Loading…
Assessment of medication use during pregnancy by Web-based questionnaires, pharmacy records and serum screening
•Assessing medication use with self-administered questionnaires or prescription databases often results in misclassification.•Biological monitoring has the potential to improve assessment of medication use among pregnant women.•Many exposures went undetected with untargeted LC-TOF-MS analysis, parti...
Saved in:
Published in: | Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-03, Vol.84, p.93-97 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-54e6f0187777f65928b96596b46185fc371ae2b27dd0b2f3ab9f7ab46c1cfef43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-54e6f0187777f65928b96596b46185fc371ae2b27dd0b2f3ab9f7ab46c1cfef43 |
container_end_page | 97 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 93 |
container_title | Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | van Gelder, Marleen M.H.J. de Jong, Lutea A.A. te Winkel, Bernke Olyslager, Erik J.H. Vorstenbosch, Saskia van Puijenbroek, Eugène P. Verbeek, André L.M. Roeleveld, Nel |
description | •Assessing medication use with self-administered questionnaires or prescription databases often results in misclassification.•Biological monitoring has the potential to improve assessment of medication use among pregnant women.•Many exposures went undetected with untargeted LC-TOF-MS analysis, particularly inhalation, dermatological, and short-term medication.•For medications taken orally for chronic conditions, excellent agreement was observed between questionnaire and serum screening.
To compare assessment of early pregnancy medication exposure using three methods of data collection.
Serum samples were obtained from 752 women participating in the PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) Study before gestational week 17. For 52 women using medication at the date of blood sampling according to Web-based questionnaires or pharmacy records, we analysed serum samples using untargeted liquid chromatography time-of-flight spectrometry.
Medication was detected in 18 serum samples (35%). Medications taken orally for chronic conditions reported in the questionnaire were detected in serum and vice versa. Pharmacy records did not identify additional exposed women, but missed exposure in 5 women mainly due to unavailability. We observed substantial discordance between the three methods for inhaled medication, dermatological preparations, and medications for short-term use, which went often undetected in serum.
It remains challenging to assess medication use in large-scale studies as no ‘gold standard’ is currently available. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.01.002 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2165040363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0890623818304970</els_id><sourcerecordid>2165040363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-54e6f0187777f65928b96596b46185fc371ae2b27dd0b2f3ab9f7ab46c1cfef43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1v2zAQQImiQeM6_QsBxw6VepRkStoaBEkaIECWBBkJkjq6NCzS5UlF_O9D107X3nLDvft6jF0KKAUI-X1TJtylOMXXsgLRlyBKgOoDW4iurQvRQveRLaDroZBV3Z2zz0QbAGjavv3EzmuQYtVXcsHiFRESjRgmHh0fcfBWTz4GPhPyYU4-rPku4TroYPfc7PkLmsJowoH_npEOaNA-IX3ju186jTpTCW1MA3EdBk6Y5pGTTYghz7pgZ05vCb-c8pI93948Xf8sHh7v7q-vHgrbCDkVqwalg_xLDifzqZ3pc5KmkaJbOVu3QmNlqnYYwFSu1qZ3rc5VK6xD19RL9vU4N0v6e6caPVncbnXAOJOqhFxBA7WsMyqPqE2RKKFTu-RHnfZKgDrIVhv1LlsdZCsQKsvOjZenHbPJ4v61vdvNwI8jgPnTPx6TIusx2Cw5K5rUEP3_drwBUfaWeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2165040363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of medication use during pregnancy by Web-based questionnaires, pharmacy records and serum screening</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>van Gelder, Marleen M.H.J. ; de Jong, Lutea A.A. ; te Winkel, Bernke ; Olyslager, Erik J.H. ; Vorstenbosch, Saskia ; van Puijenbroek, Eugène P. ; Verbeek, André L.M. ; Roeleveld, Nel</creator><creatorcontrib>van Gelder, Marleen M.H.J. ; de Jong, Lutea A.A. ; te Winkel, Bernke ; Olyslager, Erik J.H. ; Vorstenbosch, Saskia ; van Puijenbroek, Eugène P. ; Verbeek, André L.M. ; Roeleveld, Nel</creatorcontrib><description>•Assessing medication use with self-administered questionnaires or prescription databases often results in misclassification.•Biological monitoring has the potential to improve assessment of medication use among pregnant women.•Many exposures went undetected with untargeted LC-TOF-MS analysis, particularly inhalation, dermatological, and short-term medication.•For medications taken orally for chronic conditions, excellent agreement was observed between questionnaire and serum screening.
To compare assessment of early pregnancy medication exposure using three methods of data collection.
Serum samples were obtained from 752 women participating in the PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) Study before gestational week 17. For 52 women using medication at the date of blood sampling according to Web-based questionnaires or pharmacy records, we analysed serum samples using untargeted liquid chromatography time-of-flight spectrometry.
Medication was detected in 18 serum samples (35%). Medications taken orally for chronic conditions reported in the questionnaire were detected in serum and vice versa. Pharmacy records did not identify additional exposed women, but missed exposure in 5 women mainly due to unavailability. We observed substantial discordance between the three methods for inhaled medication, dermatological preparations, and medications for short-term use, which went often undetected in serum.
It remains challenging to assess medication use in large-scale studies as no ‘gold standard’ is currently available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-6238</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.01.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30615926</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Drug monitoring ; LC-TOF-MS ; Pharmacy records ; Pregnancy ; PRIDE Study ; Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.), 2019-03, Vol.84, p.93-97</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-54e6f0187777f65928b96596b46185fc371ae2b27dd0b2f3ab9f7ab46c1cfef43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-54e6f0187777f65928b96596b46185fc371ae2b27dd0b2f3ab9f7ab46c1cfef43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30615926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Gelder, Marleen M.H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Lutea A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>te Winkel, Bernke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olyslager, Erik J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vorstenbosch, Saskia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Puijenbroek, Eugène P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbeek, André L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roeleveld, Nel</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of medication use during pregnancy by Web-based questionnaires, pharmacy records and serum screening</title><title>Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Reprod Toxicol</addtitle><description>•Assessing medication use with self-administered questionnaires or prescription databases often results in misclassification.•Biological monitoring has the potential to improve assessment of medication use among pregnant women.•Many exposures went undetected with untargeted LC-TOF-MS analysis, particularly inhalation, dermatological, and short-term medication.•For medications taken orally for chronic conditions, excellent agreement was observed between questionnaire and serum screening.
To compare assessment of early pregnancy medication exposure using three methods of data collection.
Serum samples were obtained from 752 women participating in the PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) Study before gestational week 17. For 52 women using medication at the date of blood sampling according to Web-based questionnaires or pharmacy records, we analysed serum samples using untargeted liquid chromatography time-of-flight spectrometry.
Medication was detected in 18 serum samples (35%). Medications taken orally for chronic conditions reported in the questionnaire were detected in serum and vice versa. Pharmacy records did not identify additional exposed women, but missed exposure in 5 women mainly due to unavailability. We observed substantial discordance between the three methods for inhaled medication, dermatological preparations, and medications for short-term use, which went often undetected in serum.
It remains challenging to assess medication use in large-scale studies as no ‘gold standard’ is currently available.</description><subject>Drug monitoring</subject><subject>LC-TOF-MS</subject><subject>Pharmacy records</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>PRIDE Study</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><issn>0890-6238</issn><issn>1873-1708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1v2zAQQImiQeM6_QsBxw6VepRkStoaBEkaIECWBBkJkjq6NCzS5UlF_O9D107X3nLDvft6jF0KKAUI-X1TJtylOMXXsgLRlyBKgOoDW4iurQvRQveRLaDroZBV3Z2zz0QbAGjavv3EzmuQYtVXcsHiFRESjRgmHh0fcfBWTz4GPhPyYU4-rPku4TroYPfc7PkLmsJowoH_npEOaNA-IX3ju186jTpTCW1MA3EdBk6Y5pGTTYghz7pgZ05vCb-c8pI93948Xf8sHh7v7q-vHgrbCDkVqwalg_xLDifzqZ3pc5KmkaJbOVu3QmNlqnYYwFSu1qZ3rc5VK6xD19RL9vU4N0v6e6caPVncbnXAOJOqhFxBA7WsMyqPqE2RKKFTu-RHnfZKgDrIVhv1LlsdZCsQKsvOjZenHbPJ4v61vdvNwI8jgPnTPx6TIusx2Cw5K5rUEP3_drwBUfaWeg</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>van Gelder, Marleen M.H.J.</creator><creator>de Jong, Lutea A.A.</creator><creator>te Winkel, Bernke</creator><creator>Olyslager, Erik J.H.</creator><creator>Vorstenbosch, Saskia</creator><creator>van Puijenbroek, Eugène P.</creator><creator>Verbeek, André L.M.</creator><creator>Roeleveld, Nel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Assessment of medication use during pregnancy by Web-based questionnaires, pharmacy records and serum screening</title><author>van Gelder, Marleen M.H.J. ; de Jong, Lutea A.A. ; te Winkel, Bernke ; Olyslager, Erik J.H. ; Vorstenbosch, Saskia ; van Puijenbroek, Eugène P. ; Verbeek, André L.M. ; Roeleveld, Nel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-54e6f0187777f65928b96596b46185fc371ae2b27dd0b2f3ab9f7ab46c1cfef43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Drug monitoring</topic><topic>LC-TOF-MS</topic><topic>Pharmacy records</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>PRIDE Study</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Gelder, Marleen M.H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Lutea A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>te Winkel, Bernke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olyslager, Erik J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vorstenbosch, Saskia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Puijenbroek, Eugène P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbeek, André L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roeleveld, Nel</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Gelder, Marleen M.H.J.</au><au>de Jong, Lutea A.A.</au><au>te Winkel, Bernke</au><au>Olyslager, Erik J.H.</au><au>Vorstenbosch, Saskia</au><au>van Puijenbroek, Eugène P.</au><au>Verbeek, André L.M.</au><au>Roeleveld, Nel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of medication use during pregnancy by Web-based questionnaires, pharmacy records and serum screening</atitle><jtitle>Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Reprod Toxicol</addtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>84</volume><spage>93</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>93-97</pages><issn>0890-6238</issn><eissn>1873-1708</eissn><abstract>•Assessing medication use with self-administered questionnaires or prescription databases often results in misclassification.•Biological monitoring has the potential to improve assessment of medication use among pregnant women.•Many exposures went undetected with untargeted LC-TOF-MS analysis, particularly inhalation, dermatological, and short-term medication.•For medications taken orally for chronic conditions, excellent agreement was observed between questionnaire and serum screening.
To compare assessment of early pregnancy medication exposure using three methods of data collection.
Serum samples were obtained from 752 women participating in the PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) Study before gestational week 17. For 52 women using medication at the date of blood sampling according to Web-based questionnaires or pharmacy records, we analysed serum samples using untargeted liquid chromatography time-of-flight spectrometry.
Medication was detected in 18 serum samples (35%). Medications taken orally for chronic conditions reported in the questionnaire were detected in serum and vice versa. Pharmacy records did not identify additional exposed women, but missed exposure in 5 women mainly due to unavailability. We observed substantial discordance between the three methods for inhaled medication, dermatological preparations, and medications for short-term use, which went often undetected in serum.
It remains challenging to assess medication use in large-scale studies as no ‘gold standard’ is currently available.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30615926</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.01.002</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-6238 |
ispartof | Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.), 2019-03, Vol.84, p.93-97 |
issn | 0890-6238 1873-1708 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2165040363 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Drug monitoring LC-TOF-MS Pharmacy records Pregnancy PRIDE Study Questionnaires |
title | Assessment of medication use during pregnancy by Web-based questionnaires, pharmacy records and serum screening |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T14%3A18%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20medication%20use%20during%20pregnancy%20by%20Web-based%20questionnaires,%20pharmacy%20records%20and%20serum%20screening&rft.jtitle=Reproductive%20toxicology%20(Elmsford,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=van%20Gelder,%20Marleen%20M.H.J.&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=84&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=93-97&rft.issn=0890-6238&rft.eissn=1873-1708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2165040363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-54e6f0187777f65928b96596b46185fc371ae2b27dd0b2f3ab9f7ab46c1cfef43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2165040363&rft_id=info:pmid/30615926&rfr_iscdi=true |