Is the dentifrice containing calcium silicate, sodium phosphate, and fluoride able to protect enamel against chemical mechanical wear? An in situ/ex vivo study

Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a dentifrice that contains calcium silicate, sodium phosphate, and fluoride on erosive-abrasive enamel wear. Material and Methods This randomized, single-blind in situ / ex vivo study was conducted with four crossover phases of 5 days...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical oral investigations 2019-10, Vol.23 (10), p.3713-3720
Main Authors: Ionta, Franciny Querobim, dos Santos, Natália Mello, Mesquita, Isabela Maníglia, Dionísio, Evandro José, Cruvinel, Thiago, Honório, Heitor Marques, Rios, Daniela
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Abrasion
Animals
Calcium Compounds - chemistry
Calcium phosphates
Cattle
Citric acid
Cross-Over Studies
Data processing
Dental Enamel
Dental erosion
Dentifrices
Dentifrices - chemistry
Dentistry
Enamel
Fluorides
Humans
Medicine
Original Article
Phosphates - chemistry
Silicates - chemistry
Single-Blind Method
Slurries
Sodium
Sodium fluoride
Sodium Fluoride - chemistry
Sodium phosphate
Stannous chloride
Tin
Tooth Erosion - prevention & control
Toothbrushes
Toothbrushing
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a dentifrice that contains calcium silicate, sodium phosphate, and fluoride on erosive-abrasive enamel wear. Material and Methods This randomized, single-blind in situ / ex vivo study was conducted with four crossover phases of 5 days (one group tested per phase). Bovine enamel blocks ( n  = 256) were allocated to 16 volunteers and 8 groups. The groups under study were test dentifrice, with calcium silicate, sodium phosphate, and 1450 ppm sodium monofluorophosphate; tin dentifrice, with 3500 ppm stannous chloride, 700 ppm amine fluoride, and 700 ppm sodium fluoride; conventional dentifrice, with 1450 ppm sodium monofluorophosphate; and control (deionized water). Half of the enamel blocks were subjected to erosion and the other half to erosion plus abrasion. The daily extraoral protocol consisted in four citric acid exposures (2 min) and two applications of dentifrice slurry on all blocks for 30 s; after, half of the blocks were brushed for 15 s. The response variable was enamel loss. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Fisher’s test ( p  
ISSN:1432-6981
1436-3771
DOI:10.1007/s00784-018-2792-4