rate was observed for the outdoor patients (OPD). Although collistin showed 0% resistant while ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and tigecycline showed 90%, 68%, 66%, 66% and 62% resistance against Acinetobacter spp. respectively. An alarming increase in the resistance rate of meropenem, cefoperazone/sulbactam, piperacillin/ tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, and imipenem was observed from the year 2015 to 2016. This startling resistance acquired by Acinetobacter spp. within a period of one year, represent very limited therapeutic options left for the infections caused by Acinetobacter spp. Unavailability of effective drugs and limited therapeutic options enforce the health care practitioners to prescribe expensive and broad range antibiotics, which may cause harm to the patient. Therefore, it is need of an hour to better understand the antimicrobial patterns and optimize antimicrobial prescription policies for the control of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2161064512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A569606796</galeid><sourcerecordid>A569606796</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g250t-44541208669e26ff6849b5fe5fa9a511d22ddd854bade904e870fccd5010e19a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UE1LAzEUzEGxtfoXJEcvK0mapBtvpfgFBcEPEDws2eSlRnaTNckK_ntXq8zhPWbmDbw5QHNKKK0koS8zdJzzOyGSK6WO0GxJRL3iiszR69r4ACW22hRI-HEYLvEDZJ-LDgawDhaXN0h6gLF4gy0Yn30MGevyI-AypoCj-91D_IQO977rIAQ_9ifo0Okuw-nfXKDn66unzW21vb-526y31Y4JUirOBaeM1FIqYNI5WXPVCgfCaaUFpZYxa20teKstKMKhXhFnjBWEEqBKLxfofJ87pPgxQi5N77OBrtMB4pgbRiWdXheUTdaLvXWnO2h8cLEkbSZY6L2JAZyf-LWQShK5UnI6OPvLHtsebDMk3-v01fw3uPwGi6lsDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2161064512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acinetobacter Spp: Resistance and therapeutic decisions at the turn of the novel millennium</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Saeed, Muhammad ; Rasheed, Farhan ; Hussain, Shahida ; Riaz, Saba ; Hanif, Aamir ; Ahmad, Maqsood ; Ain, Noorul ; Khan, Fizza ; Iram, Shagufta ; Arshad, Muhammad</creator><creatorcontrib>Saeed, Muhammad ; Rasheed, Farhan ; Hussain, Shahida ; Riaz, Saba ; Hanif, Aamir ; Ahmad, Maqsood ; Ain, Noorul ; Khan, Fizza ; Iram, Shagufta ; Arshad, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><description>This study was planned to evaluate sample wise isolation and antimicrobial resistant trends of Acinetobacter spp in different departments of a tertiary care hospital. This was a transversal descriptive study, carried out in the clinical microbiology laboratory of the Allama Iqbal Medical College/ Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, during the period of January 2015 to December 2016. Every clinical specimen was processed for bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibly testing. A total of 3590 (2015=1780, 2016=1810) clinical specimens were processed. Of the total, only 54.7% were gram-negative, among these Acinetobacter spp were isolated from 10.1% and 16.5% samples respectively in 2015-16 with an overall rate of 24.3%. The highest occurrence of Acinetobacter spp isolates was reported from Intensive care units (ICU) (54%) followed by surgical units (25%) and medical units (16%). It is noteworthy that ICU and internal medicine showed the highest resistance rates, whereas, lower resistance rate was observed for the outdoor patients (OPD). Although collistin showed 0% resistant while ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and tigecycline showed 90%, 68%, 66%, 66% and 62% resistance against Acinetobacter spp. respectively. An alarming increase in the resistance rate of meropenem, cefoperazone/sulbactam, piperacillin/ tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, and imipenem was observed from the year 2015 to 2016. This startling resistance acquired by Acinetobacter spp. within a period of one year, represent very limited therapeutic options left for the infections caused by Acinetobacter spp. Unavailability of effective drugs and limited therapeutic options enforce the health care practitioners to prescribe expensive and broad range antibiotics, which may cause harm to the patient. Therefore, it is need of an hour to better understand the antimicrobial patterns and optimize antimicrobial prescription policies for the control of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1011-601X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30587490</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pakistan: Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences</publisher><subject>Acinetobacter - drug effects ; Acinetobacter - isolation &amp; purification ; Acinetobacter - physiology ; Acinetobacter Infections - drug therapy ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Cross Infection - drug therapy ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial - drug effects ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial - physiology ; Humans ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods ; Tertiary Care Centers - standards ; Tertiary Care Centers - trends</subject><ispartof>Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2018-11, Vol.31 (6 (Supplementary), p.2749-2754</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30587490$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saeed, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasheed, Farhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Shahida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riaz, Saba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanif, Aamir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Maqsood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ain, Noorul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Fizza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iram, Shagufta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arshad, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><title>Acinetobacter Spp: Resistance and therapeutic decisions at the turn of the novel millennium</title><title>Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences</title><addtitle>Pak J Pharm Sci</addtitle><description>This study was planned to evaluate sample wise isolation and antimicrobial resistant trends of Acinetobacter spp in different departments of a tertiary care hospital. This was a transversal descriptive study, carried out in the clinical microbiology laboratory of the Allama Iqbal Medical College/ Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, during the period of January 2015 to December 2016. Every clinical specimen was processed for bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibly testing. A total of 3590 (2015=1780, 2016=1810) clinical specimens were processed. Of the total, only 54.7% were gram-negative, among these Acinetobacter spp were isolated from 10.1% and 16.5% samples respectively in 2015-16 with an overall rate of 24.3%. The highest occurrence of Acinetobacter spp isolates was reported from Intensive care units (ICU) (54%) followed by surgical units (25%) and medical units (16%). It is noteworthy that ICU and internal medicine showed the highest resistance rates, whereas, lower resistance rate was observed for the outdoor patients (OPD). Although collistin showed 0% resistant while ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and tigecycline showed 90%, 68%, 66%, 66% and 62% resistance against Acinetobacter spp. respectively. An alarming increase in the resistance rate of meropenem, cefoperazone/sulbactam, piperacillin/ tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, and imipenem was observed from the year 2015 to 2016. This startling resistance acquired by Acinetobacter spp. within a period of one year, represent very limited therapeutic options left for the infections caused by Acinetobacter spp. Unavailability of effective drugs and limited therapeutic options enforce the health care practitioners to prescribe expensive and broad range antibiotics, which may cause harm to the patient. Therefore, it is need of an hour to better understand the antimicrobial patterns and optimize antimicrobial prescription policies for the control of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp.</description><subject>Acinetobacter - drug effects</subject><subject>Acinetobacter - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Acinetobacter - physiology</subject><subject>Acinetobacter Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cross Infection - drug therapy</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial - drug effects</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers - standards</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers - trends</subject><issn>1011-601X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1UE1LAzEUzEGxtfoXJEcvK0mapBtvpfgFBcEPEDws2eSlRnaTNckK_ntXq8zhPWbmDbw5QHNKKK0koS8zdJzzOyGSK6WO0GxJRL3iiszR69r4ACW22hRI-HEYLvEDZJ-LDgawDhaXN0h6gLF4gy0Yn30MGevyI-AypoCj-91D_IQO977rIAQ_9ifo0Okuw-nfXKDn66unzW21vb-526y31Y4JUirOBaeM1FIqYNI5WXPVCgfCaaUFpZYxa20teKstKMKhXhFnjBWEEqBKLxfofJ87pPgxQi5N77OBrtMB4pgbRiWdXheUTdaLvXWnO2h8cLEkbSZY6L2JAZyf-LWQShK5UnI6OPvLHtsebDMk3-v01fw3uPwGi6lsDA</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Saeed, Muhammad</creator><creator>Rasheed, Farhan</creator><creator>Hussain, Shahida</creator><creator>Riaz, Saba</creator><creator>Hanif, Aamir</creator><creator>Ahmad, Maqsood</creator><creator>Ain, Noorul</creator><creator>Khan, Fizza</creator><creator>Iram, Shagufta</creator><creator>Arshad, Muhammad</creator><general>Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Acinetobacter Spp: Resistance and therapeutic decisions at the turn of the novel millennium</title><author>Saeed, Muhammad ; Rasheed, Farhan ; Hussain, Shahida ; Riaz, Saba ; Hanif, Aamir ; Ahmad, Maqsood ; Ain, Noorul ; Khan, Fizza ; Iram, Shagufta ; Arshad, Muhammad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g250t-44541208669e26ff6849b5fe5fa9a511d22ddd854bade904e870fccd5010e19a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acinetobacter - drug effects</topic><topic>Acinetobacter - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Acinetobacter - physiology</topic><topic>Acinetobacter Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cross Infection - drug therapy</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial - drug effects</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers - standards</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers - trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saeed, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasheed, Farhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Shahida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riaz, Saba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanif, Aamir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Maqsood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ain, Noorul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Fizza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iram, Shagufta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arshad, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saeed, Muhammad</au><au>Rasheed, Farhan</au><au>Hussain, Shahida</au><au>Riaz, Saba</au><au>Hanif, Aamir</au><au>Ahmad, Maqsood</au><au>Ain, Noorul</au><au>Khan, Fizza</au><au>Iram, Shagufta</au><au>Arshad, Muhammad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acinetobacter Spp: Resistance and therapeutic decisions at the turn of the novel millennium</atitle><jtitle>Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Pak J Pharm Sci</addtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6 (Supplementary</issue><spage>2749</spage><epage>2754</epage><pages>2749-2754</pages><issn>1011-601X</issn><abstract>This study was planned to evaluate sample wise isolation and antimicrobial resistant trends of Acinetobacter spp in different departments of a tertiary care hospital. This was a transversal descriptive study, carried out in the clinical microbiology laboratory of the Allama Iqbal Medical College/ Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, during the period of January 2015 to December 2016. Every clinical specimen was processed for bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibly testing. A total of 3590 (2015=1780, 2016=1810) clinical specimens were processed. Of the total, only 54.7% were gram-negative, among these Acinetobacter spp were isolated from 10.1% and 16.5% samples respectively in 2015-16 with an overall rate of 24.3%. The highest occurrence of Acinetobacter spp isolates was reported from Intensive care units (ICU) (54%) followed by surgical units (25%) and medical units (16%). It is noteworthy that ICU and internal medicine showed the highest resistance rates, whereas, lower resistance rate was observed for the outdoor patients (OPD). Although collistin showed 0% resistant while ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and tigecycline showed 90%, 68%, 66%, 66% and 62% resistance against Acinetobacter spp. respectively. An alarming increase in the resistance rate of meropenem, cefoperazone/sulbactam, piperacillin/ tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, and imipenem was observed from the year 2015 to 2016. This startling resistance acquired by Acinetobacter spp. within a period of one year, represent very limited therapeutic options left for the infections caused by Acinetobacter spp. Unavailability of effective drugs and limited therapeutic options enforce the health care practitioners to prescribe expensive and broad range antibiotics, which may cause harm to the patient. Therefore, it is need of an hour to better understand the antimicrobial patterns and optimize antimicrobial prescription policies for the control of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp.</abstract><cop>Pakistan</cop><pub>Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences</pub><pmid>30587490</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1011-601X
ispartof Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2018-11, Vol.31 (6 (Supplementary), p.2749-2754
issn 1011-601X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2161064512
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Acinetobacter - drug effects
Acinetobacter - isolation & purification
Acinetobacter - physiology
Acinetobacter Infections - drug therapy
Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Cross Infection - drug therapy
Drug Resistance, Bacterial - drug effects
Drug Resistance, Bacterial - physiology
Humans
Microbial Sensitivity Tests - methods
Tertiary Care Centers - standards
Tertiary Care Centers - trends
title Acinetobacter Spp: Resistance and therapeutic decisions at the turn of the novel millennium
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T06%3A45%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acinetobacter%20Spp:%20Resistance%20and%20therapeutic%20decisions%20at%20the%20turn%20of%20the%20novel%20millennium&rft.jtitle=Pakistan%20journal%20of%20pharmaceutical%20sciences&rft.au=Saeed,%20Muhammad&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6%20(Supplementary&rft.spage=2749&rft.epage=2754&rft.pages=2749-2754&rft.issn=1011-601X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA569606796%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g250t-44541208669e26ff6849b5fe5fa9a511d22ddd854bade904e870fccd5010e19a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2161064512&rft_id=info:pmid/30587490&rft_galeid=A569606796&rfr_iscdi=true